, biofuels, green buildings, and consumer products. His tools of research include life cycle assessment (LCA), industrial ecology, material flow analysis, energy efficiency, market diffusion models, reuse and recycling, and sustainable development. Prior to his current position, he was an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan-Flint.Heather Dillon Dr. Heather Dillon is Professor and Chair of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Washington Tacoma, where her research team is working on renewable energy systems, solid-state lighting, energy efficiency in buildings, fundamental heat transfer studies, and engineering education. She is the Chair of the Council on Undergraduate Research
scholarship programs[11], or through peer advising, mentoring, tutoring and professional development workshops tolearn more about factors associated with their persistence in their programs [12], or studyminorities [13], etc. We can also find efforts that begin before technologists go to a four-yearinstitution. In [11], the authors introduce the approach to understanding better of the“professional identity, culture and formation” of the technologists that will go on to four-yeardegree programs colleges. We can also find reviews of approaches to student retention such asthe work reported by Mann and Tan [14]. These authors analyzed several approaches toundergraduate engineering education including “1) development of interdisciplinaryundergraduate
-doctoral fellowship at Sanofi Oncology in Cambridge, MA. She earned a bachelor’s degree in biological engineering from Cornell University and a Ph.D. in biomedical engineering from the University of Virginia.Eileen Johnson Eileen Johnson received her bachelor’s and MS in bioengineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She previously worked in tissue engineering and genetic engineering throughout her education. During her undergraduate career, she worked with Dr. Brendan Harley developing biomaterial implants for craniomaxillofacial defects and injuries. In graduate school, she worked with Dr. Pablo Perez-Pinera working on new genetic engineering tools. There, she became interested in engineering
Paper ID #37174Centering Equity and Inclusion in Engineering Collaborationand WritingJennifer C Mallette (Associate Professor) Jennifer Mallette is an associate professor of English at Boise State University, where she collaborates with engineering faculty to support student writers. Her research builds on those collaborations, examining best practices for integrating writing into engineering curriculum; she also explores women’s experiences in engineering settings through the context of writing. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
) Michael Ben-Avie, Ph.D., is the Senior Director of Learning Assessment and Research at Quinnipiac University and a Senior Fellow at AAC&U. He co-edited six books on educational change and youth development with colleagues at the Yale Child Study Center. He conducts longitudinal, cohort studies to discern the impact of higher education on students’ learning and development. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work in Progress: Engineering First-Year Academy to Help Underprepared StudentsIntroductionThis work-in-progress paper describes an effort to improve the retention rate of traditional
Practice: A Reflection on the Application of Engineering Education Coursework to New Course Development. 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 23.1247.1-23.1247.15. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--2263214. Tschimmel, K. (2012). Design Thinking as an effective Toolkit for Innovation. In: Proceedings of the XXIII ISPIM Conference: Action for Innovation: Innovating from Experience. Barcelona. ISBN 978-952-265-243-0.15. Sanders, E. B.-N., Stappers, P. J., (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-Design, 4(1), 5–18.16. Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem- solution. Design Studies, 22, 425–437.17. Visscher-Voerman, I., & Gustafson, K. L
methods.Modeled after industry practices, this course sequence includes design sprints, projectmanagement, risk assessments and mitigation, formal design reviews by the course instructors,and presentations to industry professionals. Each cross-functional team includes a mix ofelectrical, computer, and mechanical engineers. All teams consist of students of differentethnicities, genders, and ages. Teams are formed with diversity in mind, but also based on eachstudent’s expressed project-type interest. The instructors then lead the students through problemidentification, project ideation, and development into an appropriately scaled design that is bothchallenging and doable.Much of the course is focused on team building and processes, conflict management
focused on artificial intelligence/machine learning and interested in Natural Language Processing applications. Passionate about diversity in the tech industry!Monique Ross Assistant Professor, Knight Foundation School of Computing and Information Sciences and STEM Transformation Institute at Florida International University, research interests include broadening participation in computing through the exploration of: 1) race, gender, and identity in the academy and industry; 2) discipline-based education research that informs pedagogical practices that garner interest and retain women and minorities in computer-related fields. She uses her scholarship to challenge the perceptions of who belong in computing.Mark Finlayson
