humanitarian content in bold.Assignment Engineering principles Humanitarian Value-related Assessment element(s) concepts methodA. Talking The role of engineers None specifically in Career choices Essay descriptionwith/interviewing a and engineering the assignment of interview/practicing engineer education (for non- description conversation engineering careers)B. Describing history Manufacturing Environmental Economic choices Essay comparingof manufacturing and engineering
technology graduates-- graduates endowed with public policyskills, yet fully adroit in the latest and emerging technology, defining a contemporary needed role for thegood of the society. However, with a paucity of such talent (and jobs) available today, it’s crucial to growthese new career pathways which are destined to be in high demand 5-10 years from now. [2]Among its various charters, the PIT-UN is managing new curriculum introductions and courses acrossuniversities by first building awareness through various outreach programs. It’s time to reshape theengineers traditional role into an expert where constant private sector innovations will face competenttechnical staff with public policy skills.Figure 1 shows the PIT-UN first phase, high-level
professional opportunities serves a dual role. Alignmentbetween academic offering and professional opportunities is ideal, if not essential. Directlymapping these efforts, in connection to academic research and teaching programs, will showfaculty how their engineering formation is or is not leading to career satisfaction. In other words,is there alignment between what engineers for good want from their careers versus how they arebeing trained in their academic programs?Volunteer opportunities. Mapping relevant volunteer opportunities will probably providedifferent outlets for engagement of engineers for good. These opportunities include volunteeropportunities within companies, i.e. when companies allow employees to work on “passionprojects” regularly
career at GE Motors, in 1988, as a product design engineer, specializing in the design and application of direct current motors and generators used in open pit mining equipment, such as shovels and draglines. During this period he attended the GE Advanced Engineering Courses, and obtained a master of science degree from Case Western Reserve University, majoring in mechanical and aerospace engineering. Michael then transferred to GE Transportation in 1992. While at GE Trans- portation, Michael has managed and was principal engineer for several engineering teams involved with locomotive, off highway vehicle, wind drive train, and energy storage systems. GE Transportation was purchased by Wabtec Corporation in 2019, and
a M.S. degree at Washington University in St. Louis. Upon deciding to return for his D.Sc. degree, he was awarded the National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship. He com- pleted his D.Sc. degree at Washington University in 2003 and has held faculty positions at the University of Florida, University of Missouri, and Duke University. He has received several prestigious early career awards, such as the NSF CAREER Award from the National Science Foundation, the 2007 SAE Ralph Teetor Educator Award, and the Office of Naval Research Young Investigator Award. His present research interests include innovative applications of nonlinear systems theory, energy harvesting, and investigating the stabilizing
Engineering Programs at the State University of New York (SUNY) at New Paltz. He received his B.S. from National Tsing-Hua Univer- sity in Taiwan in 1990 and M.S. and Eng.Sci.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from Columbia University in 1995 and 1997, respectively. Subsequently he joined IBM Microelectronics as an R&D sci- entist/engineer for a 21-year career in the microelectronics industry to develop advanced semiconductor technologies. He joined SUNY New Paltz in 2018 with expertise in materials science and solid mechan- ics, as well as research interests in stress-induced phenomena in engineering materials, microelectronics reliability and additive manufacturing of metals. He has over 50 technical
’ lack of interest, motivation, knowledge and skills required to compete in theglobal economy. By leveraging the Sandia National Laboratories University Allianceand its MEMS Design competition, Central New Mexico Community College (CNM) hasenabled undergraduate Manufacturing Technology MEMS (Micro ElectromechanicalSystems) students to compete with graduate and undergraduate engineering studentsacross the nation from Universities including: Texas Tech, Oklahoma State, University ofNorth Carolina, and the University of Illinois. The CNM design teams finished first orwere runners up over the last three years resulting in many students realizing that they toowere capable of pursuing an engineering career. Due to the high placement within thecontest
resumes_________________________________________________________ Practicing the job interview____________________________________________________ Other suggestions for topics concerning communication to help you be more professional on the job. Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of New Mexico – Albuquerque Copyright © 2008, American Society for Engineering Education Attachment 2Exit Questionnaire for EE 4811—Design One November 30, 2007Name (optional)__________________________E-Mail(Optional)_____________________________We follow up with selected students as they proceed into the Design II class and careers
