theoutcomes of student learning from the program of structured construction internships which are requiredfor the ABET-accredited, Bachelor of Science degree in Construction Engineering and Management atPurdue University.The term “internship” has a wide range of connotations in engineering education. In this study, and toextrapolate its conclusions, certain characteristics of an internship program and of the students’ status andexperience apply. An “effective internship” as used in this study is characterized by:a. Completing the internship assignment(s) is an integral component of the engineering degree program andconstitutes a significant educational objective of the program;b. The university takes an active role in the quality and the
Bioengineering and Director of the Engineering Education Research Center at Washington State University. He has led numerous multidisciplinary research projects to enhance engi- neering education. He currently leads projects creating and testing assessments and curriculum materials for engineering design and professional skills, especially for use in capstone engineering design courses. He has been a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education since 2002.Paul B Golter, Washington State University Paul B. Golter obtained an MS from Washington State University and recently defended his PhD degree and is currently the Laboratory Supervisor in the Voiland School of School of Chemical Engineering and Bio-engineering
engineering ideas and concepts to practical problems.It became evident in the development of the project based curriculum that one aspect of project Page 7.35.1based learning that is not typically addressed in engineering curricula is the integration of Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationengineering ideas into a larger business framework. The disconnect between the coupling ofbusiness/market forces and engineering training is often seen in the product design process.Engineering training often
Century, G. C. Weaver, Ed. West Lafayette, UNITED STATES: Purdue University Press, 2015.[47] P. C. Abrami, C. Poulsen, and B. Chambers, "Teacher motivation to implement an educational innovation: factors differentiating users and non-users of cooperative learning," Educational Psychology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 201-216, 2004/04/01 2004.[48] L. R. Lattuca and J. S. Stark, Shaping the college curriculum: Academic plans in context. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.[49] J. W. Dearing, "Applying diffusion of innovation theory to intervention development," Research on social work practice, 2009.[50] J. W. Forrester, "System dynamics and the lessons of 35 years," in A systems-based approach to policymaking: Springer
Fellowship. She is currently pursuing her Ph.D. in ECE at Northwestern University.Bugrahan Yalvac, Northwestern University BUGRAHAN YALVAC is a postdoctoral fellow in assessment studies for the VaNTH ERC at Northwestern University. He holds B.S. degrees in Physics and Physics Education and an M.S. degree in Science Education from METU, Ankara. For his Ph.D. studies at Penn State, he majored in Curriculum and Instruction and minored in Science, Technology, and Society (STS).Alan Sahakian, Northwestern University ALAN V. SAHAKIAN earned the Ph.D. in ECE at the University of Wisconsin - Madison in 1984. Since then he has been at Northwestern University where he is currently Professor of BME and
advantages into oursociety through cooperation. As mentioned earlier, the activities of international cooperation can be classified into three categories: personalexchanges, holding seminars/participating conferences, and conducting research projects. Although these activitiesdon’t necessarily act in any sequence, coordinating these activities closely improves the dissemination of the resultsof international cooperation. Building up individual connection through personnel exchange and then progressinginto cooperation of researchers to reach consensus for further collaboration is the most common collaborative modelfor most researchers. However, for an integrated proposal in which more researchers like to participate, a seminarwhich aims to
combines the academic disciplines of social science, organizationallearning, Industrial and Systems Engineering to support the design and implementation ofsustainable systems. Collective System Design is an integrative course for the SystemsEngineering Curriculum at Southern Methodist University. Students apply the CollectiveSystem Design methodology to design a sustainable lean manufacturing system as part of an in-class physical system design and simulation workshop. The students then apply CollectiveSystem Design within their own work environments. The result of the new system design is toidentify both hard savings and soft savings that show up on the bottom line for their company.Collective System Design uses a logic framework that defines the
