freedom to include only what we wanted.Student 10 Somewhat It seems to me it is a good tool for expressing doubts about suitable the subject, but I don’t see necessary to make comment s on the studied material.Student 11 Somewhat In my case as a student I didn’t really find it useful. I be- unsuitable lieve that learning can be measured through quizzes and that a learning journal does not say much about what I learned in the course.Student 12 Very Actually I didn’t find any enrichment value. It often de- unsuitable manded much
work remains to be done in more fully understanding the relationship between writing andlearning, particularly in order to help faculty develop assignments to support specific types oflearning.Bangert-Drowns et al.’s review five years later reflects similar processes and gaps [48]. Theirsystematic review examined hundreds of articles on writing-to-learn written over the pasthundred years, though as they note the majority of these articles were written in the 1980s and1990s. After a rigorous evaluation process that allowed them to identify a core set of articles thatprovided empirical evidence of the academic effects of writing-to-learn assignments againstcontrol groups without those assignments, the authors conducted a statistical meta
. Sometimes theyresulted in ridiculous meaning, as in this example where the students are literally saying thatflood waters will stop and speak with a geologist before reaching the flood stage: After conversations with Jim Wheeler of the Geology Department, the 100yr flood event will likely have a flowrate of approximately 2700 ft3/s…Other sentence-structure errors were compounded by students’ use of complex sentences. Theyresulted in ungrammatical sentences whose meaning is discernible but not clearly stated, as inthis example from a lab report: But the brittleness of each coupon varied with coupon #3 having little necking and being the most brittle of the three coupons, coupon #13 had more necking than #3 but less than #7 and
60 s PV output power Integrator(pout) fac_out Pout 448.3 DC-AC average power 0.9188 and efficiency
/january05/foster/01foster.html 2. Foster, N., & Gibbons, S. (Eds.). (2007). Studying students: The Undergraduate Research Project at the University of Rochester. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries. Retrieved from http://docushare.lib.rochester.edu/docushare/dsweb/View/Collection-4436 3. Asher, A. D. & Miller, S. So you want to do anthropology in your library? or a practical guide to ethnographic research in academic libraries. Retrieved from: http://www.erialproject.org/wp- content/uploads/2011/03/Toolkit-3.22.11.pdf 4. Duke, L. M., & Asher, A. D. (Eds.) (2012). College libraries and student culture: What we now know. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research
new than putting theory into practice. The textbook/lectures already covered Gathering Information, "First Cut"s, and Revision, which are simple to grasp, but the Projects give a sense of what can get done in a given amount of time, how easy/difficult it is to actually apply those steps to a real problem, and (especially) what setbacks can occur in the process and what the end result (not just the prototype but the written work too) will look like.”Two of the short answer questions asked what elements of the design process were most or leasthelpful to the students during the project. It was interesting to the author that both questionsyielded very similar responses. Two methods for organizing brainstorming, mind mapping and3-6-5, as
Annual Conference and Exposition.4. Saad, M., Abu-Lebdeh, T., Pai, D., Waters, C., 2007, “Recitation in core engineering mechanics courses: Implications for retention and student performance”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.5. Rais-Rohani, M., Walters, A., Vizzini, A. 2010, “ Emporium based redesign of statics: An innovative approach to enhance learning and reduce costs”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.6. Mackey, K., Freyberg, D., 2010, “The effect of social presence on affective and cognitive learning in an international engineering course taught via distance learning”, Journal of Engineering Education, v 99, n 1, pp 23-34.7. Sorby, S. A., Vilmann, C., 2011, “Going
Engineering Education, 2012 Incorporating Clickers and Peer Instruction into Large Structural Engineering ClassroomsAbstract Interaction and feedback are particularly challenging in large lecture environments,where class size limits student-faculty interaction. Clickers can be used to ensure studentsunderstand fundamental concepts by providing instant feedback to the instructor about studentknowledge gaps or misconceptions [1]. The use of clickers also helps maintain students’motivation and engagement in what’s going on in class, and provides an opportunity for PeerInstruction (PI). Clickers have been used since the 1980’s in many science and humanitiescourses such as physics, biology, chemistry, history
-Making and Professional Identity Development for Engineering Undergraduates. 2011;100(4):630-654.10. Foor CE, Walden SE, Trytten DA. I wish that I belonged more in this whole engineering group: Achieving individual diversity. Journal of Engineering Education. 2007;96(2):103–15.11. Capobianco BM, Diefes-Dux HA, Mena I, Weller J. What is an Engineer? Implications of Elementary School Student Conceptions for Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education. 2011;100(2):304–328.12. Downey GL, Lucena JC. Knowledge and professional identity in engineering: code-switching and the metrics of progress. History and Technology. 2004;20(4):393–420.13. Sheppard S, Colby A, Macatangay K, Sullivan W. What is Engineering Practice
