an ASEAN regional standard.4While both ABET and AUN-QA are nonprofit, non-governmental organizations, they featurevery different organizational structures (it should also be noted that AUN is a much youngerorganization than ABET and its predecessors). ABET limits its membership to technicalsocieties, currently 35 members, that represent related professions. The bulk of the work withinABET activities is done by volunteers from academia, government, and industry.5 The membersocieties nominate individuals to act as these volunteers, who are key participants in ABET’sacademic program peer-review process. Programs accredited by ABET range from the associatedegree to master degrees, depending on the accreditation commission. ABET is divided
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center. In addition to his industry experience, he has spent two years, while completing his PhD in Computer Science and Engineering, as a National Science Foun- dation GK-12 fellow - teaching and bring real-word STEM applications in two urban high schools. He has authored peer-reviewed articles, presented at national/international conferences, and taught under- graduate/graduate courses in both Hardware Security (computer science & engineering) as well as STEM Education and Outreach.Dr. Andrea Carneal Burrows, University of Wyoming Dr. Andrea C. Burrows received a Curriculum and Instruction: Science Specialization research Ed.D. from the University of Cincinnati, M.S. in Science
by analyzing in detail the context where the negotiations were made, and seestep-by-step how the teams were able to reach agreement. Figure 5. Images from “Sticky Notes” Tool 02: Using Sticky Notes, a boundary object to negotiate in larger teams These boundary objects shown in Figure 5, were usually present with large groups of individualsinvolved in the negotiation (i.e. when externals were invited to a meeting). “There were just toomany people to have everybody write on the board,” a student remarks. Sticky notes entailedlittle squares that have an adhesive on one of its sides and that could be placed on a surface. Theyshowed to be useful when there were large amounts of
to be critical in expediting acquisition ofresearch skills. In other words, each class period was designed to facilitate hands-on and minds-on learning opportunities through peer-peer and peer-instructor interactions. A significant number of communication- based activities were integrated throughout the course, including in-class and out-of- Research class written responses, in-class discussion Triangle pairs and discussion groups, poster
to develop a comprehensive theoretical and numerical multiscale strategy to accelerate the battery design process. He has presented his work nationally and internationally and has publications in several peer-reviewed journals. Currently, he is investigating the kinetics of nanoparticle dissolution at the mesocontinuum level using the phase field method. The goal is to develop a com- prehensive, theoretical and numerical strategy to predict the dissolution kinetics of small particles from experimentally measurable parameters to accelerate the particle engineering process during formulation development. Example applications include researching the effects of engineered particle size distribu- tions in solid dosage
) (Dalian, China). Qin has broad teaching and research interests in the ethical, historical-cultural, and policy perspectives of engineering practice and ed- ucation. His research has drawn on theories, methods, and practices from a wide range of fields including philosophy of technology, engineering ethics, engineering education, and Confucian ethics. His work has appeared in peer-reviewed journals such as Science and Engineering Ethics, Engineering Studies, History of Education, and Technology in Society. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Global Engineering Competency: Assessment Tools and Training StrategiesIntroductionAs many
methods in this inquiry. The Administrator of the SouthGeneral IRB from the UCLA Office of the Human Research Protection Program informed mevia email on March 23, 2022 that formal review for this proposed work was not necessary.As mentioned above, this work was meant to be an exploration and a spotlight; it was not led byspecific research questions. The main purpose was to highlight the history and evolution of SE3through review of materials and conversations with SE3 leaders. Because of this, codes were notdeveloped prior to review of the data but were emergent and intuitive. Internal validity orcredibility [2] was achieved not through triangulation in terms of peer examination, but throughmember checks. I shared a draft write-up with
4.00 4.00 4.00 and client’s needs) 2 Express individual ideas in writing using models or 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 drawings. 3 Share individual ideas orally and express group ideas in 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 writing. 4 Collaborate with one or more peers throughout the design 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 process for the selection of the most
