Knowledge 3 across specific contexts 2. Understanding and directing Self-Learner 3 oneself as a learner 3. Becoming a reflexive, RAR Learner 3 accountable, and rationale learner 4. Identifying and discerning Ethics & one’s own and others’ ethics and 3 Perspectives perspectives 5. Developing a professional Digital
for both groups.Statistics: Significance tests were conducted using student t-tests with a one tail algorithm. Table 2. Skills and abilities assessed via Post Experience Survey 1 2 3 4 5 Skills and abilities No → Moderate → Extremely Impact Impact large impact 1. Coping with conflict 2. Applying math and formulas 3. Applying creativity 4. Understanding ethics 5. Leadership ability 6. Solving problems independently 7. Appreciating other cultures
and withdrawal, and alternative methodological approaches to organizational and psychological science.Qin Zhu, Purdue University Qin Zhu is a PhD student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His main research interests include global, comparative, and international engineering education, engineering education pol- icy, and engineering ethics. He received his BS degree in materials science and engineering and first PhD degree in the philosophy of science and technology (engineering ethics) both from Dalian University of Technology, China.Ms. Kavitha D Ramane, Purdue UniversityNeha Choudhary, Purdue University Programs Neha choudhary is currently pursuing doctoral studies at Purdue university
this qualitativecase study was to better understand engineering students’ learning experiences in a EWB project,looking specifically at how students participating on the project exhibit attributes of globalengineering competencies. The case study investigates an EWB project with the mission ofdesigning and implementing a solar-powered electricity system for a school in Uganda. Wefound that students do exhibit attributes of global engineering competencies, although attributesregarding engineering cultures and ethics were exhibited more strongly than attributes regardingglobal regulations and standards. We discuss implications of these findings for educationalpractice and future research.IntroductionProviding engineering students opportunities
anenvironment of laziness and over-reliance by teachers. The best way for teachers to counter thisis to be actively involved in both teaching the students and facilitating hacking activities.Limited Administrator Support and UnderstandingIn response to limited administrator support, it was found beneficial to provide monthly “currentethics” lectures. During these lectures, a faculty advisor, an experienced student, or a guestspeaker talked about current events related to ethical hacking. This group meeting can be otherthings in addition, but it will show due diligence in informing students that they can use theirskills to benefit society instead of ending up in jail. When addressed correctly, penetration testingand other cyber-security activities
- Page 26.787.3professionalism, 3.1.9 - ethics and equity, and 3.1.12 - life-long learning1. These new objectivesresulted in the inclusion of the discourse on sustainability and social learning and an in-depthdiscussion of integrative skills (a.k.a. “soft” skills).The New First-Year CourseLater we developed a first-year course with a theme of sustainability, APSC 176: EngineeringCommunication. Its objectives are to provide students with research, critical thinking andadvanced communication skills necessary for success in the study and practice of globalengineering.We believe that a first-year communication course is uniquely positioned for integratingeducation on sustainability (ESD) with graduate attributes. APSC 176: EngineeringCommunication
first implementation of this courseachieved positive student feedback and performance in the class. Results and lessons learned arealso discussed in the paper.Literature ReviewDespite the importance of Requirements Engineering (RE) in Software Engineering, RE is notemphasized in computing education. In fact, most computer science and software engineeringprograms do not include RE courses and tend to cover this area using a few class periods1,2.Additionally, topics and careers related to RE, and subsequently a related course, are perceivedas uninteresting and not relevant to future career prospects3, 4. This is described very well by(Lethbridge et al.)5 as follows: “Anyone who has tried to teach topics such as ethics, quality, process
Industrial, Manufacturing, and Systems Engineering (IMSE) Day held at thecampus of the XXXXXXXXXX during the days of the 24th and 25th of April. The focus of theseminars was to continue with the offering a series of professional development sessions toaddress key issues currently debated and discussed in the Green Energy Manufacturing field.The majority of the planned workshops were directed to address important topics and problemsrelated to green manufacturing education as well as the current leadership directions in preparing21st century technology-savvy workforce and leaders. Six workshops were conducted, wherein,three were geared towards engineering ethics and technical leadership and the other three werebased on Green Manufacturing and energy
community instill in students the ethos of engineering as a service to the public• Projects provide student participants with direct experience with teamwork, communication, customer-awareness, project management, leadership, ethics, societal context, professionalism 77 What IEEE had contributed• A structure for groups of engineering students and educators to receive – Guidance and training – Support network – Local support (IEEE local sections) – Seed Funding – Tracking and assessment• 57 official projects around the world – About double that number initiated and funded locally – 33 official projects completed – Many involve high-school groups (EPICS-High
rubric consistently. The rubric consisted of three information literacy criteria: accessing needed information, using information effectively, and accessing and using information ethically. Scores ranging from 14 can be assigned for each of the three criteria according to the rubric, with situations in which a 0 would be assigned defined during the norming session and noted on the rubric. Page 26.1663.6Identifying information, including name, group number, and course section number, was removed from the assignments and replaced with a code by a staff member who did not participate in assessment. Each of four librarians who participated in
