Asee peer logo
Displaying results 841 - 870 of 1517 in total
Conference Session
Best Papers in K-12 / Pre-college Division
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Aran W Glancy, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities; Tamara J Moore, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Siddika Selcen Guzey, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Karl A Smith, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
develop number sense, makesense of the number line, and learn to use measurement devices and deal withmeasurement error. Simply asking students to collect and interpret data, however, doesnot guarantee that students will connect the data and measurements to the science andengineering concepts, even when the data support and demonstrate those concepts.References1. Wilkins, J. L. M. Preparing for the 21st century: The status of quantitative literacy in the United States. Sch. Sci. Math. 100, 405–418 (2000).2. Lohr, S. The Age of Big Data. New York Times (2012).3. Committee on Integrated STEM Education, National Academy of Engineering & National Research Council. STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division: Pre-college Student Experiences
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Christine Valle, Georgia Institute of Technology; Tia Jackson-Truitt; Wendy C. Newstetter, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
you tell me how you got interested in engineering?3. How did you decide on GT?4. Describe your transition to GT from high school.5. Can you tell me about how you decided on your major?6. Has that major turned out to be a good choice for you?7. Have you ever changed your major or thought about changing your major?8. What is the climate like for women in your major?9. What is the ratio of men to women in your major and can you share your thoughts on why you have this ratio?10. As a woman/African American engineering student, do you face any challenges in your major? What are the unique challenges to being a minority student in engineering?11. If s/he identifies as an African American or Hispanic/Latina woman: do you face any challenges
Conference Session
NSF Grantees’ Poster Session
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael G Mauk P.E., Drexel University; Richard Chiou, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.)
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
lighting, are rich in data that students can harvest using basic image analysis techniquesprovided by software such as MATLAB or ImageJ.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by "Solar Cell Imaging: A Gateway for Visualization and Learning inSTEM Disciplines” NSF TUES Award DUE-1245872 (June 2013 to May 2015).Bibliography 1. J. HAUNSCHILD, M. GLATTHAAR, M. DEMANT, J. NIEVENDICK, M. MOTZKO, S. REIN, and E.R. WEBER, “Quality control of as-cut multicrystalline silicon wafers using photoluminescence imaging for solar cell production” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 94, 12 2007-2012 (2010). 2. MICHAEL G. MAUK, “Image Processing for Solar Cell Analysis, Diagnostics and Quality Assurance Inspection” Ch 14 in Handbook
Conference Session
Engineering Management Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Samuel A. Malachowsky, Rochester Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management
syllabus fall 2012,http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/engineering-systems-division/esd-36-system-project-management-fall-2012/syllabus/,Aug 2012.[7] P. H. Feiler, J. B. Goodenough, A. Gurfinkel, C. B. Weinstock, and L. Wrage. Reliability validation andimprovement framework, http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/12sr013.pdf, Nov 2012. Page 26.912.11[8] R. Giralt-Mas, P. Pala-Schonwalder, F. del Aguila-Lopez, and J. Bonet-Dalmau. Teaching project managementin telecommunications engineering - introducing role-plays. In Frontiers in Education, 2005. FIE ’05. Proceedings35th Annual Conference, pages F4C–20, Oct 2005.[9] S. Goldin and K. Rudahl. Software
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division: Curricular Programs
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Brianna Blaser, University of Washington; Katherine M. Steele, University of Washington; Sheryl Elaine Burgstahler, University of Washigton
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
to support a diverse group of engineers who are better prepared as professionals todesign products that are accessible and usable to a broad range of individuals.1 Lent, R. W., Sheu, H., Singley, D., Schmidt, J. A., Schmidt, L. C., & Gloster, C. S. (2008). Longitudinal relationsof self-efficacy to outcome expectations, interests, and major choice goals in engineering students. Journal ofVocational Behavior, 73(2), 328 – 335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.07.0052 Porter, S. R., & Umbach, P.D. (2006). College major choice: An analysis of person-environment fit. Research inHigher Education, 47(4). 429 – 449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-9002-33 Grandy, J. (1994) Gender and ethnic differences among science and
Conference Session
Development as Faculty and Researcher: ERM Roundtable
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Claudia M Walter, DiZ - Center for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education; Christian H Kautz, Hamburg University of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