McGill et al. [18], "One element of thatwork is the development of inclusive and equitable UREs for students from underrepresentedgroups—communities historically excluded due to structural barriers in U.S. higher education."Many papers focus on first-generation and minority students; however, they fail to consider aninternational student's global perspective, which alters their identity compared to domesticstudents. For the United States to remain competitive, it must continue carrying a "welcoming"factor toward international students, including acceptance and seamless integration into the U.S.community and campus culture for this group of students [2]. To influence a smooth U.S.cultural adjustment for students from other countries, they should
. A., Tsai, J., Boll, A., Blacklock, J., & Johnson, K. (2019). Pain and gain: Barriersand opportunities for integrating sociotechnical thinking into diverse engineering courses. InProceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds weneed. The MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing amongfive approaches. SAGE Publications.Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic,and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268-291.Faulkner, W. (2007). ‘Nuts and bolts and people
unique campus-specific aspects. For example, Scholars at all three institutions participate in Summer Bridgeprogramming through their home campus, but each Summer Bridge program has unique aspectscatering to the specific needs and structures of each institution.Purpose of Summer BridgeAt all three institutions, Summer Bridge serves several purposes. In the broadest sense, thepurpose of Summer Bridge is to provide additional academic and social support for incomingScholars (that is, students receiving the S-STEM scholarship). More specifically, the purpose ofeach Summer Bridge is to create community among these students, prepare them for theacademic rigor of first-year engineering curriculum, and build their STEM identity and sense ofbelonging
Paper ID #37687Work in Progress: Preparing Students for UndergraduateResearch Online and In the Classroom - Framework,Participant Reflections, and Lessons LearnedMarian S. Kennedy (Associate Professor) Marian Kennedy is an Associate Professor within the Department of Materials Science & Engineering at Clemson University. Her research group focused on the mechanical and tribological characterization of thin films. She also contributes to the engineering education community through studying the process/impacts of undergraduate research and navigational capital into graduate school.Cora Allard-KeeseJoshua D
different reason not tied to lack of resources: found a major better suited to their interests, decided to pursue another career or life opportunity, did not develop a strong engineering identity, etc.ConclusionsOverall this paper was a data driven approach to understand how SES impacts studentpersistance and performance through the aerospace engineering curriculum at a large R1university. We found that students from low SES backgrounds struggled more in calculus andearly aerospace classes, left the major at a higher rate, and had lower 6-year graduation ratescompared to students from high SES backgrounds. The admissions criteria at this universitysuggests that students come in with a strong math background. Students from low
experience [3, 4]. Wedeveloped our notion of professional skills influenced by a series of publications in BurningGlass [6, 7], emphasizing overall communication, organizational, and writing skills as a toppriority for our graduates.A brief review of design spines and their history was previously undertaken by the faculty teamin another report [8]. In this work, the authors summarized historical efforts by seminal authorsin the field such as Sheppard, Frank, and others influential in the development and defining ofthe design or professional spine educational philosophy in the engineering education sphere [9,10].In the intervening years since our last report, a number of reports and works on design spineshave been published [11-16]. One of the more
prefer to stay closer to home for their graduate studies. If a program is interested in students transferring to their PWI, it may also be important to consider schools who waive out-of-state tuition: either for people who live in bordering states or based on the merit of candidates.4. Staff support. An active career counseling staff or program coordinator is an invaluable resource when looking to develop relationships with a MSI. These personnel are ideally in direct contact with students daily through their management of extracurricular activities involving registered student organization (RSOs), engineering clubs, and student support services. This contact can be leveraged to help identify students, especially nontraditional
