Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bonnie Ferri, Georgia Tech; JillL L. Auerbach, Georgia Institute of Technology; Jennifer E. Michaels, Georgia Institute of Technology; Douglas B. Williams, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

Controls Laboratories,” Proceedings of theAmerican Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR.[7] R.W. Hendricks, K.M. Lai, and J.B. Webb, 2005, ”Lab-in-a-Box: Experiments in Electronic Circuits ThatSupport Introductory Courses for Electrical and Computer Engineers,” Proceedings of the American Society ofEngineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR.[8] B. Ferri, S. Ahmed, J. Michaels, E.Dean, C. Garvet, S. Shearman, , “Signal Processing Experiments Wit LEGOMINSTORMS NXT Kit for Use in Signals and Systems Courses,” Proceedings of the American ControlConference, St. Louis, pp. 3787-3792., June 2009.[9] B. Ferri, J. Auerbach, H. Qu, “Distributed Laboratories: A Finite State Machine

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Schneider, Cornell University; Maria Terrell, Cornell University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

concepts represented on the MAI from pre-calculus are average of numbers,average rate of change, fractional change, reasoning from and about graphs/graphical displays,asymptotic behavior, and signed numbers (arithmetic with positive and negative numbers). Themathematical concepts from introductory calculus include the derivative, the definite integral,and the fundamental theorem of calculus. MAI items were categorized into a short taxonomybased on the mathematical content area(s) represented and the cognitive process (knowing,applying, or reasoning) required to solve the item.In addition to analyzing students’ open-ended responses to the MAI test items, researchers alsoconducted in-depth interviews with a sample of fourteen students immediately

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christopher W. Swan, Tufts University; John J. Duffy, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; Kurt Paterson, Michigan Technological University; Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

, gender, institution as obtained through surveys and virtual and real communities) • Number and type of student engaged in LTS • LTS career impacts to faculty • Learning outcomes for students from participation in LTS activities • Institutions with LTS (program models, number of faculty and students involved, disciplines) • Communities benefited by LTS (locations, number of projects created, project types, number of people affected)5.0 AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNos. 1022927, 1022883, 1022738, 1023022, and 1022831. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Jackson, VCU Haptics Lab; Dianne T.V. Pawluk, Virginia Commonwealth University; Curtis R. Taylor, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

v – cursor velocity (P1 - P0) / t P1 – cursor’s position, found by the equation (P0 + v*t) A, B, C, D – the four corner points of a brick’s rectangular side n – the surface normal to the plane of the brick’s side s – the distance between the cursor’s previous position and intersection point when moved along the direction of vIf t = 1, Page 22.495.10 Figure 6: Diagram of collision detection algorithm.The collision detection algorithm has to locate the plane intersection point where thebrick’s surface exists and to determine if the intersection point is within the four cornersof the brick’s side. The

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Patricia A. Carlson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

aregiven for each of the twelve categories. (The accompanying key indicates what each of thesenumbers represents.) Page 22.1102.5 Table B: Four Types of Communication Assignments for Engineering DesignExploratory Activities Heuristics for Higher-Order Document Components Final Artifact(s)(CPR mediated) Mental Manipulations (CPR mediated) (CPR mediate)Assignments to foster Assignments that reflect Assignments that enact The final product (devicediscovery. the “rationalization” of the more “formal

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Krupczak, Hope College; Kate A Disney, Mission College

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

). American Society for Engineering Education. 13. Orr, J.A., D. Cyganski, R. Vaz, “Teaching Information Engineering to Everyone,” Proceedings of the 1997 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (1997). American Society for Engineering Education. 14. Pisupati, S. Jonathan P. Mathews and Alan W. Scaroni, “Energy Conservation Education for Non- Engineering Students: Effectiveness of Active Learning Components,” Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2003). American Society for Engineering Education. 15. National Science Foundation, Science and Engineering Indicators, http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind04/., Accessed

