, December 2011.[5] National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020 : Visions of Engineering in the New Century, Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2004.[6] K. C. Davis and F. R. Beyette Jr., "Developing and Assessing Elevator Pitches in Capstone Design," in ASEE Annual Conference, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[7] University of New Haven, "KEEN: Fostering an entrepreneurial mindset through integrated e-learning modules," [Online]. Available: https://www.newhaven.edu/engineering/kern- entrepreneurial-engineering-network/elearning-modules/. [Accessed 2 January 2020].[8] J. Bell, "Student business plan competitions: who really does have access?," in Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Small Business Institute
Paper ID #28955Student responses to active learning strategies: A comparison betweenproject-based and traditional engineering programsDr. Elizabeth Pluskwik, Minnesota State University, Mankato Elizabeth leads the Engineering Management and Statistics competencies at Iron Range Engineering, an ABET-accredited project-based engineering education program located in northern Minnesota. She enjoys helping student engineers develop entrepreneurial mindsets through active and collaborative learning in the classroom, on project design teams, and while out on co-op placement. Her prior education and industry experience are in
, need to have a basic knowledge of environmental issues and how to make designsmore sustainable. In the age of climate change and environmental disasters (e.g., 2019-2020bushfires in Australia, 2011 earthquake in Japan that caused a massive release of radioactivematerial, 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico), it is important for allengineers to be aware of how they can help minimize, avoid, and/or solve these problems.Solving many of today’s environmental problems will require future engineers to be creative,cooperative, and have an entrepreneurial spirit3,4. This starts with learning about and working onsolutions to real-world problems in the classroom.The Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) is a group of faculty
Stanford Graduate Science and Engineering Fellow. Eskandari is a recipient of ASEE’s Early Engineering Educator Award and the prestigious K. Patricia Cross Future Leaders of Higher Edu- cation Award from the Association of American Colleges and Universities.Dr. Ville Mikael Taajamaa, City of Espoo Dr.Ville M. Taajamaa, research and teaching focuses on new product development and engineering edu- cation especially in the context of sustainable development. The main focus in his research is the creation of new models and metrics for entrepreneurial, innovative and interdisciplinary engineering education where emphasis is more in the first phases of the engineering process when the problem space is spanned in order to find
Entrepreneurial Mindset in the Engineering Classroom," Education Sciences, vol. 9, p. 7, 2019.[46] L. Bosman, B. Mayer, and P. McNamara, "Promoting entreprenuerially minded learning through online discussions - curriculum innovation: incorporating the Kern Engineering Entrepreneurial Network (KEEN) framework into online discussions," in American Society of Engineering Education, Columbus, OH, 2017.[47] L. B. Bosman, N. Duval-Couetil, B. Mayer, and P. McNamara, "Using Online Discussions to Develop the Entrepreneurial Mindset in Environmental Engineering Undergraduates: A Case Study," International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, vol. 9, 2019.[48] C.-C. Chang, "Using jigsaw collaborative learning strategy in
– 2014. His research interests are in heterogeneous catalysis, materialscharacterization and nanomaterials synthesis. His research group has pioneered the development ofelectron microscopy tools for the study of catalysts.YAN CHENDr. Yan Chen is a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Departments of Chemical & Biological Engineering atthe University of New Mexico. Her research interests focus on computer supported collaborativelearning, learning sciences, online learning and teaching, and educational equity formulticultural/multiethnic education.SUNG “PIL” KANGDr. Sung “Pil” Kang is an assistant professor at the University of New Mexico. His academicinterests include change management, change model validation, and mindset evolution. He may bereached at
with a focus on design, mechanics, materials, systems, and prototyping. Her research includes work in engineering education, entrepreneurial mindset, and devel- oping new engineering educators. Dustyn received her B.S. in Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering (2003) from Carnegie Mellon University, her M.S. in Biomechanics & Movement Science (2004) from the University of Delaware, and her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering (2014) from New York University.Prof. Jenni Buckley, University of Delaware Dr. Buckley is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at University of Delaware. She received her Bachelor’s of Engineering (2001) in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Delaware, and her MS (2004) and
