# within the object-oriented software developmentenvironment Visual Studio 2017. The software is organized in several subroutines, whichcomprise the numerical solution of the torsional pendulum’s equation of motion, the readoutand illustration of the results and the visualization of the motion of Pohl’s wheel.For the numerical integration of Equation (16) different numerical methods with varyingorders of the truncation error have been implemented. By default the fourth-order Runge-Kutta (RK4) method is offered, but the user can choose by mouse click the explicit Eulermethod, Heun’s method, or a second-order Runge-Kutta (RK2) method. Thus, different ordersof accuracy can be tested and compared for the same time step size, an additional benefitwhen
integrating the variables that matter to them is a step thatwe can take to increase the number of women and underrepresented minority graduates inengineering. This paper shares an evaluative case study as we report findings from data gatheringtools guiding our continuous improvement process. The findings illuminate students’ perceptionsof their engineering design course and curriculum. We conclude by discussing the pedagogicaldecisions the teaching team is making as a result of listening to our students’ voices.IntroductionAccording to a 2012 report from the President’s Council of Advisors on Science andTechnology, the U.S. needs approximately one million additional science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) college graduates in order to
. • Demonstrate flexibility in thinking. • Independently pursue learning. • Students will build team work skills (brainstorming, integrate independent work in a team environment, respect and appreciate other opinions, share learning)We did an ad-hoc assessment of the above-mentioned learning outcomes as we could not haveour own surveys. Assessing informally their level of interest and engagement, all 15 girls were100% engaged in every activity and enjoyed their time. Students were asked questions such as: 1. Do you find a connection between what you learn in school and the real engineering world? What specific connection did you find in doing this activity? (both activities) 2. What mathematics concepts did you apply here
Pharmacy. Most of Kate’s publication history revolves around how health and technology interact, and her primary research focus is on how people are accessing, understanding and disseminating information.Ms. Kari D. Weaver, University of Waterloo Kari D. Weaver holds a B.A. from Indiana University, an M.L.I.S. from the University of Rhode Island, and is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Instruction & Teacher Education, School of Education at the University of South Carolina. Currently, she works as the Instructional Design Librarian at the University of Waterloo Library in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Her research interests include co-teaching, information literacy perceptions and behaviors of students across
Japan and Norway. The results of this survey were then compared to the resultsof a similar survey taken by domestic engineering graduate students and international engineeringgraduate students studying in the U.S. Findings indicate that there are statistically significantdifferences between U.S. domestic engineering graduate students with international engineeringgraduate students for most of the engineering writing attitudinal factors studied, indicating thatinstructors should begin to tailor approaches differently for individual students. From a researchperspective, we will continue to use these findings to investigate and illuminate cultural variationsthat can influence the writing process.IntroductionWriting is an integral aspect of
, among other publications.Dr. James Nyachwaya Nyachwaya, North Dakota State University James Nyachwaya is an Associate professor in the departments of Chemistry and Biochemistry and School of Education at North Dakota State University.Emily A Berg, North Dakota State University Emily Berg is the Director of Institutional Research and Analysis at North Dakota State University.Dr. Jared Ladbury, Minnesota State University MoorheadProf. Paul Kelter, North Dakota State University Paul Kelter’s 39-year career has focused on the integration and transfer of knowledge among students and teachers at all educational levels. He was the inaugural director of the Science Outreach Office at the University of Wisconsin – Oshkosh in
-guided study on how systems engineers develop their expertise. Additionally,many systems engineers have an integrative role, “requiring a deeper understanding of a widerange of areas than provided by a focused education” [Ross et al., 2014]. Anecdotally, manyuniversity faculty agree that successful systems engineers can only be made through experience,as evidenced in part by the relatively few programs in systems engineering, especially at theundergraduate level1. As Adcock et al. [2015] note: “current undergraduate engineering education1 A brief note on terminology is appropriate here. While there are many graduate engineering programs that addressthe problems posed by complex engineering systems, these programs tend to focus on the science of