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Muhsin Menekse, Arizona State University; Glenda Stump, Arizona State University; Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University; Michelene T.H. Chi, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(2), 163-182.2. Davis, E.A. (2003). Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 91-142.3. Katz, S., O’Donnell, G., & Kay, H. (2000). An approach to analyzing the role and structure of reflective dialogue. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11(3), 320-343.4. Lee, A., & Hutchison, L. (1998). Improving learning from examples through reflection. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied, 4, 187-210.5. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2005). Role of Guidance, Reflection, and Interactivity in an Agent-Based Multimedia Game

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hirak C. Patangia, University of Arkansas, Little Rock

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

-Capacitor-Based Step-Up Resonant Converters”, IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems—I: Regular Papers, vol. 52, no. 5, May 2005[6] H. Patangia, “Amplitude Division Multiplexing Scheme in Analog Signal Processing”, in Proc. IEEE Int. Midwest Symp. Circuits & Systems, August 2005, Cincinnati, Ohio.[7] B. P. Lathi, Modern Digital and Analog Communications Systems, (The Oxford Series in Electrical and Computer Engineering), 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, April 1998.[8] H.C. Patangia and D. Gregory, “High Voltage Signal Processing Using a Small Signal Approach” in Proc. IEEE 2007 ISSPIT, December 2007, Cairo, Egypt.[9] H. Patangia and D. Gregory, “Sectionalized PWM(S-PWM): A New Multilevel Modulation

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

AnnMarie Thomas, University of Saint Thomas; Jan B Hansen, University of Saint Thomas

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

ensure that the educationstudents have appropriate resources and support as they enter, and take, these courses.ConclusionThe University of St. Thomas has launched two new Engineering Education programs, oneundergraduate and one graduate, for students majoring in Education. The development of theseprograms, still in their early stages, is a collaboration between faculty from the Schools ofEngineering and Education.AcknowledgementsFunding for this project was provided by the National Science Foundation under grant DUE-0942117.Bibliography 1. Brophy, S., S. Klein, M. Portsmore, and C. Rogers. "Advancing Engineering Education in P-12 Classrooms." Journal of Engineering Education, 2008: 369-387. 2. Yasar, Senay, Dale Baker, Robinson

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yongpeng Zhang, Prairie View A&M University; Lin Li, Prairie View A&M University; Xuemin Chen, Texas Southern University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

/survey/staying_course [4] J. T. Bell, H. S. Fogler, “Virtual Reality Laboratory Accidents”, Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. [5] J. Harward, T. T. Mao, I. Jabbour, iLab Interactive Services – Overview, 2006. http://icampus.mit.edu/iLabs/Architecture [6] University of Houston, SMSL-Smart Materials and Structures Laboratory. http://rsmsl-1.me.uh.edu/ [7] A. Valera, J. L. Diez, M. Valles, P. Albertos, “Virtual and Remote Control Laboratory Development”, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, pp. 35- 39, Feb 2005. Page 22.1663.8

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Jones, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Carmen R. Zafft, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; John Sutton, RMC Research Corporation; Lance C. Pérez, University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

for your teaching. Table 2 Participant Ratings of the Quality of the SLIs 2007 2009 Indicator of Quality N Mean N Mean Overall quality of course 9 3.67 6 4.16 Preparation of the instructor(s) 9 3.78 6 4.33 Level of participant engagement in the session 9 3.89 6 4.33 Time for participants to ask questions and/or share 6 4.16 9 4.00 comments Usefulness of information for your teaching 9

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thomas A. Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Maura J. Borrego, Virginia Tech; Jefferey E. Froyd, Texas A&M University; Wendy Newstetter, Georgia Institute of Technology; Karen L. Tonso, Wayne State University; Peggy Noel Van Meter, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

Foundation under GrantDUE-0939823. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References1 Pimmel, Russ and Sheryl Sorby, “Writing Proposals to Meet NSF’s Expectations,” Workshop at 2008 ASEE Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, June 22, 2008.2 Olds, Bar: Evolution, Approaches, and Future Collaborations, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94,No. 1, pp. 13-25 (2005)3 National Research Council, Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research, Scientific Research in Education, Richard Shevelson and Lisa Towne, Editors, National Academy Press, Washington, DC (2002)4 National Research Council

