has proven to be effective. A study conducted on Alaskan Yupik tribe students, which integrated the tribe’s culture with standardized curriculum. The results were Yupik students in the program learned math quicker, retained more information, and enjoyed math more than Yupik students who were not in the program [22]. Students saw greater academic success when their teachers exhibited a strong belief in the students learning ability, provided the curriculum in context to each student's lives, and established caring relationships with students. At times it is best that students teach their teachers on how to best teach them. Chapel Hill-Carrboro schools implemented a successful program called Student Six to help train teachers onhow to better
Geotechnics. Prior to joining the doctoral program, Medha was teaching Computer Science and Information Science classes at an engineering institute in Bangalore, India. Her research interests include hybrid/blended learning for engineering education; pedagogy of technology integration and cognitive and motivational processes of learning.Dr. Jean S Larson, Arizona State University Jean Larson has a Ph.D. in Educational Technology, postgraduate training in Computer Systems Engineer- ing, and many years of experience teaching and developing curriculum in various learning environments. She has taught technology integration and teacher training to undergraduate and graduate students at Ari- zona State University, students at
responses to this climatesurvey, was highlighted as an aspect of the culture of engineering education in Godfrey andParker’s [61] ethnographic study. They found that “the shared hardship was likened to a bootcamp mentality seen as binding students into a shared identity” (p. 12). This “shared identity”may help students feel a sense of belonging. There may be ways to promote these academic andsocial benefits of peer relations within the classroom or curriculum. For example, Meeuwisseand colleagues’ [26] found that more cooperative learning environments had a positive impact onstudents’ formal and informal interactions with peers and faculty, which in turn had a positiveimpact on students’ sense of belonging.Ong and colleagues [6] described a
. You are to make recommendations for the upcoming academic year. You must make recommendations based on the limited information below. Assume research interests of all people are similar.Adam – is an Assistant Professor in his 2nd year. His dissertation, focused on computer-integrated processes and manufacturing methods, received an award from the Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME). He enjoys teaching his undergraduate engineering courses where he tries to limit lecturing and get students involved. Adam continues to develop his research agenda and his time has been fairly well protected and not taxed with many extra duties.Bob – is an Assistant Professor who submitted his tenure package two months ago and is waiting
middle school in Phoenix, Arizona.Dr. Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game- based learning in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on stu- dent perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She was selected to participate in the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Frontiers of Engineering Education Sympo- sium in 2013, awarded the American
hardware. For the Fall 2015semester, the class was transformed to utilize microprocessors and focus on hardware limitations.The transformation was done for primarily two reasons. 1) To advance the course’s curriculum.2) Improve student retention.Every day we interact with and are surrounded by embedded systems. From cars to microwaves,they have become an integral part of everyday life. It’s no surprise then that the area ofembedded system design has grown tremendously in the past few years [1]. More graduates areworking with microprocessors as a result of the growing embedded systems field and wouldbenefit from working with them and coding during their undergraduate coursework. Therefore, itwas decided that the courses’ new focus would be centered
contributions to STEM. This paperdiscusses how she accomplished this somewhat hidden achievement and suggests a video anddiscussion activity geared toward prompting undergraduates to reframe their origin stories forcomputer science to include women. In another paper, we discuss the details of her algorithmand present a working program for use as an assignment for students in beginning computerclasses. IntroductionIn our engineering curriculum, we need to emphasize the human aspects of science andengineering. This need is clearly recognized by our accreditation agency, ABET, which requiresa portion of the curriculum to be set aside for such exposure. In order to be creative leaders inScience and Engineering
Paper ID #27451”Ingeniero como vos”: An analysis of the Mby´a-Guaran´ı Practices Associ-ated with Engineering DesignDr. Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of San Diego Dr. Joel Alejandro (Alex) Mejia is an assistant professor of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. His current research investigates how the integration of the historically and culturally accumulated wealth of knowledge, skills, and practices - also known as funds of knowledge - and engineering design can serve as a pathway to and through engineering. Dr. Mejia is particularly interested in how Latinx adolescents bring forth unique ways of
