1974. He was appointed as a dean at Wentworth Institute of Technology in Boston, directing a joint project with MIT in Iran, after which he returned to St. Louis in 1975 as the associate dean of instruction. He headed the Department of Manufacturing Engineering Technologies and Supervision at Purdue University, Calumet, from 1978 to 1980, then served for ten years as the dean of the College of Technology of the University of Houston. After a sabbatical year working on the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider at Brookhaven National Laboratory, Wolf became the president of Oregon Institute of Technology. He retired from administration in 1998, designated as a president emeritus. He
University of San Diego. She received a BS from Cornell University in Materials Science and Electrical Engineering (EE) and MS and PhD in EE from Stanford University. Her research focuses on the study and promotion of equity in engineering including student pathways and inclusive teaching. She has won best paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education, IEEE Transactions on Education, and Education Sciences. Dr. Lord is a Fellow of the IEEE and ASEE and received the 2018 IEEE Undergraduate Teaching Award. She is a coauthor of The Borderlands of Education: Latinas in Engineering. She is a co-Director of the National Effective Teaching Institute (NETI).Scarleth Vanessa Vasconcelos, Villanova University
Paper ID #17281Unique Potential and Challenges of Students with ADHD in Engineering Pro-gramsDr. Arash Esmaili Zaghi P.E., University of Connecticut Dr. Arash E. Zaghi received his PhD in Civil Engineering from the University of Nevada, Reno, where he worked on the seismic behavior of novel bridge column and connection details. After graduating, he stayed with UNR as a Research Scientist to overlook two major research projects involving system-level shake table experiments. In 2011, Dr. Zaghi joined the Department of Civil and Environmental Engi- neering at University of Connecticut as an Assistant Professor. His research
research, leading to student participation in prestigiousconferences and awards, building critical skills for biomedical engineering. By integratingtheoretical learning with practical applications and professional engagement, we demonstratedthe program’s commitment to student growth, career readiness, and ABET standards. 2.4 Criterion 4: Continuous ImprovementCriterion 4 is a key part of ABET accreditation, focusing on the systematic assessment,evaluation, and improvement of SOs to ensure graduates meet program expectations. Our effortsbegan in Spring 2021, 3.5 years before submitting our report, with the development ofPerformance Indicators (PIs). Given our faculty’s diverse expertise and the breadth of ourcurriculum, an iterative process
generally do not address barriers embedded within the curriculum design, and may or may not increase faculty understanding of best practices for [students with disabilities] (p. 182).27As is the case in other instances of identity-based discrimination in America, even the mostenergetic and best intentioned practitioners continue to operate in settings that tolerate limitedreform.Critical social scientific work on disabilities has offered important framing for understanding thisongoing inequity. To my mind, foremost among its contributions is the idea, developed duringthe 1990s, that that which a culture treats as physical or mental capacity derives from socialvalues and conditions. This “social model” of disability to a degree displaced
serves as a leadership team leader for both the Women in Science Programs and Global Science Partners.Therese M. Azevedo, Sonoma State University Therese Azevedo is a fourth year student at Sonoma State University pursuing a Bachelor of Science in Statistics. Over the Summer of 2019, she had the opportunity to work with Dr. Anne Lucietto at Purdue University on a project related to math anxiety and continued that work to present.Dr. Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue University at West Lafayette Dr. Lucietto has focused her research in engineering technology education and the understanding of engi- neering technology students. She teaches in an active learning style which engages and develops practical skills in the students
that are important for other institutions to consider when attempting toreplicate such a partnership.Overview of the ProgramBay College and Michigan Tech successfully collaborated on a grant proposal to the NSF fortheir Advanced Technological Education (ATE) grant, which was awarded for a total projectcost of $702,324. Much of these expenses were dedicated towards personnel costs to developrobotic simulation software, create curriculum, and design the articulation agreement betweenthe two institutions. Money was also reserved for stipends to be paid to workshop participants,travel to conferences and meetings, and instructor professional development. In order to trulyalign the curriculum, however, Bay College needed to purchase several robotic