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marissa Jablonski, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; John R. Reisel, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Hossein Hosseini, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Ethan V Munson, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Leah Rineck

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

need tostudy and that attendance in the study group is worthwhile.Study Group LogisticsStudents arrive at study groups to find that the leader has organized the seating in the room to bein a horseshoe shape with all chairs and desks facing the white board. The leader should beseated as if s/he is a part of the group. The leader facilitates collaborative group work byopening communication and asking about problem areas from the lecture or homework. In thecase of a large group or a group with students from several different course sections studyingdifferent chapters of the book, the leader will help break the group into smaller more appropriategroups. The leader projects equality with the group through body language alone, such as bysitting

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jianyu Dong, California State University, Los Angeles; Huiping Guo, California State University, Los Angeles

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

problems and get them prepared for the design ofnew network components or system. Since our work is still on the early stage, the paper onlypresents very preliminary assessment results at this point. In the future, more comprehensiveassessment data will be collected and analyzed, and the findings will be used to further improvethe course redesign.AcknowledgmentThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.0941839. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation (NSF).References[1] The network simulator NS-2, http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/[2] Opnet Network Simulator

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Geoffrey L. Herman, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Michael C. Loui, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

, The Physics Teacher, 30, 141– Page 22.142.11 158.[15] Jacobi, A., Martin, J., Mitchell, J. & Newell, T. (2003), A concept inventory for heat transfer. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education, Boulder, CO, November 5-8, T3D-12-16.[16] Krause, S., Decker, J.C., & Griffin, R. (2003). Using a materials concept inventory to assess conceptual gain in introductory materials engineering courses. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education, Boulder, CO, November 5-8, T3D-7-11.[17] Lister, R. (2008). After the gold rush: Toward sustainable scholarship in computing, in

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rebecca K. Toghiani, Mississippi State University; Adrienne R. Minerick, Michigan Technological University; Keisha B. Walters, Mississippi State University; Priscilla J. Hill, Mississippi State University; Carlen Henington, Mississippi State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

IntensificationProcess intensification was identified by the NSF as early as 1993 as a specific area in whichresearch endeavors should be concentrated to meet the needs of the chemical industry;1 almostone hundred archival articles were published on process intensification topics in 2008.2 Thenumber of such articles identified using the term "process intensification' in SciFinder Scholar in2009 and 2010 are 103 and 95, respectively.Benefits of process intensification activities include:3,4 1) novel or enhanced products; 2)improved chemistry; 3) enhanced safety; 4) improved processing; 5) energy and environmentalbenefits; 6) capital cost reduction; and 7) low inventories. Key to the endeavor is an ability toidentify the limitation(s) in a process, and knowledge

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marilyn Barger, Hillsborough Community College; Richard Gilbert, University of South Florida; Marie A. Boyette, FLATE

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

to trisect the entirecamp experience into pre-camp, camp and post-camp components.Pre-campAlthough making money is not the goal of most robotics camps, organizers must still collectmoney and must distribute those funds to meet the needs of the camp. This reality leads to thefirst decision. Is your summer robotic program(s) going to be operated by a not-for-profit entity,or is it being conducted to earn revenue? Revenue generating types of camps, a for-profitorganization, will include different planning, budgeting, and taxation concerns not discussed hereand our recommendation is to organize your camp within a not-for-profit structure. Either way,there are two general avenues for funds that camp organizers can pursue to assist in financing

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sushil K. Chaturvedi, Old Dominion University; Kaustubh A. Dharwadkar

