student learning in the makerspace through faculty development," 2020, vol. 2020-, no. Conference Proceedings. [Online]. Available: https://go.exlibris.link/7Cvh3GHb. [Online]. Available: https://go.exlibris.link/7Cvh3GHb[8] M.-I. Carnasciali, S. M. Gillespie, and A. M. Hossain, "Integrating Makerspaces into the Curriculum - Faculty Development Efforts," 2021, vol. 2021-, no. Conference Proceedings, doi: 10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637230. [Online]. Available: https://go.exlibris.link/GvS4WdN9[9] P. C. Fonseca and G. W. Scherer, "An image analysis procedure to quantify the air void system of mortar and concrete," Materials and Structures, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 3087-3098, 2015/10/01 2015, doi: 10.1617/s11527-014-0381-9.
of the portfolio can be the student, a faculty member, anThe difficulty lies in understanding how the student administrator, or an organization; and the purpose of theexperiences learning within this broad conceptual space. How portfolio may be developmental, evaluative, and/ordo they connect learning in a course, a curriculum, or a representative. With the ever increasing use and advancementresearch or internship experience with their other activities? of technology, the electronic portfolio (ePortfolio) is emergingHow do they see how the interconnection amongst formal as a viable option to the traditional paper portfolio.” [6]curriculum and experiential learning activities influences
Paper ID #38531Biologically Inspired Design For High School Engineering Students (Workin Progress)Dr. Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Meltem Alemdar is Associate Director and Principal Research Scientist at Georgia Institute of Tech- nology’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing (CEISMC). Her research focuses on improving K-12 STEM education through research on curriculum development, teacher pro- fessional development, and student learning in integrated STEM environments. Dr. Alemdar is currently PI and co-PI on various NSF funded projects. Her expertise includes program
concept ofstudent engagement through innovation and entrepreneurship and who were committed tointegration of the space within and across the engineering curriculum. The committee agreed tomeet monthly during the academic year to evaluate equipment needs, listen to reports on facilityusage, and actively develop educational programs to foster innovation and entrepreneurshipamong the student body. Through funding made available by the Halliburton Foundation, facultymembers from the committee were able to travel to professional development courses to enhancetheir respective knowledge in emerging pedagogy surrounding innovation and entrepreneurship.Engagement became integrated. An operations manager was retained through the associate dean for
Session 2253 Introducing Mechatronics in a First-Year Intro to Engineering Design Course Sandra A. Yost, CSJ University of Detroit MercyAbstractThis paper describes an effort to integrate principles of mechatronics into the first-yearengineering curriculum at the University of Detroit Mercy. A newly designed introductorycurriculum is aimed at improving the retention of first-year engineering students by providingthem with hands-on, team-oriented, project-based, multidisciplinary instruction in engineeringdesign. The course is taught in four
Engineer in Florida.Dr. Richard Gilbert, University of South Florida Richard Gilbert is a Professor of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering at the University of South Florida’s College of Engineering . Richard is the Co-PI for the grant that supports the NSF designated Center of Excellence for Advanced Technological Education in Florida, FLATE. FLATE, now in its 13 year of op- eration, addresses curriculum, professional development, and outreach issues to support the creation of Florida’s technical workforce. Richard has over 30 years of experience working with the K-14 education community. Other funded efforts include projects for the NIH and the US Department of Education. The latter was for the development of an
-Flores Elizabeth Suazo-Flores is a post-doctoral research associate in the Department of Biological Sciences at Purdue University. Dr. Suazo’s central work is on exploring learners’ integration of different types of knowledge when working on tasks. Following Dewey’s (1938) theory of experience and Schwab’s (1969, 1983) conceptualization of curriculum, Dr. Suazo explored the concept of personal practical knowledge (Elbaz, 1981) with an eighth grade mathematics teacher. This construct encapsulates different ways of knowing that teachers refer to when interacting with their students. She has also explored K-12 learn- ers’ experiences working on STEM units and tasks involving real-world contexts. For example, as part
Education (VICE) is a simulation designed forconstruction education. The purpose was to provide the traditional lecture-based constructioncontents along with supplementary instructions in a project-based learning environment. Sixmodules were proposed as a curriculum delivery guideline including: single span bridge,residential building, light commercial, heavy commercial, highway, and segmental bridge. Thesingle span bridge was the first module used for prototype development providing an opportunityto design, analyze, implement, and test for effectiveness. This paper describes the design stepsand results of this three-year research project. VICE-Bridge required participants to sequentiallyorder the construction activities and then select the
