continueas a cohort in ME Fundamentals 2 during Spring 2023. The pilot cohort represents approximately 16% ofthe total enrollment of first-year mechanical engineering students at our institution. The literature supportsthe importance of first-year experiences with the major; however, our current ME program of study doesnot directly engage our majors until mid-way in year two as sophomores. While our pilot implementationis not conducting a rigorous engineering education research plan, we are undertaking various directmeasures of course delivery and student achievement with cognitive and affective domain learningobjectives. We anticipate conducting longitudinal tracking of the cohort as they progress through the major,with the hypothesis that we
California, Irvine (Irvine, California) and a B.S. from the University of Florida (Gainesville, Florida). She teaches graduate classes on transportation planning and transportation data analysis. Dr. Hernandez is the faculty advisor for the student chapter of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and a member of ITE. Her research focuses on new and advanced technology applications in transportation systems engineering and is cen- tered on developing tools and methods to collect and analyze freight and commercial vehicle operations data for long range freight planning. Her project portfolio includes work for the Arkansas Department of Transportation, the US Army Corps of Engineers, the National Science Foundation
curriculum and AI concepts. This research focuses onleveraging 6th and 7th-grade science curricula related to state standards to introduce machine learningconcepts by using fossil shark teeth. Researchers from engineering, education, and paleontologycollaboratively developed learning modules to upskill Title I schoolteachers to meaningfully integrate AIfundamentals within their existing curriculum. With a special emphasis on machine learning (ML), fivelesson plans were presented during a week-long teacher professional development. Teachers conceptualizedand implemented ML models that distinguish fossil shark teeth by their taxonomy and primary functionsto recognize ecological and evolutionary patterns. After introducing a lesson, each teacher
international accreditationmovements of business schools around the world, is of interest to the management of curricula assystematic processes and assessment plans that collectively demonstrate that students achievecompetences of learning for the programs in which they participate. The objective of this work is toanalyze the implementation of the management of learning process at Unisinos University’sPolytechnic School, examining its impact on the curriculum management from the programcoordinators' perspective. This implementation process was designed as a training program forcoordinators of the 19 undergrad programs involved aiming at their development as managers of theprocess as the get involved in the process itself and organized in different
transfer students shows that different groups of transfer students need different kindsof assistance in order to succeed at their new college or university ([10] and references therein).Factors affecting transfer student success include: • Emotional factors (feeling of isolation, transfer shock, lack of sense of belonging), • Financial factors (cost), • Educational planning factors (credits earned, time to completion, clarity on credit transfer), • Academic factors (GPA, academic preparedness, required remedial courses), • Institutional factors (size of school, distance of school).Research on the STEM transfer pathway involves two sides of efforts: On the side of communitycolleges, they mainly focus on factors that can
research projects designed to increase women’s participation in post-secondary com- puting programs. This includes working with faculty and staff from a variety of collegiate computing ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Paper ID #36431 programs to facilitate their local implementation of evidence-based recruitment and retention strategies and translating these successes into resources accessible to post-secondary computing programs on a na- tionwide scale. She also engages in project management and strategic planning for the Extension Services Program. Prior to joining NCWIT, Jamie
planning and product design.Based on this review, we developed our survey as follows: • The existing surveys primarily targeted CXOs. Our survey targeted plant technical managers. As the focus of our project is on Industry 4.0 tools and technologies, we anticipate that we can learn more about what is happening on the plant floor if we gather data where “the rubber meets the road.” • In surveying managers about the technologies they are using, we followed Frank et al’s conceptual framework, which provides a useful taxonomy of Industry 4.0 technologies. However, Frank et al.’s sample consisted of Brazilian companies in construction and machinery which may be more traditional and less high-tech than U.S