, and compassionate, active listening, we havecome together to understand the concerns and needs of these varied viewpoints and come to aconsensus to create this work.INTRODUCTIONThe benefits of lecture capture in university education have been a somewhat controversial topic,with numerous studies falling on opposite sides of the debate. A recent review by Banerjeecarefully examined 71 peer-reviewed educational research articles, mostly in STEM fields [1].These studies document numerous benefits of lecture capture for individual students, includingimproved learning, higher academic performance, better work-life balance, the ability of studentsto complete and understand their own notes, overcoming language barriers, enhanced studentinterest in
of reading,they must be made aware of the immediate benefit of coming to class prepared with somebackground knowledge of topics to be discussed and their transformation from passive toactive learners.Improvement of self-confidence from reading assignments is one of the chief benefits that isusually not talked about in engineering classes. Background knowledge gained from pre-classreading assignments prepares students for active class discussion and helps them transformfrom a passive to an active learner. Within a positive and supportive class environment, itcould help students earn more recognition and respect from their peers. It boosts students'self-confidence, which results in better student engagement and performance in class. Thisbrings
Paper ID #31605Building Better Worlds: An Interdisciplinary Approach to EngineeringEthics PedagogyDr. Amy Schroeder, University of Southern California Dr. Amy Schroeder has been teaching communication in the Viterbi School of Engineering at the Uni- versity of Southern California for the past six years. She developed a new course focused on science, literature and ethics; it has become a consistently successful course in USC’s general education program. She holds a PhD in literature and creative writing from USC; her first book received the Field Prize and was published by Oberlin College Press. Her prose appears in the Los
Paper ID #15171The inGEAR Program: Recruiting International Graduate Students throughUndergraduate Research InternshipsDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Director for Graduate Initiatives at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she earned Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engi- neering from the University of Michigan. She has published more than two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her interests in educational technology and enhancing
anticipation of future expansion, the conductor sizingand other apparatus should be able to accommodate 100 PBKs. The final design of the energykiosk is shown in Figure 3. Page 26.1413.7 Figure 3. Final design of the energy kiosk.The refined design was used to write a Request for Proposal (RFP) from three Kenyan vendors tosupply equipment (other than the PBKs) and install the system. A core element in manydevelopment projects that are associated with a university is that the team of student volunteersdo most of the installation. Hiring a contractor to do this work is anathema to this mode ofoperation. However, the students
gateway to better understanding how to effectively teach computing skills. Much of this work results in cutting edge digital media experiences in digital games, interactive narrative, and educational media. Dr. Magerko has been research lead on over $5 million of federally-funded research; has authored over 60 peer reviewed articles related to cognition, creativity, and computation; has had his work shown at galleries and museums internationally; and co-founded a learning environment for computer science - called EarSketch - that has been used by tens of thousands of learners worldwide.Tom McKlin, SageFox Consulting GroupDr. Anna Xambo, Georgia Institute of Technology Anna Xamb´o is a postdoctoral fellow at Center for
research experience and strengthening their confidence and interest in pursuing aSTEM profession. The program also helped the students improve their skills in teamwork, timemanagement, scientific writing, and presentation.I. IntroductionAn adequate supply of quality workers in the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) fields is vital to continued US economic growth and competitiveness [1]. Communitycolleges enroll almost half of the nation’s undergraduate students, thus their role inundergraduate STEM education is very important, especially for individuals from groupstraditionally underrepresented in the STEM field. With support from the Department ofEducation Minority Science and Engineering Improvement Program (MSEIP), a
lecture and lab are combined in one course setting) that meets for 110minute time blocks, 3 times per week, for 10 weeks. The course leads students throughdesigning a 32-bit RISC-V processor in SystemVerilog (a hardware description language) andteaches students how to write assembly and C code to run on their processors. We implementedthe diversity and inclusion activities in two sections of the same course (one section had 25students while the other had 30 students) taught by the same instructor.Getting Students to Know One AnotherThere exist many ‘ice-breaker’ techniques that can help students get to know one another [17].The technique we decided to use included weekly seat rotations (so that students would sit nextto different people each week
