higher education. For a number of years within engineering education, engineeringaccreditation boards in the US, Canada, and internationally, have recognized lifelong learning asone of the key competencies of engineering graduates. Characteristics of the lifelong learnerinclude the ability to “set goals, apply appropriate knowledge and skills, engage in self-directionand self-evaluation, locate required information, and adapt their learning strategies to differentconditions” (p. 292-293)1, 2. Inherent in these skills of lifelong learning is the ability for one to bea self-regulated learner with the ability to plan, monitor, control, and adjust his or her behaviourto achieve a desired outcome. In a learning context, self-regulation is highly
FDM system and that may delay the prompt delivery to current masterdata to consumers [4]. Operational MDM (FDM) can deliver significant gains in the formof operational efficiencies and process consistencies, but companies recognize thepotential risk, costs and time to enterprise-breadth data to management of such a programand seek the executive sponsorship and funding required to make it a success [9].Godinez [4], Shankar [13], Shankar and Menon [14], and Loshin [10] focusedspecifically on the factors influence have on FDM and CDM. They discussed how thesefactors influence CDM or FDM selection and the influence of business and technologyon the master data management planning. For instance Shankar [13] explained thedifference between business
, the value of establishing amathematical model became apparent; this proposed model is planned to account for andmeasure such phenomena. Toward this objective, introducing an expansion of the binary systemto include “depth of coverage” or emphasis of a topic is an integral component of the model.Application 2: Testing the SchemeAnother study of applying the classification scheme occurred during a National ScienceFoundation sponsored workshop at the First Year Engineering Experience Conference in 2013.During the workshop, samples from 28 different classified courses were collected and analyzed.4The study used two different methodologies, namely by course and by outcome analysis. Bycourse analysis involves the examination of the whole course
work in this course includes enhancement of DAQ and continual assessment and improvement of the course. Additionally, we are planning to bring in other state-‐of-‐the-‐art equipment for student use including a water jet, new lathes and an upgraded quality control table and equipment. Conclusions This paper presents an overview of the Mechanical Engineering Field Session experience, specifically related to manufacturing and design. This open-‐ended experience for students is a unique opportunity for students to jump into several open-‐ended design problems and work on a team of fellow peer students. The 3-‐week, 40+ hour/week experience
also test common household materials for their ability tocontain, absorb, or remove oil. In the fourth lesson, they design and test a plan to clean up an oilspill in a tub of water, using what they’ve already learned.For the matching E4C unit, we combined multiple lessons so as to match time spent on thelessons across treatment conditions. We revised lessons selected for inclusion in E4C to be age-appropriate and share a similar format across E4C lessons and units. We also designed a fewlessons to address learning objectives for which we could not find engineering lessons availableon the web. In lesson 1, students learn about pollution and how pollution moves through theenvironment by observing a model. In lesson 2, students read about
acting versus Balancing reflecting and experiencing versus thinkingFigure 2: The Nine Basic Learning Styles9These nine types of learning styles are associated with four learning abilities: ConcreteExperience (CE), Active Experimentation (AE), Reflective Observation (RO), and AbstractConceptualization (AC). The learning abilities are defined in Figure 3. Learning Ability Definition Abstract Logically analyzing ideas, planning systematically, acting on an Conceptualization intellectual understanding of the situation Active Showing ability to get things done, taking risks, influencing Experimentation people and events through action
identify factors necessary to be considered as an engineer. The study showsthat sophomores, juniors and seniors were more likely to identify themselves as engineers thanfreshmen. Male students were also more likely to identify themselves as engineers than femalestudents. Furthermore, students with future career plans to continue in an engineering related fieldafter graduation were more likely to self-identify as an engineer. The most commonly identifiedfactors as being necessary to be considered an engineer were intangible factors such as being ableto make competent design decisions, being able to work with others by sharing ideas, acceptingresponsibility for the consequences of actions, and speaking/communicating using accuratetechnical