university, since there are few parallels in otherdisciplines. Curriculum integration also induces drag, formally encoded in prerequisitestructures. Engineering knowledge has many sequential dependencies. Therefore, an ill-considered change early in a curriculum can have unexpected, dire consequences for laterlearning. Faculty expertise may also be a drag. Whether a desirable new topic must be learnedby existing faculty or else new faculty hired, progress must wait for these to be completed.2. The Rationale For An Engineering ApproachIn this setting of continual demands for change—to always add and never subtract, to overcomecost-induced drag, and yet to accomplish all within fixed constraints on time and otherresources—we have a real engineering
withinundergraduate engineering education. By undertaking a systematic literature review, this studyaims to fill this gap, providing a nuanced understanding of generative AI’s current applications,challenges, and future potential in engineering education.[4] The goal is to equip educators,policymakers, and curriculum architects with a solid foundation to innovate curricula that not onlymeet but anticipate the needs of the engineering profession in an AI-centric world [4-7].The evolving industrial landscape, increasingly defined by AI's integration into core engineeringpractices, demands a reevaluation of educational strategies. Traditional pedagogical models mustevolve to incorporate curricula that are both adaptive and anticipatory of rapid
theory and research.” [10]. While there areundisputable benefits to integrating design problems into the curriculum during the freshmanyear of engineering education, it's important to acknowledge that such integration often demandsa substantial commitment of faculty time and resources [15].Project Based LearningProject-based learning is an educational approach that promotes students to acquire a diverse setof skills and knowledge by creation of their own projects. This approach not only expands theirunderstanding but also develops problem solving abilities and critical thinking.This review article targets to explore the effectiveness of project-based learning in the freshmanyear of engineering education. In response to this educational trend
LearningAdditional guidance came from an examination of the best practices and curriculum content ofexemplar manufacturing engineering programs in the U.S. These included Brigham YoungUniversity, General Motors Institute (now Kettering University) and Worchester PolytechnicInstitute. Based on the input from the abovementioned sources and the specific stakeholders ofthe Texas State University Manufacturing Engineering program, the mission statement,educational objectives, and educational outcomes were developed.Mission StatementAfter several revisions made in consultation with the program’s stakeholders, the Texas StateUniversity Manufacturing Engineering Mission Statement was created. The Mission Statementfor the program is:Our mission is• To sustain a
pathways and illustrate the diverse backgrounds of successfultechnicians. Student participants are recruited from inner-city high schools as the targetpopulation is underrepresented populations in STEM disciplines.While CICSTART was originally planned as in-person, the leadership team decided to shift to avirtual environment as the pandemic caused the closure of community college campuses wherethe program was to be held. Each cohort of the program is held for five consecutive Saturdays.Program modalities and curriculum were modified to shift to an online experience. Students alsoreceived a BBC Micro:bit, which will be discussed later, as a way to maintain a hands-oncomponent during the virtual Saturday workshops.Zoom is utilized for
AC 2012-3655: PROPOSED KEEN INITIATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR EN-TREPRENEURIAL MINDEDNESS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONDr. Owe G. Petersen, Milwaukee School of Engineering Owe Petersen is Department Chair and professor of electrical engineering and Computer Science at Mil- waukee School of Engineering (MSOE). He is a former member of the technical staff at AT&T Bell Laboratories and received his Ph.D. degree from the University of Pennsylvania in 1971. His technical work ranges over topics such as optical data links, integrated circuit technology, RF semiconductor com- ponents, and semiconductor component reliable. He is a Senior Member of the IEEE and an ABET EAC Program Evaluator in electrical engineering.Dr. William M
. Page 25.403.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Design Tools: The Sophomore Course in a Four-Year Design SequenceAbstractThis paper describes the sophomore-level course in a recently developed four-year verticallyintegrated design sequence in the Department of Electrical Engineering at the University Parkcampus of The Pennsylvania State University. We briefly describe the motivation behindrevising the design curriculum and the integration of material among the four design courses. Wethen focus on the objectives, development and implementation of the sophomore-level course.Revising the Design CurriculumPresently, the Department of Electrical Engineering has forty-one faculty members who