interest inthe ongoing activities of the agricultural industry. These exercises will incorporateoff-road vehicle balance and design elements, robotics and programming, andunmanned aircraft systems and instrumentation. These lessons will be piloted at acareer center run jointly by three local public school corporations, near theuniversity. Details of the lesson planning strategy, physical lab activities, andoverall learning objectives will be presented.KeywordsAgricultural Instruction, Hands-on Learning, High School, Lesson Plans, STEMIntroduction Throughout the world, the popular press is currently filled with articles describing theshortage of workers in all segments of industry following the pandemic of 2020-2021. This isparticularly
and how they need to frame their academic problem, ask for help, evaluateoptions, and decide for their academic path project.The authors identified two important courses to intervene: UNIV 1301 Learning Frameworksand MECE 1101 Intro to Mechanical Engineering. These two courses teach a variety ofimportant topics, and both traditionally had project elements of technical innovation (MECE1101) and career path planning (UNIV 1301) that required to be formalized into proper projects.For this purpose, the Challenge Based Instruction (CBI) approach (Fuentes et al., 2008;Bransford et al., 1999; Freeman et al., 2016) was chosen to guide the steps of the parallelprojects. CBI promotes engagement when properly implemented, and this is critical
paper describes a recently awarded project comprising the design andimplementation of a Sustainability Engineering (SE) Minor at UPRM. We propose a posterpresentation to discuss our SE Minor plan and collect data about people’s perceptions ofsustainability in engineering.1. IntroductionAddressing "Sustainability" is an overarching challenge for the 21st century, requiring engineersto play a critical role. In the US, undergraduate degree programs that directly attend tosustainability are of two types: (1) interdisciplinary programs that do not grant engineering degreesand (2) environmental engineering programs that are vital but do not entirely address the holisticnotion of sustainability. However, based on our reading of "Strengthening
Penn State’s 2016-2020 University-wide Strategic Plan clearly highlightsdiversity as one of its core foundations, the College of Engineering 2020-2025 Strategic Planreaffirmed and clarified this commitment by making one of its unit objectives the integration ofethics, inclusivity, and sustainability into undergraduate programs throughout the college. In theAerospace Engineering Department, senior undergraduate capstone courses offer idealconditions for exploring Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) issues since these classes areteam-based experiential learning environments intended to mirror the engineering workplace.While Penn State’s year-long Aerospace Engineering capstone courses have historically includeda unit on DEI presented at the
experiences (CURE) into the curriculum. After theworkshop, participants join a year-long coaching process with a faculty mentor to develop and executetheir projects with students.In this paper, we report on the key elements of the workshop design and insights from past participantsacross multiple years. We surveyed all past participants of the workshops, and respondents indicated thatthey had received several benefits from the workshop experience including better planning andorganization of research experiences for undergraduates. Faculty reported significant benefits to thestudents such as more attending graduate school but also to their own research practices includingbuilding a capacity for more readily identifying the value of their work.We hope
semesters has indicated that students enjoy having multi-ple homework assignments throughout the semester when they are asked to look up a paperrelated to a particular field covered in the robotics class, e.g. finding a paper in the field ofmanipulation and mobility after a manipulation lecture. The hypothesis of this work is thatthe topic that is assigned would affect the students relative interest in the subject and in pur-suing a job or internship in the field after the course has ended. During the semester, studentswere asked to look up papers of the same subject for the first half of the semester. In the sec-ond half of the semester, students were grouped into the topics of either motion planning orcontrol when being asked to look up papers in
the classroom. The current solution to tackle these challengeswas implementing a professional identity assessment [3], as well as utilizing the reflectionsto better understand their experiences and what needs arose from the program. IntroductionThe at-home remote patient monitoring sector of healthcare is a growing industry. Thishealthcare market is valued at $24 billion and is projected to reach $166 Billion by 2030 [1],[4]. This industry provides individuals with disabilities or chronic medical conditions withnew levels of independence by allowing them to remain at home. These companiesleverage technology and personally crafted care plans that address the needs of theirclients. The technologies
agile processes. The second activity discussed below highlights principles ofsoftware engineering without requiring students to do any programming. In addition, students areintroduced to humanitarian causes that encourage them to consider how their major cancontribute to social good.Lesson 1: Agile Process ActivityTraditional design processes in engineering and computing follow a sequence of steps. The endgoal of a design process could be a product or it could be a process. The steps to develop theproduct or process using a traditional approach usually start with comprehensive planning to becompleted before proceeding to creation. In contrast, agile design and development utilizesrepeated iterations of a shorter plan-create-test-revise process