” Confrontation Participants “are brought to realize possible inadequacies in their existing conceptions and/or teaching practices and thus create an awareness for the need to change” Exposure Workshop facilitator “provide[s] a direction and a model for improvement”   Commitment Workshop facilitator “encourage[s] teachers building to engage in changes and development”  In the following sections, we describe a professional development program that implements Ho’sconcept in order to foster a constructivist framework and student-centered
Conference Session
Survey and Assessment Development
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nicholas D. Fila, Purdue University; Justin L Hess, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
and Technology (DET) survey. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(4), 800-818.3. Crede, E., & Borrego, M. (2013). From ethnography to items: A mixed methods approach to developing a survey to examine graduate engineering student retention. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(1), 62- 80.4. Daigneault, P.-M., & Jacob, S. (2014). Unexpected but most welcome mixed methods for the validation and revision of the participatory evaluation measurement instrument. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(1), 6-24. Page 26.35.175. Ungar, M., & Liebenberg, L. (2011). Assessing resilience across
Conference Session
ECCD Innovative Teaching Applications
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hayrettin B Karayaka, Western Carolina University; Robert D. Adams, Western Carolina University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Energy Conversion and Conservation
also planned to develop in-class laboratorydemonstration activities for further understanding and analysis of the subject matter.Bibliography1. Barbara Mean, Yukie Toyama, Robert Murphy, Marianne Bakia and Karla Jones "Evaluation of Evidence-BasedPractices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies," U.S. Department ofEducation Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service. RevisedSeptember 2010.2. U.S. NRC, “Combined License Applications for New Reactors,” Sep 22, 2010, available online athttp://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors.html.3. U. S. Energy Information Administration, “Electric Power Annual 2010 Data Tables,” Nov 09, 2011, availableonline at http
Conference Session
Student Approaches to Problem Solving: ERM Roundtable
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jacob Preston Moore, Pennsylvania State University, Mont Alto; Joseph Ranalli, Pennsylvania State University, Hazleton Campus
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
. 99, no. 2, pp. 159–168, 2010.[5] S. P. Brophy, P. Norris, M. Nichols, and E. D. Jansen, “Development and initial experience with a laptop-based student assessment system to enhance classroom instruction,” in American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Nashville, TN, 2003.[6] S. W. Draper and M. I. Brown, “Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 81–94, 2004.[7] L. Malmi and A. Korhonen, “Automatic feedback and resubmissions as learning aid,” in IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 2004. Proceedings, 2004, pp. 186–190.[8] A. Mitrovic, “An intelligent SQL tutor on the web,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ
Conference Session
Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Keith G. Sheppard, Stevens Institute of Technology (SES); Christos Christodoulatos, Stevens Institute of Technology (SES); Kate D. Abel, Stevens Institute of Technology (SES); Leslie R Brunell, Stevens Institute of Technology (SES); Sandra V. Furnbach P.E., Stevens Institute of Technology; Vikki Hazelwood, Stevens Institute of Technology (SES); Kishore Pochiraju, Stevens Institute of Technology (SES); Eirik Hole, Stevens Institute of Technology (SSE); Bruce McNair, Stevens Institute of Technology (SES); Thomas G. Lechler, Stevens Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
constituencies while assuring a uniformity of outcomes acrossprojects and programs. The scale up has brought new challenges, especially ones unsurprisinglyassociated with needing to coordinate many design advisers and entrepreneurship instructors inthe two integrated course sequences. It has also not yet met expectations for the true integrationthat is desired. A comprehensive review following assessment of the current first implementationof the Phase 2 scale up will determine if the program is ready for full scale up and the furtherchanges needed to make it happen.  Bibliography  1. Byers, T., Seelig, T., Sheppard, S., and Weilerstein , P., “Entrepreneurship: Its Role in Engineering Education”, The Bridge, Vol. 43, No. 2, Summer 2013, National
Conference Session
Information and Network Security
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Richard Scott Bell, Northwest Missouri State University; Eugene Vasserman, Kansas State University; Eleanor C Sayre, Kansas State University
Tagged Divisions
Computing & Information Technology
thevolume and complexity of cybersecurity problems facing today’s workforce. This is what wewould like for our survey to help educators identify in their classrooms. A more detaileddescription and further analysis of this portion of our study can be found in our previous work. 5The information gained from this investigation was used to develop the statements used in ourcurrent assessment tool. Table 1: Statements included in survey 1 Pursue an advanced degree(s) focused on cybersecurity 2 Find ways to exploit vulnerabilities in existing software 3 Perform research focused on cybersecurity 4 Learn how to crack users’ passwords 5 Take additional
Conference Session
Assessing Social Responsibility & Sustainability