. Meyer, Land, R., & Baillie, C. Ed., no. Book, Whole). Leiden U6: Rotterdam ; Boston: Sense Publishers, 2010, ch. Why is geologic time troublesome knowledge?, pp. 117-129.[11] Meyer and R. Land, "Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: linkages to ways of thinking and practising," in Improving Student Learning - Theory and Practice Ten Years On, C. Rust and D. Oxford Centre for Staff Eds. Oxford: Oxford : Oxford Centre for Staff & Learning Development, 2003, pp. 412-424.[12] J. Kabo and C. Baillie, "Seeing through the lens of social justice: a threshold for engineering," European Journal of Engineering Education: Educational research impacting engineering education, vol. 34, no. 4, pp
2006-2554: THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CURRICULUM TO INSTILLENGINEERING LEADERSHIP & MANAGEMENT SKILLS INUNDERGRADUATE STUDENTSAna Ferreras, University of Central Florida Ana Ferreras is a Ph.D. student at the University of Central Florida in the department of Industrial Engineering & Management Systems. She holds a Master of Science degree in Engineering Management from Florida Institute of Technology and a Bachelor’s Degree in Electrical Engineering from University of Central Florida. Ana holds a 6-Sigma Black Belt certification from the Harrington Group, and she has worked as a Radio Frequency Design Engineer for almost two years. Her research focuses on Engineering Management, Quality
, 2009IntroductionA four-university collaboration has received National Science Foundation (NSF) Course,Curriculum and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) funding for a three-year project with twoprimary goals: 1) to develop a database of reliable and valid measures for assessing attainmentof teamwork skills and ethical awareness in undergraduate students enrolled in multidisciplinaryproject based, design projects, and 2) to identify and describe ‘best practices’ from across theseinstitutions that improve the achievement of learning objectives and thereby increase programquality. Example learning objectives from one course are described as follows: “Studentsenrolled in these project courses will experience and demonstrate an understanding of ‘bestpractices’ in the
]. In a survey of Canadian college students, Sandhu et al. found thatamong those affected, there was significant impact on their academic performance with stress (~42%), anxiety (~ 33%), and depression (~21 %) being causes of MED related poor academic [3].While considerable research has been done on undergraduate student wellbeing, very few studiesspecifically target the impact of MED on engineering students.Foremost among the findings of studies on MED in undergraduate is that stigma related to MEDis a barrier to students seeking help [1]. In the design of our program we considered that stigmamay be especially acute for engineering students. Many engineers valorize the toughness ofengineering programs and celebrate high attrition as a sign
understanding ofa scheduler’s job. Their pragmatic preparation would be orientated to success if they test thecurrent business practices and/or direct applications of the subject matters in the constructionjobsite. Early in the nineties, Benjamin et. al.1 created a knowledge‐based prototype forimproving scheduling productivity; the results confirm the system's effectiveness and support thefurther development of knowledge‐based systems as tools for improving the productivity of theconstruction industry. Real-world learning based on industry project-specific context and best business practicesmay make students a lot more marketable to industry. Every student from each group is sharingcomments, opinions, concerns and experiences, field trip notes
interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity. Page 26.1710.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Volunteerism in Engineering Students and Its Relation to Social ResponsibilityAbstractAddressing how engineering students view their role in society, their social responsibility, isseen as a central aspect toward creating holistic engineers
-99 that allowed us to maintain and increase support on all levels.The description for the expansion phase 1999-today can be found in the section on transition tointegrated curricula.IIa. Design phase.Systemic change can neither be mandated by administration, nor can it come about solely on theinitiative of single, isolated individuals. The former will lack the needed broad support in thefaculty, the latter will remain isolated with little impact beyond their own classrooms. Yet everyinstitution has a number of faculty that are interested and actively involved in improvingclassroom instruction. These are the individuals that were targeted at Louisiana Tech Universityin early 1997. A core group of nine individuals was formed and charged with
for TGNC students [7]. A primary objective ofthe site visits was to learn more about students’ experiences through collaboration.BackgroundAs described in earlier work [8], the design of research with the TGNC community should centermethodological approaches that do not reinforce harm. To address this need, our study included aresearch justice design and based analysis on feminist, trans, and queer methodologies tointerrogate ideologies that shape engineering norms and practices. This important context isdetailed more fully below.Research justiceThe design of our study was influenced by feminist, trans, and queer research methodologies thatare centered on deconstructing power imbalances between the researcher and participant as aform of