project report at the end of the course. A general handout of "Design your Process forBecoming a World-Class Engineering Student" has been published in Appendix A of “StudyingEngineering: A Road Map to a Rewarding Career”11. The project challenges students to evaluatethemselves against a benchmark student—referred to as a "world-class" engineering student—based on the following objectives: 1. Setting goal(s), e.g. which major to pursue, graduating with an engineering degree, etc. 2. Developing a strong commitment to the goal of graduating in engineering, setting-up a plan to graduation 3. Being prepared to deal with inevitable adversity 4. Managing various aspects of personal life including interactions with family and friends
a consulting engineer working for various firms including: Parsons Engineering Science, Appian Consulting Engineers and Marshall Miller and Associates. As part of his experience, Dr. Schaad has: designed waste water treatment systems to address industrial and domestic waste streams; developed designs of storm water control structures and strategies to ad- dress water quality and quantity; designed fluid transport systems to replace water supplies impacted by anthropogenic sources; designed fuel transport and delivery systems; developed designs for commercial and residential development; prepared land use plans; developed designs to protect against potential flood hazards; designed and developed plans and
representative samples ofengineering students. We planned three data collections, and examined empirical evidencebetween each collection to make revisions to the items based on results generated from itemanalysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA).Our initial conceptual framework included four constructs: multiplicity, connectivity, adaptivity,and spontaneous order. We hypothesized that these four principles comprised collaborativeemergence during teamwork in engineering classrooms. Multiplicity was defined as recognitionof strengths and weaknesses of group members. Interconnectivity was defined as interactionamong group members. Adaptivity was defined as consideration of competing ideas within thestudent groups during problem solving. Spontaneous
first week and 23 for the second. Camps were jointly taught by UC Davis students fromthe Mechanical Engineering and Education Department. Daily lesson plans were developed inconjunction with the C-STEM Center staff to ensure teaching effectiveness. During the camps,campers were engaged in different activities aiming at introducing the basic concepts ofengineering design such as brainstorming, prototyping and testing. Computer aided designactivities were held for three hours every day and the 3D modeling curriculum was used duringthat time.During the computer design activities, particular attention was given to how the mechanicaldesign software SolidWorks and 3D printing are introduced to students who have no priorexperience using these tools
planned that as part of their designs, the decision was made to allow it. However,allowing students to place parts of their design in the target zones ended up making the challengetoo easy and almost all teams created similar solutions.All but one team created the same design. This design incorporated some kind of tubing that ranfrom the start point on the third floor over the railing and ended in a box on bag placed in themost favorable zone, zone 1, on the second floor. They inclined the tube so that the ball wouldnaturally roll down from the start point to the end point in zone 1. Because of this, students wereable to get around the challenge of controlling the landing of ball reliably into zone 1. The otherteam that did not have the previous
findings that were originally presented by theauthors at a prior conference and are reviewed here for comparison to the English studentfindings.26 Engineering students related critical thinking to engineering concepts they deal within the classroom. These engineering course concepts included: applying a framework/plan;weighing, selecting, and testing options (in materials science this is known as selection and Page 26.124.5design); using background knowledge; and using problem solving. For instance, one studentexplained the critical thinking process in a design course as: There’s a coach but no one tells you what to do or how to solve the
in Business Administration and a Doctorate in Educational Foundations. She has had primary responsibility for the design and implementation of numerous state and federally funded program evaluations addressing educational issues for pre-K through graduate studies. Dr. Casta˜neda-Emenaker brings in more than 15 years of program and policy evalua- tion experience and a strong background in educational research and evaluation methods. She has been key evaluation personnel on projects focused on curriculum development and assessments, planning and implementing professional development that involved both traditional and innovative methods, STEM- related projects, college access, and various other community projects. Dr
be aligned with these national objectives.The planning team consisted of the authors as this small team possessed the expertise, resourcesand authority to perform the needs assessment and to implement the recommendations thatresulted. Dr. Stanton worked for Delphi Automotive after earning his B.S degree in ElectricalEngineering at Clarkson University. He earned his Ph.D. in Engineering Education at VirginiaTech, and was employed at Colorado State University as a Research Scientist under the HEVEprogram. Dr. Thomas Bradley was Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at CSU withindustrial and academic experience in HEV engineering and analysis. Bradley was PI for CSU’sportion of the HEVE program and had authority to implement necessary