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Justin L Hess, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Sarah Aileen Brownell, Rochester Institute of Technology; Richard A House, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Alexander T. Dale, Engineers for a Sustainable World
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods, Engineering Ethics, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
Page 26.508.5published within engineering education scholarly literature. We borrowed and adapted itemsfrom a number of existing measures, which included the following (for an item-by-itemdescription, see Appendix A):  Zhai and Scheer’s (2004) Global Perspective Scale12  Downey et al.’s (2006) global competency questions13  Braskamp, Braskamp, & Merrill’s (2008) Global Perspective Inventory, and in particular their Interpersonal Social Responsibility Scale14  Hilpert, Stump, Husman, and Kim’s (2008) Engineering Attitudes Survey15Throughout the survey development process, the authors were in dialogue with one another,providing feedback for item clarity, framing, and refinement. Along with evaluating the fitbetween
Conference Session
Potpourri
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Chaomin Luo, University of Detroit Mercy
Tagged Divisions
Computing & Information Technology
. Satisfactory performance was evaluated by various milestoneassignments, projects, presentation and other activities. Generally, on-going multi-project-basededucation combined effective classroom lectures, student active learning, innovative pedagogies,project management, and team work, benefits for both student research involvement, andengineering curriculum.References 1. Subbian, V., Purdy, C. C., and Beyette, F. R., UnLecture: A Novel Active Learning Based Pedagogical Strategy for Engineering Courses, Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, ASEE 2014. 2. Rios, E. F., Khan, A. S., and Padgett, D. V., A Senior Design Project: Heating and Cooling System for Car’s Interior
Conference Session
NSF Grantees’ Poster Session
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Noah Salzman, Boise State University; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University; Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
., Ohland, M. W., & Cardella, M. E. (2014b). Work In Progress-A Qualitative Study of the Effects of Participation in Pre-College Engineering Programs on First-Year Engineering Students. Presented at the 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Madrid.• Salzman, N., Ricco, G. D., & Ohland, M. W. (2014). Pre-College Engineering Participation Among First-Year Engineering Students. Presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN. Acknowledgement Support for this work comes from the National Science Foundation, Award No. REE 1265216. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not
Conference Session
Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mohammad Sadraey, Daniel Webster College; Nicholas Bertozzi, Daniel Webster College
Tagged Divisions
Systems Engineering
, Fort Worth, Texas, AIAA 2010-90166. Blanchard, B. S. and Fabrycky, W. J., Systems Engineering and Analysis, Fourth Edition, Prentice Hall, 20067. Richard Curran, Michel van Tooren, Liza van Dijk, Systems Engineering as an Effective Educational Framework for Active Aerospace Design Learning, 9th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, 21 - 23 September 2009, Hilton Head, South Carolina, AIAA 2009-69048. Paul S. Gill and Danny Garcia, William W. Vaughan, Engineering Lessons Learned and Systems Engineering Applications, 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 10 - 13 January 2005, Reno, Nevada, AIAA 2005-13259. John C. Hsu, S. Raghunathan, Systems Engineering for CDIO -Conceive, Design, Implement
Conference Session
Computer Science, Computer Engineering, and Digital Systems Education 1
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cheng Chih Liu, University of Wisconsin Stout
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
Comparison of Features in teaching digital/embedded systems design course Use of FPGAs in Use of FPGAs to Use of FPGAs for Use of HDL as lab assignments inspire students advanced designs: programming and/or lab exercises for their projects wireless network language to solve to accelerate communications design problems student learning curve Tyson S. Hall, et al [8] Maybe No No No José N. A. [9
Conference Session
Utilizing Digital Technologies in Classroom and Distance Learning in ET Programs
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nasser I Alaeddine, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Hamid R. Parsaei, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Konstantinos Kakosimos P.E., Texas A&M University at Qatar; Bing Guo, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Bilal Mansoor, Texas A&M Qatar
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
when structuring a faculty training program. Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 53–63.6. Roblyer, M. D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J., & Witty, J. V. (2010). Findings on facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 134–140.7. Baltaci-Goktalay, S. s., & Ocak, M. m. (2006). FACULTY ADOPTION OF ONLINE TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(4), 37-43.8. Löfström, E., & Nevgi, A. (2008). University teaching staffs’ pedagogical awareness displayed through ICT- facilitated teaching. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(2), 101e116.9
Conference Session
Promoting Engineering and Technological Literacy
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
William R. Loendorf, Eastern Washington University; Terence Geyer, Eastern Washington University
