theircollaboration with former teaching assistants who have helped run the program in past years andmaintained reports on seminar topics, student feedback, and performance.BIBLIOGRAPHY1. Norris, P. M., & Palmer, S. C. (1998). Effectiveness of the Woodruff School Doctoral Teaching Intern Program.Journal of Engineering Education, 87(3), 223-226.2. Wankat, P. C. (1999). Educating engineering professors in education. Journal of Engineering Education, 88,471-476.3. Wankat, P. C., & Oreovicz, F. S. (2005). Teaching prospective engineering faculty how to teach. InternationalJournal of Engineering Education, 21(5), 925.4. Utecht, R. L., & Tullous, R. (2009). Are we preparing doctoral students in the art of teaching? Research in HigherEducation Journal
Paper ID #7512Rationales on a Required Class on Signal and Power Integrity in a ComputerEngineering CurriculumDr. JianJian Song, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Jianjian Song (M’88, S’07) received his B.S. degree in radio engineering from Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan, China in 1982, and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engi- neering from the University of Minnesota in 1985 and 1991. He joined the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering of Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in Terre Haute, Indiana in 1999 as associate professor and he has been full professor since 2010. From
their generation of energy to power all aspect ofmankind’s existence.References1. International Energy Agency, “World Energy Outlook 2011”, OECD Publishing, November 2011, http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/publications/weo-2011/, accessed August 2012.2. D. L. Greene, J. L. Hopson, and J. Li, “Have We Run Out of Oil Yet? Oil Peaking Analysis from an Optimist's Perspective”, Energy Policy, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 515-531, March 2006.3. S. Sorrell, J. Speirs, R. Bentley, A. Brandt, and R. Miller, “Global Oil Depletion: A Review of the Evidence”, Energy Policy, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 5290-5295, September 2010.4. G. Keith, S. Jackson, A. Napoleon, T. Comings, and J. Ramey, “The Hidden Costs of Electricity: Comparing the
(greencircles) and 5 graduate student mentors (turquoise circles) are shown for demonstration. Eachproject has a graduate student mentor with only the most experienced students supervising morethan one project. The graduate students meet with their undergraduate team(s) a couple of timesa week (ideally) and are available for consultation at other times. These graduate students arevolunteers who are involved in some aspect of project engineering in their own research. Theyare chosen largely on their understanding that, to receive the benefit of undergraduates workingon their project, they will be required to invest much more time at the beginning than simplyundertaking the specific tasks themselves. Such mentoring abilities require considerablecoaching
. Researchers are anxious to discover if those results will besimilar to these in the end.Bibliography1. Karayan, S. & Crowe, J. (1997). Student perspectives of electronic discussion groups. THE Journal: Technological Horizons in Education, 24(9), 69–71.2. Smith, D. & Hardaker, G. (2000). e-Learning innovation through the implementation of an Internet supported learning environment. Educational Technology and Society, 3, 1–16.3. Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: theory and practice. Modern Language Journal, 8(4), 470–481.4. Haythornthwaite, C., Kazmer, M. M., Robbins, J. & Shoemaker, S. (2000). Community development among distance learners: temporal and technological dimensions. Journal
conditions of learning and theory of instruction (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.4. McKeachie, W. J. (1999). Teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university students (10th ed.). Lexington, MA: Heath.5. Wankat, P.C. (2002). The effective, efficient professor: Teaching, scholarship, and service. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.6. Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.7. Bruce, J.W. & Bruce, L. (2004). Maximizing your productivity as a junior faculty member: Being effective in the classroom. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.8. Goss Lucas, S., & Bernstein
