Session 3215 SEVE - A Structural Engineering Visual Encyclopedia by Robert M. Henry ASEE/University of New HampshireIntroduction - The ProblemCivil engineers use construction (or engineering) drawings to convey to other engineers and laypeople their designs for bridges, highways, buildings, etc. These drawings are often labeled"contract drawings", because they define a contract between the architect, the engineer, and thecontractor as to how the finished project is to look, what materials are to be used, and how it is tobe built
. d. Practical application for teachers and outreach staffEach lesson plan provides a summary of the topic and its alignment with the NGSS, learningobjectives, a breakdown of the lesson segments by time, a list of materials needed, and follow upquestions. These lesson plans can be easily replicated in any classroom.Authentic Engineering Connection. Identify and describe how you will explicitly address theways in which your lesson or activity is representative of the processes, habits of mind andpractices used by engineers, or is demonstrative of work in specific engineering fields.i At leastone of those must be within the first four listed, below; i.e., do not only check “other”. Check allthat apply: Use of an engineering design
them together in focusedsettings to find solutions to specific problems. Students who participated in the conferencegained a unique experience that opened their eyes and minds to the world around them, and thefaculty members who attended the event were able to gain tremendous insights that they couldshare with their own students.3. The Global EngineerThe practice of civil engineering and construction on a global scale requires that engineeringgraduates be adequately prepared to deal with diverse issues that surpass their geographicalboundaries and challenge their comfort zone. Parkinson7 presented a rationale for developingglobal competence. In his synthesis, he answered the question of why global competence isneeded and provided concrete
. Engineering training process in Russia on each stage of professional education is subjectto Federal State Educational Standards (FSES). According to FSES of higher professionaleducation, university has to provide socio-cultural environment for harmonized personaldevelopment. Growing social significance of engineers in the contemporary global context of rapidtechnological changes and constant innovational processes in industry require engineeringuniversity graduates to by flexible and adaptive, to have open mind and be ready for innovations.Besides, future engineer should be able to integrate into global technological network, be mobileand communicate with colleagues all over the world. Therefore social-psychological competenceof future
Session 1898 ROBOTS! – Freshman Clinic in Mechanical Engineering Hong Zhang Jennifer Kadlowec College of Engineering, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028 zhang, kadlowec@rowan.edu 1. Introduction The integration of both hands-on experience and minds-on thinking in engineeringeducation is the hallmark of Rowan Engineering. The Engineering Clinic 1,2 sequence wasdeveloped to promote project-based learning. As a unique component of the Rowanengineering curriculum, engineering clinic is a framework that includes the topics fromintroduction of
guidelines for applying problem solving skills andserves as a roadmap for integrating troubleshooting into academic curriculums. Table II. Framework for Teaching Troubleshooting Skills Elements Phases Tools/Methods for Teaching 1. Identification - System Diagrams Understanding the 2. Comprehension - Product Manuals Problem - Flow Charts - Mind Maps - Reverse Engineering Exercises 3. Data Collection - Product Manuals
nature of engineering practice? As engineeringeducators, our responses to these questions often emphasize contextualization. Efforts toencourage engagement with public welfare, sociotechnical thinking, or social justice amongengineering students often begin - and sometimes end - with illuminating the broader context ofengineering practice and problems. For socially minded engineering educators, contextualizationis nearly always a virtue.This paper analyzes and critiques practices of contextualizing engineering. Based on a qualitativecontent review of recent engineering education literature, we first describe and classify differentmodes of contextualization. In some cases, contextualizing means adding personal context oralternative perspectives
