high school biology teacher, he is now an educational research and program evaluation specialist with experience on a broad range of projects funded by NSF, US Department of Education, ONR, and NIH and with participants ranging from elementary school to higher education. Much of his work focuses on broadening participation in STEM.Dr. Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington Elizabeth Litzler, Ph.D., is the director of the University of Washington Center for Evaluation and Re- search for STEM Equity (UW CERSE) and an affiliate assistant professor of sociology. She has been at UW working on STEM Equity issues for more than 17 years. Dr. Litzler is a member of ASEE, 2020-2021 chair of the ASEE Commission on
institutions need to makesure their graduates stay up to date with the latest trends in computer science research, gainhands-on and teamwork experience, and be good problem solvers before graduation. In thispaper, we will elaborate the steps that should be taken by the institutions of higher education inorder to graduate students with these types of qualities and be more prepared for the job market.Hands-on ExercisesThe learning style for current generation has changed. Experience shows that many students donot spend very much of their time on reading textbooks. They do not enjoy reading the theory,but they really enjoy learning by doing. Working on homework and exercises is not appreciatedby them but they really like implementing the projects and
of engineering design constraints, and applying the entrepreneurial mindset to first-year programming projects through student engagement in educational software development. Estell earned his BS in Computer Science and Engineering degree from The University of Toledo and both his MS and PhD degrees in computer science from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Work in Progress: Tackling DEI Issues in the Classroom Through Interactive Historical FictionIntroductionSince its release as a video game in the 1980s, The Oregon Trail has taught and inspired
• train a growing workforce spanning the full supply chain• De-risked technology development in a highly regulated industry that is facilitated by collective action and collaboration with NIST and FDA• Participate in collaborative projects. • For deployment of technology, scale-up and regulatory science • For applied RD&D to de-risk process development• Opportunity to share in IP addressing shared challenges.• Partnership to train a workforce for producing, testing, A M E R I C A N I N N O VAT I O N AT W O R K and regulating products at scale
Community-Based Learning: Student Outcomes Kurtis G. Paterson, Ph.D., P.E. Michigan Technological University Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringAbstractInitiated in Fall 2006 with the help of a NSF grant, this program engages engineeringstudent teams in community-based learning (CBL) outside La Paz, Bolivia. CBL isdefined as learning via working with and in a community in need of engineering (orother) services. This paper will present student participation, project results, and lessonslearned to date.The four main goals of this CBL experience are: (1) to produce engineers with a bettersense of the societal and global interconnections of
collaboration data mining project with Bristol Myers Squibb pharmaceutical company, Rowan University Seed grant for a study of statistical and data mining techniques in the field of network security and computer forensics, as well as College of Science and Mathematics grant for evaluation of data classification techniques. I also am performing Biomarker research aimed at optimizing and verifying c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #17920the utility of autoantibody biomarkers for early diagnosis-Biomarker Discovery Center at Rowan SOM.Where I ensure that all of the data evaluation strategies and
” activities is an increased sense of agency – self confidence in theability to complete projects and make change in the world [3, 4]. While there is good evidencethat agency and self-efficacy are critical for student success [5], relatively little is known aboutwhat agency looks like in maker contexts, nor how it develops over time. In this paper, weinvestigate if and how student agency develops within a high school maker program.Theoretical FrameworkSelf-efficacy is an individual’s belief in their ability to complete tasks in a given domain [6]. Arobust body of literature has shown that individuals’ self-efficacy is an important predictor oftheir likelihood of engaging, persisting, and successfully participating in many academicdomains [7], and is
these camps, students are introduced to and work with Lego Robotics in addition topreparatory skills from science, technology, engineering, and math. The use of these programswill create more opportunities to educate students about the fundamentals of engineering usinginnovative, fun and exciting projects.1. HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT DATAElectrical engineering undergraduate program at Prairie View A&M University (PVAMU) hadan enrollment of over 500 students in 1991. In 2001, our enrollment had decreased to 250students. By 2004, our enrollment had increased to 307, however the next year we were able to Page 12.1229.2maintain above 300. The
