Paper ID #37329Board 394: Sustaining and Scaling the Impact of the MIDFIELD project atthe American Society for Engineering Education (Year 1)Dr. Susan M Lord, University of San Diego Susan Lord is Professor and Chair of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. She received a BS from Cornell University in Materials Science and Electrical Engineering (EE) and MS and PhD in EE from Stanford University. Her research focuses on the study and promotion of equity in engineering including student pathways and inclusive teaching. She has won best paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education, IEEE Transactions
. in Mechanical Engineering and Secondary Math- ematics Education at the University of Nevada, Reno (’17). Atop his education, Justin is a previous National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow and has won over a dozen awards for research, service, and activism related to marginalized communities, including the 2020 American Society for En- gineering Education Educational Research and Methods Division Best Diversity Paper for his work on test anxiety. As a previous homeless and food-insecure student, Justin is eager to challenge and change engineering education to be a pathway for socioeconomic mobility and broader systemic improvement rather than an additional barrier.Ms. Alexandra Mary Jackson, Rowan
) experience is examined sharing critical aspects of content,assessment, and pedagogical differentiation. Features of the three-year experience includescaffolded and repetitive instances of engineering design practice for live performance withincremental leadership, formative “just-in-time” instruction, and the use of public critique.IntroductionPreparing high-quality and work-ready engineering graduates in support of societal needs is anessential goal for any school/college of engineering. In educational institutions where researchand the development of engineering research scholars is a priority, the “how” of engineeringeducation can become a source of great debate. The definition and debate of educationalpriorities (Duderstadt, 2007) and
, teachers, and undergraduates in this role. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Quantitative Methodological Approaches to Understand the Impact ofInterventions: Exploring Black Engineering Student SuccessAbstractAs engineering educators and practitioners, we must broaden the participation of students fromracially minoritized populations to meet engineering education's social and ethical responsibilitiesto address problems and design solutions relevant to our diverse communities. However, theengineering profession in the United States has historically and continues to exclude certain racialand ethnic populations, including Black, Latinx, and Native people. As a result, engineeringremains a predominantly
collaboration isneeded. Research Questions 1) How does applying CoP principles in graduate engineering courses impact student perceptions of class effectiveness and preparation for professional engineering work? 2) How do members of traditional engineering groups perceive the contributions of members of underrepresented groups in their CoPs, and (how) do they think about and act to build psychological safety in their CoPs? 3) How do academic CoPs function? What are some best practices, heuristics, and guidelines for effective academic CoPs? MethodsThis study was conducted in a large public research university in the Southeastern United Statesand
foundational research in student retention and other evidence-based practices that engage, enroll, and graduate their women and BIPOC engineers.5. Professional Learning a. Provide a toolbox of resources to guide collaboration and partnerships at their respective institutions, with partners, and with each other (broader impact/broadening participation, proposal development, writing research papers, etc.). b. Expand PEERs’ understanding of national funding opportunities aligned with their institutional goals (NSF grants, national education grants, industry grants, etc). 1017
identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chem- ical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her a National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent diversity, which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning to understand engineering students’ identity development. She has won several awards for her research including the 2021 Journal of Civil Engineering Education Best Technical Paper, the 2021 Chemical Engineering Education William H. Corcoran Award, and the 2022 American Educational Research Association Education in the Professions (Division I) 2021-2022 Outstanding Research Publication
learning,and independence in research activities. While in many respects the twolaboratories are similar, the presence and role of a leader-mentor in daily activitiesis what set them apart. In this report, we analyze the impact of leadership-mentorship on learning and professional formation. We argue that the degree towhich a leader-mentor is consistently active in the laboratory’s life presentsadvantages and disadvantages with respect to different aspects of learning andprofessional formation. On one hand, professional development of students maybe hindered by the absence of direct oversight from an in-laboratory professionalmentor, resulting in delayed graduation for example. On another, absence ofdirect oversight can compel students to
