level biomedical engineering specific courses. While thebasic courses cover essential engineering topics and attempt to incorporate biomedical examples,the upper level courses specifically target biomedical topics, using the basic engineeringprinciples as a basis. This paper describes the organization and contents of a two-semestertransport sequence for undergraduates, covering topics from Navier-Stokes to bioartificialorgans.Design of First CourseThe first course was designed as a traditional engineering course in Transport Phenomena,focusing on the fundamental problems, with prerequisites of differential equations andmechanics (syllabus can be found online atwww.slu.edu/colleges/parks/departments/BME/curriculum/330/bme_330.html). Topics
anything) prior to class. The firstday of class includes an introduction to the course syllabus – a detailed schedule of course topics,relevant textbook sections, and homework and exam dates – and expected prerequisitebackground per the Course Catalog. To maximize course retention, students are advised toreview topics before class. However, the only incentive is self-motivation. In the past, the authorhas witnessed only a few diligent students who carefully review material prior to class meetings.The newly-created lecture videos are intended to help prepare students before class. The authoris currently creating an online quiz for each video – administered through Cal Poly’s PolyLearn(Moodle) online system – to test for student comprehension and
. [Accessed: 1 Mar 2021].[2] "CDIO Syllabus 2.0 | Worldwide CDIO Initiative", Cdio.org, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.cdio.org/benefits-cdio/cdio-syllabus/cdio-syllabus-topical- form. [Accessed: 3 Mar 2021].[3] C. Araneda and amp, "CDIO Organization | Worldwide CDIO Initiative", Cdio.org, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.cdio.org/cdio-organization. [Accessed: 3 Mar 2021].[4] R. Bragós, " Las competencias del profesorado en el entorno CDIO," REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, vol. 10(2), pp. 57-73, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2012.6097. [Accessed Dec, 2020][5] "Proceedings of the International CDIO Conference | Worldwide CDIO Initiative", Cdio.org, 2021
participated in the common module delivery. Thefirst experience was gained with the guidance of the British team by using Associate Online forthe module “Researching multimedia in education”.Due to the technical development and free availability of Moodle the consortium decided toexamine the inter-compatibility of these VLEs. With Finnish volunteering the new commonmodule delivery was decided for “Multimedia and e-learning: e-learning methods and tools”.Resources can already be reached on the Moodle VELVITT area of Tampere Polytechnic(moodle.tamk.fi).Now by the “Multimedia and e-learning: e-learning methods and tools” module we introduce thesyllabus of the virtual course and the teaching-learning process in VLE.I. Aims and Assessments
this course. AppendixII shows example of these LOs for chapter 1. The LOs provide students with a guide for learningthe material in the chapter. For each of the LOs we prepared a power point slide with an online Page 24.1018.4video, which is about 1 to 4 min long as shown in figure 1. Before coming to the lecture, studentswatch about 10 or more online videos related to the LOs as shown in the syllabus in Appendix I.These videos introduce the basic concepts and material of the course. At the end of the each video the students take an online quiz that is automatically graded. The students can view thevideos multiple times and take these
[11] addressed various Faculty questions as it relates to SCL andhave documented several examples and practices that help the Faculty. They addressed facultyquestions like, ‘Can the content in the syllabus be covered using SCL learning approaches? Canthis approach be used for small and large classes?’ Their research also suggested solutions andresources to address them: ‘how to respond to those students who might resist this approach andhow to help better team work’, etc. Again, implementing many of these for both online and onsiteclasses would need to be tailored for each type of course offering.It was observed during this initial implementation that generally students expect to be passivewhen they come to an onsite class. It is a challenge
acknowledgement, a policy on academic integrity,family education rights and privacy act (FERPA), mental health resources, disability resourcesand services, policies on religious observances, and sexual misconduct reporting obligations.Each institution may have their own recommended syllabus statements and instructors caninquire about recommended or required statements. An example instructor philosophy isincluded below. Your success and development throughout this course is my priority. Below you will find several beliefs that are paramount to achieving this goal: • All students are valuable and important; this course is designed to be accessible and inclusive. • Student-centered active learning is key to mastery and
Course Outcomes.Learning: Building the Electronic Course PortfolioAs part of the assessment process, each faculty member is responsible for producing a courseportfolio. The course portfolio contains students’ key assignments as a means to directly assesstheir attainment of course outcomes which in turn correlate to student outcomes. In the past, eachfaculty member was required to submit an objective evidence folder at the end of each semesterthat contained key assignments, the syllabus, and FCAR to be used at the yearly review.Gannon’s ECE Department uses EvalTools®15 – an online program assessment toolset – thatreplaces the functionality of Blackboard® for daily classroom lesson and assignment activities;additionally, it tracks key assignments