family members to check in with one another andshare important news that builds capital between members. Social capital is thought of as thecommunity resources and networks that individuals access from their communities or networks.An example of this might be the professional networks that people engage in and may leverageto identify career opportunities or other supportive resources. Navigational capital may manifestas someone having the proficiency and resources to maneuver effectively through society. Forexample, graduate students may receive advice or assistance from postdoctoral fellows aboutnavigating the job market. Aspirational capital encapsulates the dreams, goals, and vision of thepeople to whom you belong. An example of this could be
/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report/sections/higher-education-in-science-and-engineering/undergraduate-education-enrollment-and-degrees-in-the-united-states[2] National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics.“Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2019”.Alexandria, VA, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19304/digest[3] M. M. Uddin, “Best Practices in Advising Engineering Technology Students for Retentionand Persistence to Graduation,” Journal of Technology, Management & Applied Engineering,36(1), 1–13, Jan. 2020.[4] B. K. Townsend and K. Wilson “‘A Hand Hold for a Little Bit’: Factors Facilitating theSuccess of Community College Transfer Students to a
their choice of major? [8]. They also took a similar approachBinghamton University has taken.While the motivation and types of information used in their choices is important, other studieshave also investigated the sources of the information. One study concluded that “Self-LedExploration of Engineering Disciplines” (SLE) is the single most important source ofinformation that students use in deciding on an engineering major [9]. Mohammadi-Aragh et al.surveyed a range of factors, including parents’ educational achievement, timing of the desire tostudy engineering, and current engineering major in order to develop a survey instrument thatcould be used by universities to collect information concerning the choice of engineering major[10]. Some other
papers. He is honored with Inaugural Georgia Tech. College of Engineering Outstanding Teacher Award in 2022, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Award in 2020, Geoffrey G. Eichholz Faculty Teaching Award in 2015 and Undergraduate Educator Award in 2012 from the Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL), Georgia Tech.Terri Dunbar Terri Dunbar is currently a PhD candidate in Engineering Psychology at the Georgia Institute of Technology, as well as a Graduate Teaching Assistant at Tech's Center for Teaching & Learning. Her research focuses on identify best practices in how to scaffold and sequence the learning activities to support the development of systems thinking while using simulations.Ruth Yow (Georgia Institute of
accomplished the following: (1) recruited andincreased participation in five targeted science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)majors, focusing on women, underrepresented student population, and undeclared and liberal artsstudents with strong math preparation; (2) retained and graduated academically talented, low 2income students in STEM programs by strongly encouraging students to register for 15+ creditsper semester to promote timely progress to graduation; (3) provided comprehensive supportstructures at critical junctures that include financial support, academic advisement, academicsupport, and career counseling, using a natural cohort approach to developing a professional STEMidentity
Paper ID #37304Student performance impacted from modifying a first-year/semester engineering core course during a globalpandemicJacques C. Richard (Instructional Associate Professor/Aerospace Engineer) Dr. Jacques C. Richard is an instructional associate professor and REU Principal Investigator at Texas A&M University. He got his Ph.D. at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. He studies plasmas using particle and spectral methods, as well as engineering education factors that build critical algorithmic thinking skills in diverse engineering students. Research includes plasma turbulence and plasma jets, and jet engine
boost their STEM resume. Through our technology platform and community, RePicture.com, students tell the story of STEM all around us and discover diverse role models. The RePicture Program is helping students “breaking through” the artificial barriers that prevent many from pursuing and flourishing in STEM by building their STEM identity, moving beyond what they know, and showing them what is possible.Katie P. Wheaton, M.S., P.E., S.E. Katie P. Wheaton is a Senior Instructor in the Civil & Environmental Engineering Department of Case Western Reserve University. She teaches undergraduate courses related to Structural Design, Surveying, Computer Graphics, and Civil Engineering Systems. She is the faculty advisor
situational analysis of semi-structured interviews, we attribute this lack of competenceto “undone ethics” in engineering education. Here, we want to formulate what the ideas aroundundone ethics might look like, particularly in the context of engineering education andengineering ethics. This paper develops the terminology “undone ethics” through exploring theconcept of “undone science,” drawn from literatures of science and technology studies (STS).Undone science is defined as research that has been “left unfunded, incomplete, or generallyignored”[1],[2]. In order to map out the connections of undone ethics to undone science, weattempt to create a typology of undone ethics, drawing from empirical, qualitative data throughinterviews with engineering
