promote a free and open forum forfocused discussion and thoughtful debate regarding editorial decisions.The Engineering Technology Accreditation Commission (ETAC) of ABET establishes generalcriteria for student outcomes associated with program accreditation [3]. The curriculum ofETAC programs must include “topics related to professional responsibilities, ethicalresponsibilities, respect for diversity, and quality and continuous improvement.” These curricularcomponents are further clarified with the ABET Policy on Diversity [4]. This statementencourages a commitment to “diversity and inclusion through developing and using the talents ofall persons.” With these guidelines in mind, engineering technology educators are encouraged topromote student
, requires programs to evaluate students’ “ability to applyengineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs…” (ABET EAC 2019-2020SO 2). This major design experience, typically a senior capstone project, should include theculmination of the foundational materials students learn during their course of study. ABET hasalso defined “engineering design” which includes many concepts of Design Thinking (DT). DTis a multistep process that begins with the formalization of the problem statement and movesthrough implementation of possible solutions with the needs of the end-user in mind. There areseveral ‘flavors’ of design thinking available and we have been following the 5-step designthinking process described by Plattner 2010 where the
Paper ID #28623The Sequential Nature of Engineering Problem SolvingDr. Carolyn Plumb, Montana State University Carolyn Plumb is the recently retired Director of Educational Innovation and Strategic Projects in the College of Engineering at Montana State University (MSU). Plumb has been involved in engineering education and program evaluation for over 25 years, and she continues to work on externally funded projects relating to engineering education.Rose M Marra, University of Missouri - Columbia Professor Rose M. Marra is the Director of the School of Information Science and Learning Technology at the University of
. • Experimental Physics and Engineering Lab III : Electricity and Magnetism - The final course is designed to complement a lecture-only physics course on electromagnetism and electromechanical systems and includes laboratory assignments that uses sensing, control and actuation to demonstrate electromagnetic concepts as well as an introduction to microcontrollers. Also included is a continuation of non-technical topics such as ethics and art-in-engineering. These three courses were purposefully designed with several goals in mind includingteaching students critical think skills through the use of programming, supporting students asthey learn highly theoretical concepts in their physics courses, introducing students to
. In the mind of the actor—the structure of adolescents’achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social PsychologyBulletin 21 (3): 215–25.[33] Wigfield, A., and J.S. Eccles. 2000. Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation.Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (1): 68–81.[34] Watt, H.M.G., and J.S. Eccles, eds. 2008. Gender and occupational outcomes:Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences. Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.[35] Alias, M., and N. Hafir. 2009. The relationship between academic self-confidence andcognitive performance among engineering students. In Proceedings of the Research inEngineering Education Symposium (REES). Palm Cove, Australia.[36
and in a way that would attract their attention. The PDP consideredin the presentation is shown in Figure 1 and corresponds to the generic PDP proposed by Ulrichand Eppinger [32] for “market-pull” products of low to moderate complexity that are engineered,discrete, and physical.The presentation to teach the ST/SE topics selected for the intervention was designed for twofifty-minute class sessions keeping in mind the level of the course and the desired cognitive levelfrom the revised Bloom’s taxonomy [24, 25] that the students were expected to attain for eachtopic. An effort was made to present concepts in a simple way and to illustrate each topic usingan example that included a figure, picture, or video to maintain student interest. For
Paper ID #28865Outcome-Based (Engineering) Education (OBE): International AccreditationPracticesProf. Junaid Qadir, Information Technology University, Lahore, Pakistan Junaid Qadir is an Associate Professor at the Information Technology University (ITU)—Punjab, Lahore since December 2015, where he directs the ICTD; Human Development; Systems; Big Data Analytics; Networks (IHSAN) Research Lab. His primary research interests are in the areas of computer systems and networking, applied machine learning, using ICT for development (ICT4D); and engineering education. He is the author of more than 100 peer-reviewed research papers