learning scientists in twouniversities has been working on a collaborative grant project funded by the Department ofEducation for the purpose to enhance the student diversity in STEM fields. In this project, weaimed at (1) contextualizing the student learning experience in STEM fields, and (2)implementing an integrated STEM education approach to teach the skills and knowledge that arenecessary to be competent in engineering and technology careers in 21st century. The researchobjective of the present study is to investigate the effectiveness of evidence-based instructionalstrategies and the integration of the maker culture on students’ problem solving and life-longlearning skills. Specifically, we introduce evidence based pedagogy together with
Paper ID #27029Board 70: Development and Implementation of a Non-Intrusive Load Moni-toring AlgorithmDr. Robert J Kerestes, University of Pittsburgh Robert Kerestes, PhD, is an assistant professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of Pittsburgh’s Swanson School of Engineering. Robert was born in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He got his B.S. (2010), his M.S (2012). and his PhD (2014) from the University of Pittsburgh, all with a concen- tration in electric power systems. Robert’s academic focus is in education as it applies to engineering at the collegiate level. His areas of interest are in electric
’ persistence [12]. Introductionto civil engineering classes are an opportunity to provide this information and the RePicture Appcan be a tool for this.RePicture App Objectives and DevelopmentThe RePicture App objective is to increase interest and diversity in engineering. Our goal is totest the App’s use in civil engineering curriculum and then expand to other engineering andSTEM fields. The RePicture App helps students repicture the world around them and viewengineering as a career that is shaping the future.RePicture is a free tool to bring the engineering community together, including high schoolstudents, engineering students, professional engineers, and engineering organizations. It wasdeveloped based on our review of research and discussions with
doing” and one of the core values of “servicelearning”, the service learning project evaluates the quality of instruction by integrating the state-of-the-art technologies in an interdisciplinary project. It addresses Cal Poly Pomona’srecognition of its responsibilities to the community and the importance of applying andadvancing sustainable practices in our campus classrooms. It also provides a welcomingenvironment for prospective students to learn about Cal Poly Pomona.College of Engineering at CPP has Outreach Offices responsible for community developmentand outreach programs. The outreach programs enhance the College of Engineering’scommitment to support underserved populations by recruiting and graduating increased numbersof historically
Paper ID #27563Collaborative Autoethnographic Study of a Large-Scale Flipped ClassroomImplementation with Multiple InstructorsRobyn Paul, University of Calgary Robyn Paul PhD student at the Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary where she also works as the Program Evaluation and Planning Specialist. She is the team lead for the faculty on all matters related engineering education including teaching and learning, curriculum development, Capstone design and engineering accreditation. Robyn just completed master’s degree in engineering education where she is looking at the impact of engineering leadership
SIUC and completing the baccalaureate degree. To ensure scholars advance academicallyand professionally, they are integrated into a mentoring and support network of staff, peers, facultyand professionals. Together they engage in a diverse set of professional development activities.Goal 2: Improve the education of future scientists, engineers, and technicians, with a focus onacademically talented low-income students (Quality Educational experiences in EnergyScience/engineering) Energy Scholars join a learning community through a common curriculum and facultymentored hands-on learning experiences. Individual assistance is provided for scholars to secureinternships and research opportunities that focus on collaborative interdisciplinary
manipulation of integrated system, malware information from within a in an Air- chosen covert device and to vulnerable device; optical computer otherwise Gapped leak of test key or acoustic noise reduced disconnected from Computer captured signal integrity surroundings Can use existing sound Acoustic MATLAB and signal Capture sounds of mechanical software and MATLAB to Keyboard
within their coreengineering courses [6].In Engineering Justice, Leydens and Lucena [3] present criteria to be used “to guide educators[to render] SJ visible within the engineering sciences without compromising valuable coursecontent” and pedagogical tools designed to integrate SJ and engineering in the curriculum. Wewere intrigued by the “Problem Re-write Assignment” in which students are guided to write asocial context for decontextualized engineering problems by specifying how “a system...mightaffect humans using it, including how it might enhance or curtail SJ criteria as opportunities andresources or the distribution of risks and harms” [3]. Lucena conducts this exercise in“Engineering and Social Justice,” an upper level course required of