employed as a GK-12 Fellow. This studentworks as a visiting scientist in Albuquerque Public School science classes. GK-12 Fellows researchand create labs and assist students and teachers with science learning and understanding. Energytopics related to the solar project have been taught at a middle school level. It is the goal of allparties involved with the GK-12 program to inspire scientists and engineers of the future. TheMechanical Engineering building solar project along the GK-12 Fellowship have the potential ofsteering careers toward one of the most important challenges facing society today. Conclusions1. The life cycle analysis for the UNM ME buildiing shows minimal cost savings as a result ofenergy
District, Educational Leadership Program Enhancement Project at Syracuse University and the University at Albany through the Teacher Leadership Quality Program. She holds an advance degree in Educational Theory and Practice from the University of New York/SUNY Albany, with experience in teaching educational methods at the master’s level as well as an introduction to education courses designed to develop new interest in teaching careers. She has worked as an elemen- tary classroom teacher developing specific curricula for gifted and talented students as well as inclusion classrooms in a school district eligible for rural and low-income programs. Dr. Gullie’s experience and past projects qualify her for the position of
ability to produceindependent and productive workers. Rote memorization dominates pedagogical practice acrossmost of the nation.The results of the pervasiveness of rote pedagogies are far-reaching. Directly, studentsdisengage, learn less effectively, and lose interest in STEM careers. Engaging Ghanaian studentsin hands-on activities can, however, significantly counter these negative effects [2,3]. Byextension, rote memorization results in minimal technological innovation that Ghanaians canpoint to with pride as a local output. This falsely perpetuates the negative global narrative aroundwhat capabilities young Africans possess. The concept of stereotype threat has been used tounderstand how students who are viewed poorly because of their identity
Paper ID #34466Student Motivation and Self-efficacy in Entrepreneurial-minded Learning(EML): What These Mean for Diversity and Inclusion in EngineeringClassroomsProf. Erin A. Henslee, Wake Forest University Dr. Erin Henslee is a Founding Faculty and Assistant Professor of Engineering at Wake Forest University. Her research spans biomedical engineering, e-sports, and STEM education. Prior to joining Wake Forest she was a Researcher Development Officer at the University of Surrey where she supported Early Career Researchers. She received her BS degrees in Engineering Science and Mechanics and Mathematics from Virginia
students for rapid changesthat will surely come during their careers, it is not the sort of disciplinary barrier-breaking thatmatches the visions in the aforementioned reports.We are motivated by efforts to substantially integrate the humanities and engineering,particularly at the introductory level. UC Berkeley Professor J. M. Prausnitz foreshadowed the1994 ASEE report when he argued in 1989 that “[undergraduate] engineering should be taught ina social context” [7, p. 14]. Draw lessons from the humanities, he expands (addressing a likelyreticent audience): Yes, teach science, teach phenomena, experiment, theory, and correlation. Yes, teach technology, plant design, and product development. But don't stop there. Teach also, or at
inpeople, e.g., faculty, students, and administrators in academia, and employees, clients, and publicstakeholders in industry. Bringing out our best performances increases career satisfaction andproductivity. Yet we also recognize that the engineering education and industry cultures weinhabit often fall (far) short of that ideal.Many of us in engineering education are working towards the transformation and healing of theengineering profession and engineering education cultures – while individually striving to bemore authentically ourselves. We recognize that our inner work is directly linked to our outercommunity. This panel represents the collective thinking of a group of six engineering educatorsin different paths and stages in our careers. We
that the interaction of gender and thedevelopment of engineering identity is complex and multilayered and that it requiresunderstanding of how women and men develop understanding of what engineering identity is.Jorgenson examines the construction of engineering identities among female students [17] andfinds that many of the participants of the study were reluctant to acknowledge that genderrelations have any consequences in their career. Women who were interviewed for this studystrongly identified themselves with their career but acknowledged the male environment theyworked in was challenging. Many mentioned having to prove themselves before they were takenseriously as professionals. However, they strongly associated themselves with the notion