introduced to welding by her grandfather. She hadmany opportunities to weld and use other tools growing up which was a big factor in choosingthis engineering program. This undergraduate-only engineering program aims to prepare itsstudents for a changing landscape of engineering that requires engineers to be adept creators,problem-solvers, and collaborators. Here students learn engineering through the practice ofengineering and as Jesse tells me, “all I want to do is build stuff.” That made this program, withfabrication projects built into engineering coursework, an ideal choice for her.As she goes on to explain how she developed the skills needed to accomplish her current project,a theme emerges. When she has a question about materials, she talks to
School of Construction, Sustainability, and Infrastructure at FIU where he focuses on multidisciplinary research that harmonizes sustainability in construction. His other research interests include Sustainable Construction, Robotics, and AI-based Construction, Engineering Education, Green Buildings, Sustainable Infrastructure, Resilient and Sustainable Post-Disaster Reconstruction, and Circular Economy. Piyush is also a LEED Green Associate and ENV SP (i.e., Envision Certified Professional in Infrastructure Sustainability).Mohamed Elzomor (Assistant Professor) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com
Technology, vol. 29, no. 1, p. 32, 2012.[7] A. M. Lucietto, "Identity of an Engineering Technology Graduate,," presented at the 123rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[8] H. Eshach, "Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: Formal, non-formal, and informal education," Journal of science education and technology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 171-190, 2007.[9] A. M. Lucietto, "Who is the engineering technology graduate and where do they go?," in Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Erie, PA, 2016: IEEE, pp. 1-7.[10] Elena Bartolomé, Ignasi Florensa and Marianna Bosch (2021): Teaching Strength of Materials through ‘‘Study and Research Paths’’: Invariants and Differences
influence of familismo on Latinastudent STEM identity development,” Journal of Latinos and Education, vol. 20 no. 2, pp. 177-189, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1080/15348431.2019.1588734.[32] R. M. Banda and A. M. Flowers, “Birds of a feather do not always flock together: A criticalanalysis of Latina engineers and their involvement in student organizations,” Journal of HispanicHigher Education, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 359-374, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1177/1538192716662966.[33] J. Cavazos, M. B. Johnson, and G. S. Sparrow, “Overcoming personal and academicchallenges: Perspectives from Latina/o college students,” Journal of Hispanic Higher Education,vol. 9 no. 4, pp. 304-316, Oct. 2010, doi:10.1177/1538192710380744.
southeasternregion. The research experiences for undergraduate students were built upon the followingprinciples: • Students should demonstrate knowledge of fundamentals and be proficient with computational tools as preparation for graduate studies and, ultimately, to be more marketable for competitive jobs; • Students deserve opportunities in supportive learning environments to develop as independent thinkers within cutting-edge research projects; and • Students should be encouraged to explore their passion and developed interest field, as it might not be as present in their home institution, which in turn should facilitate understanding the value of more education.2.1 Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Research
those whoare academically talented - have inadequate preparation for the increased rigors of collegeeducation through their K-12 education and limited family guidance due to the fact that moststudents are first generation college students. With support from NSF Scholarships in Science,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (S-STEM), the Culturally Adaptive Pathway toSuccess (CAPS) program aims to build an inclusive pathway to accelerate the graduation foracademically talented, low-income students in Engineering (Civil Engineering, ElectricalEngineering, and Mechanical Engineering) and Computer Science majors at Cal State LA, whichtraditionally serves the underrepresented and educationally disadvantaged minority students inthe Los Angeles
identity. For the purposes of thisstudy engineering identity is defined as set out by previous work by Stevens et al. [5] : anindividual’s belief that they ARE an engineer. As Stevens explains, this shift towards identifyingas an engineer is often accompanied by changes in disciplinary knowledge, and as a studentnavigates through the education process., For example, a student will likely have a strong senseof engineering identity when they feel that they are able to do tasks they associate with thoseperformed by a successful engineer, are identified as an engineer by their mentors, peers, andfamily, and have passed certain courses and graduated [6]. It should be noted that while this studyfocused on the engineering identity of mechanical