Acs 111 24.05 0 Gra 100 63.20 39 Fup 33 7.98 0 Acp 100 28.43 0 Lib 982.25 430.89 195.98According to the research process of QCA, it is necessary to detect the necessity ofeach condition for the outcome before the logic minimization processing of thetruth table is carried out for standard analysis to obtain sufficient conditions forleading the outcome, and the analysis results are shown in table 3. According to thetable, the
cohort. Itwill, however, be worthwhile tracking this data over the long term to see if there is muchimprovement in the retention rate. Table II: Engineering Retention Rate Start Year 1 -2 year retention 2nd-3rd year retention (based on original enrollment st nd numbers) Fall 2009 48.1% 33.3% Fall 2010 84.6% 73.1% Fall 2011 60% 48% Fall 2012 69.8% 60.5% Fall 2013 65.6% 50% Fall 2014 80.8% 76.8% Fall 2015 66.7% 57.8% Fall 2016 71.9% 71.9% Fall 2017 76.5
, Glasgow. Available online at: http//www. enhancementthemes. ac. uk/documents/flexibleDelivery/FD Flexible Learning JCaseyFINALWEB. pdf [accessed 15 November 2010], 2005.[15] D. Boud, F. Dochy et al., “Assessment 2020. seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education,” 2010.[16] D. H. Schunk, “Metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning: Research recommendations,” Educational psychology review, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 463–467, 2008.[17] D. R. Krathwohl and L. W. Anderson, A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman, 2009.[18] E. Swartz, M. Pearson, R. Striker, L. Singelmann, and E. Alvarez Vazquez, “Innovation-based learning on a
educate OR educating OR pedagogy OR pedagogical OR teach OR teaching OR teacher OR learn OR learning OR learned) AND (circuits OR electronics) Elsevier (((((engineer*) AND (educat* OR pedagog* OR teach* OR learn*) AND Engineering (circuits OR electronics)) WN ALL)) AND ((({ca} OR {ja}) WN DT) AND Village ((2019 OR 2018 OR 2017 OR 2016 OR 2015 OR 2014 OR 2013 OR 2012 OR 2011 OR 2010 OR 2009 OR 2008 OR 2007 OR 2006 OR 2005 OR 2004 OR 2003 OR 2002 OR 2001 OR 2000 OR 1999 OR 1998 OR 1997 OR 1996 OR 1995 OR 1994 OR 1993 OR 1992 OR 1991 OR 1990) WN YR)))In keeping with the SLR methodology, the search phrases were constructed to fetch as
ones. The evaporator temperature wassimulated with the same 3-different temperatures used for the experimental study. To calculatethe condenser temperature for both cases, shaded and unshaded, it was assumed that the difference in the heat rejected by the condenser in both cases was solely due to the solar heatgain by the condenser as shown in equation (3).Qc,u = Qsun + Qc,s (3)Qsun = 𝑞 × Ac (4)where Qc,u is the unshaded condenser heat rejected, Qc,s is the shaded condenser heat rejected,and Qsun is the solar heat gain, respectively. The solar heat gain was calculated in equation (4)using an estimated value of solar flux
Table 2. A layout of a typical Associate Degree Program in Mechatronics Semester 1 Semester 2 General Education/Math/Science 7 Technical Elective 4 Hours AC. and D.C. Circuit Fundamentals 3 Electric Motor Control 4 Electrical Machines 3 Introduction to Mechatronics 3 Digital Systems 3 Instrumentation 3 Semester Semester Total 16 Total 17 Semester 3 Semester 4 Technical Elective General Studies/Math/Science 9 Programmable Logic Controller 3 Mechanisms 3 Hydraulic Systems 3 Electronic Devices 3 Mechanical Elective 3 Semester Total 18 Maintenance 3 Fluid Power
from 32 years of engineering experience in the power industry working for General Electric Power Systems on both mechanical and electrical engineering projects. While at GE as Principal Engineer/Technical Leader he was an expert in AC electric motor and generator evaluation and application in nuclear plants, and was an industry conference presenter. Mr. Mokri is a registered Professional Engineer in California, is an ASME member and has Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in Mechanical Engineering and a Bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering from Cal Poly University.Dr. Nicole Okamoto, San Jose State University Nicole Okamoto is professor and chair of Mechanical Engineering at San Jose State University. She has a
agreement.Miss Daniel’le April DeVoss, Northern Arizona University Daniel’le graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Environmental Engineering degree from Northern Ari- zona University and is currently an E.I.T. at a civil engineering firm. She is interested in the applications of biological and chemical processes to reduce the environmental impact of industrial practices. She is ac- tive with The Society of Women Engineers, and has a deep interest in broadening participation in STEM, especially for underrepresented minorities. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Mixed Method Approach to Evaluate Sustainability Thinking among the Next Generation of Civil and
