howcommuters use the financial assistance that they receive and its impact on the progress they maketowards completing their degrees; (c) identifying the support practices and interventions thatenhance the academic success of commuter students from among the many that are provided byuniversities and colleges; and (d) identifying the challenges that commuters face with jugglingresponsibilities and obligations from home, work, and school.Rationale and Approach of the ProjectThe objectives of this project are to (a) increase graduation rates of the STEM cohorts; (b) buildthe foundation for a sustainable institutional structure and support STEM scholars and otherstudents; (c) carry out research designed to advance understanding of the factors, practices
characteristics of effective PD identified in the literature include:(i) sufficient duration; (ii) focus on subject matter; (iii) hands-on activities; (iv) attention toproblems of practice; and (v) institutional support for implementation. It is further suggested thatteacher learning is best promoted by a set of complementary approaches, such as summer PD andonline discussions as follow up [24].Traditionally, the focus of teacher PD programs has been on preparing teachers to follow, ratherthan to create or adapt, innovative, research-based curriculum materials [25]. However, whenteachers do not understand the underlying model of the expert-designed curricula provided tothem, they tend to pick and choose elements of the new curriculum to fit their
medicalnanotechnology device for disease detection and complete a microfluidics lab on a chipexperiment. Students read journal articles and used newfound knowledge from these articles toinform their designs throughout the project. Much like the robot design/build project, thestakeholder needs and tasks for the alternative were well-defined. The research-based project forthe 2022-2023 academic year was redesigned to be more open ended and to expand the themesof the course. Specifically, it asked students to identify an opportunity and problem within thethemes of either medical nanotechnology or sustainability. The course still focused on researchand reading journal articles but also expanded assignments to consider value creation, needs, andthe impact of their
Professor Engineering and Computing Education at Florida International Univer- sity. He has a prior academic and professional background in engineering, having worked professionally as an acoustical engineer. He has taught several courses on design, sociotechnical contexts, and engineer- ing education. He runs the Equity Research Group which incorporates qualitative, ethnographic, partic- ipatory, and action-oriented research methods to examine and improve equity in engineering education contexts.Angela Estacion, WestEd Angela Estacion is a Senior Research Associate and Evaluation Lead for WestEd’s newly launched Center for Economic Mobility. Estacion brings over 15 years of experience in research and evaluation settings
diverse, interdisciplinary teams [26]–[29] and as part of theleader-mentor-learner triad [30]–[32]. As with all EF training, these leadership skills will bepresented using a variety of role-playing and discussion exercises to allow participants toimmediately practice new skills in the context of engineering research and practice.In addition to the materials being developed by Tau Beta Pi and Michigan State Universitythrough the NSF-funded project, the EF facilitators are lending their professional expertise to thedevelopment of additional curriculum modules. For example, a module on Design Thinking isbeing developed based on work done at The Pennsylvania State University. The development ofthis module responds to the recent growth in popularity
Course, University of Dayton, Fall2016.Swart, A.J., “Does it matter which comes first in a curriculum for engineering students—Theoryor practice?,” Int. J. Elect. Eng. Educ., vol. 47, pp. 189–199, 2010.Swart, A.J., “Theory versus practical in a curriculum for engineering students—A case study,”presented at the AFRICON, Nairobi, Kenya, 2009.The VARK modalities. http://vark-learn.com/introduction-to-vark/the-vark-modalities, 2017.The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF), 26. Business Scenarios,http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/ 2011.Yin, R.K., Case study Research—Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE, 2009.