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer102/gaytan102.htm8. Hannafin, M. J. (1984). Guidelines for using locus of instructional control in the design of computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Instructional Development 7(3): 6–10.9. Heinich, R., M. Molenda, J. D. Russell and S. E. Smaldino. (2003). Instructional media and technologies for learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.10. Hijazi, S., Crowley, M., Smith, M. L., & Shaffer, C. (2006). Maximizing learning by teaching blended courses. Proceedings of the ASCUE Conference, 2006.11. Holmberg, B (1987) Growth and structure of distance education. Routledge.12. Johnson, J. L. (2003) Distance education: the complete guide to design, delivery and improvement. NY
Conference Session
Introductory Experiences in Chemical Engineering
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joseph J. Biernacki, Tennessee Technological University
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
hed by the texxt author(s).. In the exam mple shown inFigure 1,, there are foour streams (M=4), ( threee componentts (N=3, air, water and thhe substancee ofthe materrial to be dried on a dry basis, b e.g. wood, w clay brrick, etc.). T The degrees oof freedomanalysis for f this exam mple followss: GDF = M×N M + MFlowws + NRates = 4×3 + 4 + 0 = 16 GC
Conference Session
ECCD Innovative Teaching Methods & Outreach
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Paul J. Weber, Lake Superior State University; Joseph P Moening, Lake Superior State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Energy Conversion and Conservation
) Benchmark: Sentence(s) Answer Sankey Diagram 2 Final Exam: Multiple Choice & Sentences Answer 3 Policy Goals and Impacts Sentence(s) Answer (Sustainability Analysis) Earth-Sun Interaction Sentence(s) Answer 33.2. Final exams: energy-sun interactionAnother method used to assess the learning outcomes of the Energy Systems & Sustainabilitycourse and to help determine student
Conference Session
Industrial Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Max de Jesús Suárez Montiel, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Mexico; Alberto Abelardo Hernandez-Luna, Tecnológico de Monterrey
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Industrial Engineering
, VOP.Introduction“Customer experience is critically important; it is broken, and fixing it can be veryprofitable. Corporations removed major quality defects in the 80’s, re-engineered businessprocesses in the 90’s, and now it’s time to take on the next big challenge for corporateAmerica: Customer Experience”1.Six sigma has garnered recognition in the manufacturing sector, its applications in theservice industry are not yet well documented2, the nature of services and the wayscustomers tend to evaluate service quality face important challenges for six sigma3, due toservice quality is a function4 of differing customer perceptions over time5.Service Quality can be defined from two perspectives: operational is the operation’sassessment of how well the service
Conference Session
Faculty Development II
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jennifer A Turns, University of Washington; Brook Sattler, University of Washington; Lauren D. Thomas, University of Washington; Cynthia J. Atman, University of Washington; Richard Brown Bankhead III, Highline Community College; Adam R Carberry, Arizona State University; Kristine R. Csavina, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Patrick Cunningham, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Douglas Karl Faust, Seattle Central College; Trevor Scott Harding, California Polytechnic State University; Ken Yasuhara, Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching, University of Washington
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
campusDr. Patrick Cunningham, Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyDr. Douglas Karl Faust, Seattle Central College PhD in Physics, professor of Mathematics, physics, astronomy and computer science.Dr. Trevor Scott Harding, California Polytechnic State University Dr. Trevor S. Harding is Professor of Materials Engineering at California Polytechnic State University where he teaches courses in materials design, biomedical materials, and life cycle analysis. He has pre- sented his research on engineering ethics to several universities and to the American Bar Association. He Page 26.1323.1 serves as Associate Editor of
Conference Session
Cultivating Engineering Scholarship and Research Mindsets Among URM Students
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sedig Salem Agili, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg; Aldo Morales, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg; Linda M. Null, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg; Janice E. Smith, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg; Sofia M. Vidalis, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
Paper ID #12057Reflections on Experiences of a Successful STEM Scholarship Program forUnderrepresented GroupsDr. Sedig Salem Agili, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg Sedig S. Agili received his BS, MS, and Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Marquette University in 1986, 1989, and 1996, respectively. Currently he is a Professor of Electrical Engineer- ing teaching and conducting research in signal integrity of high-speed electrical interconnects, electronic communications, and fiber optic communications. He has authored numerous research articles which have been published in reputable peer refereed
Conference Session