difference between those who participated in one organization and those whoparticipated in three or more organizations. This suggests that it is possible that students with lowPersonal Interest scores become involved in more student organizations. BACKGROUND 3.1.Participation in Extracurricular Activities One of the most common ways for students to become engaged in their campuscommunity is to participate in ECAs. Research has demonstrated the impact of participation inthese activities on education, offering consistent and strong support for the value of studentorganizations to both student and the universities that sponsor them (see Figure 1) [10, 11, 13-24]. Participating in student organizations—a subset of ECAs-- leads to
introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include evaluating conceptual knowledge, mis- conceptions and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect conceptual change and associated impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and per- sistence. The other is on the factors that promote persistence and
global economy, formal study of standards and regulations has become essential totechnologists. The authors recommend that all undergraduate technology programs embedstandards study into the curricula. Graduate study of standards should include the impact ofstandards on policy and decision issues. Finally, corporations and government agencies shouldtrain professionals on how to develop the best standards, as the economies of all nations dependon the collective ability to develop and maintain an effective international standards system.References: 1. Purcell, Donald E. Editor. “The Strategic Value of Standards Education.” The Center for Global Standards Analysis, August 2008. (For a copy of the Center’s survey report, contact
diversity of engineering students and improving education for all engineering students. Two of Beth’s current projects are an NSF sponsored S-STEM grant and the project described in this paper.Mary Virnoche, Humboldt State University Mary Virnoche is an Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of Sociology at Humboldt State University. Mary collaborates with colleagues in STEM areas to increase interest and diversity in those fields. She is currently working with a team on an NSF S-STEM project. In recent past her action research focused on the Expanding Your Horizons conference designed to generate and retain girls' interest in science and engineering. Mary completed her doctoral work at
teacher educator, she has added engineering to her elementary and early childhood science methods courses, and developed a Teaching Engineering Design course for middle school pre-service teachers in a science track. Since 2008, she has partnered with Harford County Public Schools in Maryland on the SySTEmic Project, a district-wide project to implement elementary engineering instruction using EiE units of instruction. More recently, she has provided science and engineering professional development to Tunbridge Public Charter School, Baltimore City, and to Cecil County Public Schools, Maryland. Her research largely examines factors that support and those that hinder elementary teachers as they learn to teach
encouraged to draw from their own junior and senior level coursework(especially their senior design projects) to help students gain perspective, and learn how to applyfundamental laws to more difficult and complex circuits. The purpose was to help thesefreshman students understand why EE 302 is a foundational course in the curriculum, and SIleaders participated in weekly professional development meetings to discuss best practices indirecting student learning of both the content and study skills. Leaders maintained detailed lessonplans and were asked to identify content and study skill objectives for each week’s lesson. FourSI sessions were offered weekly and efforts were made to ensure that the sessions did notconflict with lecture or lab timesIII
@uark.edu http://uark.libguides.com/ENGRMiss Lihua Yang, University of Arkansas Lihua Yang is a doctoral student in Educational Statistics and Research Method. She currently works as a teaching and research assistant at the University of Arkansas. She can be contacted at ly001(at)uark(dot)edu. Page 26.1222.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Perceptions and Misconceptions of Industrial Engineering from First Year Engineering StudentsAbstractPerception has a hidden importance in our society. It is what drives us to buy that namebrand product, move to a
and enter the workplace. E-Compete has beensuccessfully piloted in a capstone engineering technology course where students are designing,building, and testing a Baja vehicle in preparation for the competition.IntroductionThe EvaluateUR method provides statistically reliable assessments of student learning growth ina wide variety of outcome categories identified as essential to success in the workplace. Themethod differs from more traditional approaches to assessing student outcomes because it isintegrated directly into the research/engineering design experience. A unique feature of theEvaluateUR method is its emphasis on metacognition by helping students learn and practice thediscipline of realistic self-assessment. Thus, the method also