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

of Human Factorsand Ergonomics Society, Annual Meeting, 2007.12. Messner, J.I. et al., “Using Virtual Reality to Improve Construction Engineering Education”, Proceedings ofASEE Annual Conference, 2006.13. Bell, J.T. and Fogler, H.S., “Virtual Reality in Chemical Engineering Education”, Proceedings of the 1988ASEE North Central Section Meeting, Detroit, Michigan.14. Chaturvedi, S.K., Bawab, S., Akan, H., and Abdel-Salam, T.M., “Development of a Methodology to Visualizeand conduct a Physical Experiment as a Web-Based Virtual15. Chaturvedi, S.K. and Abdel-Salam, T., “A Web-Based Student Learning Tool for Thermodynamics ConceptsRelated to Multistaging in Compressors and Turbines”, Innovations 2008: World Innovations in EngineeringEducation and

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pratibha Varma-Nelson, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis; Stephen Hundley, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis; Terri Tarr, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

Education.3. McAlpine, L. and Harris, R. (1999). “Lessons learned: Faculty developer and engineer working as faculty development colleagues.” International Journal for Academic Development, 4(1).4. Sheppard, S. Macatangay, K., Colby, A., and Sullivan, W. (2008). Educating engineers: Designs for the future of the field. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.5. Fisher, D., Fairweather, J., and Amey. M. (2003). “Systemic reform in undergraduate engineering education: The role of collective responsibility.” International Journal of Engineering Education, 19.6. Gillespie, K.J. and Robertson, D.L. (Eds.) (2010). A guide to faculty development (2nd edition). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.7. Wankat, P. (2002). The effective, efficient professor

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nasser Alaraje, Michigan Technological University; Aleksandr Sergeyev, Michigan Technological University; Fred Scheu, College of Lake County

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

. Bibliography:[1] N. Alaraje, S. Amos and J. E. DeGroat, “A Re-Configurable SoFPGA Architecture Design – Learning Tool,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (ASEE 2006), June 2006[2] http://www.altera.com[3] R. Furtner and N. Widmer, “Technology Education and the new frontier of digital electronics,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (ASEE 2006), June 2006[4] N. Alaraje and J. E. DeGroat, “Evolution of Re-Configurable Architectures to SoFPGA,” IEEE International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS 2005), August 2005.[5] B. Zeidman, “ The future of programmable logic,” Embedded System Design, Oct 2003.[6] http://www.bls.gov/oco/home.htm.[7] http://www.abet.orgAcknowledgmentsThe authors gratefully

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Sarah Jane Grigg, Clemson University; David R. Bowman, Clemson University; Michelle Cook, Clemson University; Roy P. Pargas, Clemson University / U.S .Air Force Academy

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

and Hearing a Freshman Engineering Student Think. 2010 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.3. Grigg, S., Bowman, D. and Benson, L. (2011). Technology Adoption Behaviors in a First Year Engineering Classroom. 2011 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.4. Jonassen, D.H. and Tessmer, M. (1997). An outcomes-based taxonomy for instructional systems design, evaluation, and research. Training Research Journal 2:11-46.5. Wong, R.M.F., Lawson, M.J. and Keeves, J. (2002). The effects of self-explanation training on students’ problem solving in high-school mathematics. Learning and Instruction 12: 233–262.6. Olszewski, B., Macey and Lindsrom (2006). The practical work of coding: An ethnomethodological inquiry. Human Studies 29:363-380

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Kaye, Baltimore City Community College; Yun Liu, Baltimore City Community College

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

Robotics: Applying Modern AI Techniques, Proceedings of Page 22.452.8International Conference on Autonomous Minirobots for Research and Edutainment (AMIRE), 2001. [9] Lund, H.H., Modern Artificial Intelligence for Human-Robot Interaction, Proceedings of the IEEE Volume 92,Issue 11, Nov. 2004 Page(s): 1821 – 1838. Page 22.452.9

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew W. Roberts, University of Wisconsin, Platteville; Philip J. Parker, University of Wisconsin, Platteville; Michael K. Thompson, University of Wisconsin, Platteville; Barb A. Barnet, Univeristy of Wisconsin - Platteville