publishing; and to allow students to delvemore deeply into a subject. The Search Strategy Page, as mentioned earlier, is a vehicle to studyand report on students’ progress. In this undergraduate engineering class, we teach for that class but keep in mind the needto encourage students to keep learning, keep searching and keep refining their ability forwriting/communicating well, over their coming 30-year-long professional career. The lifelonglearning standard was established in the 2000 ABET accreditation process with criteria 3i thatstated that programs must demonstrate that their students attain “a recognition of the need for,and an ability to engage in lifelong learning” [7]. Canada followed with 3.1.12, LifelongLearning [1]. Since
and longer time since such power engineering courses were offered [36-48].We have also have to keep in mind that an upgrading of a power engineering laboratory is anexpensive enterprise and requires adequate laboratory facility, space and support. Recent powerindustry developments demonstrate that technical understanding of power systems, underscoredby hands-on laboratory experience, is even more important than some might have previouslythought. A versatile laboratory, providing coverage separately or in combination, became avaluable asset, which can be used for various experiments, while emphasizing on different facetsof power systems analysis, power electronics and control, machine characteristics or energyconversion concepts. While most of
project that helped them with their presentation skills.We chose the project based on the students' background and passion and with having their degree,general engineering, in mind. Students at Cornell College are heavily involved in artistic andathletic activities. The students involved in this project had recently taken the engineering circuitscourse and have a musical knowledge background. The technical goal of the project was toconstruct a gesture-controlled piano that could recognize the distance from an object to the sensorand translate it into musical notes. The idea came from an open-source project designed by AndyGrove. The students built upon the open-source project and expand its capabilities. They addednew features to the initial
and its effectiveness.Both Arnold and John again encouraged participants to co-create a community of reflectivepractice and report back on what they learned about our own practice of teaching, theirdeveloping philosophy of education, and being able to defend it through evidence-based actionresearch. What works? When and why and how? They suggested that participants connect theoryand practice using an engineering frame of mind; that trying to learn to teach is like a big designproblem, with uncertain constraints and variables. The leaders sincerely offered to help theparticipants over the next year via virtual meetings phone, email, Skype calls, and encouragedgoal setting, reflective teaching, and reporting back in eight months at the next
, Experientially Focused Instructional Practices,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 400–411, 2014.[14] C. G. P. Berdanier, X. Tang, and M. F. Cox, “Ethics and Sustainability in Global Contexts: Studying Engineering Student Perspectives Through Photoelicitation: Ethics and Sustainability in Global Contexts,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 238–262, Apr. 2018.[15] K. L. Tonso, “Engineering Identity,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 267–282.[16] G. Hofstede, M. Minkov, and G. J. Hofstede, Cultures and organizations: software of the mind : intercultural cooperation and its importance for
cases. Also, it is importantthat students apply concepts in steps, allowing the development of new knowledge and skillsfrom previous knowledge in a summative way. With these ideas in mind, the approach presentedin this paper has the following characteristics that facilitate the achievement of benefits regardingincreasing engagement, active learning, meeting learning outcomes, student success, andprofessional success: • Projects assigned are related to a real apparatus/device used in an engineering application • Projects require experimental validation and calibration • Projects expose students to multiple setbacks related to the development of a product, which will be encounter as a professional. • Students need to research
Paper ID #30045The Modalities of Governance in Engineering EducationDr. Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Atsushi Akera is Associate Professor and Graduate Program Director in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (Troy, NY). He received his M.A. and Ph.D. in the History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania. His current research is on the history of engineering education reform in the United States (1945-present). He is a the current Chair of the ASEE Ad Hoc Committee on Interdivisional Cooperation; Chair of the International Network for
international example to follow.U.S. higher education has had a long history of pursuing engineering expansion. “Every studyof engineering education in this century, beginning with the Wickenden report in the 1920s,directed attention to broadening the engineering curriculum [3, p. 120].” The broadeningincluded the humanities. The president of the National Academy of Engineering wrote, “Don’tbe tempered to crowd the humanities, arts, and social sciences out of the curriculum. Theintegral role of these subjects in U.S. engineering education differentiates us from much of therest of the world. I believe the humanities, arts, and social sciences are essential to the creative,explorative, open-minded environment and spirit necessary to educate the engineer