begin to paint a morecomprehensive picture of obstacles to retention. Do these same factors vary byinstitutional type?To more fully understand the institutional context for discouraging and encouraging Page 14.23.2factors for SME retention, Seymour and Hewitt designed a multi-institutionalethnographic study of three private and four public universities in four differentgeographical areas.10 Institutions were selected on the basis of their private or publicfunding, their mission, the level of prestige accorded their research activities, and the sizeand composition of their graduate and undergraduate populations with a concentration oninstitutions
disagreedthat it helped to improve problem solving, teamwork, and communication skills, with significantdifferences observed between pre- and post-survey responses (p < 0.05).Recommendations for future study are to assess improvement objectively by incorporating DSTs intostudent assessments, and to observe the impact of the DST on improving student professional skillsover a longer period.Keywords: virtual work integrated learning, professional development, virtual field trips, desktop sitetoursIntroductionIn recognition of the importance of interpersonal and professional skills, Engineers Australia(EA) have made it an accreditation requirement for all tertiary engineering students to gainexposure to industrial practice prior to graduation [1
happen. Individual departments in science, mathematics, and social science will retain ownership of their respective courses, as it is most important for students to hear and work with professors from these diverse fields. Problems of the 21st-century will best be solved by multidisciplinary teams with different points of view and approaches, all contributing to the optimal solution. • A set of modules of instruction, in electronic, interactive form, for both self-study and in- class use, will be developed in key skill areas essential for the practice of engineering: problem solving and design, technical communication, professional development, measurement systems, and computing, all with a balance between theory and
are space systems, robust fault tolerant control, nonlinear control, adaptive control, small spacecraft design, high performance spacecraft components, mechatronics, real-time health monitoring, and diagnostic methodology.Dr. Michael A. Swartwout, Saint Louis University, Parks College of Eng. Dr. Swartwout is co-director of the Space Systems Research Laboratory. His research and teaching interests focus on systems engineering and design. Page 26.1454.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Systems Engineering Entrepreneurship Modules across Aerospace
interest inengineering. Not only do makerspaces offer chances for young students to engage in engineeringendeavors in creative ways, but makerspaces have shown great potential in addressing broadergoals of education, such as the augmentation of first-year engineering student retention. Much ofthe research on makerspace impacts and practices have focused on K-12 and informal education.Little is known about how a well-designed, makerspace-based engineering course can addressbarriers to first-year students’ persistence in engineering, such as the interest in engineering barrierfocused on in this paper.Research also suggest that the makerspace movement provides a beneficial opportunity forstudent development of interests and identity. The structure of
Civil EngineeringDr. Jennifer Harper Ogle, Clemson University Dr. Jennifer Ogle is a Professor in the Glenn Department of Civil Engineering at Clemson University, and a 2005 graduate of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Georgia Tech. Her research portfolio focuses on transportation infrastructure design, safety, accessibility, and management. She is currently the facilitator for the NSF Revolutionizing Engineering and Computer Science Depart- ments (RED) grant at Clemson, and is leading three transformation efforts related to culture, curriculum, and community to achieve adaptability, innovation, and shared vision. Alongside her research, Dr. Ogle has been active in the development of engaged
within the schema of practical procedural problems as knowledgeencapsulation. The application in a capstone class is to provide the student with repeatedpractical problems to encourage expertise development in the realm of practical engineeringproblems. It should be pointed out that the relationship between PBL and knowledgeencapsulation is an untested hypothesis based on previous research, but remains encouraging.Table 1. ABET 2004-2005 Program Outcomes6 identified by the department as primary outcomes of the capstone classes. ABET Description of Criteria: Designation The 21st century civil engineer must demonstrate: an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science
GEDCenvisions the enhanced capabilities of engineering deans to transform their schools in support oftheir societies in a globalized world. In keeping with its vision, the GEDC will provide a forumfor cooperation, and for discussion of experiences, challenges, and best practices in leading anengineering school. He is a Fellow ofInstitution of Mechanical Engineers (FIMechE), UK; Institution of Engineers Singapore (FIES);Institute of Materials, Minerals & Mining (FIMMM), UK; and American Institute for Medicaland Biological Engineering (FAIMBE), USA. He received several awards and honors includingLee Kuan Yew Fellowship, NUS Outstanding University Researcher Award, JSPS, ASME BestPaper Award, IES Prestigious Engineering Achievement Award, and ASEAN