Society for Engineering Education, 2023GTAs play a vital role in the implementation of active learning, largely because of their key rolesin the targeted large enrollment courses. GTAs lead recitations and labs in which smallerenrollments and the learning goals of the sessions are well aligned with active and hands-onlearning. Initial project plans included regular (weekly or bi-weekly) seminars for GTAs. Aformal seminar has been implemented for physics GTAs and more informal meetings aboutteaching recitations for math GTAs. While these seminars and meetings build community andprovide an opportunity to introduce pedagogical topics, they begin after the semester has startedand do not provide new GTAs with any training before they dive into their
the implementation of innovative ideas in sustainable energy and bioengineering. 2.Educate students to become independent researchers with entrepreneurial thinking skills and provide themopportunities to use their newly developed as well as innate skills in the summer-end final projectpresentation and competition. 3. Develop a network of mentoring relationship among high school teachers,faculty and underrepresented minority (URM) undergraduate students that will support them in theirprofessional and graduate careers. 4. Educate teachers on sustainable energy and bioengineering and helpthem create their lesson plans for high school curriculum development on nanotechnology and engineeringthat will increase students’ interest in STEM fields.The
instructors (Fig.1) throughout the Spring 2023 semester. We asked to meet with each instructor to plan theimplementation of ABP into the instructors’ courses early in the spring semester. Additionally,we recruited an instructor to allow us to collect data in his course so we could gather informationon students’ responses to ABP. Pre-Data Post-Data Professional Implement Debrief Plan Collection Collection Development Instructors Individual Plan course of student of student Host
facilitators. We begin by briefly describing the FLCmeetings completed and planned for over this time frame, followed by a detailed description ofhow we are investigating the impacts of this intervention. We will present the design of ourqualitative study which includes evaluating participant feedback. We are collecting feedbackwithin each session, as well as over the complete experience. Additionally, we plan to collect datafrom our participants’ students in their Spring semester classes to examine potential impactsmade by our members’ application of concepts gained through the experiences of the FLC. Weconclude by describing our hypothesized expectations for this work and look forward to feedbackfrom the community on these efforts.IntroductionIt is
entrepreneurship education program at the university. Throughexploratory factor analysis, the ESE-E demonstrated a 7-factor solution. Factors includedproduct ideation, business planning, customer discovery, team and network formation, ideapitch, people and human resources, and finance. Additionally, correlational analysesdemonstrated that these seven factors were related to each other positively. This means that ifstudents are confident about one entrepreneurial-related skill described in this instrument, theyare likely to feel confident about other entrepreneurial-related skills described in the instrument.Further and interestingly, students with a growth creative mindset tended to have high self-efficacy for product ideation, team formation, and people
created to showcase how different engineeringdisciplines are contributing toward resilience, mitigation, and adaptation techniques. The moduleincluded a lecture on the basics of climate change—introducing the concepts of “Anthropocene”,greenhouse gases, and the Keeling curve. Students looked at the proposed plan for achieving netzero emissions described in the book, “Speed & Scale” by John Doerr (2021) and identified theengineering disciplines involved in each of the plan’s objectives [5]. A list of articles featuringnews on climate change-related work from all major disciplines was compiled for the students tohighlight recent real-world applications [6]–[19]. At the end of the module, each student createda concept map [20] to link the fields
-regulation in action (SRA) or strategicaction (SA), is the basis of self-regulated learning (SRL). SRC is comprised of iterative andrecursive cycles of interpreting requirements, planning (e.g., resources, time, strategies),implementing cognitive processes, monitoring progress, evaluating progress against internal andexternal standards, and continually refining approaches to better achieve goals (see Figure 1)[16]. This iterative process continues until a problem is solved or the student abandons the goal.As students manage their activities in tasks, they engage in iterative cycles of strategic activity,including actively interpreting requirements (i.e., interpreting task), developing a plan of action(i.e., planning), acting on a developed plan, and
