AC 2011-1348: GLOBAL INTERESTS AND EXPERIENCE AMONG FIRST-YEAR CIVIL ENGINEERING STUDENTSAngela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt, PhD, PE, is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil, Environmental, & Ar- chitectural Engineering at the University of Colorado - Boulder (CU). She is affiliated with the Mortenson Center in Engineering for Developing Communities at CU. She has taught the first-year Introduction to Civil Engineering course 13 times, starting in 1997. She also teaches a senior capstone Environmental En- gineering Design course, which included international water and sanitation projects in 2001, 2002, 2006, and 2010. Her research interests include ceramic water
Paper ID #23825IBBME Discovery: Biomedical Engineering-based Iterative Learning in aHigh School STEM Curriculum (Evaluation)Mr. Locke Davenport Huyer, University of TorontoNeal I. Callaghan, University of TorontoRami Saab, University of Toronto I am a MASc student in the Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering (IBBME) at the Uni- versity of Toronto. My research interests include medical device design, brain-computer interfaces, and algorithms for biosignal information processing. My teaching experiences include graduate level teaching assistant positions and I am currently a physics curriculum executive with the
AC 2009-1725: ENHANCING FUNDAMENTAL MATERIALS ENGINEERINGEDUCATION USING BIOMEDICAL DEVICES AND CASE STUDIESKathleen Kitto, Western Washington University Page 14.567.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Enhancing Fundamental Materials Engineering Education Using Biomedical Devices and Case StudiesAbstractDuring the past six years several best practices in teaching and learning have been implementedin our Introduction to Materials Engineering course to transform the course from a traditionallecture only course to a course that is centered on conceptual and active learning. In addition,this academic year the content of the course was also
during the last decade: more than 50% of its currentfaculty have been added, the graduate program has grown significantly, and the undergraduateenrollment is approximately 900. These statistics place the School in the ranks of the largestchemical engineering programs in the country and give it the ability to provide both diversity andexcellence in its academic and research programs.Georgia Tech offers its courses on a quarter-based system, which involves ten weeks of classesfollowed by one week of examinations. In a calendar year, there are four equal-size quarters:Fall, Winter, Spring, and Summer; the first three quarters constitute an academic year. Thisquarter-based system has been very convenient for the students participating in our co
questions: 1. How can participation in a faculty learning community (FLC) enable or nudge engineering faculty to adopt and personalize mindful reflection and best practices? 2. How and to what degree does faculty participation in an FLC impact engineering college culture? 3. To what degree does faculty participation in an FLC impact engineering student belonging and success?To create the FLC, at least two faculty members were recruited from each of five departments.Together with the principal investigator (PI) team, the FLC has around 15 members. In addition,one research assistant and one or two evaluators usually attend sessions. The FLC meets once permonth for eight months during the academic year, on Friday mornings, a time
, engineering management, and teamwork for engineershave been debated, as the definition of ‘engineering leadership’ has evolved. Wilding, W. V., &Knotts, T. A., & Pitt, W. G., & Argyle, M. D. 1 have defined leadership characteristics forengineering students and created a working definition comprised of 13 qualities for theirengineers; highlighted by “follows as well as leads”, “takes time to evaluate personalperformance as a team member and improves when needed”, and “understands the personalitytraits of self and others and can work with others in accomplishing tasks”. They have noticed the“prominence of teamwork skills” in their list.1 From an extensive review of best practices, Paul,R., & Cowe Falls, L. G.2 propose the definition is
2022-2023 academicyear, a pilot decision matrix will also be developed to aid faculty and instructors to furtherpromote and support the implementation of inclusive practices in engineering classrooms. Thecontinued refinement of the menu and creation of both the website and decision matrix are thenext steps in the development of an inclusive classrooms toolkit that can be used across allengineering classrooms and curriculums.Introduction and Background Minoritized and underrepresented students have historically experienced prejudice anddiscrimination within and outside of their classrooms, negatively impacting their educationaloutcomes. In 2018, the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center reports that in terms ofcollege