students presented their rehabilitation devicesand gave them to their clients.The course modules that were intentionally designed to help students engage with their clientsincluded empathic design, disability etiquette, and the ecological model of disability. Thelearning objectives of each module is described below, and authors of this paper will gladly sharespecific module curriculum upon request.Empathic Design Discuss empathy and how it relates to engineering design. Compare and contrast emotional and cognitive empathy. Describe the consequences of only using an analytical state of mind when facing today’s complex design problems.Disability Etiquette Provide examples of using first person disability language. Explain to a
0.31 put 0.31 profit 0.29 art 0.30 mind 0.29 creativ 0.31 surround 0.31 sourc 0.29 design 0.30 care 0.29 along 0.30 drink 0.31 destroy 0.29 give 0.30 form 0.29 find 0.30 risk 0.31 negat 0.29 new 0.30 strong 0.29 realli 0.29 part 0.30 read 0.29 materi 0.29 realli 0.29 week 0.29 well 0.30 want 0.29 includ 0.29 concern 0.29 interest 0.29 engineer’ 0.30 produc 0.29 look 0.29 rule 0.29 word 0.29 regard 0.30 stop 0.29 littl 0.28 film 0.29
Paper ID #30606Solution Diversity in Engineering Computing Final ProjectsMs. Sara Willner-Giwerc , Tufts University Sara Willner-Giwerc is a Ph.D. candidate in mechanical engineering at Tufts University. She graduated from Tufts University with a B.S. in mechanical engineering and a double minor in engineering education and engineering management in 2018. She is a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow, which supports her research at the Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach (CEEO) on technological tools, learning experiences, and environments for teaching engineering in classrooms pre-k
mill. That involved no red tape atall, but also a complete change for me. It’s in an extremely rural area, which I had never lived inbefore. I don’t know. It’s really weird, right? You don’t think of electrical engineering studentsworking in a steel mill, which was scary but also exciting. Since it’s private industry, notgovernment, I would make a lot more money. These two potential jobs were really fighting me,fighting each other in my mind. I was really struggling with the thought that I have to choose whatpath my life is going to take right now, and the choice that I make is going to determine my future,which isn’t something that I really had to do all by myself before. When I was selecting a college,I got input from my parents and friends
Paper ID #29336A Review of Agentic Frameworks in Engineering EducationMs. Brianna Shani Benedict, Purdue University Brianna Benedict is a Graduate Research Assistant in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She completed her Bachelor’s and Master’s of Science in Industrial and Systems Engineering at North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University. Her research interest focuses on interdisci- plinary students’ identity development, belongingness in engineering, and agency.Mrs. Kayla R. Maxey, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Kayla is a doctoral
setbacks and move on with things. You can't dwell on what's not working. You have to get people looking to what needs to happen in order for progress to occur.” (Carlos, 904-927)For the engineering leaders we interviewed, seeing the larger picture and being mindful ofcontext can mean looking beyond the surface of the current difficulty and considering personaland organizational history in order to find a way forward. It means fighting for the resourcesneeded for proper due diligence, because the alternative could result in project failure.Furthermore, looking at the bigger picture means being responsive to changes as they occur,especially where there are external constraints outside of personal control. …you need to
Paper ID #30547Work-in-Progress: Fostering a Chemical Engineering Mind-set throughHands-on ActivitiesDr. Julianne Vernon, Vanderbilt University Assistant Dean Vernon works in the field of STEM educational research; some areas of focus include stu- dent retention and implementation of innovative pedagogy and technology. She is currently the Assistant Dean of Academic programs overseeing the First Year Courses, Study Abroad Programs, and Interna- tional Initiatives at Vanderbilt University. She received her Bachelors in Chemical Engineering from the City College of New York and her Doctorate degree at University of Florida in
pressures and difficulties their students may be facing 5. Train students to be continually aware of the mental health and wellness of themselves and othersThe following sections will describe the committee’s reasoning for selecting these five goals. Thereader should bear in mind that the decision to adopt these particular objectives was based on thecommittee members’ personal experiences, conversations with students, the university resourcesavailable, and the atmosphere and culture of this specific department. The initiatives describedhere may not be appropriate in every chemical engineering department or at everyuniversity.2.1 Increasing student/faculty and student/student interactionThe CBE Wellness Committee recognized that it