Paper ID #26684Does Student Satisfaction Equal Learning? A Differentiated Design Strategyfor Course Improvement: Lessons Learned from Learning Outcomes andGrade DistributionDr. J. Martin Chernosky, Texas A&M University J.Martin Chernosky is the Learning Architect for the Studio of Advanced Instruction and Learning for the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. He earned a B.A. in Education, an M.Ed. in Adult Learning and Technology from Western Governors University, and an Ed.D. in Educational Leadership from the American College of Education. With over 25 years in dynamic adult education settings ranging
Paper ID #26974Virtual Instrumentation for Study of a Fluid Power SystemDr. Alamgir A. Choudhury, Western Michigan University Alamgir A. Choudhury is an Associate Professor of Engineering Design, Manufacturing and Management Systems at Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan. His MS and PhD are in mechanical en- gineering from NMSU (Las Cruces) and BS in mechanical engineering from BUET (Dhaka). His interest includes computer applications in curriculum, MCAE, mechanics, fluid power, and instrumentation & control. He is a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Ohio and affiliated with ASME, ASEE
an instructor that has extensive hands-on experience inengineering technology and engineering. This new faculty member has been a key tosuccessfully incorporating the hands-on manufacturing portion of the 1030 Introduction toEngineering Design course.Item 2: The CCET 1030 Manufacturing Course will have new curriculum and outcomes.This course will be taught once each semester at SUU.The course was revised to a complete start to finish manufacturing process with significanthands-on experiences. The course requires the student to reverse engineer an electric guitar,model the guitar, customize, fabricate and re-assemble the guitar. This course revision wasmade over the summer of 2018 and taught to the rural high school instructors in the
University Dr. Gallagher is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, with joint appointments to Mathematical Sciences and Education & Human Development. Her research inter- ests include student cognition in mathematics, development of teacher identity among graduate teaching assistants, curricular reform to foster diversity and inclusion in STEM fields, and development of mathe- matical knowledge for teaching. She is co-PI on an NSF INCLUDES Design and Development Launch Pilot, ”Statewide Coalition: Supporting Underrepresented Populations in Precalculus through Organiza- tional Redesign Toward Engineering Diversity (SC:SUPPORTED),” Award #EEC-1744497.Abigail E Hines, Clemson
and Engineering Ethics journal were found using a keyword search on“human rights” AND privacy. Privacy is also a key issue in computing education, being requiredunder the ABET Computing Accreditation Commission’s criteria (5. Curriculum, (a)2.d. Humansecurity) [37] and recommended for computer engineering education (e.g. in the ACM/IEEE’sCurricular Guidelines [38], privacy is found among the Preparation for Professional Practiceoutcome 9, contemporary issues). A general discussion of scenarios and issues related to ethicsand privacy is provided by Britz [39] from the perspective of an information professional.Human rights are discussed as one of three ethical norms applicable to privacy (also includingtruth and freedom). The paper is written
classrooms and developing K-16 curriculum in earthquake engineering and spatial visualization.Dr. Nathan Delson, University of California, San Diego Nathan Delson’s interests include mechatronics, biomedical devices, human-machine interfaces, and en- gineering education. He isCo-founder and Past President of Coactive Drive Corp., which develops novel actuators and control methods for use in force feedback human interfaces. Medical device projects include an instrumented mannequin and laryngoscope for expert skill acquisition and airway intubation training. He received his undergraduate degree in mechanical engineering from the University of California, San Diego, and then went on to get a doctorate in mechanical
, problemstatements, and teamwork…” [33]. Another approach at Baylor University [34] builds upon theICE workshops with monthly lunchtime seminars along with “End-of-semester FacultyDevelopment Workshops” and an “Internal Grant Program: the KEEN Innovators Program.”The purpose of the Innovators program is to encourage faculty to integrate entrepreneurialconcepts in their courses through stipends supporting the development of modules. The durationof the module can be from 15 minutes up to two hours in length and the modules are packagedfor dissemination. While there are existing professional development opportunities that instillthe Entrepreneurial Mindset in engineering courses, no such program exists for non-engineering,foundational STEM courses. This
. Collaboration is a vital skill for all students, across the spectrum. For example, thechallenge by Prince [12] for engineering faculty to promote collaboration in their classes isexplicitly required by the accrediting agency for engineering programs [14]. Collaboration isspecifically linked to the engineering curriculum via two of the 11 required student outcomes: (1)the ability to function on multidisciplinary teams and (2) the ability to communicate effectively[14]. Employers also desire graduates who can collaborate on teams; however, they reportstudents are not well prepared in this area [15]. Engineering graduates of a large publicuniversity reported in an extensive survey the most important ABET competencies for theirprofessional practice were