confidence in personal ability, expanding conceptions ofresearch, science and culture while increasing openness to employment outside the United States,and ability to relate to peers and professional scientists. These outcomes were present for bothcohorts, IRAP and R2R, with some instances of statistically significant increases pre- to post-participation despite the small counts of participants (IRAP = 18, R2R = 11). Several of theoutcomes parallel findings from prior support of international research experiences by TAMUSLSAMP (Preuss et al, 2020; Preuss, et al, 2021; Preuss et al, 2022). The survey findings fromsummer 2022 are presented as an initial data set that, while requiring verification throughreplication of programming in 2023 and beyond
for the 2019 summer cohort as to whatneeded to be cut from the schedule to accommodate a 6-week versus 10-week research program.It was decided that REM students would not need to prepare or present a research paper; instead,we asked that they only prepare and present a poster to capture their research. There were alsosome professional development topics that were either cut from their schedule or given in ashorter timeframe, especially with respect to writing research papers and pursuing differentcareer pathways.Design Element #1: Forging connection between theory, research, and application. Theprogram was designed to help deepen participants’ understanding of the connection betweentheory, research, and application, making them better
connected-automated Vehicle Technologies, Transportation Data Analytics, and Alter- native Fuel Vehicles. Dr. Bhavsar has published in peer reviewed journals such as the Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technology, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and the Environment and Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board. Dr. Bhavsar was pre- viously a postdoctoral fellow in a connected vehicle research program in the Glenn Department of Civil c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #18938 Engineering at Clemson University, where he worked on
project that will look good on theirresume, and assist landing a post education job or entering graduate school. For example, oneselected topic was “Forecasting Ford Motor Company (USA) Sales”. This project wasimplemented in R and used historical data, regression models, and a neural network. A secondtopic was an “Analysis and Model of Firearm Policy to domestic violence”. This project wassearching for a longitudinal relationship between changes in firearm policy, and changes indomestic violence rates. The project was implemented in Python. During the semester, studentsmeet at least every two weeks with an adviser, write a proposal, perform algorithm and codereviews, and provided demos of data collection and analysis progress. The class concludes
recommend it toother undergraduates. This REU will continue to strive to: 1) increase the number of undergraduatesparticipating in research projects focused on cancer related research; 2) increase communication of bio-inspired science and engineering to undergraduate peers, faculty and general audience; and 3) diversifythe supply of scientists and engineers contributing to American industries and economics as a whole.to a diverse audience; 3) diversify the supply of scientists and engineers contributing to American industriesand economics as a whole. We expected at least 6 out of the 10 undergraduate students enrolled in ourREU site to come from institutions outside NJIT and at least 60% from institutions with limited researchopportunities. We will
faculty cope with traditional engineering education sowe can target more effective ways of teaching and learning engineering to retain these groupsand make our problem solving and solution generation more effective. Using Collaborative Autoethnography to write a counterstoryIn this section, we discuss how we intend to use collaborative autoethnography and variouspotential elicitation techniques to write our counter-story. The first stage of our study will focuson the experiences of professors and students in engineering education.Autoethnography is the study of culture through autobiography. It lends itself well to studyingthe experiences of minoritized individuals while also providing a space for catharsis [24].Collaborative
writing, interview preparation, career fairs, etc.). 11. I regularly interacted with STEM students who planned to apply to and attend graduate school. 12. I regularly interacted with STEM students from different demographic groups (e.g., different races, genders, ages, etc.). 13. I received helpful information about STEM-related opportunities (e.g., research, academic, professional, etc.) from my student peers. 14. Overall, I was empowered by my professors' commitment to my academic success. 15. I had a STEM faculty member whom I considered as my mentor. 16. Overall, faculty members encouraged me to make connections with my classmates.Select-All-That-Apply and Multiple Choice Items: 17. Which of the