other types of multimedia that augment learningwith content that is interactive, engaging, and readily available. Lectures, in-class demos, andlaboratory projects for the Rose-Hulman ECE481 music synthesis and audio signal processingcourse, have been deployed as a set of learning modules hosted on Connexions(http://www.cnx.org), encouraging free distribution, customization, and localization of thecontent. The course materials include “screencasts” – narrated videos of computer screenactivity. The screencasts embody the theoretical exposition with handwriting, diagrams, andanimations drawn on a tablet device, and also demonstrate LabVIEW programming techniquesto implement the concepts. In addition, downloadable LabVIEW simulations (VIs) offer
AC 2008-2277: NORTH TEXAS STEM CENTER: AN ENGINEERS PERSPECTIVEJames Morgan, Texas A&M UniversityLuciana Barroso, Texas A&M University Page 13.934.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 North Texas-STEM Center: An Engineer’s PerspectiveAbstractCan engineering professors really help high school teachers? We think YES – college freshmanare little different than high school seniors in terms of academic and social development. Theexperiences from National Science Foundation funded engineering coalitions, as well as otherengineering education projects over the past couple decades, can certainly apply to math andscience education at the high
instrumentation. The second is taught duringthe fall of the senior year and covers digital signal processing. A design project in the second course requiresstudents to synthesize the concepts from both courses and use them to design and build a completeinstrumentation system. John Webster’s text, “Medical Instrumentation,” is used for the first course andWillis Tompkin’s text, “Biomedical Digital Signal Processing,” is used for the second course 1,2.NEED FOR HANDS-ON LABORATORY EXPERIENCE “Engineers put things together to make things that haven’t been around before.” - Joe Bordogna,NSF. Assuming this description of what engineers do to be accurate, an engineers training should bestructured to allow the prospective engineer time to do engineering
Paper ID #17644University as Partner: Building Professional Relationships between Construc-tion Programs and Their InstitutionsDr. James W. Jones, Ball State University Dr. James W. Jones is the Construction Management Program Director and an Associate Professor in Ball State University’s Department of Technology. He has taught in the areas of leadership and construction management for more than 14 years and has more than a decade of experience managing construction projects in both field and office environments. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 University as Partner
in your applicationmaterials and/or recommendation letters include: Research experience (volunteer or paid work in a lab; independent study with a faculty; extensive research or design projects completed as part of coursework; research or problem solving skills developed through internships or work experience) Industry experience (volunteer or paid internships; opportunities to solve problems, test equipment, investigate materials, give presentations, work in a team, etc.) Leadership experience (serving as an officer in student organizations; organizing an event or activity; leading a research or project team, etc.) Teamwork skills (working effectively with others to solve problems or complete
Paper ID #20028REU Site: Solar Energy Research for the Terawatt ChallengeProf. Zachary Holman, Arizona State UniversityDr. Michelle Jordan , Arizona State University Michelle Jordan is as associate professor in the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State Uni- versity. She also serves as the Education Director for the QESST Engineering Research Center. Michelle’s program of research focuses on social interactions in collaborative learning contexts. She is particularly interested in how students navigate communication challenges as they negotiate complex engineering design projects. Her scholarship is grounded in
students’ effectiveness as team membersworking together on a final design project and presentation. A new integration program wasimplemented for six sections of a Design Thinking course during the Fall 2016 semester, whileanother six sections of the introductory Design Thinking course were taught without the formalintegration. In both classes, a multi-part team project was assigned for the last half of thesemester. Teams were periodically asked to rate each team member’s performance using theComprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness (CATME) tool. By analyzing theresults of this peer evaluation in integrated versus non-integrated format of the course, weexamine the student contributions and grades in the final project and their