believe themselves or others may have been able to perform well on assignments without attending classes in person, nor reviewing recorded lectures?2.2. Course StudiedThe studied senior capstone design course covers many topics, including review of process flowdiagrams (PFDs) and piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs), applying informationlearned in previous courses toward the design of chemical processes, use of ASPEN, costingcapital equipment / manufacturing, and engineering economics. The course is delivered as atwice-a-week 75-minute lecture with active learning activities (e.g. think-pair-share) led by theinstructor approximately every 15-20 minutes. Classroom and syllabus policies remainedunchanged from those prior to the
course, there are several courses of action. Theseinclude banning generative AI from the classroom, allowing limited use of generative AI,incorporating generative AI into the classroom and engaging with it, structuring classroom worksuch that generative AI impacts are minimized, or changing assessment such that the desiredprocess of learning is rewarded. 1. Ban all generative AI. Some faculty may consider banning the use of generative AI in the classroom or for high stakes activities such as exams. Nominally this might be a statement in the syllabus. It might also be banned for specific types of assignments within a class. As generative AI expands across platforms, such an approach can be difficult as generative
, and analysis and reporting of results.The Communications Practicum provides focused instruction in both written and oral communication skills.The practicum syllabus is closely coupled to the projects lab. Strong motivation for the students to learn com-munications skills is provided since only a small fraction of the grade in the projects lab is determined by thefaculty advisors who work with each student team. The majority of the grade is awarded by the course staffwhose main insight into the research project is through a variety of written and oral assignments. Practicuminstruction is conducted in a specially designed electronic seminar room which allows online drafting, annota-tion, and peer review of documents, as well as video-taping and
Mathematics, and a BS degree in Mechanical Engineering. He is also a Registered Mechanical Engineer in California, and a Designated Engineering Representative (DER) for the FAA. He resides in California with his wife and three children. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Scaling-up a MOOC at a state university in a cost-effective mannerAbstractEducation in the world is changing rapidly. Online course offerings are increasing at anexponential rate as universities attempt to meet the needs of a diverse global community oflearners. Amidst this potpourri of online courses, massive open online courses (MOOCs) areemerging as an alternative way to educate a multifarious group of learners worldwide
would consist of foursegments. Students were required to work on assignments, take the quiz, and complete thesegment test by a designated date. They were permitted to work ahead of the schedule, butthey were unable to work past any pre-determined deadline.Course information was provided including course description, course goals, class syllabus,grading requirements, and test information (Figure 2). Page 6.356.2Proceeding of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright @ 2001, American Society for Engineering EducationFigure 2 Course information page A
and lower the barriers to QISTentry? As outlined in the literature [11]–[16], various factors, such as learning environment, design andorganization of the curriculum, assessment, feedback, and learning new tools outside thestudent's comfort zone can impede learning. This research focused explicitly on identifyingfactors that could serve as barriers within the newly designed modules for the Introduction toQuantum Computing course (EEE 4423).Course Structure of Introduction to Quantum Computing (EEE 4423)The course syllabus was designed to cover the 9 key concepts for Quantum Information Science(QIS) learners [17]. This course aims to provide engineering students with an in-depthunderstanding of quantum computing software as well as some
introduce core computer design concepts primarily to college students studying applied science and technology programs, such as computer science and information technology. With a particular focus on single-board computers and associated hardware modules, students are introduced to core computer compo- nents early in their coursework, and encouraged to study advanced engineering concepts as higher elective courses to help them better understand the underlying design of hardware modules. Hands-on ac- tivities and problem-based modules are re-designed with the flexibility to be applied in settings that involve all in-classroom cohorts, as well as courses offered in synchronous and/or asynchronous online learning methodologies, which is