Engineering (CSAE), 2011 IEEE International Conference on 4, 300 –304 (2011).19. Argall, B. D., Chernova, S., Veloso, M. & Browning, B. A survey of robot learning from demonstration. Robot. Auton. Syst. 57, 469–483 (2009).20. Jensen, E., Franklin, M., Lahr, S. & Gini, M. Sustainable multi-robot patrol of an open polyline. in 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 4792–4797 (2011). doi:10.1109/ICRA.2011.598027921. Thrun, S. & Mitchell, T. M. Lifelong robot learning. Robot. Auton. Syst. 15, 25–46 (1995).22. Zhou, H. & Sakane, S. Sensor planning for mobile robot localization based on probabilistic inference using Bayesian network. in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and
overcome their often inadequateprior educational experiences and succeed in their university programmes and laterprofessional lives. For South Africa, this is the only hope of supplying the country’s need forenough competent engineers within a reasonable time frame. In this paper we describe thedesign features of a planned five-year engineering degree program and show how it hascontributed to an increase in the one-year retention rates both in engineering as a whole andfor black students, thus addressing the dual challenges of increasing retention and equity.ContextThe University of Pretoria is a large urban university of nearly 50 000 students,approximately 5000 of whom are enrolled in nine undergraduate engineering programs,which, according to
and engineering employers consider as a must for engineering graduates.However, the process of achieving critical thinking skills is not always well laid out and /ordeveloped. Although a number of models have been developed in this topic by many academics,developing “critical thinking skills” can be a long and arduous process. In particular, thedevelopment of higher education program level critical thinking skills require detailed courselevel planning, structured assignments, critical analysis of case studies, student centric learning,and guided design using tools such as simulation and gaming, communication exercises, andlaboratory experiments. Research suggests that the development of any skill is best facilitated bypractice and not by
Chair of the ASEE Long Range Planning Committee.Dr. D. Patrick O’Neal, Louisiana Tech University D. Patrick O’Neal is an associate professor in the Biomedical Engineering program which is part of the College of Engineering and Science at Louisiana Tech University. Prior to moving to academia in 2005, he served as PI on industrial nanomedicine-based development projects supported by NSF, NIH, and NIST funding. Given a research focus in biomedical optics, he has published peer-reviewed articles in basic and clinical cancer research, nanomedicine, and applied electro-optic instrumentation. Based on experiences instructing courses like Biomedical Engineering Senior Design and his ongoing involvement with the medical
Paper ID #11384Developing Courseware for Robotics in Pre-Engineering Education for HighSchool StudentsMr. Jonathan R Zubarriain, Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology Sophomore student in Mechatronics Engineering major at Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technol- ogy. He is the vice president of the Vaughn College’s UAV Club.Mr. Nicholas Kumia, Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology Sophomore in the Undergraduate Mechatronics Engineering Program He graduated high school at the age of 16 and plans to complete the 4-year Mechatronics Program in 3-years. Recently, He co-founded the UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) Club
program objectives) and compliance with the program outcomes is prepared andsubmitted to the department chair for the assessment purposes.Future plans to evaluate the effectiveness of the capstone in term of learning outcomes: actions that willbe implemented to improve the effectiveness of the curriculum in term of learning outcomes: We expanded on the instructors’ self-evaluation such that more direct assessment of students’ learning outcomes is obtained. A set of standards for instructor’s self-evaluation will be prepared by the faculty and the Board of Advisors and will be implemented with the annual assessment cycle. The main point of these standards is that the evaluation of students’ performance will based
, involvement with student volunteer groups andprofessional societies, involvement with undergraduate research, internship opportunities,industry expectations, graduate studies, use of campus resources like the tutoring center andcareer services, etc. Such mentoring sessions are scheduled once a month. The facultyadvisement is typically associated with program requirements, course registration, course pre-requisites and course planning. Individual advisement is generally done once a semester. Faculty advisement Faculty- (individual) Student student