cash flows. For instance, t=1 is the end ofperiod 1 or the beginning of period 2. Similarly, t=2 is the end of period 2 or the beginning ofperiod 3, and so on.Discount Rate. The rate that money earns interest or the rate that money is discounted into thefuture. Usually this rate is the best opportunity rate. For an individual this may be the rate that ispaid by the bank for money kept in a savings account. For a company it may be the rate that thecompany can borrow from a bank or from investors.Equivalent Cash Flows. Two cash flows occurring at different time periods are said to beequivalent when, based on the discount rate used, they are of equal value to an investor whencompared at a common time period.Net Cash Flow. In many cases in
research, leading to student participation in prestigiousconferences and awards, building critical skills for biomedical engineering. By integratingtheoretical learning with practical applications and professional engagement, we demonstratedthe program’s commitment to student growth, career readiness, and ABET standards. 2.4 Criterion 4: Continuous ImprovementCriterion 4 is a key part of ABET accreditation, focusing on the systematic assessment,evaluation, and improvement of SOs to ensure graduates meet program expectations. Our effortsbegan in Spring 2021, 3.5 years before submitting our report, with the development ofPerformance Indicators (PIs). Given our faculty’s diverse expertise and the breadth of ourcurriculum, an iterative process
evaluating the achievement of learning outcomes prior tostudent graduation. Direct measures are those that assess achievement by observation ofperformance rather than by soliciting opinion about the achievement of a particular outcome. Astandardized exam is a good direct measure. Others might include a third party evaluation ofstudent projects or a manager’s assessment of work done on co-op/internship. A standardizedexam may be the most tempting for busy faculty trying to assess their program because it isfairly easy to administer, the results are naturally quantifiable, and the program can more or lessguarantee a consistent rate of response. Such an exam, however, should be evaluated using apsychometric evaluation to study reliability, validity
students that graduated in the first engineering major they choseafter FYE, compared to 78% of DM graduates who stayed with their first major choice. FYE programs also have thequickest path to graduation in engineering, which may be a result of fewer FYE students changing their majors asevery change of discipline within engineering requires an average of two additional semesters.7Motivation theories attempt to explain the relationships between beliefs, values, and goals with respect to action andthus, may be useful for studying major choice. A number of identity and motivation constructs have been associatedwith retention and success within engineering. Specifically, researchers have shown that domain identification, utility,perceived ability, and
Human Development specializing in Educational Technology Leadership. Her work focuses on projects that measure and assess student perceptions of learning related to their experiences with engineering course innovations. She is a faculty development consultant with previous experience in instructional design and instructor of the Graduate Assistant Seminar for engineering teaching assistants. Page 22.906.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Integrating Ethics into Undergraduate Environmental Science and Economics Education Abstract Good
1974. He was appointed as a dean at Wentworth Institute of Technology in Boston, directing a joint project with MIT in Iran, after which he returned to St. Louis in 1975 as the associate dean of instruction. He headed the Department of Manufacturing Engineering Technologies and Supervision at Purdue University, Calumet, from 1978 to 1980, then served for ten years as the dean of the College of Technology of the University of Houston. After a sabbatical year working on the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider at Brookhaven National Laboratory, Wolf became the president of Oregon Institute of Technology. He retired from administration in 1998, designated as a president emeritus. He
University of San Diego. She received a BS from Cornell University in Materials Science and Electrical Engineering (EE) and MS and PhD in EE from Stanford University. Her research focuses on the study and promotion of equity in engineering including student pathways and inclusive teaching. She has won best paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education, IEEE Transactions on Education, and Education Sciences. Dr. Lord is a Fellow of the IEEE and ASEE and received the 2018 IEEE Undergraduate Teaching Award. She is a coauthor of The Borderlands of Education: Latinas in Engineering. She is a co-Director of the National Effective Teaching Institute (NETI).Scarleth Vanessa Vasconcelos, Villanova University
Paper ID #17281Unique Potential and Challenges of Students with ADHD in Engineering Pro-gramsDr. Arash Esmaili Zaghi P.E., University of Connecticut Dr. Arash E. Zaghi received his PhD in Civil Engineering from the University of Nevada, Reno, where he worked on the seismic behavior of novel bridge column and connection details. After graduating, he stayed with UNR as a Research Scientist to overlook two major research projects involving system-level shake table experiments. In 2011, Dr. Zaghi joined the Department of Civil and Environmental Engi- neering at University of Connecticut as an Assistant Professor. His research