ethical (i.e. authenticity of the material) as well as quality ofthe textbook. It also allows teachers to keep ownership of their work and make changes whennecessary. In two semesters of our trial study, we found that 100% of our students purchased thetextbook. In conclusion, we feel that self-publishing high quality textbooks have the potential tochange education for the better and we plan to continue using them in our classrooms in thesemesters ahead. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2015
and curriculum to provide students with opportunitiesto conceive, design, and implement engineering solutions to complex global issues. This paper describes the development and assessment of a redesigned first yearcornerstone course called Engineering Opportunities. The motivation for the courseredesign was to both be a pathway into the engineering community and to equip studentsfor success in both the classroom and the engineering profession. The course is built on alearner-centered platform that is intended to create an inclusive environment for first yearstudents to successfully transition from high school to college. The course content covershuman-centered design, systems thinking, professionalism and ethics. The intention ofthis
ABET Criteria Traditional AerosPACE ICED Capstone (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve
and those servedb) SC Campus Compact AmeriCorps VISTAs , graduate students, and Krause Center for Leadership and Ethics. Staff administer curricular and co-curricular SL&CE programsa) Summer SUCCEED as Leaders program and AmeriCorps-VISTA Summer Associates focus on prevention of learning loss and inspiring healthy psychosocial changes in youth who live in poverty The Citadel• All Freshmen participate in a service project• All sophomores lead freshmen in a partner requested service project• All sophomores must develop and lead a service project (leadership lab)• A large number of juniors and seniors continue in service projects• Carnegie classified program
reflection component on personal development, social impact, academic enhancement,university mission, and ethics. A mixed-methods approach was used to examine differencesbetween first-year engineering students who participated in service-learning projects during thefall semester of 2014 and those who did not. Students participating in service-learning projectsshowed significantly higher gains in confidence in both technical and professional engineeringskills. Female students in particular showed the most dramatic gains, with an average increase of81.6% in technical engineering confidence as a result of their service-learning course. The highergains in confidence can be attributed to the students learning more about how to identify andunderstand
Task Planning, 2001 7–12 (2001). doi:10.1109/ISATP.2001.92895823. Elfes, A. Dynamic control of robot perception using multi-property inference grids. in , 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1992. Proceedings 2561–2567 vol.3 (1992). doi:10.1109/ROBOT.1992.22005624. Sugie, H., Inagaki, Y., Ono, S., Aisu, H. & Unemi, T. Placing objects with multiple mobile robots-mutual help using intention inference. in , 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1995. Proceedings 2, 2181–2186 vol.2 (1995).25. Lin, P., Abney, K. & Bekey, G. A. Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics. (The MIT Press, 2011).26. Anderson, M. & Anderson, S. L. Machine Ethics
EngineeringLeadership, and (3) Engineering Leadership Capstone) within the minor are developed andtaught in-house. The final requirement involves experiential learning engagement. Studentprogress and leadership development are tracked as they complete the requirements of the minor. The elective courses are classified into four concentrations: (1) communication, (2)ethics, (3) creativity and innovation, and (4) global and societal impact. The four concentrationareas were created following research about other engineering leadership programs and thecourses available to engineering students across the university. The ‘communication’concentration includes courses that focus on the development of students' professional skills andengagement with technical
literature) that aredifficult to achieve in the rest of the engineering curriculum. These learning outcomes includestudent ability to function effectively as a member of a diverse and interdisciplinary team,student understanding of professional and ethical responsibilities, student ability to understandthe impact of technology in a societal context, and student ability to grasp engineering projects ina holistic sense. The course is designed to be a part of the project-based learning sequence and isexpected to prepare students for the challenging senior year projects where students are requiredto demonstrate a strong ability to synthesize and integrate the skills learnt from the previousyears. This course serves as a scaffolding2 to assist the junior
through multidisciplinary projectsand ethics from three students’ perspectives. From these case studies we examine the way we, asstudent engineers, reconcile technocentrism with ways of thinking utilized in liberal education.Analysis of the case studies imply a role for reflection and care in addressing technocentrism andour paper ends with a call for further studies analyzing these relationships.Introduction:“My app will change the world, my product is a disruptive innovation”―these are the mantras ofstartup founders, engineers, and computer scientists throughout the Silicon Valley. Writer JoelStein presents this profile of tech entrepreneurs in his Bloomsberg Businessweek article,Arrogance is Good: In Defense of Silicon Valley.3 This stereotype
chosen a different approach to this section,from teaching a broad overview using a seminar approach, to focusing on teachingspecific software necessary for future courses.Introduction to Chemical Engineering The department faculty has adapted a project-based learning approach due to thelarge success shown in many other similar introductory level courses(3-7). The goal was tointroduce different unit operations through a fun process example that was simple enoughfor the students to follow. The process needed to involve simple chemistry and provideopportunities for introducing different unit operations, teamwork, ethics andsustainability. The other challenge, due to lack of laboratory space, the process ideallywould not require the use of a