-Fitzpatrick and G. D. Hoople, “Cultivating an Entrepreneurial Mindset: An Interdisciplinary Approach Using Drones,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 7, no. 3, 2019. www.advances.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/vol07/issue03/Papers/AEE-25- Hoople.pdf15 G. D. Hoople, A. Choi-Fitzpatrick, and E. Reddy, “Drones for Good: Interdisciplinary Project Based Learning Between Engineering and Peace Studies,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1378-1391, 2019. https://www.ijee.ie/latestissues/Vol35-5/12_ijee3801.pdf16 E. Reddy, G. D. Hoople, and A. Choi-Fitzpatrick, “Interdisciplinarity in Practice: Reflections on Drones as a Classroom Boundary Object,” Journal of Engineering Studies, vol. 11
publication; a student, on the other hand, might think ofwriting a summary of existing information. Spending time defining some of these outcomes at thebeginning of the semester will help students plan accordingly and rise to the challenge at hand.Another way to better support struggling students is to encourage more entrepreneurial thinking.Who is their customer/audience, and what are their wants/needs? By focusing on these ideas,students can better understand the idea of external value and find more ways to add external valueto their work. Finally, reviews should occur early and often. By communicating what students aredoing well and what they can improve upon, they begin to feel more comfortable with the controlthey have.Takeaways for
Paper ID #29549WIP: Virtual Writing Group Participation: Surprises & Unintended Out-comesDr. Lisa Bosman, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Bosman holds a PhD in Industrial Engineering. Her research interests include STEM Education and the Impacts of Technology on Society. Within the realm of STEM Education, she has done a variety of work in areas including teaching the entrepreneurial mindset, competency-based learning, self-regulated learning, transdisciplinary education, integrating the humanities into engineering education, workforce development and faculty professional
International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control.Dr. Muhammad Ajmal Khan, Ohio Northern University Dr. M. Ajmal Khan is an Assistant Professor (tenure-track) in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering and Computer Science (ECCS) at Ohio Northern University (ONU). He did his Ph.D. from The University of Western Ontario (UWO), London, Canada in wireless communications and data net- works in 2016. His current research interests include wireless communications and networks, wireless systems security, and engineering education. He has actively participated in KEEN Innovating Curricu- lum with Entrepreneurial Mindset (ICE) Workshop in 2017 and KEEN National Conference 2018. He has actively
concerns. Her research interests include how students approach decision making in an engineering design context. She obtained her BS in General Engineering (Systems & Design) and MS in Systems and Entrepreneurial Engineering from the University of Illinois and PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Modeling the Systems Design Thinking ParadigmAbstractSystems thinking and design thinking have always been considered separate concepts. Systemsthinking is described as the cognition a person uses in the solution and design of large-scalecomplex systems, often requiring hypothetical and holistic approach. Design thinking prioritizesthe
will also be compared to see if they changedor not. Reliability of the data is calculated before moving forward and on completion. 3.4. Empathy Assignment DevelopmentThe Empathy module was created with support from content designers from the University ofNew Haven to develop e-learning modules for use by engineering students throughout the UnitedStates. The empathy module is lengthy to incorporate in this paper so the authors have attached asnippet from it below. The goal for the modules were to instill an entrepreneurial mindset inengineering students. The module presented in this paper was focused on valuable outcomes thatwould promote student curiosity, building connections, and creating value 24–26. The module issegmented into four
Biomedical Engineering CurriculumAbstractHands-on design projects are widely used in engineering curricula to improve hardware/softwareskills, develop design mindsets, and tie real-world problems to engineering curricula with an eyetoward increased student engagement and retention. In Fall 2018, Kansas State University (KSU)accepted its first cadre of incoming freshmen into a new Biomedical Engineering (BME) degreeprogram. In an effort to increase the effectiveness of the program’s design courses, which will beoffered annually to students of various ages beginning in Fall 2020, the authors performed asearch of recent engineering education literature related to the inclusion of design projects inundergraduate BME curricula, focusing on (a) projects
Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering fos- ter or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her a National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent diversity, which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning, to understand engineering stu- dents’ identity development. She