generally do not address barriers embedded within the curriculum design, and may or may not increase faculty understanding of best practices for [students with disabilities] (p. 182).27As is the case in other instances of identity-based discrimination in America, even the mostenergetic and best intentioned practitioners continue to operate in settings that tolerate limitedreform.Critical social scientific work on disabilities has offered important framing for understanding thisongoing inequity. To my mind, foremost among its contributions is the idea, developed duringthe 1990s, that that which a culture treats as physical or mental capacity derives from socialvalues and conditions. This “social model” of disability to a degree displaced
2006-2554: THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CURRICULUM TO INSTILLENGINEERING LEADERSHIP & MANAGEMENT SKILLS INUNDERGRADUATE STUDENTSAna Ferreras, University of Central Florida Ana Ferreras is a Ph.D. student at the University of Central Florida in the department of Industrial Engineering & Management Systems. She holds a Master of Science degree in Engineering Management from Florida Institute of Technology and a Bachelor’s Degree in Electrical Engineering from University of Central Florida. Ana holds a 6-Sigma Black Belt certification from the Harrington Group, and she has worked as a Radio Frequency Design Engineer for almost two years. Her research focuses on Engineering Management, Quality
serves as a leadership team leader for both the Women in Science Programs and Global Science Partners.Therese M. Azevedo, Sonoma State University Therese Azevedo is a fourth year student at Sonoma State University pursuing a Bachelor of Science in Statistics. Over the Summer of 2019, she had the opportunity to work with Dr. Anne Lucietto at Purdue University on a project related to math anxiety and continued that work to present.Dr. Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue University at West Lafayette Dr. Lucietto has focused her research in engineering technology education and the understanding of engi- neering technology students. She teaches in an active learning style which engages and develops practical skills in the students
that are important for other institutions to consider when attempting toreplicate such a partnership.Overview of the ProgramBay College and Michigan Tech successfully collaborated on a grant proposal to the NSF fortheir Advanced Technological Education (ATE) grant, which was awarded for a total projectcost of $702,324. Much of these expenses were dedicated towards personnel costs to developrobotic simulation software, create curriculum, and design the articulation agreement betweenthe two institutions. Money was also reserved for stipends to be paid to workshop participants,travel to conferences and meetings, and instructor professional development. In order to trulyalign the curriculum, however, Bay College needed to purchase several robotic
strong science identity bolsters minority students’ sense of belonging and performance in college,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(4), pp. 593-606, 2021.[13] K. Atkins, B. M. Dougan, M. S. Dromgold-Sermen, H. Potter, V. Sathy, & A. T. Panter, ‘“Looking at Myself in the Future”: how mentoring shapes scientific identity for STEM students from underrepresented groups,’ International Journal of STEM Education, 7, pp. 1- 15, 2020.[14] A. McDaniel, & M. Van Jura, “High-impact practices: Evaluating their effect on college completion,” Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, vol. 24(3), pp. 740-757, 2022.[15] M. Z. Moore, “Fostering a sense of belonging using a multicontext approach
global economy, formal study of standards and regulations has become essential totechnologists. The authors recommend that all undergraduate technology programs embedstandards study into the curricula. Graduate study of standards should include the impact ofstandards on policy and decision issues. Finally, corporations and government agencies shouldtrain professionals on how to develop the best standards, as the economies of all nations dependon the collective ability to develop and maintain an effective international standards system.References: 1. Purcell, Donald E. Editor. “The Strategic Value of Standards Education.” The Center for Global Standards Analysis, August 2008. (For a copy of the Center’s survey report, contact
. Meyer, Land, R., & Baillie, C. Ed., no. Book, Whole). Leiden U6: Rotterdam ; Boston: Sense Publishers, 2010, ch. Why is geologic time troublesome knowledge?, pp. 117-129.[11] Meyer and R. Land, "Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: linkages to ways of thinking and practising," in Improving Student Learning - Theory and Practice Ten Years On, C. Rust and D. Oxford Centre for Staff Eds. Oxford: Oxford : Oxford Centre for Staff & Learning Development, 2003, pp. 412-424.[12] J. Kabo and C. Baillie, "Seeing through the lens of social justice: a threshold for engineering," European Journal of Engineering Education: Educational research impacting engineering education, vol. 34, no. 4, pp