Knowledge Center(http://www.wepanknowledgecenter.org) is another excellent source of material, researchreports, initiatives and organizations pertinent to women in STEM. The National Academy ofEngineering’s Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CASEE), in conjunctionwith the Society of Women Engineers (SWE)’s Assessing Women in Engineering (AWE) Page 25.932.10Project, is producing its Advancing Research into Practice (ARP) series, which translatesresearch findings on many these issues into practical recommendations for use in the classroom(http://www.engr.psu.edu/awe/ARPResources.aspx). Lastly, all of the professional
4 – Somewhat Likely 5 – Very LikelyThe module received a 5.0+/-0.0 (5 out of 5 from all 5 respondents).Questions from the Module 1 exit interview are listed below, and the results from the 3undergraduate students that participated in the course are listed in Table 1. Exit Interview Items: 1. Do you believe this course motivated/helped improve your experience in your Calculus classes? Explain. 2. What part(s) of the module implementation (teaching, worksheets, communication, field trip, etc.) do you think were the best and should be kept? Explain. 3. What part(s) of the module implementation (teaching, worksheets, communication, field trip, etc.) do you think were
vintage, 8000 sf unreinforced masonry building and the construction of a 10,000 sf building for an Historical Archive Complex • Green Building Competition - 1,000 sf residences in New Orleans, $100,000 budget, sustainable and accessible with the main floors elevated above the maximum predicted flood levels • Sedgewick Nature Reserves • Crandall Gymnasium & Natatorium - Redevelopment of a 1927 gymnasium and adjacent 1937 natatorium into a state of the art digital fabrication center. • UCSB College of Creative Studies – 60,000 sf building(s), parking, site work • Athletic Department Complex – 100,000 sf building(s), 1,000 car parking structure, 15,000 seat stadium, building renovations, sitework
Modernisation Project Vignette § Singapore Water Management Vignette § FAA Advanced Automation System (AAS) Vignette § Standard Korean Light Transit System Vignette References:1. Pyster, A., D. Olwell, J. Anthony, S. Enck, N. Hutchison, and A. Squires, eds.; Ferris, T. lead author (2011, December 15). Graduate reference curriculum for systems engineering (GRCSE) version
Learning Sciences, 235-76. 4. Prince, M.J. 2004. “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research,” Journal of Engineering Education, 1-9. 5. Harsha, P., M. Green. 2010. Computer Science Majors Significantly Increase for the Second Year in a Row: Growth Reverses the Steep Decline in Enrollment of the 2000’s. Retrieved from http://www.cra.org/uploads/documents/resources/taulbee/CRA-Taulbee-PR-2010-Final.pdf. 6. Dahlstrom, E., T. de Boor, P. Grunwald, M. Vockley. 2011. The ECAR National Survey of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, Educause Center for Applied Research. Page
., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom- Based Practices. Jnl. Eng. Ed. 94, 87–101 (2005).3. Kilpatrick, D. J., Linville, M. & Stout, D. E. Procedural justice and the development and use of peer evaluations in business and accounting classes. Journal of Accounting Education 19, 225–246 (2001).4. Byrd, J. S. & Hudgins, J. L. Teaming in the Design Laboratory. Jnl. Eng. Ed. 84, 335–341 (1995).5. Eschenbach, E. A. & Mesmer, M. A. Web Based Forms for Design Team Peer Evaluations. Proceedings of the 1998 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (1998).at 6. Wang, J. & Imbrie, P. K. Assessing Team Effectiveness: Comparing Peer-Evaluations to a Team Effectiveness
: Linking Engineering and Society. National Academy of Engineering. 36(2):38-446. Paterson, K., C. O’Holleran, and C. Leslie (2010). Faculty Impressions of Service Learning in Engineering Education. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. Louisville, KY. AC2010-2033, 8 pp.7. Silliman, S., R.Mohtar, K.G. Paterson, and W. Ball (2010). Engineering Academic Programs for Hydrophilanthropy: Commonalities and Challenges. Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education. 145:5-29. (I)8. Bielefeldt, A.R., K.G. Paterson, and C.W. Swan (2010). Measuring the Value Added from Service Learning in Project-Based Engineering Education. International Journal of Engineering Education. In Special Issue on
-intercept, caused by physical and electronic offsets between the active elements of thetransducers and the measured displacement between the bases of the holders, can be ignored.)The speed of sound found for a 10-point fit is typically within 1% of the textbook speed of soundin air of 343 m/s at 20° C.Because the Machine Science pulsers cannot be adjusted in frequency or amplitude, theextensions that we have used at NU to measure the (lack of) dependence of the speed of soundon frequency or intensity were not possible at NECC. Using the Voltage Cursor feature theNECC students were able to measure the decrease in intensity of the signal as the distancebetween the transducers in increased. This can be displayed as a scatter plot in Excel, and