Paper ID #9730Work in Progress: International BME Capstone and Summer Design Expe-rienceProf. Mark A. Ruegsegger, The Ohio State University Mark Ruegsegger is currently an Associate Professor of Practice in the Department of Biomedical Engi- neering at Ohio State University. He has a curricular focus on the Senior Design capstone course, which includes multi-disciplinary teams of BME, Mechanical Engineering, Occupational & Physical Therapy, and other Medical and Engineering disciplines. Each project team builds a device that provides assis- tance to those with disabilities, or projects with other clinical or
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 3D Printer from Scratch Made with e-WasteASTRACTIn this project we present our idea about building a 3D printer based on the recycled electroniccomponents. The motivations for us to work on the project are (1) 3D printing technology asnext industrial revolution has caught wide attention around the world. With the development ofthe technology, a custom part that would previously take a great deal of time and money for aprofessional manufacturer to produce can now be made much quicker at a very low cost.Particular for college engineering education, students can produce different innovative parts fortheir new designs for robots or unmanned aerial vehicles using a self-made
Definition 0 No evidence of achievement 1 Limited evidence of achievement 2 Adequate evidence of achievement 3 More-than-adequate evidence of achievement 4 Substantial evidence of achievementThere is a very good synopsis,3on the definitions of rubrics which also referred to the manyreasons as to why rubrics should be employed.4Our old rubrics as shown above lack the clarity as to what to give the scores on.The D.O.S couldbe explained as follow: for each of the outcome under consideration, the assessing faculty wouldexamine the specific evidence (test, homework, project, paper, etc.) of student work and
Paper ID #16905Integrating Ethical Considerations In DesignDr. Megan Kenny Feister, Purdue University, West Lafayette Megan is a postdoctoral researcher in EPICS at Purdue University with a Ph.D. in Organizational Commu- nication from the Brian Lamb School of Communication from Purdue University. Her research focuses on design, organizational identity, identification and socialization, team communication, innovation, and technology. She is currently working on an NSF grant examining ethical reasoning and decision-making in engineering project teams, and examining the relationship between teams and individuals in engineer
Paper ID #15475WORK IN PROGRESS: A Study on Student Feedback Regarding the Us-ability of Online LaboratoriesMr. Christian Kreiter MSc, Carinthia University of Applied SciencesMr. Danilo Garbi Zutin P.E., Carinthia University of Applied Sciences Danilo G. Zutin is currently a Senior Researcher and team member of the Center of Competence in Online Laboratories and Open Learning (CCOL) at the Carinthia University of Applied Sciences (CUAS), Vil- lach, Austria, where he has been engaged in projects for the development of online laboratories, softtware architectures for online laboratories and online engineering in general. Danilo
from each subject, Technology,Communications, and English, collaborate and weave the curricula together to form thoseexplicit connections. An example of this collaboration is a final project that is developed acrossall three disciplines and presented as a culmination of their work in all three courses.The purpose of this paper is to explore research methods and assess the validity of using theEngineering Design Process Portfolio Scoring Rubric (EDPPSR) to analyze students’ finaldesign journals in both integrated and non-integrated sections. This Rubric is intended tomeasure students’ abilities to document their design processes. For this paper, multipleresearchers evaluated artifacts using the EDPPSR evaluation rubric. This pilot study will
will learn and get hands-onexperience with quality engineering software which will be enhanced further by working onsemester projects involving analysis of real world projects and published case studies. Further,the paper also outlines the teaching modules and modalities to enhance the learning outcomes ofthe subject.Course objectives and outcomesThis course will expose students to modern quality philosophies and advanced qualityengineering techniques. Topics include fractional factorial design, advanced statistical processcontrol techniques, and correlation and regression analysis to understand the relationshipamongst quality factors. The course will prepare students to take positions such as lead qualityengineer or engineering technologist
AC 2007-2133: INTRODUCING FRESHMEN TO CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATINGAND SCHEDULING USING K’NEX BRIDGE KITSCarol Considine, Old Dominion University Carol L. Considine is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering Technology at Old Dominion University. She joined the faculty of Old Dominion University in fall 1999. She has fifteen years of industrial experience in construction estimating and project management. She received her B.S. in Civil Engineering from Virginia Tech and her M.S. in Civil Engineering from the University of California at Berkeley.Vernon Lewis, Old Dominion University Vernon W. Lewis, JR. P.E., Senior Lecturer, is Program Director of Civil Engineering Technology at Old Dominion