engineering design course. The framework wasderived from an analysis of best practices already in-use within the course. The resulting eightcharacteristics will ideally provide greater cohesiveness between the course’s module content andthe scaffolding design projects. While projects that leverage the framework have been piloted,additional evaluation is still needed, such as assessing changes in engineering design self-efficacyduring the design project. Additionally, engagement with curriculum can be measured with a preand post open-ended survey asking students to describe the engineering design process; coding ofresponses could provide insight into how much or how little students understood and engaged withcourse content.5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This
at Stevens Institute of Technology for an M.E. in Environmental Engineering. She is the lead laboratory technician for the Environmental Biological Systems course, the Environmental Science Curriculum, and the USMA Environmental Engineering Sequence Curriculum.Dr. Michael A. Butkus, United States Military Academy Michael A. Butkus is a professor of environmental engineering at the U.S. Military Academy. His work has been focused on engineering education and advancements in the field of environmental engineering. His current research interests are in physicochemical treatment processes with recent applications in drink- ing water disinfection, lead remediation, sustainable environmental engineering systems, and
, indoor air quality, humanthermal comfort, and energy conservation. While working in industry, he oversaw maintenance and managementprograms for various facilities including industrial plants, high rise residential and commercial buildings, energyaudits and condition surveys for various mechanical and electrical and systems. He has conducted several projects toreduce CO2 fingerprint for buildings by evaluating and improving the energy practices through the integration ofsustainable systems with existing systems. Professor Shehadi is currently investigating various ways to reduceenergy consumption in office buildings by integrating research and curriculum development. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education
, University of Central Florida Richard Hartshorne is an Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of Learning Sciences and Educational Research at the University of Central Florida (UCF). He earned his Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction with a focus on educational technology production and technology and teacher education from the University of Florida. Prior to his tenure at the UCF, Richard was an Assistant and Associate Professor of Instructional Systems Technology at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte for seven years and a physics instructor at Ed White High School in Jacksonville, FL for seven years. At the University of Central Florida, his teaching focuses on the integration of technology into the
projects.Since the 1970s, WPI’s project-based curriculum at the undergraduate level has been providingsignificant value to students. WPI curriculum requirements balance both “soft skills” with acomplementary offering of “technical skills” and depth required in each discipline. Through thesenior-year “Major Qualifying Project” (MQP), companies can also interact with faculty andstudents by providing a meaningful engineering/science challenge through sponsorship. Whencoupled with an internship or co-op experience, businesses can grow university talent into strongfull-time hire potential. These students, by spending ample time with the employer throughinternships and sponsored project work, understand the business culture and mission of theorganization and
Paper ID #25326Cui Bono. Engineering and Technological Literacy and Higher EducationDr. John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin John Heywood is professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College Dublin- The University of Dublin. he is a Fellow of ASEE and Life Fellow of IEEE. he is an Honorary Fellow of the Institution of Engineers Ireland. He has special interest in education for the professions and the role of professions in society. He is author of Engineering Education. research and development in Curriculum and Instruction; The Assessment of learning in Engineering Education; The human Side of Engineering, and Empowering
Motivations and ExpectationsStudents largely chose to participate in the CPM program because of the opportunities to gainexperience integrating engineering and medicine, interacting with clinicians and clinical units,and alignment with their career goals. Survey results supported similar reasons reported in theinterviews. Respondents reported interest in witnessing first-hand how engineering andmedicine interact and playing an active role as a CPM. The prospect of advancing their careergoals was another popular motivation for becoming a CPM. Regardless of whether studentswere interested in pursuing medicine (n=8), dentistry (n=1), medical device industry (n=5), orconsulting/technical services (n=3) at the time they participated in the CPM program