Paper ID #29202STREAMLINING CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT: Efficiently CreatingValue WhileSatisfying ABET Criterion 4Dr. Thomas M. Hall Jr., Northwestern State University of Louisiana Tom Hall is Professor Emeritus, Northwestern State University, having served for ten years as Profes- sor and Head of the Department of Engineering Technology. He has 20 years experience as a program evaluator, team chair and editor for ABET. He is currently the Chair of the Engineering Technology Ac- creditation Commission, a recipient of the James H. McGraw Award, and a Fellow of ASEE.Dr. Scott Danielson, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus
Paper ID #30821WIP: Building a Bridge Between Hackathons and Software EngineeringCapstones Through Adaptive ExpertiseCecilia La Place, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Cecilia La Place is a first-year Ph.D. student at Arizona State University (ASU) studying Engineering Education Systems & Design. She has received her M.S./B.S. in Software Engineering through an ac- celerated program at ASU. She began researching hackathons after she joined the Fulton Undergraduate Research Initiative (FURI) in her junior year. This stemmed from her love of learning in hackathons having participated in numerous hackathons from
, 2007.[7] J. E. King, "Working their way through college: student employment and its impact on the college experience." In. 2006. ," American Council on Education: Issue Brief. ACE, United States.2006.[8] S. Jewell, "The Impact of Working While Studying on Educational and Labour Market Outcomes," Business and Economics Journal, vol. 5, pp. 1-12, 2014.[9] B. Neyt, E. Omey, D. Verhaest, and S. Baert, "Does student work really affect educational outcomes? a review of the literature," J. Economic Surveys, vol. 33, pp. 896-921, 2019.[10] D. Auers, T. Rostoks, and K. Smith, "Flipping burgers or flipping pages? Student employment and academic attainment in post-Soviet Latvia," Communist and Post-Communist
demonstrations,course instruction, activities, and deliverables have been designed in a dual-purpose manner, inthat they augment student practice of essential engineering skills while at the same time scaffoldingprogression towards Cornerstone Project completion. The Cornerstone Project for current courseiteration(s) involves the construction, optimization, and mechanical design of a windmill system;which includes the integration of a windmill, student-built AC motors, DC motors, circuitry, anddata acquisition systems. Cornerstone demonstration assessment is divided into two separatecomponents, one dedicated to author-developed design challenges integrated within the windmillsystem, and the other dedicated to student-programmed windmill parameter
study results will be correlatedwith the Engineering Summer Bridge success and retention rates. Although the initial surveyresults are not reported in this paper, the first Bridge participants are exhibiting signs ofbelonging. They are actively engaged, leading Wright College Chapters of national 10organizations, currently constituting fifty percent (50%) of the Society of Hispanic ProfessionalEngineers SHPE Wright Chapter leadership and all are officers/active members of otherorganizations at Wright (American Chemical Society (ACS), Society of Women Engineers(SWE), Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE), and Society for Asian Scientists andEngineers (SASE)). In addition, few
Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Paper AC 2007-2234. 23 pp.[8] Pickering, M., E. Ryan, K. Conroy, B. Gravel, M. Portsmore. 2004. The Benefit of Outreach to Engineering Students. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition. Session 1692. 12 pp.[9] Bielefeldt, A.R., J. Lewis, M. Polmear, D. Knight, N. Canney, C. Swan. 2020. Educating civil engineering students about ethics and societal impacts via co-curricular activities. Journal of Civil Engineering Education. In press.[10] Cress, C.M., C. Burack, D.E. Giles, J. Elkins, M.C. Stevens. 2010. A Promising Connection: Increasing College Access and Success through Civic Engagement
grading in the activities at the beginning and gradually withdrawfacilitation [20] as the students become more self-directed.Research MotivationWhile the current research done with the StRIP instrument has covered a number of specificengineering classes, we are interested in evaluating the students’ potential resistance across anentire engineering program that is dedicated to providing students with active learning experiences.Founded in 2010, the Iron Range Engineering (IRE) program transforms the landscape ofengineering education with its philosophy of integrated engineering, project-based learningcombined with an entrepreneurial mindset. Project-based learning (PBL) is inherently active innature, as students work with industry clients on a
://qprinstitute.com/ , accessed on Jan13, 2020.[30] Slavich, G., & Zimbardo, P. (2012). Transformational Teaching: TheoreticalUnderpinnings, Basic Principles, and Core Methods. Education Psychology Review, 24, 569-608.[31] SkillsYouNeed, “What are Social Skills?” https://www.skillsyouneed.com/ips/social-skills.html accessed on February 2, 2019.[32] Lopes, D. C., Gerolamo, M. C., Musetti, M. A., and Prette, A. D., “Social Skills: A KeyFactor for Engineering Students to Develop Interpersonal Skills,” International Journal ofEngineering Education, 31(1(B)), pp 405-413, 2015.[33] Waters, C., Chen, H., and Sheppard, S., “Delivering Engineering Education ResearchFindings to the Practitioners: A New Workshop Model Approach, AC 2010-253, 2010 ASEEAnnual
