lessons, students improve their recall ability, apply their existing knowledge, constructnew ideas, and formulate their own questions. Moreover, by engaging in group-work, studentsare afforded opportunities to share their discoveries and explanations with their peers, thusconcretizing their understanding of newly learned concepts. We posit that linking robotics-basedlessons with Bloom’s cognitive domains can allow students to draw connections between diverseSTEM concepts, apply their learning to new situations, and control their own learning. The example lessons address typical educational objectives of K-12 STEM disciplinesand strengthen students’ ability to learn the subject material. Three lessons, based on LEGOMindstorms robotics, are
the purposeof the project and the specific research and writing strategies one selects. Adams and colleagues,for example, examine “storytelling in engineering education” with the explicit goal of betterunderstanding the emergence of an “engineering education research community.” Their focus is,in other words, accounting for an observed convergence and possibly contributing further to it.They invited eight scholars, including three co-authors, to prepare “story poster” presentations atthe national Frontiers in Education conference (supported by the IEEE). The organizers askedpresenters to respond to a structured set of questions designed to evoke “insider knowledge”pertaining to “driving passions and goals, processes such as getting started
Education”the card they were holding to stand up as I went through the questions. This way the students were notreporting their own answers. The results were quite revealing. Of 54 students in the class: ! 42 said they would report ethical misconduct where they were employed ! 52 admitted to downloading music and not buying the CD ! 40 admitted to downloading movies ! 29 admitted to cheating on an exam or quiz ! 19 said they would report someone they knew was cheating on an examThe class was concluded with a short “quiz.” I asked each student to reflect and write down the twomore important things they learned from the discussion in class. A number of students were surprisedat how wide spread the
, were most likely to report changes in their emphasis onteamwork (52%), technical writing (39%) and verbal communication (34%). Nearly a thirdreported some or significant increases in their emphasis on professional responsibility and ethics.Faculty also reported moderate changes in attention to contemporary issues (43%), global andsocial contexts in engineering (41%), professional responsibility (37%), and professional ethics Page 22.1711.4(34%). Attention to topics that would promote interdisciplinary connections appeared to be onthe rise after EC2000.Although these curricular changes are positive, because this study measured change in
organizationsas “creating value” in the same way that technological innovation is [9], [10]. These types oflower-recognition tasks also can include “office housework”—planning social events, gettingcoffee for colleagues, coordinating meetings. Some of these tasks carry more organizationalsignificance than do others, as they can sustain networks, communication, and projectmomentum, but few are rewarded in the way that strategic stretch work can be; Babcock et al.[8] write that these are tasks people generally do not want to do as part of their jobs and wishwould be completed by others.And yet some groups do them, and do them more than other groups do, even among those in thesame profession and role. Sociological and economic research shows that gender
]. Thus, understanding the challenges that women face in the engineering workforce,including but not limited to sexual harassment, is critical to bringing the benefits of this diversityof thought into engineering and reducing the large numbers of women engineers who begin acareer in engineering and later decide to leave [8]. The peer reviewed literature provides insightinto which women are leaving engineering and why, but gaps remain in workplace studies toprovide a sufficiently comprehensive understanding of what’s going on so that major stepsforward are possible.Women in the WorkplacePre-Twentieth Century: The assumption that women have not contributed to institutional worksettings or the incomes of their families prior to the twentieth century
and found that it engendered positive attitudes toward their chosen fieldof study.The Engineering Projects in Community Service (EPICS) at Purdue University is a well-knownexample of service learning in engineering education. The program was established in Fall 1995and continues as of the writing of this paper in Spring 2022. A report from 2001[4] reflected onthe program to that point. Project partners who are service agencies that work with student teamscomposed of freshman through senior level undergraduate engineering students in a wide varietyof engineering disciplines. Design solutions are created, implemented, and supported by thestudents. Assessment was thorough, including student awareness of how their projects impactedtheir clients.A
. They leverage industry tradeshows and conferences inspecific industries, giving research teams the opportunity to introduce themselves, pitchideas to technology decision makers, arrange follow-on meetings to get feedback on thebest paths forward, and identify key milestones.Workshops: These focus on topics such as writing effective Small Business InnovationResearch (SBIR) proposals to participating national funding agencies. They familiarizeparticipants with funding opportunities and offer best practices for applications.Evaluating Large Scale Education and Training ProgramsLarge scale education and training programs require an evaluation component tounderstand impact, which can include changes in student learning over time or othermeasures of
, student- centered online learning environments for educators.Dr. Gillian Roehrig, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities Dr. Roehrig is a professor of STEM Education at the University of Minnesota. Her research explores issues of professional development for K-12 science teachers, with a focus on beginning teachers and implementation of integrated STEM learning environments. She has received over $30 million in federal and state grants and published over 80 peer-reviewed journal articles and book chapters. She is a former board member of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching and past president of the Association for Science Teacher Education.Dr. Elizabeth A. Ring-Whalen, St. Catherine University
. I’m nervous that they’re gonna be like,man, she doesn’t know anything. But otherwise, no, [I’m not nervous]. I think just because it'shands-on, I feel prepared for it, you know, like as far as my technical writing skills and my teamwork skills and my people skills and that kind of stuff.[Now that I’ve been at work for 3 months] Mostly my responsibilities are just doing whateveranybody tells me to do, so that can range anywhere from working on [specific softwarepackage], which is something that I actually know how to do personally … or working on areport or attaching wires or testing some sort of a component. I’m not having to learn a whole lotyet, but for the stuff that I’m doing, I feel completely prepared for it. [...] I read up on