, 2009IntroductionA four-university collaboration has received National Science Foundation (NSF) Course,Curriculum and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) funding for a three-year project with twoprimary goals: 1) to develop a database of reliable and valid measures for assessing attainmentof teamwork skills and ethical awareness in undergraduate students enrolled in multidisciplinaryproject based, design projects, and 2) to identify and describe ‘best practices’ from across theseinstitutions that improve the achievement of learning objectives and thereby increase programquality. Example learning objectives from one course are described as follows: “Studentsenrolled in these project courses will experience and demonstrate an understanding of ‘bestpractices’ in the
]. In a survey of Canadian college students, Sandhu et al. found thatamong those affected, there was significant impact on their academic performance with stress (~42%), anxiety (~ 33%), and depression (~21 %) being causes of MED related poor academic [3].While considerable research has been done on undergraduate student wellbeing, very few studiesspecifically target the impact of MED on engineering students.Foremost among the findings of studies on MED in undergraduate is that stigma related to MEDis a barrier to students seeking help [1]. In the design of our program we considered that stigmamay be especially acute for engineering students. Many engineers valorize the toughness ofengineering programs and celebrate high attrition as a sign
introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include evaluating conceptual knowledge, mis- conceptions and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect conceptual change and associated impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and per- sistence. The other is on the factors that promote persistence and
understanding ofa scheduler’s job. Their pragmatic preparation would be orientated to success if they test thecurrent business practices and/or direct applications of the subject matters in the constructionjobsite. Early in the nineties, Benjamin et. al.1 created a knowledge‐based prototype forimproving scheduling productivity; the results confirm the system's effectiveness and support thefurther development of knowledge‐based systems as tools for improving the productivity of theconstruction industry. Real-world learning based on industry project-specific context and best business practicesmay make students a lot more marketable to industry. Every student from each group is sharingcomments, opinions, concerns and experiences, field trip notes
interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity. Page 26.1710.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Volunteerism in Engineering Students and Its Relation to Social ResponsibilityAbstractAddressing how engineering students view their role in society, their social responsibility, isseen as a central aspect toward creating holistic engineers
-99 that allowed us to maintain and increase support on all levels.The description for the expansion phase 1999-today can be found in the section on transition tointegrated curricula.IIa. Design phase.Systemic change can neither be mandated by administration, nor can it come about solely on theinitiative of single, isolated individuals. The former will lack the needed broad support in thefaculty, the latter will remain isolated with little impact beyond their own classrooms. Yet everyinstitution has a number of faculty that are interested and actively involved in improvingclassroom instruction. These are the individuals that were targeted at Louisiana Tech Universityin early 1997. A core group of nine individuals was formed and charged with
for TGNC students [7]. A primary objective ofthe site visits was to learn more about students’ experiences through collaboration.BackgroundAs described in earlier work [8], the design of research with the TGNC community should centermethodological approaches that do not reinforce harm. To address this need, our study included aresearch justice design and based analysis on feminist, trans, and queer methodologies tointerrogate ideologies that shape engineering norms and practices. This important context isdetailed more fully below.Research justiceThe design of our study was influenced by feminist, trans, and queer research methodologies thatare centered on deconstructing power imbalances between the researcher and participant as aform of
scaffolding mentors understanding of cutting edgecollaboration technologies in A/E/C. The paper discusses implications for the design ofP5BL environments, processes and implications for university and industry relationships.IntroductionIsolation of Architecture/ Engineering/Construction (A/E/C) students within discipline-specific education has impacted graduates ability to function within interdisciplinarydesign teams when they enter industry. Not only are new graduates commonly hamperedby poor cross-disciplinary communication, coordination and negotiation skills, theyemerge from educational institutions with narrow perceptions of what it means toparticipate in the design process as a member of their specific discipline.P5BL - the People- Problem