Statics On-Line, an interactive multimedia collection of problems and lessonswhich forms an integral part of the statics course currently taught at UMR (2). Dr. Tim Philpot,while at Murray State University, created MD-Solids, used to enhance teaching of Mechanics ofMaterials. Since joining the faculty at UMR in 1999, he has continued to expand and refine thiswork (3). Dr. Nancy Hubing has recently created, using Flash®, some very effective modules forteaching and learning topics in Statics. (4) Page 7.656.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
in the Chemical Engineering Department at MIT. She is presently teaching teamdevelopment to chemical engineering students. Since completing the pilot project started in 1997 she has beendeveloping a curriculum in team work training that is being integrated into the chemical engineering curriculumfrom the undergraduate to the graduate course level.Appendix A Initial Team DialoguesGOALS1, What should be the team goals for your project?Student #l To work together in a cooperative manner such that the work that needs to be done is done (and donewell).Student #2 Team goals should include both project related goals as well as team work goals. For example, theteam should have an idea about what the project objectives, they wish to explore
ofsituations. The success of these maker spaces on the hobbyist, educational, and commerciallevels demonstrate that it is possible to expand and cater to various user bases while integratingprevious technologies. Secondary schools could use the principles of the maker movement tobetter integrate ER into their communities.Aside from engagement and exposure to STEM topics as part of an educational experience, thereis niche demand for Educational Robotics tools as a method of recruitment. This market hasformed in colleges and advanced technology institutions who use ERs as a way to recruitstudents or employees 9, 17; these projects can be classified as “exposure” projects. Theaforementioned studies describe ER programs that have the goal of exposing
). Page 26.813.1420 May, G.L.,” The Effect of Rater Training on Reducing Social Style Bias in Peer Evaluation,” Business Communication Quarterly, Vol. 71, No. 3, 297-313, September (2008).21 Ostafichuk, P.M., E.A. Croft, S.I. Green, G.S. Schajer and S.N. Rogak, “Analysis of Mech 2: An Award-Winning Second Year Mechanical Engineering Curriculum,” Proc. of EE2008, Loughborough, UK, July 2008.22 Michaelsen, L.K., M. Sweet, M., and D.X. Parmelee , Team-Based Learning: Small Group Learning’s Next Big Step. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2008).23 Sibley, J. and P.M. Ostafichuk , Getting Started with Team-Based Learning, Stylus, Sterling, VA (2014).24 Ostafichuk, P.M., Hodgson, A.J
been offered twice since Spring 2023, with a total enrollment of 15 students. It aims tointegrate first-year students into the MSE department and promote their academic successthrough activities including student panels and lessons on time management and wellness. TheMSE seminar is based on an academic success strategies course developed at the start of thepandemic that emphasized time management, wellness, and reflective change [28]. Both courseswere taught by department faculty and integrated significant peer interactions.This study had two research questions: (1) How do students perceive belonging in the two engineering departments? (2) Are there differences in students’ perceptions of belonging between students who
Project-Based Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education in Engineering R. Radharamanan Mercer University, Macon, GA 31207AbstractThis paper highlights project-based innovation and entrepreneurship education activitiesdeveloped and implemented at Mercer University School of Engineering (MUSE). MUSEpromotes entrepreneurial mindset among engineering students through curriculum development,extracurricular activities, and involvement of students in the entrepreneurship program. It hasdeveloped and implemented a course sequence to integrate elements of entrepreneurship inengineering courses; develop an entrepreneurial mindset in
Paper ID #19123Cultivating Evidence-Based Pedagogies in STEM EducationDr. Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University Bugrahan Yalvac is an associate professor of science and engineering education in the Department of Teaching, Learning, and Culture at Texas A&M University, College Station. He received his Ph.D. in science education at the Pennsylvania State University in 2005. Prior to his current position, he worked as a learning scientist for the VaNTH Engineering Research Center at Northwestern University for three years. Yalvac’s research is in integrated STEM education, implementation of evidence-based pedagogies
Paper ID #42689Ill-Structured Design Challenges in First-Year CoursesMadalyn Wilson-Fetrow, University of New MexicoProf. Anjali Mulchandani, University of New Mexico Dr. Anjali Mulchandani is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering at the University of New Mexico. She leads the Environmental Resource Sustainability group, which studies themes related to environmental and water resources engineering, atmospheric water harvesting, waste-to-energy technologies, and environmental remediation. Her work integrates and highlights science communication and community needs-based