-regulated learning, self-efficacy,and general well-being [5]. In our study, we explored whether we could help students persist inengineering by encouraging such positive learning dispositions and behaviors.In this work-in-progress paper, we report preliminary results from a one-credit course called“Engineering the Mind.” We used design-based research and the Transtheoretical Model (TTM)of Health Behavior Change to design the course and assess the outcomes. The goal of the coursewas to encourage students to adopt positive learning dispositions and behaviors by teaching themhow the brain works.BackgroundDesign-based research (DBR) is a research method that evaluates theory-based interventions(that were developed in laboratory conditions) in complex
-adaptive-expertise-in-biomedical-engineeri ng-students[6] National Research Council, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2000. doi: 10.17226/9853.[7] G. Hatano, “The nature of everyday science: A brief introduction,” Br. J. Dev. Psychol., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 245–250, 1990, doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1990.tb00839.x.[8] S. Wineburg, “Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts,” Cogn. Sci., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 319–346, 1998, doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2203_3.[9] N. M. Hicks, A. E. Bumbaco, and E. P. Douglas, “Critical thinking, reflective practice, and Adaptive Expertise in engineering,” presented at the
Developmental Psychology, Vol. 8, pp. 245-250.5. Winburg, S., (1998). Reading Abraham Lincoln: An Expert/Expert Study in the Interpretation of Historical Texts. Cognitive Science, Vol. 22(3): pp. 319-346.6. Bransford, J., A. Brown & R. Cocking, Eds. (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. National Academy Press: Washington, DC.7. Fisher, F. T., & Peterson, P. L. (2001). A Tool to Measure Adaptive Expertise in Biomedical Engineering Students. 2001 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 24-27, Albuquerque, NM.8. Fisher, F. T., & De Rosa, A. J. (2021). A Review of Adaptive Expertise and its Integration within Undergraduate Engineering Curricula. Presented at the Middle Atlantic ASEE Section Spring 2021
, and Kacey Beddoes. "Team effectiveness theory from industrial and organizational psychology applied to engineering student project teams: A research review." Journal of Engineering Education, 102, no. 4 (2013): 472-512.12. Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, 1980.13. Tien, Lydia T., Vicki Roth, and J. A. Kampmeier. "Implementation of a peer-led team learning instructional approach in an undergraduate organic chemistry course." Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39, no. 7 (2002): 606-632.14. Pazos, Pilar, Marina Micari, and Gregory Light. "Developing an instrument to characterise peer-led groups in collaborative learning
Paper ID #11775Does Motivation Matter for Conceptual Change: Developing Effective Qual-itative Research ApproachesDr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research
Paper ID #40028Engineering Global Competencies through Study AbroadDr. Patrick Tunno, Pennsylvania State University Patrick Tunno is the inaugural Director of Penn State’s Center for Global Engineering Engagement and an Associate Teaching Professor. He has overseen and continues to lead the development and expansion of diverse international initiatives. Under his leadership, the college has established an award-winning Global Engineering Fellows Program, launched Penn State’s first 3+1+1 program for international stu- dents to pursue a one-year master’s degree, and initiated new interdisciplinary faculty-led study abroad
an electrical fluid (current).” This seems like the statement in Sabbagh that the realexistence of electrical properties is not essential for engineering knowledge. Nilsson 2015 [12, p.11] includes almost the same sentence: “In circuit theory, the separation of charge creates anelectrical force (voltage) and the motion of charge creates an electrical fluid (current).” Perhapsthis change was for brevity or clarity, but it is epistemically significant. When discussing idealresistors Nilsson 1983 begins by saying “One must keep in mind several important properties ofthe ideal resistor” and follows by describing three assumptions. Nilsson 2015 omits much of thisdiscussion, presenting only one assumption and ends by saying “In this book we assume
can see this worked out in Kallenberg’s [22] approach tothe teaching of ethics to engineering students, and we can also see that by substation of theengineering examples it is a more general application of design as knowledge. As both Kallenburgand Koen point out in any area of thought and practice that is ‘messy’ heuristics are valuable.Exercise 3. Student activity in relation to teaching decision making and its outcomesI had neither of these things in mind when I asked my students to design and implement a lesson toevaluate the merits of Wales and Stager’s design/problem solving heuristic for teaching decisionmaking. This heuristic was widely discussed by engineering educators in the nineteen seventies (Eckand Wilhelm, 1979 [23]; Heywood[24