, 1993 7. Katzenbach, Jon R. and Smith, Douglas K. The Discipline of Teams. Boston: Harvard Business School Page 23.1156.10 Press, 1993 8. Lencioni, Patrick. The Five Dysfunctions of a Team. Jossey-Bass, 20029. Zaccaro, Stephen and Rittman, A. , Marks, M. Team leadership. The Leadership Quarterly. 12 (2001) 451- 483.10. Lafasto, Frank and Larson, C. When Teams Work Best. Sage Publications, 2001.11. Singh, Anup K. and Muncherji, N. Team Effectiveness and Its Measurement: A Framework. Global Business Review, 8:1 (2007): 119-133.12. Zemke, Diane and Zemke, S. Identifying Roles and Behaviors of Informal
Study to Determine which students would BenefitMost from Spatial Training” Proceedings of the ASEE, 2011.[8] Sorby, S., Wysocki, A.F. and Baartmans, B.J. “Introduction to 3D Spatial Visualization: An Active Approach”Prentice Hall, Inc.[9] Bodner, G. M. and Guay, R. B “The Purdue Visualization of Rotations Test”, The Chemical Educator, 2(4) 1-17,1997.[10] Jones, S. “The Bachelor of Arts in Engineering: A Paradigm for Bridging the Liberal Arts and Engineering”Proceedings of the ASEE, 2008.[11] National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering the New Century, NationalAcademies Press, D.C., 2004.[12] Hertzberg, J., Leppek, B. R. and Gray, K.E. “Art for the Sake of Improving Attitudes toward Engineering”Proceedings of
do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation and LITEE.References 1. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), 369-398. 2. Aleven, V. A., & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science, 26(2), 147-179. 3. Schank, R. C., Berman, T. R., & MacPherson, K. A. (1999). Learning by doing. Page 23.1301.10
, and Test Projects to Teach Engineering, Elger, D.F.; Beyerlein, S.W.; Budwig, R.S.,Frontiers in Education 30th Annual Conference, 2000, Volume 2, Issue , 2000 Page(s):F3C/9 - F3C13 Page 23.1304.710. Virtual Flight Tests: An Effective Pedagogical Tool, M. Javed Khan and Bruce Heath, ASEE AnnualConference, 11 -13 June, San Antonio, TX, 201211. The Development and Implementation of a Flight Simulation Based Environment for Teaching Math & Science,M. Javed Khan, Marcia Rossi, Chadia Aji, Bruce Heath, Proceedings of the SITE Conference, 5 – 9 March, 2012,Austin, TX12. Teaching of Math and Physics Using a Flight Simulator, M. Javed
Unique Scroll Wheel(36) [company] Driver(s)(34) Touch Steering(21) Menu Hierarchy(34) Driver Needs(8) Sensitive Steering(19) Menu Structure(16) Test Driver(7) Touchable Steering(13) Text Input(110) Driver Navigation(4) [company] Interaction(34) Current [interface](14) Team [company](56) Page 23.1325.10 Inputting
engineering students. Additionally, he has spoken at two recent NSF-sponsored workshops on gaming in engineering and computer science education and how to vertically integrate student teams in games for learning projects.Dr. Sushil Acharya, Robert Morris University Sushil Acharya, D.Eng., Associate Professor of Software Engineering joined Robert Morris University in spring of 2005 after serving 15 years in the Software Industry. With US Airways Acharya was re- sponsible for creating a Data Warehouse conceptual design and using advance Data Mining Tools for performance improvement. With i2 Technologies he worked on i2’s Data Mining product ”Knowledge Discover Framework” and at CEERD (Thailand) he was the product manager of
ethics.Bibliography1. Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M., & Thoma, S. (1999). A neo-Kohlbergian approach: The DIT and schema theory. Educational Psychology Review, 11, 291-324.2. Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.3. Kohlberg, L. (1985). Resolving moral conflicts within the just community. In C. B. Harding (Ed.), Moral dilemmas: Philosophical and psychological issues in the development of moral reasoning (pp. 71-97). Chicago: Precedent Publishing.4. Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.5. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.6. Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S
Association 104(6), 44-57.11 Water and wastewater treatment plant and system operators. (2012, March 29). Retrieved from Page 23.1360.11http://www.bls.gov/ooh/production/water-and-wastewater-treatment-plant-and-system-operators.htm12 Frangione, C. S., & Good, J. (2007). Survey finds that lack of operator certification reciprocity hinders the staffingof operations. Weftec. Retrieved from http://www.workforwater.org/WorkArea/linkit.aspx?LinkIdentifier=id