Scientific Olympics). Mr. David Hinds along with the other executivemembers of the NAACP of Collier County worked closely with FGCU and raised more than halfof the funds for the 2014 STEM summer program. Plans are on the way to continue thisinteraction for the next five (5) years. Although a large number of people think the organizationis just about civil rights, it actually has a strong educational mission as well.Program Structure and ResultsProgram DemographicsThe 2014 FGCU/NAACP Pre-Collegiate summer camp was initiated by the NAACP of CollierCounty along with the Office of Outreach Program at FGCU. The Associate Provost at FGCU,Dr. Tony Barringer, and Associate Professor at FGCU, Dr. Claude Villiers joined this effort withthe mission to improve
Fall 2014 Lecture Welcome to students; instructor Lecture Welcome & Course Overview/Plan for outline class Semester Lecture Future of Engineering Discussion Professional Image Lecture Engineering teamwork, creativity Lecture Future of Engineering - Grand and entrepreneurship Challenges Lecture Understanding your personal Discussion Common Reading Experience strengths Lecture Dept. of Materials Science and Lecture Consideration of Sustainability in Engineering Engineering Lecture Dept. of
-Operate), an innovative educational framework forengineering, also addressed the need for engineering leadership in their most recent syllabusupdate. The syllabus extension includes ten different learning outcomes related to Creating a Page 26.634.2Purposeful Vision and Delivering on the Vision5 (p.69).In today’s workplace, the knowledge and experience gained through engineering leadershipeducation is valuable to all engineers, regardless if they plan to pursue managerial roles. Themajority of engineering work is team oriented, thus engineers must be prepared to work on teamsand take initiative when solving technical problems6. Leadership skills
practitioners?35Our current research, and that which we are planning, is a new and important step in thatdirection, as it is both empirical and theoretically-grounded. Personal epistemology could proveuseful in understanding the development of global competencies, particularly given findings thatraise questions about the connections between international experience and global competency.Our aim in future work will be to provide systematic and empirical evidence of attributes that areimportant for global engineering, namely attributes related to personal epistemologies.As discussed above, epistemologies vary across geographic contexts; however, what thoseepistemological differences might be in engineering specifically, and how they affect
26.958.13*Combined Extremely Important and Very Important ratings Figure 9: Respondents Early-career vs. MDC Important Criteria (> 12%) (n=9)Future PlansThe industry sponsor survey results indicated several MDC program outcomes as having a strongrelationship between an engineer’s early professional career and the importance to the MDCprogram. Based on these results, the authors identified one area of improvement that is directlyrelated to the program. This area is to analyze and interpret data. Analyzing and interpreting datacan be directly related to designing and conducting an experiment. The authors plan toemphasize the testing and validating phase of the capstone course by increasing the length oftime that students can complete this
of the other courses.Introduction to Engineering: InnovationInnovation at Western New England University starts for students on the first day in theIntroduction to Engineering course. Four person teams compete in a series of four autonomous‘bot challenges. The ‘bot platform used is the Parallax BOE-BOT [2] controlled with an Arduinomicrocontroller. This platform was chosen after seeing the success of the “living with the lab”program at Louisiana Tech University [2]. The ‘bot challenges parallel lesson plans in computeraided design (CAD), programming (C in the Arduino IDE environment), the design process,fabrication methods and electronics which the students require to complete the designprojects. Active and Collaborative Learning (ACL
of fully arts-integrated programs have thus farbeen small scale and qualitative, but have produced promising results. At the high school level, aCalifornia teacher has implemented a project-based STEAM program that has, in its second year Page 26.1034.3of development, seen its popularity far exceed its capacity and achieved 50% female enrollment,with many students reporting they plan to pursue engineering in college 10 . At the university level,a computer systems technology program has seen improvements in students’ application of artand graphic design principles to web interface design 11 .Furthermore, research in cognitive science
further scaffold, facilitators might provide design-teams with a list ofproposed roles to choose from. However, in design settings, it may be important for students toself-select the roles they take on during an open-ended design challenge.Future analysis will compare students’ perceptions with student-observers’ andresearcher/teachers’ perceptions based on recorded data and transcripts of design-teaminteraction. It will also compare these perceptions with project outcomes. Furthermore, a thirddesign iteration is planned using revised protocols and instruments based on the results of thisstudy. For instance, for the question about how groups’ evaluated their progress, a total of 20responses could not be coded or were missing a response altogether