, Gainesville. She did post-doctoral work with the USDA in Peoria, IL as a biochemist in soy- bean oligosaccharides before joining Central State University in 1989. Dr. Lowell maintains a research program in directed energy to kill weeds as an integrated pest management strategy. She mentors un- dergraduate students in funded research projects who have gone on to present at local, state and national conferences.Dr. Xiaofang Wei, Central State University Dr. Xiaofang Wei, Professor of Geography, GIS, and Remote Sensing at the Department of Water Re- sources Management (WRM) at Central State University. Dr. Wei received her bachelor degree from Wuhan Technical University of Surveying and Mapping and her doctoral degree from
with advisors and mentors, and provided brainstorming andsupport to help negotiate these relationships.Evaluation MethodologyAssessment and evaluation were an integral part of this project from its initial conception. Thebudget for this project proposed, and was funded, with an explicit eye for evaluation and anexperienced educator was hired to plan, execute, and evaluate the program. Approval for Page 26.825.5research with human subjects was obtained from the University’s Institutional Review Board (IRB), and participants were provided with an informed consent form and had the option toparticipate in the discussion series with—or without
assessment questions that include the skilltags dimensional analysis and system integration. To begin to place roughness into someappropriate context, the descriptor of “Specialist” or “Specialized” are used. These descriptorswould indicate that the given student has very strong talents in a few specific skills at theexpense of proficiency in other skills. Figure 3B represents the student with the largest averagecircular radius value, which means that that student has the highest level of average proficiencyacross all skill tag questions compared to the class. Though this student does not represent thelowest roughness value, when compared to others this student can be considered fairly “well-rounded”. A well-rounded profile may be likened to an
College of Engineering (CoE) graduation rates for 2015 at our Hispanic ServingInstitution revealed to be 73% for students from households with income above $50,000/year, and54% from households with income below $7,500/year. Similar trends were also noticed in retentionand persistence rates indicating higher attrition among students from lower income families. Thisprogram aims to increase these statistics among LIATS by integrating elements from Lent’s et al.Social Cognitive Career Theory [1] [2] and Tinto’s Departure Model [3][4] in conjunction with ascholarship program. The final objective is to establish an intervention model to be furtherinstitutionalized in the CoE, if proven to be effective [5][6]. In this program we have includedtools to
topic of interest in K-12 education. Childrenthat are exposed at an early age to STEM curriculum, such as computer programming andcomputational thinking, demonstrate fewer obstacles entering technical fields [1]. Increasedknowledge of programming and computation in early childhood is also associated with betterproblem solving, decision-making, basic number sense, language skills, and visual memory [2].As a digital competence, coding is explicitly regarded as a key 21st Century Skill, as the“literacy of today,” such that its acquisition is regarded as essential to sustain economicdevelopment and competitiveness [3]. Hence, the reliable evaluation of students’ process data incontext of problem solving tasks that require CT is of great
Technology. New course materials integrating the parallel and distributedcomputing concepts were developed and offered to undergraduate students. Project-basedlearning was introduced into classroom. More advanced concepts, such as computer vision andmachine learning were explored by undergraduate students. At the same time, the researchresults were disseminated in junior and senior level courses. Faculty members applied effectivepedagogy to teach new generation computing. For all the classes involved in this project, studentsurveys were collected to guide future project implementation. This article shares the currentoutcomes and findings of the project.IntroductionComputing technology has advanced to an unbelievable level compared to decades ago
. Realizeit developed an adaptive learning system for psychology, nursing, and algebra courses at the University of Central Florida. The results showed a moderate increase in performance and high student satisfaction—83% reported that the system helped them learn better. [22] • Increasing passing rates o Smart Sparrow and Australian Universities. Adaptive tutorials were developed to assist in the teaching of introductory mechanics. Failure rates dropped from 31% to 19% in the first year of use and, as the curriculum was tuned, continued to decrease over the next two years to under 10%. They also observed an improvement in performance by students