authors found that thecitizen scientists’ perceptions toward engineering as a process were greatly influenced by theirparticipation in the project. However, their perceptions of engineers as persons did not change.Interestingly, the citizen scientists volunteered their own “funds of knowledge” aboutengineering skillsets and “habits of mind” but did not connect their personal traits and skills toengineering or engineers. Since the rainwater harvesting project of the citizen scientists wassimilar to the open-ended, project-based learning experiences of many engineering students, weposit that student perceptions of the engineering process are strongly influenced by project-basedlearning, but the impact on their engineering identity is limited. We
crosslistedas a multidisciplinary course in the School of Arts, Science, and Engineering at the University ofRochester instructs on how to interface sensors and actuators with microcontrollers in order to makemeasurements and control objects in the real world.While learning objectives for this course center around teaching students to properly interfacemicrocontrollers with sensors and actuators, the course was designed with a number of meta-objectivesin mind. One such goal is the desire to enhance the employability of our engineering students byproviding them with more and earlier opportunities to acquire and demonstrate technical knowledge andskills, which have been shown to be very important to engineering employers [1] Second, this initiativesought
bothstudents and instructors. Students will likely perceive greater benefits from using concept mapsin courses evaluated on comprehensive applications. Students may also find the concept mapmore useful if it is modified to include more equations and analytical relationships. More datashould be collected to increase the sample size and control for variations in course offerings forconclusive evidence to be gathered on the impact of concept maps in undergraduate fluidmechanics.References[1] National Research Council, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2000.[2] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and
Investigation,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[11] J. Graham, J. Haidt, and B. A. Nosek, “Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 1029–1046, 2009.[12] J. Haidt, The Righteous Mind. New York: Vintage Press, 2012.[13] E. E. Buchtel et al., “Immorality East and West: Are Immoral Behaviors Especially Harmful, or Especially Uncivilized?,” Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull., vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1382–1394, 2015.[14] V. Dranseika, R. Berniūnas, and V. Silius, “Immorality and bu daode, unculturedness and bu wenming,” J. Cult. Cogn. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1–2, pp. 71–84, 2018.[15] J. D
Paper ID #30292Gender Stereotypes: Historical comparison of female students’ beliefs oncareer, marriage, and children (1935 versus 2019 populations)Dr. Suzanne Zurn-Birkhimer, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Suzanne Zurn-Birkhimer is Associate Director of the Women in Engineering Program and Associate Professor (by courtesy) in the Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences at Purdue Uni- versity. Dr. Zurn-Birkhimer conducts research and leads retention activities including administration of the undergraduate and graduate mentoring programs and the teaching of the Women
most: it is students’ long-term success. As Hopkins et al state, “success in some disciplines [engineering among them]depends on students possessing a cumulative body of knowledge and is thwarted by poorretention of foundational content.”1This cumulative body of knowledge is often described as knowledge structure and there is aproblem: the connections within many students’ mental knowledge structure are weak and,therefore, the structure itself is ineffective. As a structural engineer, the author became concernedwith the integrity of the structures being built in his students’ minds and realized a new designphilosophy was necessary for the courses he taught.The way students organize, or structure, what they learn is critically important. This
be argued that they tend to emphasize therole of ethics in the life of the individual engineer rather than the ethical implications ofengineering as a profession, as a force that shapes and affects society. Given the role oftechnology in the modern world, it is crucial to bear in mind Herkert’s distinction between“microethics” and “macroethics.” [3] Macroethics, as Herkert defines it, is the study of the ethicsof the profession of engineering, of engineers as a whole. It seems self-evident that we mustinclude the macroethical view in ethics education, but this view is difficult to emphasize incertain pedagogical modalities. Many ethics pedagogies focus on the role of the individualengineer, particularly case studies that analyze issues such