engineeringcurriculum at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. This sequence of courses provide a platformfor students to develop and improve their oral and written communication skills. After taking afreshman engineering design course, each student admitted to biomedical engineering in thesophomore year does a team design project each semester for six sequential semesters. Theteams work on progressively more challenging real-world projects submitted by clients fromaround the university and from industry. While advancing their technical and problem-solvingskills through successive projects, the students also learn interpersonal and publiccommunication skills through this experience.IntroductionBeginning in 1998, we started teaching a sequence of design courses
design projects andultimately as alumni. Is the introduction in second year working? Are our senior students andalumni using CAD/CAE intelligently or are they using it as a black box? We opted to use recentcapstone design projects to provide some initial feedback. These projects have been conducted Page 11.340.3by students who have experienced our second year courses.Capstone design projects at Guelph are identified and developed by the students and completedin a single semester. Teams are typically made up of 3-4 students. Actual product development,prototyping and industrial collaborations are encouraged. Each design team has a faculty
developments of comparing the use of LabVIEW (agraphical programming language) to MATLAB (a text-based language) in teaching discrete-timesignal processing (DSP).This paper presents the results of using both methods in a junior-level introduction to DSP class.The students who enter this class have had a course in continuous-time signals and systems butno DSP theory background. The class uses the text “Signal Processing First”, by McClellan,Schafer, Yoder, published by Prentice Hall, to introduce discrete-time signal processing. In thepast, a series of MATLAB based mini-projects were used in addition to homework to reinforce theDSP concepts. The new version of the class uses the same mini-projects except that they arebased on LabVIEW.Several quarters
. She has a total of over nineteen years of teaching experience including other schools such as Michigan Technological University, University of North Dakota, and Virginia Tech. Noel is active in teaching, research and service. She enjoys teaching electrical engineering and power engineering topics to students. In research and graduate studies, she has been very active having graduated 40 MS and 12 PhD students; published 160 papers and 2 book chapters; and brought in over $10 M in external research through individual and collaborative projects including an U.S. National Science Foundation CAREER award. She has been active in the IEEE Power & Energy Society serving as Secretary from 2004-2007, Treasurer
introductory design experience with some linkageto a concurrent Graphics course2. Elements of teaming, project management, economics andeffective communication are included. The second half of the course is focused on a major teamproject to build a robot that can negotiate obstacles and fulfill a prescribed task in competitionwith the robots from other teams. The project introduces students to sensors, algorithmdevelopment and microprocessor programming, and it is also fun! The design sequence continuesin the 2nd semester of Freshman year with a design course that strongly links to a Mechanics ofSolids lecture course3. The third design course links to the Thermodynamics and EnergyConversion course4. These design laboratories further advance the
faculty in architectural engineering and construction science and management at Kansas State University in Jan. 2008. She received her B.S.A..E from K-State in 2001 and com- pleted her M.S.A.E. from K-State in 2010 related to curriculum development in architectural engineering and construction science with regards to building information modeling. Vogt is currently pursuing her Ph.D. in electrical and computer engineering with an emphasis in engineering education/outreach under the supervision of Dr. Noel Schulz. During 2001-2008, Vogt was employed full-time with Affiliated Engineers, Inc., a national engineering consulting firm in Madison, Wis. where she held several roles, including project manager, project engineer
nearly all engineering development contracts. TheRFP specifications used in the courses are adapted from actual equipment specifications used inthe procurement of major system development, such as a redundant air traffic control computersystem and a digital telephony switch.Teams are chosen by the instructor and, as far as practical, contain equal numbers of ComputerScience, EE students, graduates, and undergraduates.The major benefits of the RFP methodology and the significant award (exemption from the finalexam) are: • Generating an extremely high level of interest, which is a key to learning. • Developing lively and interactive project presentations, since each team has worked on the same design