personalexperiences that led to their enrollment and persistence in a post- secondary engineeringprogram. These research findings will help enable K-14 educators to make informed decisionsabout deliberate efforts to engage and support young women, both in their career through pre-engineering and engineering curriculum supports and in the transition from high school tocollege.Research QuestionThe following research question was explored in this study: How do young women’s perceptionsof their K-14 STEM experiences influence their decision to enroll and persist in an engineeringmajor? The sequential approach allowed the researcher to construct specific focus group andinterview questions based on an initial quantitative survey to gain an in-depth understanding
engineering ABET criteria may force an even furthernarrowing of the engineering curriculum and thus limit the development of the so-called “21stcentury skills” for all students [25], organizations such as NSBE and SHPE continue to provideunique opportunities for engineering students of color to develop many of the professional skillsoutside of the classroom such as those described in the Engineer 2020 vision. These twoprofessional organizations provide unique opportunities for students to acquire skills and buildknowledge that is not (or cannot be) taught in traditional engineering classrooms. AfricanAmerican and Latina/o engineering students develop skills such as communication, ethics, andtime and resource management through interactions with the
to supportstudents electing not to attend campus-sponsored advising interventions6. At the ColoradoSchool of Mines, an ethnographic study found that low-income, first-generation students facespecific barriers to feeling like they belong, including financial pressure, curriculum overload,lower family support, and lower confidence in technical skill, but that they could establish asense of belonging in engineering when their prior knowledge and experiences were validated7.A case study at the University of Maryland at College Park revealed that mismatches betweenstudents’ epistemological identities and the intellectual climate influence the decision to leave orstay in engineering8. Engineering departments at the University of Washington found
member.Since the inception of the Douglass Engineering Living-Learning Community in 2012, 42 first-year women have participated and completed the program. Of those women, 38 havesuccessfully stayed in an engineering curriculum (90% retention rate), and 29 have continued tolive together in another residence hall. To assess the effectiveness of this program on thepredictors of retention, all students participating were asked to complete the LongitudinalAssessment of Engineering Self-Efficacy (LAESE) developed by The Pennsylvania StateUniversity and University of Missouri. This instrument measures several outcomes related toretention and is widely used to better understand students’ feelings towards engineering. Focusgroups were also used to generate
individual diversity(i.e. breadth of experience of an individual) of both faculty and students. Foor et al.63 alsorecommend faculty to pay attention to “us” and “them” classroom dynamics that are establishedas a result of “capital differences” among diverse students and to be aware that students withaverage grades can also excel as engineers. In general, Foor et al.63 insist that faculty must makeunder-represented students feel “more welcome” in engineering colleges. Thus faculty cancertainly help students develop the critically required social capital29 and cultural wealth26.Insight 2: Research-based instructional strategies influence academic integration of all thestudents, more so of women. Faculty members use of research-based
programs becomeeligible for graduate assistantship funding as soon as their graduate career level is activated.Since research is a major component in R1 institution’s mission, such early career opportunitiesare vital to student’s success as this fosters the exposure to research at an early stage, whichfurther hones and develops students’ professional and technical skills. The 4+1 program couldfoster an effective educational paradigm by integrating undergraduates to collaborate and workwith graduate students to enhance their technical and professional skills [7].Background and MotivationSTEM Education in the U.S. has undergone drastic changes over the past years due to concernsrelating to the quality of education being offered to prepare the next
equitable STEM experiences. Such a requirement could foster an interestin STEM subjects and careers in more, diverse students, while reducing the focus on STEMpipelines. This would parallel the situation in some other countries where the college track requiresall students to follow the same curriculum, regardless of gender. In another way, it would alignwith education in the humanities and social sciences where the focus is not explicitly on careersand pipelines, but on knowledge. Harvey Mudd College has had success in reaching gender parityin computer sciences by starting first year students at the same place, making certain that all takeIntroduction to Computer Science, thereby eliminating the effect of women feeling less preparedbecause of prior