A Practical Application of Thevenin Circuit ModelEric BogatinDr. Eric Bogatin has been a full time professor in the Electrical, Computer, and Energy EngineeringDepartment at the University of Colorado Boulder since January 2021 where he has been teaching thePractical Printed Circuit Board and the Senior Design Capstone courses.Dr. Bogatin received his BS in physics from MIT in 1976 and MS and PhD in physics from theUniversity of Arizona in Tucson in 1980. In his graduate work, he focused on lasers, quantum optics anddesktop experiments on special relativity and cosmology using frequency stabilized lasers.Mona ElHelbawyDr. Elhelbawy joined ECEE on July 1, 2022. Prior to joining CU Boulder, she taught at Colorado Schoolof Mines, California
Texas at El Paso Diane works diligently to support minorities, especially women in STEM and preparing future educators to be STEM strong in knowledge and skills. She is an assistant professor at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP) and serves as the director for the University of Texas El Paso’s YES! She Can and STEMShine programs.Victor Manuel Garcia Jr., Victor Garcia is a doctoral student at The University of Texas at El Paso and a research assistant of the Yes She Can program from the College of Education. His research topics are in the areas of characterization and design of pavement materials, civil ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 “Work-in-Progress
programs teach traditionalacademic research skills, they must also provide opportunities for students to collaborativelyengage in research to address authentic STEM problems. Despite the fact that many universitiesare actively pursuing various ideas in their attempt to transform graduate education, federalscience agency programs continuously report that even the best research-based Master’s and PhDprograms that exist in the U.S. today are not fully prepared to provide the kind of support that theSTEM workforce needs [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. It becomes even more relevant when itcomes to the Big Data and Data Analytics (BDA) field, which incorporates professionals fromacross the STEM fields [14].Though there is a large body of research that
Delaware. She specializes in the development of mixed methods research designs for educational research.Dr. Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Towson University Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Ph.D., is Professor of Science and Engineering Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy, and Geosciences at Towson University. She has integrated engineering into courses for PreK-8 teacher candidates, developed and directed a graduate STEM program for PreK-6 teachers, and partnered with teachers to implement PreK-8 science-integrated engineering learning experiences. She has authored numerous engineering-focused teacher practitioner articles, chapters, and research articles, and presents her research regularly through the ASEE Pre
of the journal, Advances in Engineering Education and she serves on the ASEE committee for Scholarly Publications.Dr. Mayra S. Artiles, Arizona State University Mayra S. Artiles is an assistant professor in engineering at the Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Her research expertise includes engineering doctoral education structure, experiences of underreprAbimelec Mercado Rivera, Arizona State University Abimelec Mercado Rivera is a Puerto Rican doctoral student and graduate research assistant in the En- gineering Education Systems and Design program at Arizona State University. Abimelec received his ©American Society for
projects and buildingparticipants’ confidence as educational researchers. This project was funded based on impactrather than knowledge generation; thus, this paper will report on the impacts of the ProQualInstitute in terms of participants served and evaluated outcomes and project team observations.The key evaluation questions we answered were: 1. To what extent did the project design and implement a high-quality and culturally responsive training program? 2. What knowledge and skills did participants gain because of participation in the ProQual Institute? 3. How could the ProQual Institute be built upon to improve participant outcomes?Background & Conceptual FrameworkThe target audiences for the ProQual Institute were STEM
from 2016 to 2018. His research interests mainly focus on higher education administration, comparative higher education and higher engineering education.Min Zhao, Graduate School of Education, Beijing Foreign Studies University Miss. Min Zhao is a postgraduate student who is majoring in the Curriculum and Instruction at the Graduate School of Education, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, China. Her research interests mainly focus on EFL teaching and learning, and higher engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Research on the Power of Quality Assurance in Engineering Department: Case of Worcester Polytechnic InstituteAbstractWith the advancement