studied how the lab reports were evaluated. We collected the instructional materials,such as course syllabus, lab handouts, or lab report assessments, given to the students from seveninstructors in nine lab courses from both electrical and mechanical engineering programs.The study results may contribute to engineering educators to visualize a school’s engineering labreport writing education. Also, this study presents engineering lab instructors’ writingpedagogies and preparedness for lab report assignments and assessment from the program level.It also suggests room for improvement in engineering lab report writing education.2. Methods of Approach2.1 Study AreaThis study took place in the engineering programs (Electrical and Mechanical) at
ideas, and workingcollaboratively with interactive virtual media which aligns with active learning strategies [4]Meanwhile, many round table discussions focused on the advantages and disadvantages ofdistance learning, including a radical idea of permanently replacing certain in-person classeswith a remote teaching mode. Online teaching has been perceived as a temporary response to theglobal health crisis but it warrants careful assessment and consideration as a viable teachingmethod for the next generation of students. The author’s institution deployed diverse modes ofinstruction for the Fall 2020 semester, including asynchronous, synchronous, hybrid, live stream,and in-person courses. Table 1.1 shows the definitions of the various instruction
education (based on Fall 2022 enrollment data) were considered ineach state (n=100). The research team recognizes that there are other institutions beyond these100 teaching civil engineering and that using this set of institutions does not encompass allcoursework offered to students in the U.S. However, following this method enables a reasonablescope while still supporting evaluation of a broad cross-section of civil engineering programs.For the educational institutions identified, the online course catalogs were reviewed forundergraduate- and graduate-level engineering courses related to timber or wood. Course titlesand descriptions were screened for keywords, including “wood,” “timber,” “design,” and“engineering.” General civil engineering
discussion and group problem solving. Computer projectors are typically available, and many instructors project their solutions to problems and explore the models developed in class. PowerPoint is extensively used, as are online videos and images of real reactor systems. Some environments allow students to solve problems on computers alongside the instructor. Some classes are taught in a studio environment to facilitate interaction amongst students.In addition to program determined outcomes, individual instructors tend to have areas ofemphasis corresponding to their individual perceptions of importance of class topics. Typicalindividual goals for this course include Application of conservation laws
development, areas of greatest mastery and greatest confusion, andcommunicate their understanding to the instructor. A literature review of both homeworkstrategies and classroom assessment techniques shows the development of the dual-submission-with-reflection homework methodology. The instructors administer the methodology throughsyllabus explanations, coversheet templates, and online learning management systems.Instructors discuss the effectiveness, benefits, and drawbacks of the methodology. Results fromstudent surveys illustrate the effectiveness of each component of the dual-submission-with-reflection homework methodology.KeywordsHomework, Instructor Perspectives, Student PerspectivesIntroductionHomework in engineering courses serves many
in real time during the lab sessions, itbecame clear to me that in most cases the major deficiencies resided in post-lab work and in theirability to submit a coherent, well written final report. Trying to dissect the source and location ofthe deficiencies, I decided to keep track of the performance of the various lab classes with themetric of these parameters. The hope was to be able to characterize with some quantitativemeasures (a) the progress of the class, if any, within the same semester/lab and (b) the progressof the class along the sequence of the four lab courses described above.Accordingly, while all the reports were graded following the syllabus description, I also kept arecord for myself with the marks assigned in each one of the
as an on-demand consultant to thefaculty members in departments delivering the targeted courses. At the end of the semester, asecond meeting with each Chair/Director took place to assess progress toward a systematic androbust process for assessing the Core Outcomes addressed by the targeted courses.5.3 Introduction to Philosophy (PHL 1000)In the original collection of syllabi, only one PHL 1000 syllabus was available. Because this is arequired course for all undergraduate students, multiple sections are offered, and several full-timeand part-time faculty participate in teaching the course. After identifying PHL 1000 as a targetedcourse in this study, the first author requested and obtained from the department Chair the PHL1000 syllabi from
both of these areas. He has implemented online instructional tools to enhance student experience in hydraulics and hydrology courses.Dr. Ken Rainwater, Texas Tech University Dr. Ken Rainwater is a Professor in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Construction Engineer- ing at Texas Tech University. Rainwater has 34 years of experience in water resources and environmental engineering. He teaches courses in fluid mechanics, environmental engineering, engineering hydrology, water systems design, groundwater hydrology, groundwater contaminant transport, and water resources management. His research expertise is in problems of groundwater quantity and quality, remediation of soil and groundwater contamination, and