Continuing Professional Development Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael Richey, The Boeing Company; Timothy Kieran O'Mahony, University of Washington; Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University; Fabian Zender, The Boeing Company; Barry McPherson, Boeing
Tagged Divisions
Continuing Professional Development
Conference Session
Hands-on Active Learning
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Aurenice Menezes Oliveira, Michigan Technological University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
and then discusswhy the correct response is correct and the distractors (incorrect responses) are not. 16iv. Minute Papers, Direct Paraphrasing, Application Cards, and Lecture SummariesThese are examples of individual approaches. In minute papers or clearest/muddiest point, theinstructor should stop two minutes before the class period ends and ask students to write mainpoint(s) of the lecture and the “muddiest” or least clear point(s). Collect the papers and useresponses to plan the next lecture. In direct paraphrasing, the students should write a definitionin their own words. In application cards, students should provide a specific real-worldapplication for the topic covered in class; and finally in lecture summaries, students shouldwrite
Conference Session
Simulation
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Stephanie L. Cutler, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach; Wendi M. Kappers, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
), Engineering (E), Mathematics (M), and Science (S). Currently, Dr. Kappers is the fulltime Direc- tor of the Rothwell Center for Teaching and Learning Excellence Worldwide Campus (CTLE – W) for Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. In addition, she holds Adjunct Assistant Professor status in the College of Arts and Sciences, Worldwide Campus, teaching RSCH 202 – Introduction to Research, and in the College of Engineering, Daytona Beach Campus, teaching CS120 – Introduction to Computing in Aviation. Both positions allow her to stay focused upon real-life educational and classroom issues while designing training that explores technology utilization that is based upon structured learning prin- ciples and practices. She is an
Conference Session
Curricular and Non-curricular Models for Diverse Learners in Engineering
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gustavo B. Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles; Adel A. Sharif, California State University, Los Angeles; Arturo Pacheco-Vega, California State University, Los Angeles; Deborah Soonmee Won, California State University, Los Angeles; Tonatiuh Rodriguez-Nikl, California State University, Los Angeles; Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California; Crist Simon Khachikian, California State University, Northridge
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. Page 26.1385.12References1. Schreiner, L.A., & Pattengale, J (Eds.). (2000). Visible solutions for invisible students: Helping sophomores succeed. Monograph Series No. 31. Columbia: National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, University of South Carolina.2. Gump, S.E. (2007). Classroom research in a general education course: Exploring implications through an investigation of the sophomore slump. The Journal of General Education, 56: 105-125.3. Graunke, S.S., & Woosley, S.A. (2005). An exploration of
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Program Development & Desired Outcomes
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Elizabeth Nilsen, VentureWell; Victoria Matthew, VentureWell/Epicenter; Angela Shartrand, VentureWell; Thema Monroe-White, SageFox Consulting Group
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
ended. Ideally, the community will create new ways towork together, and will continue to share and develop their expertise.AcknowledgmentsThis work is supported by the National Science Foundation: DUE 1125457.References1. Beach, A. L., Henderson, C. & Finkelstein, N. Facilitating Change in Undergraduate STEM Education. Change Mag. High. Learn. 44, 52–59 (2012).2. Dempster, J. A., Benfield, G. & Francis, R. An academic development model for fostering innovation and sharing in curriculum design. Innov. Educ. Teach. Improv. 49, 135–147 (2012).3. Duderstadt, J. J. Engineering for a Changing World. (University of Michigan, 2008).4. Byers, T., Seelig, T., Sheppard, S. & Weilerstein, P. Entrepreneurship: Its Role in
Conference Session
Industrial Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jessica L. Heier Stamm, Kansas State University; Reuben F. Burch V, Kansas State University; Hugh R. Medal, Mississippi State University
Tagged Divisions
Industrial Engineering
Conference Session
NSF Grantees’ Poster Session
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Geoffrey L Herman, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Katherine Anne Earl, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Dong San Choi, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
grant DUE-1140554.The opinions, findings, and conclusions do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation or the author’s institution. Page 26.1438.13References1. Borrego, M., & Henderson, C. (2014). Increasing the use of evidence-based teaching in STEM higher education: A comparison of eight change strategies. Journal Of Engineering Education, 103(2), 220-252.2. Felder, R. M., Brent, R., Prince, M. J. (2011). Effective instructional development strategies. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 89–122.3. Brownell, S., & Tanner, K. (2012). Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: Lack of training