engineering education research, and the Associate Director of Educational Innovation and Impact for UGA’s Engineering Education Trans- formations Institute (EETI). In addition to coordinating EETI’s faculty development programming, Dr. Morelock conducts research on institutional change via faculty development, with an emphasis on innova- tive ways to cultivate and evaluate supportive teaching and learning networks in engineering departments and colleges. He received his doctoral degree in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where he was a recipient of the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship. His dissertation studied the teaching practices of engineering instructors during game-based learning activities, and how these
practitioner subject matter expertshould feel virtually identical to the process of graduate research, dissertation writing, post-doctoral scholarship, and the years leading up to tenure.Within engineering instruction, the course design and pedagogical approaches can be successfulfor long-term deep learning and formation of engineers when the educator helps the studentswith both fluency (i.e., practice) and in doing engineering (i.e., working with an expert to receivefeedback, revise, iterate, critically reviewing their work) to achieve deep learning under theguidance of an instructor who is the master of the content. Many pedagogical tools have beenproposed to help the educator with this mission. Ranging from Active Learning [6-8], ProductiveFailure
, Physics and Engineering, and Computer Science from Lansing Community College. Her research interests include the impacts of culture on students and their sense of belonging, graduate educa- tion, and the faculty experience. This work is motivated by her experience and training in student affairs and her enthusiasm for student development and inclusive environments. She is hoping to continue her work and research in an engineering education Ph.D. program in the coming cycle.Dr. Erika Mosyjowski, University of Michigan Erika A. Mosyjowski (she/her/hers) is the Research and Faculty Engagement Manager in the Center for Socially Engaged Design at the University of Michigan. She has a B.A. in Psychology and Sociology from
as a part of the strategic P12 STEM initiative, he prepares Engineering/Technology candidates for teacheMs. Adrie Koehler Doctoral Student, Learning Design & TechnologyMr. Shawn Farrington, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Shawn Farrington is a Senior Lecturer in the Polytechnic Institute at Purdue University. He co-coordinates a first-year Design Thinking program and teaches several of his own sections. Shawn is also an Educa- tional Psychology Ph.D. candidate at Purdue. HisElnara Mammadova Elnara is a Graduate Research Assistant in the Technology, Leadership and Innovation program at Purdue University. She is dedicated to her research on fostering inclusivity in the curriculum and ensuring digital
Content Access, Jul. 2021. Accessed: Feb. 06, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/a-leadership-development-ecosystem-for-engineering-graduate- students[7] R. Paul and L. G. C. Falls, “Engineering Leadership Education: A Review of Best Practices,” presented at the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2015, p. 26.634.1-26.634.11. Accessed: Feb. 06, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/engineering-leadership-education-a-review-of-best-practices[8] H. Yu and J. Zhu, “The Design and Implementation of Engineering Leadership Programs: A Comparative Study,” presented at the 2016 ASEE International Forum, Jun. 2016. Accessed: Feb. 06, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/the-design
&M University. She earned her PhD in industrial-organizational psychology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Her research interests include workplace safety, occupa- tional health, and fairness and mistreatment in the workplace and in STEM classrooms and programs.David Christopher SeetsEmma Edoga, Texas A&M UniversityLuis Angel RodriguezGuillermo Aguilar, Texas A&M University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Evidence Based Practice: Innovation training and its impact on faculty approach to curricular or pedagogical changesIntroductionThe Project called Teams for Creating Opportunities for Revolutionizing the Preparation ofStudents (TCORPS), is
. Sociology of education, 2008. 81(1): p. 53-76.5. Perna, L.W., Racial and ethnic group differences in college enrollment decisions. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2000. 2000(107): p. 65-83.6. Strayhorn, T.L., Bridging the pipeline: Increasing underrepresented students’ preparation for college through a summer bridge program. American Behavioral Scientist, 2011. 55(2): p. 142-159.7. Talbert, P.Y., Strategies to increase enrollment, retention, and graduation rates. Journal of Developmental Education, 2012. 36(1): p. 22.8. Zarate, M.E. and R. Burciaga, Latinos and college access: Trends and future directions. Journal of College Admission, 2010. 209: p. 24-29.9. Gofen, A., Family capital: How first‐generation higher education
our studentresearchers are given and recommended best practices for undergraduate research in this area aredetailed. Finally, how this work dovetails with our implementation of a multi-disciplinaryintroductory quantum computing course running for the first time this Spring is also described.1. IntroductionEducational scholars widely agree that engaging students in authentic undergraduate researchexperiences is a high-impact pedagogical practice as it promotes student-centered learning andresults in several positive learning outcomes including improved problem-solving, critical-thinking, and communication skills [1], [2], [3]. Undergraduate research programs also help withpersonal development, giving students improved attitudes, self