successful teaching strategy.It can be used in a virtual environment or regular college classroom settings. Active learningteaching approaches have been found to improve student learning, raise retention rates, and closethe achievement gap between various student populations in college science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses [4]. Beyond the subject of electrical engineering,active learning pedagogies have been applied extensively in industrial engineering [5-7].For STEM students, in particular, who learn best in courses with hands-on laboratories, aneffective online instructional practice uses a variety of active learning pedagogies as shown inFigure 1. There is a considerable level of discontent with online engineering
design. In American Societyfor Engineering Education, vol. 26, p1.9. Galaleldin, M., Bouchard, F., Anis, H. and Lague, C. 2016. The impact of makerspaces onengineering education. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association(CEEA).10. Local Tools. Start sharing: The easy way to manage a lending library. Accessed January 24,2019. http://localtools.org/ 11. U.S. News & World Report. 2018. Best engineering schools. Accessed January 24, 2019.https://www.usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-engineering-schools/eng-rankings?_mode=table)12. University of Florida, George A Smathers Libraries. Technology @ Marston ScienceLibrary: Tool Library. Accessed January 24, 2019. http
approach to problem-solving, innovation, and value creation” [4]. The KEENframework emphasizes three primary components of the entrepreneurial mindset: curiosity,connections, and creating value. Project-based learning in which students are given a specificaudience to understand and design for is one way in which students learn to create value withtheir technical skills. Projects with simulated or real-world applications also provide students theopportunity to practice situational curiosity [5].Effective science communication is particularly necessary in the process of commercializingtechnology. When engineers create goods and services that are to have a societal impact oraddress a need, it is crucial for their success that the value of these
with end-to-endinstruction on the analysis and design steps generally followed in the development of an electricdrive system. An electric drive system includes generation, power electronic drive or powerprocessing unit (PPU), motor, and load components. By end-to-end instruction we mean teachthe student to design an electric drive system, with appropriate understanding of the role thatgeneration and end-use (motor plus load) affects the design of the PPU.This objective correlates well with Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET), Accrediting Engineering Programs, criterion 3 (Program Outcomes and Assessment),item (c), which states “Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have anability to design a system
Undergraduate Teaching Fellowsor through Terrascope-administered research projects.In this paper, we describe the structure and evolution of the program over the past four years,outcomes for students, and lessons we have learned in designing and implementing the program.IntroductionThe MIT Earth System Initiative (ESI) is a multidepartmental organization that encourages andfacilitates research and education within MIT on environmental and Earth-system science and Page 11.1245.2engineering (see http://web.mit.edu/esi for details). It is directed jointly by representatives of theDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering and the Department of
of this project was to use Keysight ADS (Advanced Design System) Via DrawingUtility software for a detailed examination of the worst-case impact of vias on the signal integrityof a signal when traversing a printed circuit board with 5 and 9 layers, respectively. The insightsgained from simulation and modeling show the best practices and design strategies for mitigatingsignal integrity challenges on industry standard PCB layer thicknesses. The first step is to designthe 3D model. This is done in the Layout modeler in ADS. In the Layout modeler, the next step isto open the substrate window. In the substrate window, layers are then added until we reach thenumber of metal layers needed for the simulation. The bottom and top substrate layers are
identifying common anti-patterns observed in classrooms, pedal can providemore nuanced feedback to students alongside feedback on rubric-based evaluations such as “Doesthe code correctly use a for loop?”. Alternatively, another approach [19], combines program repairtechniques with automated grading to directly evaluate the logic and structure of student sub-missions themselves. These innovations can effectively handle diverse solutions and demonstratea scalable approach for assignments in which students design unique projects, propose problemstatements, and implement customized solutions. However, to the best of our knowledge, none ofthe existing autograder tools can fully evaluate open-ended assignments. Most available tools aredesigned for well
-tutoring, have been identified as high impact activities that improve studentretention and success. This paper describes a successful internship program that has been inplace for several years at Penn State Harrisburg. Survey results show that the program is helpingstudents increase their abilities to succeed after graduation.I. IntroductionScience, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education is crucial to innovation,progress, and national competitiveness. A major concern, however, is that success rates in U.S.colleges and universities are still low. The National first- to second-year retention rate in 4-yearpublic institutions averages 65.6% and the mean for the National 5-year graduation rate of 4-yearpublic institutions is 37.9