recognize that STEM is a path that is open to them if they want to take it. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Ten Years Later – Where Are They Now?AbstractThis paper explores the educational and career trajectories of the alumnae of an outreach activityfor girls. The outreach activity was originally developed using an integrated marketing approachto attract girls into engineering programs.1 The program, a two day, overnight experience forrising 9th, 10th and 11th grade girls, focuses on showcasing engineering as an exciting, creativeactivity, including activities developed from that perspective. Started in 2005 and held annuallysince then, a total of over 500 girls have
Paper ID #19036Can I really do this? Perceived benefits of a STEM intervention program andwomen’s engineering self-efficacyChristina S. Morton, University of Michigan Christina S. Morton is a doctoral student in the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Ed- ucation at the University of Michigan. Christina has professional experience in Academic and Student Affairs, serving as an Academic Success Coach at Johnson C. Smith University and a Residential Direc- tor at North Carolina State University. Her primary research interests are in the motivation and persistence of underrepresented minorities in Science
Science and Management Program, and her research focus is in student engagement and retention in engineering and engineering technology education. Contact: kgt5@txstate.eduDr. Araceli Martinez Ortiz, Texas State University Araceli Martinez Ortiz, Ph.D., is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education in the College of Educa- tion at Texas State University. Araceli is Director of the LBJ Institute for STEM Education and Research and teaches graduate courses in Integrated STEM Curriculum and Instruction. She collaborates on various state and national STEM education programs and is PI on major grant initiates with NASA Educator Pro- fessional Development and NSF Improving Undergraduate STEM Education. Araceli holds
Paper ID #22662Second Year of Using the Sidekick Basic Kit for TI LaunchPad with Elemen-tary School StudentsMs. Tara N. Kimmey, Colorado STEM Academy 5th/6th grade teacher in Westminster, Colorado. She earned her Bachelor’s of Science in Liberal Studies from Longwood University in 2011 with a concentration in Elementary Education. She then went on to earn her Master’s of Science in Curriculum and Instruction in Special Education K-12 in 2012.Dr. Cameron H. G. Wright P.E., University of Wyoming Cameron H. G. Wright, Ph.D., P.E., is a Professor with the Department of Electrical and Computer En- gineering at the University of
to give a lot of benefits to an employee, they would most likely hire amale. I do not really believe there is any bias involved with this because the company just doesnot want to spend extra money on benefits.” The students’ comments were particularly surprisinggiven that 40% of the faculty of the Computer Science and Engineering Department is female,giving the students ample opportunity to observe successful females in computer fields.The IAT assignment’s failure to raise the awareness of students of issues related to the gendergap made a new approach necessary. As part of a learning community investigating possible usesof Problem Based Learning in the curriculum at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, theauthor began to develop a
.” Influences on Attitudes towards STEM. It is important to understand students’perspectives of learning STEM subjects. As they expressed, math was a big challenge for them,because it was related to science, engineering, and other STEM subjects. The concepts andproblems in math (e.g. algebra and fractions) were difficult to understand and were lessinteresting than other subjects. While, in science learning, students had troubles to comprehendthe concepts, integrate the knowledge, and solve complicated problems. However, studentsbelieved their capabilities to get good grades and push forward in math and science learning. After participating in two-weeks STEAM camp, students indicated the cooperativelearning environment was an important factor
IPEDS(Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System) standards, we use the 6-year point toinvestigate outcomes and only include students for whom six calendar years of data aftermatriculation are available. Including all the data for each student would bias the results in favorof earlier cohorts who have had more time to return and using a longer window would eliminatethe more recent cohorts from the study. There are several groups of students for whom the 6-yearpoint is not an accurate representation of their final educational outcome: those who arecontinuing at year 6, but eventually drop out (we know of 58 in engineering and 24 in othermajors), and those who have stopped out in year 6 but later returned (we know of 145 whoreturned to
and adapted by other instructors, and integrated intotheir own courses and/or GCSP, to reach an even broader audience.The on-ground version of this course uses a lot of active learning techniques and is discussion-based, incorporating activities such as mind mapping, debates, role-play-based simulation,design challenges, and case studies, to help students explore and understand the interdisciplinarynature of the complex global challenges. Additional detail on the on-ground version of the coursecan be found in [2]. This high level of in-person, active learning posed the biggest challenge totranslate to the MOOC. Therefore, in addition to reaping the benefit of modularization forportability, there was also a strong focus and intent on making