this statement with the program outcomes for ABET Criteria 3 which includethe following3: 3c) An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability and sustainability; 3f) An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; and 3h) The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context.Thus, integrating the theory and practice of sustainability into a curriculum is a critical issue forengineering educators to address. We seek to examine how best to insert these criteria ofsustainability into our
are the 2000 Criteria, which permit greater programflexibility because of the focus on a systematic approach to engineering program management.ABET 2000 Criteria allow much more flexibility in the curriculum. For example, qualitativefactors are more important than assigned credit hours to a particular subject area. Thecurriculum emphasis in the 2000 Criteria is on coverage of basic information rather than specificcourses. Instructional delivery methods and alternatives for evaluating learning are alsodifferent. ABET 2000 Criteria require a provision to evaluate learning and ensure thateducational objectives are satisfied. The curriculum must be considered an ABET curriculumand satisfy the industrial engineering Program Criteria. Specifically
. Page 23.1283.3Therefore, a successful engineering curriculum must demonstrate the affects of both thoroughand partial research, celebrating the former and explaining the negative outcomes of the latter. 3Content knowledge, application, disciplinary integration, and teamwork combine within theEDP, making design-based projects an extremely meaningful learning experience. Step 9: Completion decision Step 1: Identify need or problem Step 2
iterative process: (1) understand cost and performance requirements,(2) analyze functions, (3) plan tasks, (4) model and prototype, (5) fabrication, and integration, (6)testing and evaluation, and (7) documenting and reporting progress. To train students in thisprocess, the electrical engineering curriculum includes an Electrical Systems Laboratory as a 2-credit final semester course. A design project is an important element of the course and constitutes50% of overall grade in the course. The topics include discrete components, integrated circuits(ICs), programmable logic controllers, and LabVIEW for test, measurement, and control.MethodologyAs a first step, students are grouped in teams of 2 to 3 members. Careful consideration is given toensure
- gineering and also has led multiple curricular initiative in Bioengineering and the College of Engineering on several NSF funded projects.Gabriella R Dupont, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign I am a MEng student in Bioengineering, with a BS, Bioengineering, both from University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. I am interested in biomechanics and how curriculum structure affects education outcomes. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Are we on Track with Tracks?It is challenging to achieve technical depth in an undergraduate Bioengineering curriculum dueto the implicit breadth of multidisciplinary technical content underlying the field. Moreover
have access to such resources.Writing has been effectively integrated into many senior design courses. Nevertheless, students’skills would be further developed if writing were included throughout the undergraduateengineering curriculum. But how can electrical engineering faculty do this? Research reportedin the literature describes constructivist and knowledge transformation frameworks of howwriting helps build knowledge in the sciences. Building on these theories, successful writingexperiences in engineering are “writing to communicate” rather than “writing to learn”. Thispaper highlights several key aspects of integrating effective “writing to communicate”experience into undergraduate electrical engineering courses by an engineering
engineering programs) to include (among other things) an abilityto function on multidisciplinary teams, an understanding of professional and ethicalresponsibility, and an ability to communicate effectively.5 In addition, national leaders ineducation cite the importance of a broad-based curriculum, a curriculum that is integrative andinterdisciplinary and emphasizes the non-technical aspects of engineering, including teamwork,communication skills, leadership abilities, and knowledge of ethics.4As students make the transition from student to professional, they are faced with many demands.What is becoming increasingly obvious is that technical ability is necessary, but not sufficient for
ABET and thedepartment’s industrial advisory committees asking for better integration of writing with theengineering concepts, the department chose to go with a new plan for improving writing andputting writing as an explicit goal for all department courses.The matrix approachThe department’s discussions on technical writing instruction led to thoughts about developing anew approach to writing in engineering. Maybe some student learning did not need to becontained in a 15-week, classroom format. The university had a few years of experience with“Writing Across the Curriculum,” a thoughtful plan to implement writing as a focus throughoutthe total general education experience. Championed by a professor in the English department, itis an approach