Dominion University the senior project is a twosemester course, which is the case in most of the undergraduate programs. The Introduction toSenior Project is a first semester 1 credit course, which covers a series of career related topicsrelated to engineering technology such as engineering codes and standards, engineering ethics,technical report writing, job search and resume writing techniques, patents and property rights,and professional engineering licensure. By the end of this course the students are expected todecide on a project topic, establish partnership with a faculty advisor for the project and submita project proposal. In the second semester, the actual Senior Project is a 3 credits course inwhich students work under advisor
ecosystem model capturesthe broad spectrum of mobilities, relationships and interdependencies that exist within andoutside of the expected engineering career path [3], [4], [5]. Using ecosystem metaphors enablesus to ask questions about the quality of pathways, the availability and flow of resources, and thestructures and processes that create and sustain inequalities. Observing that systems are designedto reproduce themselves, Vanasupa and Schlemer argue that “the apparent problems of lack oflearning and lack of diversity are outcomes of a system functioning as designed rather thansomething ‘going wrong’” [6, pp. 6]. Observable leakage, which is often a primary driver in apipeline metaphor due to projected inefficiencies, is merely the “tip of the
having to satisfy very real requirements such as having thecontent ready on time, integrating the newly-developed content to the already-preparedcurriculum, and how all of this would impact my end-of-semester student-teacher evaluations(which are extremely important for an early-career educator, particularly one from amarginalized identity). I was putting a lot of trust in these students to make something amazing,and it felt incredibly vulnerable. The experience worked out in the end, but it also presented challenges to my values whentrying to be fair to all the students in the course. I had initially planned to allow the cogen teamto drop their grade for one homework assignment in exchange for their education labor.However, about halfway
Master of Public Health and Bachelor of Arts, major in Psychology, from the University of Virginia. She is beginning her professional career as an Associate Clinical Research Coordinator at the Mayo Clinic. Prior research experience has involved neurodegenerative disorders, pathogens, mental health outcomes and policies, and engineering ethics education.Araba Dennis, Purdue University Araba Dennis is a second-year PhD student studying race, culture, and institutional definitions of inclu- sion. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Exploring values and norms of engineering through responsible innovation and
Paper ID #33843How Do Human Interaction Labs Contribute to Engineering LeadershipDevelopment Growth?Mr. Brett Tallman P.E., Montana State University, Bozeman Brett Tallman is currently a Doctoral student in Engineering at Montana State University (MSU), with focus on engineering leadership. His previous degrees include a Masters degree in Education from MSU (active learning in an advanced quantum mechanics environment) and a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Cornell. Prior to his academic career, he worked in the biotech (Lead Engineer), product design, and automotive (Toyota) sectors for 14 years, and is a licensed
problems associated with the ERC field(s) of study, and career pathways(s) associated with the ERC’s field(s) of study) * Specific to an NSF ERC, not asked of SenSIP participants Communication Items related to the level at which participants perceived their and Research Skills center to impact communication skills (e.g., communicating orally/visually, networking, collaboration) and research skills X X X (e.g., formulating research questions, analyzing data, interpreting results) Mentoring Items related to the teachers’ perceptions of what their mentors provided (e.g
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Connecticut. He received his PhD in 2009 from the University of Nevada, Reno, and continued there as a Research Scientist. His latest research endeavor is on creativity and engineering education, with a focus on the unique potential of students with ADHD. Supported by multiple grants from the National Science Foundation, his research was highlighted the American Society of Engineer- ing Education’s Prism Magazine. He received a CAREER Award in 2016 to study the significance of neurodiversity in developing a creative engineering workforce.Ms. Connie Mosher Syharat, University of Connecticut Constance M. Syharat is a Research Assistant at the University
c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Transforming A Large Lecture FYE Course Structure into Virtual Collaborative LearningIntroductionFirst Year Experience (FYE) engineering courses at large, research-focused universities present aunique challenge from a curricular and administrative perspective. Prior research indicates thatFYE engineering courses should be interdisciplinary and highly interactive, whilesimultaneously presenting enough technical and career-specific content within each engineeringdiscipline to facilitate students’ choices of majors [1]–[5]. These course characteristics are mosteffectively supported by student-centered pedagogical approaches, such as project-based learning(PBL) [6