n % Literature review 7 78% Knowledge of research area 6 67% Independence 5 56% Technical presentation 4 44% Research ethics awareness 4 44% Data analysis and presentation 4 44% Networking 3 33% Scientific method 3 33% Creativity 3 33% Knowledge of bioenergy 3 33
, the EC2000 Standards of ABET require that studentsreceiving the bachelor’ s degree “ understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global,economic, environmental, and societal context, while other national bodies have similarstandards2. We argued that history of technology and engineering, rather than ethics oreconomics—the common non-engineering courses taken by engineers—is the ideal lens throughwhich to address ABET’ s recognition that that, by its definition as the application of scientificknowledge to the solution of real-world human problems, engineering must respond to changingeconomic, political and social contexts.From 1990 to 2014, The IEEE History Center was located at and formally co-sponsored byRutgers, the State University
Computer Engineering, 2) Department of Physics, 3) Departments of Biology and of Women, Gender, & Sexuality Studies, Portland State University, Oregon, USA j.e.morris@ieee.orgAbstractThe goals of the program described below are to: Address the need for greater technical awareness in the general student population Extend the breadth of nanotechnology education for science and engineering majors, and Expose both student groups to the social, economic, and ethical issues of nanotechnologies.This has been accomplished by three junior-level lecture courses and a
, religious, history, literature, fine arts, sociology, psychology, politicalscience, anthropology, economics, and foreign languages other than English or a student’snative language. Nontraditional subjects are exemplified by courses such as technology andhuman affairs, history of technology, and professional ethics and social responsibility. Coursesthat instill cultural values are acceptable, while routine exercises of personal craft are not.Consequently, courses that involve performance must be accompanied by theory or history of thesubject.I.C.3.d (2) (c) Subjects such as accounting, industrial management, finance, personneladministration, engineering economy and military training may be appropriately included eitheras required or elective courses
engineering departments to ensure that the course broadly meets the needs andexpectations across engineering disciplines. An ABET-style syllabus was also developed toidentify the student outcomes for the course and to help each engineering department understandhow they could use the course to support student outcomes a-k (Appendix). This course provided Page 26.651.4broad coverage of many ABET student outcomes since we included topics such as engineeringand research ethics and communicating research findings, in addition to the research processitself. The course is open to all engineering students and does not have prerequisites; however, itis a 400
instructors at four Canadianinstitutions.Although there is research on engineering ethics education3,4,5,6, there is a gap in examining howengineering instructors view the inclusion of ethics and the other hallmarks of STSE in their ownteaching. This research was designed to help fill this gap in the field, focusing on three keyresearch questions: (1) How do undergraduate engineering instructors describe their teachinggoals and practices?; (2) How do undergraduate engineering instructors describe their teachinggoals and practices with respect to exploring the relationship between engineering, society andthe environment (i.e. STSE)?; and (3) What are the specific challenges or enabling factors inexploring the relationship between engineering, society
, science, and engineering(b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility(g) an ability to communicate effectively(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context(i) a recognition of the need for
: technical coordination; understanding and negotiating engineering cultures;and navigating ethics, standards and regulation.16 Yet, the knowledge, skills, and attitudesrequired remain a subject of ongoing empirical research.17 Moreover, the lists of attributes thathave been developed suffer from methodological and theoretical concerns and are largely notgrounded in empirical research.18One broad definition of global competency is “the knowledge, ability, and predisposition to workeffectively with people who define problems differently than they do.”19 As this definitionhighlights, global competency requires not only specific knowledge, but also the ability andpredisposition to recognize that engineering problems are defined and solved differently
• Page 26.1461.3 MatLab and other Software Tools • Volume/Density • SI Units • Newton’s Laws of Motion • Material Properties • Ohm’s and Kirchhoff’s Laws • Ethics in Engineering • Engineering ResearchAs can be seen by the list of topics, the course is very ambitious in its efforts to expose thefreshmen engineers to the many aspects of engineering.Course logisticsThe enrollment for the course was very large, 221 freshmen engineers took the course in the Fall2014 semester. One of the priorities of the course was to offer the freshmen more personalizedinstruction than they typically see in their first year of college. Thus seven sections of ENGR100were offered. The enrollment in each section was targeted at 25
2015 ASEE Zone III Conference (Gulf Southwest – Midwest – North Midwest Sections) Building and Assessing a Hands-on Learning Experience for Robots in Business and Society Timothy Burg1, Pamela Mack2, Ian Walker2, Richard Groff2 1 Kansas State University,2Clemson UniversityAbstractAn undergraduate course is being developed for non-engineering majors to address the need forgeneral competencies in ethics, science, and technology. Robotics is a field of science that israpidly transforming our lives. Participants in the course will learn the history, mechanics andsoftware, and