experience focused only on membrane electrode assembly (MEA) components and performance. Good hands-on experience. Want to eventually work at TARDEC.B-27) Any other comments about your participation in the LTU-TARDEC Fuel Cellresearch group?: Not only did I learn about Fuel Cells while working on this project, but I also got to learn about design and implementation of experiments, was involved in test stand development and about interaction with peers, superiors and clients. The progress and involvement in the LTU-TARDEC research group nearly eliminated the learning curve that I would have required to become fully successful at an engineering company. There is no doubt in my mind that the knowledge I
specific as using a new design tool or performing aspecific task (e.g., a weighted decision matrix); documenting and/or considering a new criterion,constraint, or focus area (e.g., users, marketability); or adhering to new project managementstructure (e.g., a set of milestones/deadlines).In some cases, these approaches were restrictive initially. For example, Hannah felt that thedocumentation aspect detracted from her technical design work, which was where she believedinnovation was occurring. We have this big design document... It's a 15 or 16 page document that we had to write about the project partner… So, obviously, we wanted to record what went on. Each failure, why it went wrong, things like that. But a lot of it was like
]. Given thelimited time of the survey, we used a short ten-item measure for the BFPT. The BFPT wereapplied successfully multiple times in Entrepreneurship Research [6]. The operationalizationof the BFPT as well as the other SCCT constructs are described in the following.Despite its shortness the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) from Gosling et al. [1] hasproven its validity many times. Gosling suggests using the TIPI, if a very short measure isneeded due to time constraints or if you “can tolerate the somewhat diminished psychometricproperties associated with very brief measures” [1]. Also, Gosling found that TIPI has “(a)convergence with widely used Big-Five measures in self, observer, and peer reports, (b) test–retest reliability, (c
the design process and 15% on the performance of theprototype (performance specifications and design constraints are provided to each team as is therubric that will be used to evaluate the performance). Each student completes a confidential peerevaluation of the team members at the end of the project. Individual student grades are acombination of the team grade (75%) and an individual grade based on the logbook (5%) and theconfidential peer evaluations (20%). The design project task is necessarily simple as there is nolab component of the course and students complete the project primarily outside of class.“Real-world” examplesAs noted, one of the objectives of the course design is to enable first year engineering students tobecome engaged
competitions. We found differences between the teams in recruiting,team structure and organization, student leadership, faculty advisors, expectations forcommitment, integration into academic structure (capstone), and focus on competition success.In spite of the differences in team organization and goals, both teams missed opportunities forstudents to acquire and practice important professional skills. Neither team providedopportunities for formal learning about leadership and management, nor experience andmentorship for working with a diverse group of peers (e.g. diversity from race, gender, socio-economic status, or major discipline). The most egregious missed opportunity within these teamswas, and is for many teams, the vast number of students who
Page 26.1211.21partnership involving Georgia Tech and Emory University. In 2012, U.S. News & World Reportranked the department’s undergraduate and graduate programs second in the nation inbiomedical engineering. Finally, research leaders who purposely cultivate relationships between universities andgovernment entities may realize more innovation success. Partnerships with government officialsresponsible for writing funding solicitations may inform the direction of solicitations andincrease chances of winning the funding. University and industry leaders can alert governmentofficials of the most pressing needs for research, beyond selfish political lobbying. Researchleaders can also benefit from fostering a university‒government
enhance his or her performance or productivity,while perceived ease of use refers to the extent to which an individual believes that using aparticular technology will be easy and effortless [13]. It has been demonstrated that both (U) and(E) are important predictors of people's intentions to use technology, which eventually results inreal usage behavior [14], [15]. Figure 1. Adapted Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) [15]TAM also incorporates external variables that may influence individuals' attitudes and behaviortoward technology, such as social influence and facilitating conditions [13]. Social influencerefers to the extent to which an individual's behavior is influenced by the opinions of others, suchas peers and colleagues
, based in science.”Interestingly, despite our explicit prompt to discuss engineering culture, very few participants framedtheir responses in cultural terms. Instead, they spoke about the engineering-intensive work they did thatbrought them career satisfaction. The prominence of technical affinity in the responses of racializedwomen was also noteworthy. This finding challenges the implicit, and somewhat essentialistassumptions about women in general, and racialized women in particular, underlying recruitment andretention efforts that magnify the socio-emotional features of engineers’ work in order to diversify theprofession. Racialized women, just like their peers, tended to speak about “nerd
educators. 11-13 One key idea with respect to co-teaching is that each co-teacher has a unique,professional skill set to offer the classroom environment. Having two classroom teachersteaching together (i.e., team teaching), while potentially helpful, does not have the same spirit ofco-teaching where a combination of different skill sets provides a unique benefit to the learningenvironment. 10 For example, in one case study of elementary science co-teaching, the classroomteacher was regarded as the “science content expert” and the special educator was regarded asthe “adaptation expert”. 14 Although each co-teacher’s skill set has unique elements, co-teachers are peers withregard to level of certification, helping to ensure that “they
online game spent more timewith its connected course content, pursued opportunities to make-up late/missed assignmentsmore, and self-reported higher motivation to learn course material in comparison to the controlgroup of students who did not engage in the online gaming experience. Coller and Shernoff (2009) redesigned a traditional numerical methods course, DynamicSystems and Control, to be centered around an engineering video game, NIU-Tores incorporatedinto an existing open-source video game called Tocs (www.torcs.org) on fifty-one 3rd and 4th –year engineering students. In this study, students were tasked with writing computer programs torace a simulated car around a track. An Experience Sampling Method (ESM) was used tomeasure