class room or laboratory.For an engineer in industry, a project is a sequence of tasks required to reach an objective.Typically, the objective is to design a device or process that has value to a customer (user). Theproject begins by defining a performance problem associated with an application and ends with adesign solution. The problem drives the learning required to complete the project. Managing theproject requires the engineer to demonstrate effective teamwork, clear communication and theability to balance the social, economic and environmental impacts of the project. Project-basedlearning (PBL) is based on the practice of solving problems. The concept of problem-basedlearning was first developed in the medical field in the mid-1950’s. It
EPICSEPICS is an engineering-centered, multidisciplinary, service-learning program at PurdueUniversity that has received national recognition. Students enrolled in the EPICS courses learndesign while they develop projects for local or global community partners. In the 2011-2012academic year, over 500 students from more than 70 majors within the College of Engineeringand across the university have participated in EPICS. This program is structured with student-leddivisions, each with 8-20 students, a faculty or industry mentor, and a graduate teaching assistant(TA). Each division has one or more not-for-profit agency/ies (such as a museum, governmentservice, charity, etc.) as a community partner(s). The students work with their communitypartner(s) to
preparation for her and created a challenging objective for the group. The resultsshowed the students in her group their weaknesses in a format different from the in-class testsand verified that they did indeed need to study and that attendance in the study group isworthwhile.Study Group LogisticsAs described elsewhere8, students arrive at study groups to find that the mentor has organized theseating in the room to be in a U-shape with all chairs and desks facing the white board. Thementor takes a seat as if s/he is a part of the group. The mentor facilitates collaborative groupwork by opening communication and asking about problem areas from the lecture or homework.In the case of a group with students from several different course sections studying
. Page 25.202.1514 Baillie, C. (2011) ‘Threshold capabilities: an emerging methodology to locate curricula threshold’, in proceedings of the Research in Engineering Education Symposium, 4-7 October, Madrid.15 Male, S. and Baillie, C. (2011) ‘Engineering Threshold Concepts’, SEFI Annual Conference, European Society for Engineering Education, Lisbon.16 Smith, M., Hargroves, K., and Desha, C. (2010) Cents and Sustainability: Securing Our Common Future by Decoupling Economic Growth from Environmental Pressures, Earthscan, London.17 Von Weizsäcker, E., Hargroves, K., Smith, M., Desha, C., and Stasinopoulos, P. (2009) Factor Five: Transforming the Global Economy through 80% Improvements in Resource Productivity, Earthscan
educational objectives, Complete ed. New York: Longman. [7] Feltovich, P.J., Prietula, M.J. & Ericsson, K.A., (2006). Studies of expertise from psychological perspectives. In Ericsson, K.A. ed. The cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, xv, 901 p.[8] Chi, M.T.H., (2006). Two approaches to the study of experts’ characteristics. In Ericsson, K.A. ed. The cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, xv, 901 p.[9] Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I. & Vermetten, Y., (2005). Information problem solving by experts and novices
future is... beyond modular. The Technology Teacher, 56(7), 28-29.11 Virtual Machine Shop. (n.d.). Retrieved August 2011, from http://www.kanabco.com/vms/index.html12 Smith, R. (2007). Virtual machine shop. Retrieved August 8, 2007, from www.jjjtrain.com/vms/index.html13 Bugeja, M. (2007, September 14). Second thoughts about Second Life. Retrieved June 21, 2008, from http://chronicle.com/jobs/news/2007/09/2007091401c.htm14 Volk, K. S. (1993, Spring). Enrollment trends in industrial arts/technology teacher education from 1970-1990.15 Rogers, G. (1998). Concerns about technology education laboratories. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 35(3), 97-10016 Rogers, G. E. (1996). The untapped resource. Journal of
that the passing rate in the secondcourse in thermodynamics is higher for those students who completed the first course with theinstructors who were tough graders, that is those who issued lower GPAs in the prerequisitethermodynamics class5. Page 25.233.5 Table 1. Cumulative Grade distribution for sections of Thermodynamics-I taught by each instructor. Inst- GPA N S %A %B %C %D %F %W % DFW Type
. Page 25.235.5 Independent variable Dependent Variable Student Background Information Teaching Content of Department of Gender Architecture Extension Education Age Previous Education System Description Architecture Teaching (12 items) Previous Major Studied Analysis, Current Education System Independent S
Desktopdeployment options, learningmanagement system applications, andcontent development tools. DOE LMS Page 25.1284.6 Figure 4: Overview of the standards and technology selection process Learning Content Portability StandardsQuestion: Which learning content portability standard(s) would fit our needs?Objectives: (1) ability to move content between various delivery platforms, (2