,performance, and value beliefs. A qualitative analysis showed that students mainly chose topursue a baccalaureate degree in engineering due to the financial reward, family influences,faculty support, and early childhood interest. Furthermore, students’ motivation to continue topursue an engineering degree was attributed to prestige, engineering experiences acquired,financial and academic support, faculty and peer support, and gain of engineering knowledgethroughout their academic journey.Implications of the study were: a) a set of small samples of data was analyzed, and b)examination of students belonging to a specific cohort. This cohort was provided with financialand academic support to navigate through their studies. Future studies could consist
newexperiences and learning opportunities; these abilities can be improved over time and areinfluenced by the connection students make with the learning experience (Kolb & Kolb, 2005).Both environmental and individual factors affect young women’s connection to learning in theclassroom, including differences in learning styles and the ability to connect relevance to thematerial being taught (Kulturel-konak et al., 2014).Several factors contribute to the problem of retention in engineering, including cognitive factorssuch as GPA and SAT math scores; non-cognitive factors like interactions with peers andprofessors; individual characteristics like family educational background, gender, and ethnicity;institutional characteristics like environment, type
atintersections, including the combination of ideas from multiple contexts9. However, returnersrepresent a relatively small proportion of engineering PhD students and the limited researchabout their experiences suggests they may face particular challenges in their doctoral studiescompared to their direct-pathway peers (students who pursue a PhD shortly after theirundergraduate education). In an effort to learn more about returners’ perspectives, experiences,research, and approaches to engineering problem solving, our team designed and implementedwhat is, to our knowledge, the first large-scale mixed-methods study comparing returning anddirect-pathway engineering PhD students. We draw on Eccles’ expectancy-value theory (EVT),which describes achievement
positive team experiences on average compared to ND and maybeND students. Other course experiences and self-reported learning gains did not differsignificantly between ND and NT students. On the Fall 2023 post-survey, the ND studentresponses were generally similar to those of their NT peers. In FYED courses with significantteam-based work, extra attention to team formation and/or facilitation may be beneficial.Engineering faculty should consider both the assets and the challenges that neurodivergentstudents face.IntroductionIt is important that engineering attract and retain students from a variety of backgrounds in orderto both meet the needs of society by filling job openings and provide diverse perspectives thatimprove engineered products and
marginalization in engineering settings, specifically focusing on students’ hiddenor non-apparent identities that their peers or professors are unaware of or maybe do not understand. Forrecruitment, we adopted an intentional nationwide strategy. We conducted 21 zoom interviews withstudents, each lasting 45 to 90 minutes and representing a variety of marginalized identity groups.As a way to establish rapport during the interview, we utilized a scaffolding strategy of showing aniceberg or identity wheel [14] containing many identities, including the concept that some identities aremore visible and/or apparent. In contrast, depending on context and person, some are less visible or non-apparent. Some prompts for all participants included: 1) How do you
institutions distinct fromstaff and undergraduate students. They are notably subject to elevated levels of stress associatedwith research, teaching, and publishing responsibilities as well as high levels of uncertainty withregards to advisor expectations, financial security, and career prospects [2]. The excessive levelsof stress and uncertainty around graduate school has contributed to a concerning mental healthcrisis, with one study identifying PhD students as nearly twice as likely to be experiencingpsychological distress than highly educated peers in the general public [3]. In graduate studentoriented spaces, negative aspects of academic culture are readily named and critiqued, especiallythrough online communities and anonymous online message
unpreparedness.Even so, faculty believed that scholars would benefit from a math “conditioning” mini-courseand academic support in the form of tutoring, supplemental instruction sessions, peer teaching,and science seminars, both with regard to academic success and self-confidence.Math Boot Camp: “Math Boot Camp” in an intensive mini-course designed to refresh students’mathematics knowledge and increase fluency so students feel equipped and confident in futurecourses. Mathematics preparedness is the single best predictor of college performance in science,and rigorous high school math courses benefits college biology, chemistry, and physics.15, 16Students whose coursework includes advanced mathematics such as Trigonometry or Calculusare the most likely to be