material and conduct assessments through online tools andplatforms, ensuring academic integrity and preventing academic cheating while doing so. It isvirtually impossible to use the course delivery and assessment methods previously used in face-to-face classroom setting without modifications for use in an online setting. The activitiespreviously used in a face-to-face classroom setting have to be replaced with similar activitieswhich are conducive to be used in an online setting.The course delivery methods and instructional activities part aside, assessments methods must bemodified as well for use in an online setting. While one of the reasons being that some of theassessment methods cannot be effectively used in an online setting, the other
new production systems has created the need to update the competencies which employersseek in graduates of manufacturing engineering technology programs. Today’s engineers arebecoming an integrator, and a coordinator of information, technology, and people. Teamworkand people skills play an important role in the work of the future manufacturing engineers. Thisprinciple of integrating the environment must be reflected in manufacturing education. Forgraduates of manufacturing engineering technology programs to succeed in the manufacturingenterprise, they must possess the competencies that the employer desires.PurposeThe purpose of this presentation is to report the findings of a survey based on competencies thatemployers identified to be
curriculum and instructional methods innovel ways. For example, students may be practicing CAD or drafting skills, but the instructortakes them to a children’s museum and assigns a redesign of exhibits for increased accessibilityor the curriculum may analyze civil engineering case studies leading up to the Olympic Games.Instructors have also combined disciplines in novel ways. An engineering course may integrate awriting unit to support first-year engineering students or simulate real-world contexts withcorresponding tools and materials. Tembrevilla and colleagues [7] further suggest that studentsmay benefit from a variety of experiential assessment strategies at multiple timeframes.Innovations in assessments include students creating “The Elevator
education, When asked about the overall usefulnessof ChatGPT for enhancing the learning experience, 68% of respondents expressed a positiveopinion, suggesting that ChatGPT is perceived as a valuable asset contributing to a moreenriching learning experience.Additionally, when considering recommendations, 31% of participants expressed a definiterecommendation for ChatGPT as an educational tool, while 44% leaned towards a probablerecommendation.The survey also gauged students’ interest in further integration of ChatGPT or similar AI toolsinto their college’s curriculum. A majority of participants, comprising 58%, expressed a positiveinclination, either wanting somewhat more integration (38%) or significantly more integration(20%).In conclusion, the
, devices, and organizations, for allaspects of human learning. It is not technology in education or instructional technology but theseare becoming increasingly important in educational technology, as it impacts instructionaldesign, educational applications of computer technologies, educational application oftelecommunications and even curriculum improvement. The convergent classroom is becominga reality based on educational technology. Convergent TechnologyConvergent technology is the functional integration of audio, visual, computing, andcommunication technologies31. Internet access is becoming standard. Digital technologies areenabling creation of interactive media-rich content. Increasing bandwidth and better
their own abilities in those areas. Technology, as stated, isanother area of opportunity. From effective use of the Internet, to providing ideas for topicillustration, to actually teaming with a teacher to teach a Web Page Creation elective for studentsin grades 3-5, our engineering students are proving to be a valuable resource to our teachers.Finally, NCSU students are developing, with guidance from curriculum experts known to theschools, inquiry-based, integrated science lessons for teacher delivery.From an extracurricular standpoint, there are opportunities for engineering students to work asmentors on science fair projects and Science Olympiad teams. The role model aspect in theseoften-voluntary events is crucial, especially for
prosthetics to tissueengineering to bioinformatics [1]. As the field continues to evolve, undergraduate biomedicalengineering programs have also continued to grow and evolve. To support the needs of thegrowing field, biomedical engineering (BME) curricula were established as broad andinterdisciplinary, integrating knowledge from both basic sciences and engineering disciplines.This training prepares graduates for a wide variety of careers in medicine, government, andindustry. The first BME programs were accredited by ABET in the early 1970s [2] and at presentthere are 139 programs accredited, with new programs accredited each year [3].In an effort to define the core content of a BME undergraduate curriculum, the VaNTHcurriculum project identified key