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

engineering offered by theUWP CEE department (construction, environmental, geotechnical, transportation, and structur-al). As part of this introduction, each sub-discipline area would assign students to assess a por-tion of the local infrastructure.All faculty in the CEE department participated in developing the materials for the modules, withone module created for each sub-discipline area. Faculty worked in their area(s) of expertise.The result is a set of materials that is targeted directly at sophomore students. Each sub-discipline area was instructed to devote one lesson of their module to introducing their sub-discipline and three lessons to explaining one (or more) facet of the sub-discipline. For eachmodule, students had to gain knowledge and

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fei Hu, University of Alabama

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

:[1] TIME.com (Partners with CNN), (February 4 2010), The Unsustainable U.S. Health Care System, http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2010/02/04/the-unsustainable-u-s-health-care-system/. (Web visited in December of 2010).[2] CardioNet, see http://www.cardionet.com/. Visited in May of 2009.[3] V. Shnayder, B. Chen, K. Lorincz, T. R. F. F. Jones, and M. Welsh, “Sensor networks for medical care,” Technical Report TR-08-05, Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University , 2005.[4] Ohno-Machado et al., “SMART: Scalable Medical Alert Response Technology,” http://smart.csail.mit.edu/.[5] Lenert et al., “WiiSARD :Wireless Internet Information System for Medical Response in Disasters

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Salahuddin Qazi, State University of New York, Institute of Tech, Utica, New York and Mohawk Valley Community College; Robert C. Decker, Mohawk Valley Community College

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

://www.nanoscience.com/index.html15. Veeco Caliber User Manual , www.veeco.comAcknowledgementThis paper is based upon work supported, in part, by the National Science Foundation underGrant DUE # 0737204. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material arethose of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation Page 22.1668.12

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amelito G. Enriquez, Canada College

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

). Online Delivery Management for Teaching and Learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(2):237-246.51. Enriquez, A. (2010). Assessing the Effectiveness of Synchronous Content Delivery in an Online Introductory Circuits Analysis Course. Proceedings: 2009 American Society of Engineering Education Zone IV Meeting, Reno, NV, March 25-27, 2010..52. CCC Confer (n.d.). CCC Confer Products. Retrieved December 21, 2009 from http://www.cccconfer.org/products/products.aspx53. Kowalski, F., Kowalski, S., & Hoover. E. (2007). Using InkSurvey: A Free Web-Based Tool for Open-Ended Questioning to Promote Active Learning and Real-Time Formative Assessment of Tablet-PC-Equipped Engineering Students. Proceedings; 2007 American

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kirsten A. Davis, Boise State University; Sondra M Miller, Boise State University; Ross A. Perkins, Boise State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

Instructional and Curricular Change in Engineering, R. Spalter-Roth, N. Fortenberry, and B. Lovitts, eds., American Sociological Association, Washington, DC.11. Ambrose, S. (2007). "Exploring the Role of the Reward System in the Diffusion of Innovation in Engineering Education." The Acceptance and Diffusion of Innovation: A Cross-Curricular Perspective on Instructional and Curricular Change in Engineering, R. Spalter-Roth, N. Fortenberry, and B. Lovitts, eds., American Sociological Association, Washington, DC.12. Kramer, L. (2007). "Greedy Institutions and Faculty Involvement in Retention." The Acceptance and Diffusion of Innovation: A Cross-Curricular Perspective on Instructional and Curricular Change in Engineering, R

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jianyu Liang, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Terri A. Camesano, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

Engineering, 2008. 18: p. 367-375.34. Moursi, A.M., et al., Enhanced osteoblast response to a polymethacrylate2hem.oxyapatite composite. Biomaterials, 2002. 23: p. 133-144.35. Harper, E.J., J.C. Behiri, and W. Bonfield, Flexural and fatigue properties of a bone cement based on polyethylmethacrylate and hydroxyapatite. Journal of Materials Science and Materials in Medicine, 1995. 12: p. 799-803.36. Sontgerath, S., et al. Who teaches matters- providing female role models and gender inclusive curricula for middle school students. in WEPAN. 2004. Albuquerque, NM.37. Patton, M.Q., Utilization Focused Evaluation: The New Century Text. Vol. 3rd edition. 1997, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.38. Cousins, J.B. and E. Whitmore, Framing Participatory