scaffolding mentors understanding of cutting edgecollaboration technologies in A/E/C. The paper discusses implications for the design ofP5BL environments, processes and implications for university and industry relationships.IntroductionIsolation of Architecture/ Engineering/Construction (A/E/C) students within discipline-specific education has impacted graduates ability to function within interdisciplinarydesign teams when they enter industry. Not only are new graduates commonly hamperedby poor cross-disciplinary communication, coordination and negotiation skills, theyemerge from educational institutions with narrow perceptions of what it means toparticipate in the design process as a member of their specific discipline.P5BL - the People- Problem
engineering students. It concludes that the current practices by variousuniversities will help engineering educators to create more practical, scaleable, diversified andsustainable programs in a global context.I. IntroductionEngineering is now practiced in a global, holistic business context1. It is common for engineers to workon multi-national teams designing products, which will be manufactured in one part of the world andsold in another part2. The ever-increasing trend of economic globalization necessitates dynamic andmeaningful collaboration between engineers, designers and executives, transcending political andcultural boundaries3,4.Today’s engineering students graduate in a world that is becoming highly competitive as geographicalbarriers are
engineeringeducation culture while also presenting a valuable and unique opportunity for engineeringeducation researchers and faculty developers to make significant practical impact. However,seizing this opportunity has been difficult, and the development of an inclusive culture hascontinued to elude traditional educational research approaches. While quantitative methods canbroadly identify the presence and prominence of marginalized inclusion, they often lack thedepth needed to foster a comprehensive understanding of inclusion. In contrast, qualitative andnarrative-based approaches offer rich accounts of marginalized experiences and perspectives butstruggle to reach a broad faculty audience. Dissemination approaches for engineering educationresearch
previously served as elected co-chair of the Science & Technology Taskforce of the National Women’s Studies Association, and as a Postdoctoral Research Officer at the Centre for Informal Learning and Schools (CILS) at King’s College, University of London. Her graduate training is in Science & Technology Studies and Women’s Studies at Virginia Tech.Dr. Dianne J DeTurris, California Polytechnic State UniversityAlana Christine SnellingMs. Nhu Y TranLia Marie Applegarth Page 26.1068.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Learning from Senior-Level Engineering
development, effective modeling and training for decision making. His publications encompass the developing of decision support systems for supply chain design; manufac- turing, transportation and warehousing optimization, manufacturing capacity modeling and forecasting, simulation, scheduling, inventory policy, and process design and optimization. He got his Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering at Arizona State University in 1999 with a Fulbright-Conacyt scholarship.Dr. Yueqing Li, Lamar University Yueqing Li is an associate professor in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Lamar University. His research focuses on human factors & ergonomics, human-computer interaction, and driv- ing safety.Maryam
to the challenges and building upon the existing body of research, we havedeveloped a Chemical Engineering Escape Room that leverages virtual elements programmed inMATLAB. This approach aims to create a more practical and cost-effective solution whilemaintaining the engaging aspects of traditional escape rooms. Our design integrates educationalbrochures to provide participants with game flow guidance and concise explanations of theunderlying engineering principles, addressing the need for clear educational objectives [17].The escape room will be implemented at the upcoming 2024 ASEE Midwest section conference,where we plan to gather data gauging its effectiveness through a post-activity questionnaire.However, the analysis of learning
emphasis includes faculty development and mentoring, graduate student development, critical thinking and communication skills, enhancing mathematical student success in Calculus (including Impact of COVID-19), and promoting women in STEM. Her technical research focuses on sustainable chemical process design, computer aided design, and multicriteria decision making. She also has extensive experience in K-12 STEM education and program evaluation and assessment. She has held a variety of administrative positions: 1) Director of STEM Faculty Development Initiatives-Clemson, 2) Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies in the College of Engineering, Computing and Applied Sciences-Clemson, 3) Interim Director of Student