Mathematics Humanities Study of the human- Study of the natural Study of mathematical Study of human mind made world world constructs and perception Engineering design Scientific inquiry Mathematical analysis Rhetoric and criticism Iterative design process, Hypothesis testing Theorems, proofs, Eclectic methods, optimum solution and evaluation rational constructs comparative values Artifact produced Theory confirmed Theorem validated Opinion rationalized Engineering, the noun, uniquely connects all three disciplines. In creating
Session 3663 Theoretical Foundations for the Foundation Coalition Core Competencies Jeffrey Froyd, Karen Frair Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology/University of AlabamaAbstractThe Foundation Coalition was funded in 1993 as the fifth coalition in the National ScienceFoundation's Engineering Education Coalitions Program, and is currently in the seventhyear of a ten-year project. The member institutions have changed since its formation andnow include Arizona State University, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Texas A&MUniversity, Texas A&M University - Kingsville, the University
Choi, University of Southern California Helen Choi is a Lecturer at Engineering Writing Program at the USC Viterbi School of Engineering. She teaches Advanced Writing and Communication for Engineers and is the Co-Chair of the USC Academic Senate Campus Climate Committee. She is a former corporate attorney, licensed to practice in New York and California.Cheyenne Gaima American c Society for Engineering Education, 202112With the research about the roles of affirmation and storytelling inSTEM success and community-building in mind, we created Re-Engineering Engineering Education (RE3) program in whichundergraduate engineering students are hired and trained to
ENGINEERING ACCREDITATION: PROCESS AND CHALLENGES Tamer Ceylan University of Wisconsin-Platteville E-mail: ceylan@uwplatt.edu Phone: (608) 342-1367 ABSTRACT This paper summarizes the important aspects of the experience gained before, during, and after the recent ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology) accreditation visit for the engineering programs at the University of Wisconsin-Platteville. From an engineering educator’s perspective, it provides information on the critical process issues and challenges with the
Introduction to Advocating for Engineering Miriam Quintal Lewis-Burke Associates, LLC February 4, 2019Lewis-Burke and ASEE• Lewis-Burke has been representing ASEE since October 2017• As federal consultants, Lewis-Burke promotes the policy agenda of scientific organizations to a diverse set of audiences, including: – United States Congress – White House/Administration and the Federal Agencies – Like-minded organizations and the advocacy community in Washington, DC• 27 policy experts with range of expertise/backgrounds allow multi-layered issue teams with deep expertise in agencies and scientific/education areas• 38 clients exclusively composed of non-profit entities: universities, scientific
.~ I Session 2358 Teaching Engineering via PictureTel David L. Huggins, Robert Madar ASEE/Penn State University At Penn State New Kensington and Penn State McKeesport, a pilot lecture/problem-solving course inStrength of Materials was taught using distant learning
processes, we can prevent more errors.ConclusionsBased on the literature survey, and the experiences from the authors including the projectspresented in this paper, it is clear that engineering education has a fair share of critical thinkingcontent. However, there is a lack in addressing the subject in manufacturing education as well asutilizing the tools for gathering information, organizing and presenting it, along withidentification of what is taking place – analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. With this in mind, aproject-based manufacturing product design course relating not only to the engineering designand to development process, but also to critical thinking and its critical pieces need to bedeveloped. This course will also have strong
Introduction to Advocating for Engineering Miriam Quintal Lewis-Burke Associates, LLC February 3, 2020Lewis-Burke and ASEE• Lewis-Burke has been representing ASEE since October 2017• As federal consultants, Lewis-Burke promotes the policy agenda of scientific organizations to a diverse set of audiences, including: – United States Congress – White House/Administration and the Federal Agencies – Like-minded organizations and the advocacy community in Washington, DC• 30 policy experts with range of expertise/backgrounds allow multi-layered issue teams with deep expertise in agencies and scientific/education areas• 41 clients: universities, scientific societies, managers of large federal facilities