‡ Department of Computer Science • School of Information University of Arizona ? School of Computer Science Georgia Institute of TechnologyAbstractStudents in engineering programs are typically among those having the highest time-to-degree forany of the programs offered on a university campus. Keeping a cohort of students on track to-wards on-time graduation is extremely difficult given the tightly prescribed nature of engineeringprograms. Any deviation from the standard degree plan, for any reason
in Figure 7. The project was organized and managed by higher-level categories ofResearch, Design, Implementation, Testing, and Wrap up. There are proposed milestones for this project created by students. The selected milestones forthe second semester are shown in Table 1. The milestones include the completion of electronics,mechanical, and software implementations. These milestones were completed, and the tableshows the status of the milestones and the dates. This capstone project successfully delivered afunctional prototype as it was planned. Milestones Due Status Complete Mechanical and Electronics Implementation 9/15/22 Completed Complete
use this robotic arm inrecruitment activities. In the following sections, more details will be provided on thedevelopment, plans, and preliminary outcomes of this work-in-progress project.Robotic Arm Developed as a Summer Engineering Internship ProjectThanks to the generous donations, we were able to offer an internal hands-on experience calledSummer Engineering Internship (SEI) to students in the Engineering Physics and AppliedPhysics majors over the past few years. This program engages students with 128 hours of hands-on engineering internship-like experience, mentored by two engineering faculty members. Theprogram aims to provide undergraduate students, with little engineering experience, an enrichingand relevant experience for their
Estimated 2D cross-section sketch 3-5 min. Boring layout and testing plan Boring location selection 3-5 min. Field exploration Clear straw sampling 5-10 min. Fence diagram Fence diagram 5-10 min. Idealized soil profile Idealized soil profile 5-10 min.SetupAt the beginning of class, students are told they will be performing a geotechnical siteinvestigation of a nearby green space for the construction of a building for the campuscommunity. Depending on the learning objectives for the class, students briefly list and discussthe common objectives and outcomes of site characterization
University Mazen is an Associate Professor in the General and Basic Engineering Department at Regional University. His research interests include: Freight modeling and logistics, facilities planning and material handling, optimization and simulation modeling, production planning and control, reverse logistics and recycling, modern manufacturing systems, microalloying and mechanical behavior, teaching statistics and increasing the data analytics content in engineering curricula, and the impact of the administrative policies on the engineering education. Memberships: Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers, American Society for Quality, Institute for Supply Management, and Institute for Operations Research and the
lack of student engagement in the process of planning their curriculum and registeringfor classes. Students enter advising mee?ngs without looking at the course schedulebeforehand or expec?ng their advisors to create a schedule for them. How do we encouragestudents to be more proac?ve in this process? What addi?onal informa?on or tools do theyneed to take ownership of their academic and professional futures?We hypothesized that students need more informa?on around the alignment of their courseswith their career objec?ves to engage more fully in registra?on and curriculum planning a partof the main role of academic advising. In the Fall 2022 advising period, we administered asurvey to Engineering and Computer Science students at a mid-sized
adaptation of national models for “gold/red shirt” programsand a first-year research program for mid-tier incoming students, guided by significant featuresof our local context. Here we describe the motivation and structure for this hybrid model first-year plus support program and an informal assessment of our first year.Background and Local ContextSince first learning of Jackie Sullivan's plan to launch a program she called Goldshirt atUniversity of Colorado-Boulder, an engineering education team at OU started trying to figure outhow we could do something similar for our institution [1]. Our local context resulted in acapacity-limited, economic, and political environment that prohibited a similar launch at ourstate institution. The Goldshirt program
pilot study’s insights show where problems seem to lie in the application through theeyes of students. The corrective and prospective mindset works to provide a framework to form asolution. This combination leads to a well-informed and cohesive human factors approach.Current & Planned DesignWebTA is still in development. Both the current and planned parts of the system will beanalyzed. The current design entails a course page and assignment pages with the ability to seeprevious critiques and submit MATLAB code for critiquing. The planned design adds trainingpages to educate students on antipatterns and associated verbiage based on the antipatterns in thecode submission. Figure 1 displays a potential navigation a student may have