funding organizations are also moving toward a greaterconsideration of the future impact of research activity forcing those in the academy to promotetheir work in a broader and more application driven light. The careers of engineers often grow toincorporate managerial and strategic responsibilities which are almost impossible without anability to consider business and legal issues and to communicate effectively to many differentaudiences. 1, 2, 3, 4 And, as Meier et al., suggest even those who remain squarely within atechnical arena, “are being asked to take responsibility for the overall system.”5 One subject thatneatly encompasses the concepts of innovation (implying new markets and new products),opportunities, creating networks, management
differences in such factors as climate, natural resources, and economic conditions. Thus, technology use varies from region to region and over time (MS-ETS1-1). ● New technologies can have deep impacts on society and the environment, including some that were not anticipated. Analysis of costs and benefits is a critical aspect of decisions about technology (HS-ETS1-1 and 1-3).Yet, helping youth understand the complexities of sociotechnical issues in engineering is nosmall feat, and teachers and researchers alike struggle to support students’ understanding of themultiple and multi-faceted factors involved in implementing engineered solutions to address ahuman need or desire. Nonetheless, failing to do so at best limits students
funded projects led by five differentprofessors. I had learned how to do qualitative research by practicing it and by being exposed tomany different professors who did this work. While the tools for experimental research tend tobe external to the individual researcher, qualitative research depends on the researcher as analystto make decisions based on decades of reading and experience. I was unsure how to condenseseveral years of situated learning into a digestible nugget. This problem was compounded by mydiscomfort performing “sage on the stage” knowledge-transfer type teaching.I tried my best and ended up leading a seminar on paradigms, focusing on positivism, socialconstructivism, and critical theory [25]. I created a chart to help my
Institute of Technology, Old Westbury, NY, USA, in 2016, and the B.S. degree in intelligent transportation engineering from Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China, in 2014. He was Graduate Teaching Assistant for ECE1013 Foundations in ECE, ECE1022 Foundations in Design, ECE4713/6713 Computer Architecture, and ECE4753/6753 Introduction to Robotics at the undergraduate level and as a guest lecturer delivered graduate-level courses, ECE 8743 Advanced Robotics and ECE8833 Computational Intelligence. He received the ECE Best Graduate Researcher Award from the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Mississippi State University in 2023. He received the Research Travel Award from Bagley College of Engineering
).[32] E. Chen and M. Asta, "Using Jupyter Tools to Design an Interactive Textbook to Guide Undergraduate Research in Materials Informatics," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 99, no. 10, pp. 3601-3606, 2022/10/11 2022, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00640.[33] O. David Olubiyi et al., "Teaching Basic Concepts in Machine Learning to Engineering Students: A Hands-on Approach," Portland, Oregon, 2024/06/23. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/48058.[34] A. Y.-T. Wang et al., "Machine Learning for Materials Scientists: An Introductory Guide toward Best Practices," Chemistry of Materials, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 4954-4965, 2020/06/23 2020, doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c01907.[35] A. Strachan, S. Desai
workshops organized in either collaborations by industry, government,and academia12 or as a singular effort. Initiatives from universities include use of standardsin capstone projects12-13 and design classes.14-15 Academic libraries also play a role instandards education by providing campus-wide access to standards collections, teachingabout standards through research guides,16 library instruction sessions,17 collaboration withfaculty18 and organizing small scale local workshops, etc.On our campus, the analysis of a library survey sent to returning co-op students by theengineering librarian revealed a strong need for standards education. There was also interest indeveloping a standards workshop from two graduate students who were active members
learning works best for them. Whenpresented with a problem, they are equipped to quickly identify which style of learning andtechnique(s) best apply to the situation enabling them to address problems in a timelier manner.While metacognition and SDL skills sets can be applied to familiar problems, they also providevalue in approaching unfamiliar problems. IRE alumni consistently reported earning confidencefrom peers and supervisors through a versatile ability of routinely solving unfamiliar problemsmaking the alumni valuable workplace assets.Future Directions and SignificanceWe have identified three areas of research we intend to pursue. First, we will continue totriangulate the think-aloud data with students’ self-report interview data but on an
SJ concerns [3], we work with more technocratically oriented STEM majors. For thisreason, we decided to start our research by inquiring into perceptions that students have aboutcontextualized and decontextualized problems (Con/Decon), and what resources they would useto try to write contexts, in order to understand how we might successfully coach them to come upwith context on their own.Evidence suggests that the invisibility of SJ concerns in engineering curricula factors into a“culture of disengagement” [2], [5], [7]. This scholarship posits that the divide between technicalknowledge and social concerns in engineering curricula impacts undergraduate engineeringmajor retention -- since students who are more driven by social/humanitarian