matters related to their professional development.Thus, one can see that Engineering First seeks more to grow new habits of the mind as aresult of their learning experience, and it sets students’ expectation that their educationwill be much more than just an accumulation of domain specific knowledge.Implementation ExperienceOne of the essential features of a successful change in an educational program is itscapacity for continuous improvement. An understanding by the faculty that they mustalways be assessing for improvements – those driven by recognition of better learningobjectives as well as those driven by unsatisfactory meeting of existing learningobjectives – may be uncommon but is essential. Assessment of the courses inEngineering
engineers who are environmentallysensitive, the “caring” aspect of environmental learning is increasing in importance [25]. Tochange engineering students’ mindsets from technologically-oriented to contextually approaches,Kastenberg et al. suggest that engineering students need to possess the goals of embodying thevalues of a new integrated culture of engineering, as well as enhancing self-awareness ofcontemporary issues [20]. Manion also suggested that engineering faculty members need notonly to increase students’ contextual awareness but also to complement this awareness byassisting them to transform their attitudes, values, and philosophies to match the engineer of the21st century [26]. Developing the students’ attitude of having an open mind to
Press.Hargreaves, D.J. (1997). Student learning and assessment are inextricably linked. European Journal of Engineering Education. 22 (4), 401-409.Gardiner, L.F. (1997) Redesigning higher education: producing dramatic gains in student learning, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, 23 (7), Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.Gardner, H. (1983) Frames of Mind: The theory of multiple intelligences, New York: Basic Books.Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Beng Lee, C. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95 (2), 139-151.McKenna, A. F., & Agogino, A.M. (2004). Supporting mechanical reasoning with a representational-rich learning
. Student learning outcomes e. Assessment 4. Engineering Design: Innovation and Invention a. Design processes: definitions, parallels b. Practicing problem solving and design c. Evaluating products and designs 5. The Technological World a. Previous definitions b. Changing paradigms 6. K-5 Educational Programs a. Children’s Engineering b. Engineering is Elementary c. Competitions (Odyssey of the Mind, Science and Technology Fairs, etc.) d. Working with parents: STEM nights 7. Educational Grant Writing and Publishing a. General grant writing principals b. Identifying requirements c. Research versus program
program.Rationale from a student perspectiveFor an engineering student interested in biotechnology or the pharmaceutical industry, anundergraduate biochemical engineering program is very important. Biotechnology is afield that is expected to grow and provide employment opportunities to college graduates.Recently, several of the world’s largest chemical companies have announced major newbusinesses based on the life science instead of traditional petrochemical processing1,2.The recent mapping of the human genome may also open opportunities for life-science-minded engineers.MSU provides a comprehensive program to prepare chemical engineering graduates toimmediately be effective in the biotechnology industry. In addition, the program alsooffers students in
Session 1630 Encouraging Engineering Students to Become Teachers Gary Benenson, James L. Neujahr, Herbert Seignoret, Ed Goldman City College of New York (CCNY)/ CCNY/ CCNY/ Brooklyn Technical High SchoolA great divide exists between the dominance of technology in society and its nearly total eclipseas a topic of general study. Technology as a subject is basically non-existent in elementaryeducation, and reserved largely for specialized students in the secondary grades. Althougheducational reformers and standards writers generally recognize the importance of technology inthe curriculum, progress has been very slow in
Session 1532 Evolving an Undergraduate Software Engineering Course Mark J. Sebern Milwaukee School of EngineeringAbstractMany undergraduate software engineering courses combine team projects with discussion ofdevelopment cycle concepts. It can be difficult to connect these elements in a coherent way, especiallywhen the lecture is a broad survey and the project is sharply focused on meeting the needs of a client.This paper describes the evolution of a senior software engineering project course that incorporatesiterative development of a classroom example and an object-oriented