tools withtheir courses? And does this embracement and usage change over time?This study examined both the embracement and usage patterns of a group of freshman studentswith an online learning management system in the School of Engineering and Technology atIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) through their first 18 months. Asurvey was administered twice, once following the first semester of the freshman year and oncemidway through the first semester of the sophomore year. The survey questions focused onevaluating the amount of engagement and usage of the learning management system. Severalopen-ended questions concentrated on learning what students found especially difficult innavigating the environment; how they perceive
as a resource to students [2] [3]. With larger research institutions oftenhaving more laboratory equipment available for student use, students benefit from the combinedresources of both institutions and collaboration between unique student cultures and perspectives[4].To foster such collaboration, MOOCIBL (Massively Open Online Course for Innovation-BasedLearning) was used as the central learning management system for a multi-institutionalCardiovascular Engineering course across four universities around the United States [5]. Thecourse introduces students to a non-traditional Innovation-Based Learning environment. In thislearning model, students define and track their learning goals by creating tokens representingtheir completed learning
students and advisors. Like a course syllabus, it is a sort ofcontract and spells out the roles and responsibilities of both advisor and student. It is meant to beupdated each semester and contains practical information such as resources, deadlines, andrelevant campus offices. It also should contain learning objectives or outcomes. Such a syllabuscan then provide a basis for assessment of an advising program or individual advisors.If the ideas of Lowenstein24 are applied to the syllabus, i.e. that the advisor’s job is to inculcatethe student with the entire curriculum, both formal and informal, then the advising syllabuswould be expected to differ for liberal arts degrees and professional degrees. In the case ofengineering degrees, we propose that
over 32,000 times, an average of 232 views perstudent during one semester of Molecules and Cells.The Blackboard course site and syllabus links provide access to over 100 videos, animations, andsimulations. The videos are generally under five minutes and give the student a quick firstexposure to the terms and concepts which will be covered in more depth during the lecture.Spring 2016 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 8-9, 2016 GWUBased on survey data, 30% of the students took advantage of these online resources. Thesimulations on Blackboard allowed students to work through multiple scenarios, such as theeffect of varying concentrations of an enzyme inhibitor on product formation, or the effect ofglucose on activation of the lac operon. We
SUN MON TUE WED THUR FRI SATFigure 3: Students accessed the Blackboard site over 32,000 times, an average of 232 views perstudent during one semester of Molecules and Cells.The Blackboard course site and syllabus links provide access to over 100 videos, animations, andsimulations. The videos are generally under five minutes and give the student a quick firstexposure to the terms and concepts which will be covered in more depth during the lecture.Spring 2016 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 8-9, 2016 GWUBased on survey data, 30% of the students took advantage of these online resources. Thesimulations on Blackboard allowed students to work through multiple scenarios, such as theeffect of varying concentrations of an enzyme inhibitor
platform.The relation between CDIO and these platforms are shown in Fig. 2. These platforms areillustrated below.1) Teaching integration platformThis platform can integrate, manage and adapt a variety of teaching resources withcustomization features including e-learning systems, virtual training or simulation systems,online to offline teaching laboratories, etc. The platform is employed for the management ofhandouts, simulation, courseware, practice, exams, and students, and it covers all teachingtasks of the required courses of related product projects. After learning all task-specificknowledge points involved in a CDIO product project, students can access and learn allneeded knowledge and skills to complete the project, for example, the application
using e-mail to clarify assignments was enough, but a largemajority (87 percent) wanted both clarification and reminders.Much of the information students want in e-mail is already in the syllabus and course materials.Reading these materials and taking notes in class would seem to be sufficient, thus making e-mail unnecessary. Surprisingly, 84 percent recommended a weekly Sunday night messagealerting students to happenings and assignments in the upcoming week. This method may seemlike coddling. To clarify this point, I later added a statement in a brief addendum to thequestionnaire: “Sending reminders of assignments one or two days before they are due and aSunday night reminder of the upcoming week’s work is coddling students.” Sixty-nine