Michelson, SUNY Alfred State CollegeProf. Reza Rashidi, State University of New York, Alfred State Reza Rashidi is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering Technology and a faculty affiliate in Mi- cro/Nano Fabrication Laboratory at State University of New York, Alfred State College. He received his Ph.D degree in Mechanical Engineering (MEMS development) from the University of British Columbia in 2010 and completed his Postdoctoral Fellowship in Development of Biomedical Sensing Devices in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of British Columbia in 2011. He also received a minor degree in Engineering Management and Entrepreneurship from the University of British Columbia in
Computer Science from University of Portsmouth, UK in 2006. Aamir was also a Visiting Scientist at MIT, USA in 2010-11 where he worked on the award-winning Cilk technolgy. Aamir’s research interests include designing and implementing parallel software on high-end computing platforms. Aamir is an architect and the main developer of an MPI-like library called MPJ Express (http://mpjexpress.org).Prof. Ala Al-Fuqaha, Hamad Bin Khalifa University (HBKU) Ala Al-Fuqaha received Ph.D. degree in Computer Engineering and Networking from the University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City. He is Professor at Hamad Bin Khalifa University. His research interests include the use of machine learning in general and deep learning in
. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/7976.[30] R. Freeman et al., "Development And Implementation Of Challenge Based Instruction In Statics And Dynamics," presented at the 2010 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky, June 20-23, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/16904.[31] Y. Kim, "Learning statics through in-class demonstration, assignment and evaluation," International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 23-37, 2015, doi: 10.1177/0306419015574643.[32] R. Echempati and A.L. Sala, "Experiences of Implementing Blended Teaching and Learning Technique in Mechanics and Design Courses," presented at the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
has over 30 years’ experience in engineering practice and education, including industrial experience at the Tennessee Valley Authority and the US Army Space and Missile Defense Command. Her research inter- ests include Engineering Ethics, Image and Data Fusion, Automatic Target Recognition, Bioinformatics and issues of under-representation in STEM fields. She is a former member of the ABET Engineering Ac- creditation Commission, and is on the board of the ASEE Ethics Division and the Women in Engineering Division. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Can ABET Assessment Really Be This Simple?AbstractWith the hard roll-out of ABET’s new outcomes 1-7 in the 2019
Chicago Dr. Houshang Darabi is an Associate Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (MIE) at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC). Dr. Darabi has been the Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Department of MIE since 2007. He has also served on the College of Engineering (COE) Educational Policy Committee since 2007. Dr. Darabi is the recipient of multiple teaching and advising awards including the UIC Award for Excellence in Teaching (2017), COE Excellence in Teaching Award (2008, 2014), UIC Teaching Recognitions Award (2011), and the COE Best Advisor Award (2009, 2010, 2013). Dr. Darabi has been the Technical Chair for the UIC
criterion 5D, 2017.[2] IUSE / Professional Formation of Engineers: Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (IUSE/PFE: RED). National Science Foundation. 2019.[3] “CE-ARCH: ARCH Initiative.” CEARCH, cecas.clemson.edu/ce-arch/arch-initiative/.[4] R, Marion. The edge of organization: Chaos and complexity theories of formal social systems. Sage, 1999.[5] M.R. Oswald. AC 2012-3084: INTEGRATING THE CHARRETTE PROCESS INTO EN- GINEERING EDUCATION: A CASE STUDY ON A CIVIL ENGINEER- ING DESIGN CAPSTONE COURSE. (2012)[6] S. Sanford, M.S, L.C. Benson, P. Alluri, W. Martin, L.E. Klotz, J. H. Ogle, N. Kaye, W. Sarasua, S. Schiff, “Evaluating Student and Faculty Outcomes for a Real-World Capstone Project with Sustainability
Century. The National Academies Press, 2005.[2] E. Dowell, E. Baum, and J. McTague, "The Green Report Preface Engineering Education for a Changing World," 2010. [Online]. Available: https://asee.org/papers-and- publications/publications/The-Green-Report-Preface.pdfhttps://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/The-Green-Report.pdf.[3] W. J. Schell and B. E. Hughes, "The Potential of The Leadership Identity Model to Develop Undergraduate Engineering Leadership: A Theoretical Approach," in American Society for Engineering Management 2016 International Annual Conference, Charlotte, NC, October 26-29, 2016 2016.[4] D. B. Knight and B. J. Novoselich, "Curricular and Co‐curricular Influences on