2006-2646: WATER RESOURCES EVALUATION FOLLOWING NATURALDISASTER IN HAITIBruce Berdanier, Ohio Northern University Dr. Bruce Berdanier is currently an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering in the TJ Smull College of Engineering at Ohio Northern University. In this position, Dr. Berdanier is responsible for teaching all of the courses in Environmental Science, Water and Wastewater Treatment, Solid and Hazardous Waste, Surface Water Quality and Project Management that are included in the Civil Engineering curriculum. Additionally, Dr. Berdanier directs all teaching and research activities in the Environmental Engineering laboratory. Dr. Berdanier also conducts research in surface
Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Educators1 David Jonassen, Johannes Strobel, Chwee Beng Lee University of Missouri/Concordia University/Nanyang Technology University Many engineering programs have integrated problem-based learning (PBL) into their instruction. Quite often, the problems that are solved in PBL programs are not authentic. In order to develop more authentic problems that are required to prepare engineering graduates to solve complex, ill-structured workplace problems, we developed a case library of engineering problems as described by practicing engineers. The qualitative analysis of those stories showed that workplace problems are ill
nine U.S. patents. Page 22.1404.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Teaching Sustainability Analysis in Electronics Lecture CoursesAbstractBased on positive prior experiences teaching sustainability analysis in electronics laboratorycourses, this work explores techniques for teaching sustainability analysis in lecture courses. Asdifficult as it may seem to incorporate sustainability into integrated circuit courses or otherengineering courses, it may prove as easy as asking students to consider how the courseworkrelates to sustainability issues.The need to educate students “to
addition, it is anticipated that it will serve as acontinuing resource that students can return to regularly throughout their education and serve as aresource for practicing professionals. Farther reaching, this research is an integral part of alonger-term and broader vision to build an undergraduate “National Technological University”(NTU) for selected core courses in the engineering curriculum. It is anticipated that through Page 7.1291.15 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationcomputer-based
. Assessment and outcomes research has been done more vigorously in recentyears (see 19 for a comprehensive survey), and there have been many studies of design per se(e.g. 20, 21 ), and there are some assessment data on the impact of cornerstone project and designcourses.Olds and Miller9 reported that “average” engineering students at the Colorado School of Mines(CSM) recruited into a pilot integrated curriculum that was intended to allow students “todiscover and explore important connections among the humanities, physical and social sciences,and engineering subjects they studied in their first year at CSM” showed a 9% increase in the 5–year graduation rate, with much of the benefit being attributed to mentoring by senior faculty andthe development of
Paper ID #29366The Role of Timely Actionable Student Feedback in Improving Instructionand Student Learning in Engineering CoursesDr. Petros Sideris, Zachry Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University Dr. Sideris is an Assistant Professor at the Zachry Department of Civil and Environment Engineering at Texas A&M University, since 2017. Prior to joining Texas A&M, Dr. Sideris was an Assistant Professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder, where he also served as the Director of the Structures and Materials Testing Laboratory. He received his Master’s (2008) and Ph.D. (2012) in Civil
learning, and how tobetter infuse 21st century skills into the classroom. As a result, new teaching strategies arenecessary so that faculty can have deeper understanding of students and can develop moreconfidence in working with today’s students. Such new strategies will help the transformationand adoption of high impact educational technology, and deepen faculty’s passion for teachingand the process of learning. Collaborations between faculty and industrial partners can be an efficient approach toimprove engineering technology education [16-20]. Such collaborations may includecollaborative lab delivery, student research mentorship, senior design project supervision, etc.Such collaborations can not only get faculty familiar with resources
students aresupposed to be learning.While some of the equipment used does take some skill to build, none of the equipment used inthese demonstrations is expensive. As the reader will see most of the equipment is made from“junk” that is lying around ones house, office, or can be borrowed from another department atyour institution.We will try to organize the demonstrations in an order that a student might encounter the topicsin a standard mathematics curriculum at an institution where engineering is taught.DemonstrationsA. The cycloid curveThe first demonstration we will consider can be used in any calculus class where parametricequations are taught. This is a classical cycloid curve. To generate the curve we use a circularpiece of wood in which