program structure and activities are designed to prepareundergraduates for research work with the ultimate goal of retaining students in science,technology, engineering, and math fields as well as preparing them for graduate school. Thisevidence-based paper demonstrates an effective hybrid-model (virtual and in-person) researchprogram for undergraduate students over a five-year period across a network of eleven (11) siteswithin the continental U.S. Through mixed methods research, a longitudinal case study showsevidence of 100% retention of the *105 REU alumni in the engineering and STEM field; 9% ofthe REU alumni are enrolled in an engineering PhD program; and diversity measures includeparticipation from 53% females, and 25% first-generation
Professor of Process Engineering at Universidad EAFIT (Medellin, Colom- bia). Juan holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University and an M.S. in Process En- gineering and Energy Technology from Hochschule Bremerhaven. In addition to teaching undergraduate and graduate courses for more than 10 years, Juan has over 6 years of experience as a practicing engineer, working mostly on the design and improvement of chemical processing plants.Dr. Jennifer Lyn Benning, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Jennifer Benning is an Instructor in the Engineering Education Department at Virginia Tech.Dr. Natalie C.T. Van Tyne, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Natalie Van Tyne is an
Associate Director of Educational Innovation and Impact for UGA’s Engineering Education Trans- formations Institute (EETI). In addition to coordinating EETI’s faculty development programming, Dr. Morelock conducts research on institutional change via faculty development, with an emphasis on innova- tive ways to cultivate and evaluate supportive teaching and learning networks in engineering departments and colleges. He received his doctoral degree in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where he was a recipient of the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship. His dissertation studied the teaching practices of engineering instructors during game-based learning activities, and how these practices affected student motivation.Dr
as a self-assessment tool for graduate students and early career researchers to prompt introspection andreflection to identify strengths and developmental gaps in research portfolios [8], [11], [12]. Using these entrepreneurial attributes combined with the Vitae Researcher DevelopmentFramework (RDF) as a binding framework, future faculty professional development moduleswere designed and embedded into three engineering and engineering education graduate coursesat two major R1 institutions in the eastern United States over multiple semesters. Feedbackgathered from students and instructors were used to iteratively revise and re-design aspects of theprofessional development modules over the course of multiple semesters. A subset of
for designing for manufacturability andpromote a design mindset conscientious of manufacturing costs and time which managers andemployers value. The goal of any proposed engineering curriculum addition should be, in someway, to better prepare students to be ready to engineer immediately upon graduation. Thisproposal outlines a plan to accomplish exactly that by reconciling with the need in the industryfor engineers who understand common manufacturing processes and how to design for them.Whether a student goes on to become a researcher, practicing engineer, project manager,independent consultant, or engineering entrepreneur, their background will be strengthened by anunderstanding of manufacturability considerations and systems engineering
understanding is key to the successful design and implementation of higher education adjacent programming at industry partners. Ashleigh completed a BS in Biological Engineering at Kansas State University where she worked in the Women in Engineering and Science program. In this role, she witnessed the incredible impact targeted support and guidance can have for STEM students. She then completed an Med in Higher Education Administration and a Graduate Certificate in Institutional Research at Pennsylvania State University.Dr. Kimberly D. Douglas, Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc. Dr. Kimberly D. Douglas is SHPE’s Chief Research & Innovation Officer. She has over 25 years of expe- rience as an engineering
conversation shifts about the content). By determining whether the codebook istransferable in the same context, we can provide evidence for its robustness and application inengineering educational contexts. Figure 1 shows an overview of the research process includingthe summer study. Figure 1. Overview of the research design.4.1. Research Context – TikTokTikTok is a popular, video-based social media platform where users create short video clips thatdescribe or show their experiences as a form of expression and has unique community interaction[60], [61]. TikTok, gained popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic [60] and continues to beone of the top apps on both the Apple App Store and Google Play (as of February 2023