Engineering, LATICE 2014, 2014, pp. 74–77.[6] G. W. Hislop and H. J. C. Ellis, “Using scaffolding to improve written communication of software engineering students,” in ITNG 2009 - 6th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, 2009, pp. 707–712.[7] T. A. Eppes, I. Milanovic, and H. F. Sweitzer, “Strengthening capstone skills in STEM programs,” Innov. High. Educ., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 3–10, Feb. 2012.[8] L. Bosman, “From Doing to Thinking: Developing the Entrepreneurial Mindset through Scaffold Assignments and Self-Regulated Learning Reflection,” Open Educ. Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 106–121, Oct. 2019.[9] T. Morgan, “Enabling Meaningful Reflection Within Project-Based-Learning in Engineering
University. He has additional appointments in the Jonathan M. Tisch College of Civic Life and the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach at Tufts. His current engineering education research interests focus on community engage- ment, service-based projects and examining whether an entrepreneurial mindset can be used to further engineering education innovations. He also does research on the development of sustainable materials management (SMM) strategies.Dr. Daniel Knight, University of Colorado Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the Program Assessment and Research Associate at Design Center (DC) Colorado in CU’s Department of Mechanical Engineering at the College of Engineering and Applied Science. He holds a B.A. in
work was initiated at a KEEN Innovating Curriculum with Entrepreneurial Mindset (ICE)workshop. The author is grateful for the financial support of the Kern Family Foundation toattend the workshop. Facilitators and participants of the workshop provided helpful suggestionsduring the development of the module.References 1. T. A. Litzinger, L. R. Lattuca, R. G. Hadgraft and W. C. Newstetter, “Engineering education and the development of expertise,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 100, No. 1, 2011, pp. 123-150. 2. M. M. Lombardi, “Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview.” Educause learning initiative, 2007, pp. 1-12. 3. T. Byers, T. Seelig, S. Sheppard, and P. Weilerstein, “Entrepreneurship: Its Role in
Mechanical Engineering de- partment. His teaching focus is in fluid mechanics and thermodynamics but has also taught classes such as numerical methods and introduction to engineering. His interests include student pathways and mo- tivations into engineering and developing lab-based curriculum. He has also developed an interest in non-traditional modes of content delivery including online classes and flipped classrooms and incorporat- ing the entrepreneurial mindset into curriculum.Dr. Ashley Bernal, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Ashley Bernal is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technol- ogy. She received her PhD from Georgia Institute of Technology in 2011. She was an
better understanding of currentexperiential learning activity within the College. Over 10,000 students, including 7,350undergraduates, are enrolled in the College of Engineering at the University of University.Through a rich opportunity mix including hundreds of student organizations, curricularopportunities, co-curricular opportunities, research and entrepreneurial experiences, teamcompetitions, and others, 98% of 2018 engineering graduating seniors (Figure 1) reportedinvolvement with at least one type of the following experiences—research, civic engagement,creative work, international experience, entrepreneurship, client project, or internship [3].College of Engineering (n=1604) student engaged learning participation rates are slightly
selected as a National Academy of Education / Spencer Postdoctoral Fellow and a 2018 NSF CAREER awardee in engineering education research. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two-strand research program fo- cused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn.Dr. Pil Kang, University of New Mexico Sung ”Pil” Kang is an assistant professor at the University of New Mexico. His academic interests include change management, change model validation, and mindset evolution. He may
concerns. Her research interests include how students approach decision making in an engineering design context. She obtained her BS in General Engineering (Systems & Design) and MS in Systems and Entrepreneurial Engineering from the University of Illinois and PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Dr. Joe Bradley, University of illinois Joe Bradley is a Clinical Assistant Professor in Bioengineering, Teaching Assistant Professor at the Carle Illinois College of Medicine, and Lecturer in the Gies College of Business at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. He has worked in a variety of industry sectors that includes – consumer products, software, and govern- ment research. He teaches
, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Eunhye Kim is a Ph.D. student and research assistant in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research interests lie in engineering design education, especially for engineering stu- dents’ entrepreneurial mindsets and multidisciplinary teamwork skills in design and innovation projects. She earned a B.S. in Electronics Engineering and an M.B.A. in South Korea and worked as a hardware development engineer and an IT strategic planner in the industry.Carolina Vivas-Valencia, Purdue University Carolina Vivas-Valencia is a Ph.D. student in the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering at Purdue University, West Lafayette IN. Her research interests lie in
entrepreneurial mindset, initiation by student, strength based, quality of the finalproduct as the focus, and use of the final product. Project based learning helps connect thereal world with learning. However, it has its own inherent disadvantages which includedeficiencies in the assessments. If the products are used by self or commercially sold post theacademic assessments, it can meet the criteria for Product Oriented Learning.Over years, engineering programs moved from a practice-based curriculum to an engineeringscience-based model. The intended consequence of this change was to offer students arigorous and scientific foundation that would equip them to address unknown future technicalchallenges [9]. But in reality, the engineering education moved
members [34]; [35]; [36] which cannot be carried out using machines 3 Complex Team Team structure in Industry 4.0 will expand globally [7]; [37]; [38]; [39]; Composition with increases in size, diversity and virtual teams to [40]; [41]; [42] solve complex and challenging team goals 4 Social The right mindset of team members to create [43]; [27]; [44]; [37]; Competency conscious and intelligent actions on their own [21]; [38]; [45]; [39]; emotional response, managing other team members [23]; [46]; [47]; [48]; reaction to build positive relationship and mentoring [49]; [34]; [25]; [50
(Systems & Design) and MS in Systems and Entrepreneurial Engineering from the University of Illinois and PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Mrs. Gretchen M. Forman, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Towards an understanding of the effect of summer programming on early engineering student outcomes.Abstract Starting in 2013, Large Midwestern University has conducted a yearly bridge programfor 30-50 entering students from the state to get a head start on their transition from high schoolto university. The program, entitled Summer Scholars, consists of an eight-week residentialprogram where
Engineering at Purdue Uni- versity. He received his PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh. His research interest includes big-data health analytics. He is actively in collaborating with international partners to enhance American engineering students’ global learning.Mrs. Eunhye Kim, Purdue University at West Lafayette Eunhye Kim is a Ph.D. student and research assistant in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research interests lie in engineering design education, especially for engineering stu- dents’ entrepreneurial mindsets and multidisciplinary teamwork skills in design and innovation projects. She earned a B.S. in Electronics Engineering and an M.B.A. in South Korea
educators.Our quantitative study is based on a dataset of 559 early-career engineering graduates whoparticipated in the Engineering Majors Survey (EMS). EMS is a longitudinal U.S. nationwidesurvey designed to explore engineering students’ and then later graduates’ technical,innovation, and entrepreneurial interests and experiences. Innovative behavior outcomes areanalyzed considering socio-demographic characteristics such as gender and underrepresentedracial/ethnic minority (URM) status, and characteristics of the workplace such as industryand company size. Furthermore, we elaborate on the interrelation of innovative behavior andleadership responsibility.We find no significant differences in innovative behavior of female and male engineeringgraduates
ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2018.[3] J. O. James, V. Svihla, C. Qiu, and C. Riley, “Using design challenges to develop empathy in first-year courses,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2018.[4] J. Walther, S. E. Miller, N. W. Sochacka, and M. A. Brewer, “Fostering empathy in an undergraduate mechanical engineering course,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2016.[5] C. Bell-Huff and H. L. Morano, “Using simulation experiences, real customers, and outcome driven innovation to foster empathy and an entrepreneurial mindset in a sophomore Engineering Design Studio,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
Team-based Learning in a First-year Introduction to Engineering Course,” presented at the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015, pp. 26.913.1-26.913.14.[24] R. Tehrani, M. F. Kiani, E. Bellas, J. J. Helferty, and W. H. Suh, “A Project Based Approach To Introduction To Engineering,” presented at the 2017 FYEE Conference, 2017.[25] C. Wang, “Teaching Entrepreneurial Mindset in a First-Year Introduction to Engineering Course,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.[26] A. Ferrar and P. Watkins, “A Connected Course Approach for Introduction to Engineering Problem Solving,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[27] S. I. Safferman, M. Zoghi, and D. N