nanoribbons (GNRs).Flexible foil substrate technology relies on embedding thermo-elements in epoxy [3]. Thisdesign is constrained by the level of epoxy thickness. Foil substrates are typically made offlexible epoxy film categorized as thin or thick and vary in thickness with an average 50 µm for Page 23.283.3thin and about 190 µm for thick. Thermocouple strips capable of generating voltage areembedded in the epoxy film [3]. Glatz et al (2006) argued that because of their limited thickness,thin film deposited materials have to be laid out lateral rather than vertical inducing thermallosses through the supporting material and limiting the integration
Paper ID #7758Variety of Community Partnerships in Related ProgramsMiss Sarah Marie Brown, Northeastern University Sarah Brown is a Ph.D. student in Electrical Engineering at Northeastern University, Draper Laboratory Fellow and a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow. She completed her B.S. in Elec- trical Engineering at Northeastern University in May 2011. In addition to her studies, Sarah has been an active member of the National Society of Black Engineers, having previously served as a chapter leader at Northeastern’s Black Engineering Student Society and as the National Technical Outreach Community
supports the afterschool program, Maker Meetup,and weekend K12 workshops through several mechanisms, including a Public ServiceEndowment Grant and faculty, staff and student partnerships across three campuses (UMass,Hampshire College, and Amherst College) and multiple departments.Perhaps most transformative is the integration of an experimental University “flipped”, servicelearning, Makerspace course with both the afterschool and Maker Meetup programs. In recentyears, several definitions of “flipped learning” have emerged. We refer to the common definitionrecently proposed by the Flipped Learning Network32, 33 - “Flipped Learning is a pedagogicalapproach in which direct instruction moves from the group learning space to the individuallearning
community with a survey of these differentmodalities of governance, which we define as any recognizable institutional arrangement orprocess that has an influence on the structure and content of engineering education. We also usethis paper to open up a conversation about the policy implications that follow from theseobservations.As a work in progress, the paper that follows limits itself to a general description of the contentwe expect to present during our poster session, with a focus on mapping out the nine modalitiesof governance that emerged most prominently in our data. More detailed empirical findings willbe presented during the poster session and integrated into a subsequent publication. In whatfollows, the implications of our work will be
] and sometimes distinguishing them is not easy. The project-led education hasbeen very popular in engineering programs since the 1990s [2]. The project-based learning isextensively being used for teaching engineering design through capstone or senior designcourses. This is partly due to requirements of accreditation bodies [2].Considering the fact that teaching and research are two most important functions of highereducation systems, the integration of them has been an attractive idea. However, as reported byHealey [4], there are strong feeling among academicians on relationship between research andteaching. While some believe “university research often detracts from the quality ofteaching”[5], other stated “courses taught by those at the
EWBprojects, with their explicit social justice mission, has already been shown to have a positive effecton students, attitudes towards community service, and career expectations [2–7]. Other work hasdocumented the effects of service learning participation on meeting ABET learning outcomes [6]and providing global engineering competencies [8, 9]. While the benefits of service learning forstudent education are enticing, there is also some evidence that participation in projects with localcommunities, in contrast to internationally-based field work, can achieve the same studentoutcomes in terms of technical and professional skills [10, 11].Integration of service learning into the curriculum also necessitates the consideration of impactson the
the disciplinary practices ofengineering they can develop technology and engineering literacy, understanding how thetechnological, human, and natural components of an engineering problem all affect each other.The findings from our interviews have implications for professional development. Mostprofessional development programs in engineering design focus on increasing teachers’ contentknowledge and introducing engineering curriculum.29 Our findings suggest that teachers need toalso be prepared to assess and respond in-the-moment to students’ engineering design. DuringNovel Engineering professional development, teachers watched classroom videos and interpretedstudent thinking in engineering, building on work in mathematics and science.30-32 By