research. International Journal of Listening. 22 (2), 141-151.[4] Trevelyan, J. 2014. The Making of an Expert Engineer. CRC Press.[5] Crumpton-Young, L. Pamela McCauley-Bush, L Rabelo, K Meza, A Ferreras, B. Rodriguez, A. Millan, D. Miranda, M. Kelarestani, 2010, “Engineering leadership development programs: a look at what is needed and what is being done.” Journal of STEM Education, 11 (3/4), 10-21[6] Wikoff, K., J. Friauf, H. Tran, S. Reyer, O. Petersen. 2004. Evaluating the communication component of an engineering curriculum: A case study. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Session 2004-2532, 8 pp.[7] American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 2019. Civil Engineering Body
, and approximate the effects of equipment degradation over time. Many of these tools areavailable online for free including PV Watts [7] and the System Advisor Model [8], both ofwhich were developed by the National Renewable Energy Lab. Using multiple models toestimate system performance can allow a team to explore the effects of different inputparameters, and consistent results from multiple models lends confidence to the analysis. Solar Radiation AC Energy Month (kWh/m2/day) (kWh) January 2.35 115,372 February 3.32 144,642 March 4.18
and Academic Sports League competitions from 2010 to 2016.Mr. Zachary RhodesDr. Jiawei Gong, The Pennsylvania state university, The Behrend College Dr. Jiawei Gong is an assistant professor or Mechanical Engineering at The Pennsylvania state university, The Behrend College.Dr. Faisal Aqlan, The Pennsylvania State University, The Behrend College Dr. Faisal Aqlan is an assistant professor of Industrial Engineering at The Pennsylvania State Univer- sity, The Behrend College. He received his PhD in Industrial and Systems Engineering form The State University of New York at Binghamton in 2013. He has industry experience with IBM Corporation and Innovation Associates Company. His research interests include manufacturing
Bruyn, E. Mostert, and A. van Schoor. Computer-based testing - the ideal tool to assess on the different levels of bloom’s taxonomy. In 2011 14th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, pages 444–449, Sep. 2011. doi: 10.1109/ICL.2011.6059623.[20] Errol Thompson, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Jacqueline L. Whalley, Minjie Hu, and Phil Robbins. Bloom’s taxonomy for cs assessment. In Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Australasian Computing Education - Volume 78, ACE ’08, pages 155–161, Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia, 2008. Australian Computer Society, Inc. ISBN 978-1-920682-59-0. URL http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1379249.1379265.[21] John T. Bell and H. Scott Fogler. The investigation and
students. In the future, it will probablyoffer private online tutors, so that others will not be able to see what one student posts to a tutor.9. Some students will cheat and more students will cheat if others students get away with it. Thereputation of the program/college/university will suffer where cheating is prevalent. Some facultypretend cheating doesn’t exist or believe cheating only hurts the cheater. Some faculty use manyexcuses to not pursue cheaters. Cheating hurts everyone, especially the borderline D/C student whodoesn’t benefit from a curve because some cheaters “aced” the exam and fooled the instructor intobelieving the exam was more doable that it really was. Cheating also hurts the honest student whograduates from an engineering
were discussed.The experimental exercises include displacement measurement using infrared and ultrasonicsensors as well as motion detection activities.The learning objectives of this module were to utilize proximity sensors for displacementmeasurements, motion detection, sensitivity measurements, and peripheral interference effects.Data was gathered and subsequent error analyses performed. Module 4Module 4 experiments involve actuation in contrast to the previous modules where sensor inputswere studied. In this module, students conducted experiments with DC, stepper, and servomotors. In the lecture of this module, general characteristics of AC, DC, stepper, and servomotors were introduced. A generic torque vs. rotational speed curve is
Paper ID #29765Bringing the University to the Workplace: Targeted Short CourseDevelopmentDr. Luke Fredette, The Ohio State University Dr. Luke Fredette is a Research Specialist in the SIM Center at The Ohio State University. His tech- nical interests focus on nonlinear system dynamics and noise & vibration control, and he has recently been working on the development of educational programs surrounding these topics geared towards ac- cessibility and applicability for working professionals. He will be beginning as an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Cedarville University in Autumn 2020.Ms. Emily Nutwell