Dr. Steven Jiang is an Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at North Carolina A&T State University. His research interests include Human Systems Integration, Visual Analytics, and Engineering Education.Dr. Emily C. KernDr. Vinod K. Lohani, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Vinod K. Lohani is a Program Director at the National Science Foundation and his portfolio in- cludes the NSF Research Traineeship (NRT), Innovations in Graduate Education (IGE), and CAREER programs. Dr. Lohani is on leave from Virginia Tech where he is a Professor of Engineering Education. During 2016-19, he served as the Director of education and global initiatives at an
. Fast forward through coast-to-coast moves to Boston, San Diego and finally Rochester, Kathy spent many years in the fitness industry while raising her daughter, wearing every hat from personal trainer and cycling instructor to owner and director of Cycledelic Indoor Cycling Studio. Kathy draws upon these many diverse career and life experiences while directing WE@RIT. In the spring of 2020, Kathy earned her Master of Science degree in Program Design, Analysis & Manage- ment through RIT’s School of Individualized Study, combining concentrations in Project Management, Analytics and Research, & Group Leadership and Development. An unabashed introvert, Kathy enjoys reading and spending time with her family
three personas have been developed using the 2020 application pool. While thetarget personas used for the rubrics were developed using the process noted above, thesepersonas were developed using the student responses to the applications. For a more in-depthdiscussion of the method used, see our prior work [19].General Applicant Persona: Mark JohnsonMark is from North Carolina. He didn’t attend a community college before coming to thisuniversity. Both of his parents are college graduates. Mark is a second-year student in themechanical engineering concentration. Making the leap from an easy high school career to amuch more difficult undergraduate engineering career and learning how to effectively study isthe biggest academic challenge Mark has
engineering education profession, develop a vision of engineering education as more inclusive, engaged, and socially just. She runs the Feminist Research in Engineering Educa- tion Group, whose diverse projects and group members are described at pawleyresearch.org. She was a National Academy of Engineering CASEE Fellow in 2007, received a CAREER award in 2010 and a PECASE award in 2012 for her project researching the stories of undergraduate engineering women and men of color and white women, and received the Denice Denton Emerging Leader award from the Anita Borg Institute in 2013. She has been author or co-author on papers receiving ASEE-ERM’s best paper award, the AAEE Best Paper Award, the Benjamin Dasher award, and co
degree to which students perceiverespect from peers in their classes is positively and significantly correlated to satisfaction withtheir chosen engineering major and their long-term interest in pursuing and remaining in anengineering career [13]. Through the personal validation that strong peer support provides,students are better able to cope in college [14], which in turn results in improved academicoutcomes [15].Peer Support is a multi-faceted ConstructExisting research underscores the importance of studying how students perceive support fromtheir peers rather than only measuring time spent with them. However, Thompson and Mazer[16] delved further into perceived peer support by developing four different scales from 15 totalpeer support items
Engineering.Dr. Amy Clobes, University of Virginia Dr. Amy M. Clobes is committed to supporting current and future graduate students as Director of Grad- uate Programs for the University of Virginia School of Engineering and Applied Science. In her current role, Dr. Clobes collaborates to support existing programs and develops new initiatives in graduate stu- dent recruitment, training, education, and career and professional development. Dr. Clobes holds a B.S. in Biology from the University of Michigan and Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Virginia. Her combined experience in STEM research and education, program development, and student advising are key to her dedication and success in creating
program development and improvement.IntroductionOnline education is gaining momentum rapidly. Seaman [1] reports the number of graduatestudents taking distance courses in 2016 was nearly 28% higher than in 2012. Online delivery isattractive for its flexibility of time and space to full-time working professionals who wish to earna graduate education while not pausing their careers [2], [3], [4], [5], [6].Graduate engineering is not an exception in the expanded online space. The National Center forEducation Statistics [7] reports that 36% of graduate students in math, engineering, and computerscience took some online courses in 2015-2016, compared to 25.5% in 2011-2012. In the sameperiod and for the same academic disciplines, enrollment in entirely