in the solution of broadly defined problems. Civil Engineering Technician (CE Technician) is a person typically performing task- oriented scientific or engineering related activities and exercising technical judgments commensurate with those specific tasks. A person working as a CE Technician works under the direct control and personal supervision of a CE Professional or direction of a CE Technologist. A person initially obtains status as a CE Technician through the completion of requisite formal education, experience, examination(s), and/or other requirements as specified by an appropriate credentialing body. A person working as a CE Technician is expected to comprehend and
are known, theSTEP Mentor can steer students to appropriate information or resources that may help studentachieve his/her goals. As such, the STEP Mentors are in a position to connect the advisee tofaculty who have professional, research, or service interests compatible with the student’sinterests. The STEP Mentor documents recommendations in a Student Consultation Form during thesemester meeting. The form requires responses to the following: 1) Has student met with her/hisinstructor(s)? 2) Has student met with her/his academic Program Advisor? 3) Issues/TopicsDiscussed, and (4) Recommendation(s). The STEP Mentor and the student agree onrecommendations to continue or enhance academic or professional development and the studentssign this
of the Academic relevant content standards, and focused on the big ideasContent and foundational skills critical to future learning in the targeted discipline(s). Learning experiences challenge students to develop higherQuality of the Cognitive Task order thinking skills through processes such as inquiry, problem-solving, and creative thinking. Learning experiences place students in learningConnections to STEM Careers environments that help them to better understand and personally consider STEM careers. Learning experiences often
. Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authorsand do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.IX. References[1] Koretsky, M.D., Amatore, D., Barnes, C., & Kimura, S. (2008). Enhancement of student learning in experimental design using a virtual laboratory. IEEE Transactions on Education, 51(1), 76–85.[2] Koretsky, M.D., Kelly, C. & Gummer, E. (2011). Student Perceptions of Learning in the Laboratory: Comparison of Industrially-situated Virtual Laboratories to Capstone Physical Laboratories. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3), 540–573.[3] Koretsky, M.D., Kelly, C. & Gummer, E. (2011). Student Learning in
) Nerds are white males 6. Those who are nerds are typically portrayed as technology andmath loving, socially awkward, white male sexual failures 8. While the term nerd can be datedback to the 1950’s where it first appeared in Dr. Suess’s book, If I Ran a Zoo, and early versionsof the nerd on television can be dated to the 1960’s with characters like Richie on Happy Days,the stereotypical nerd persona is highly attributed to the Revenge of the Nerds franchise in the1980’s8. It is also in the 1980’s when television and film started to portray the relationship Page 23.240.3between nerds and cool jocks as a contentious relationship where nerds were
theylearned from each of the components of the course. To account for changing admissions criteria Page 23.249.6we chose the comparison group from the same cohorts as the summer course participants. Theeffect analysis uses the same methods as the undergraduate research effect study.The effect evaluation of the course harmonization effort consists of an analysis of first-attemptpass rates in a number of courses taken by transfers from community colleges to Grove, whotook the pre-requisite course(s) in their previous school. We compared the pass rates in follow-up courses before and after harmonization of the pre-requisite and follow-up course in
, Maryland. Publications, Louise Dunlap”An analysis of the Legislative History of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1975,”Twenty-First Annual Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Institute, Matthew Bender, 1976”Environmental Perspectives on the Effectiveness of SMCRA” (with James S. Lyon), West Virginia LawReview, Spring, 1986”From Kitchen Tables They Changed the Law,” USA Today guest column, August 3, 1987”Environmental Protection, Competition, and Changes in World Energy Markets” (with Joe Browder),Papers, Volume II, American Mining Congress, April 1988 Page 23.955.3 c American Society for Engineering Education
Press, 2001. (C. F. Baynes, Trans. Original work Page 23.1200.14 published 1933).[43] S. Kadel and J.A. Keehner, editors. Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education, Vol. 2. National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment, University Park, PA, 1994.[44] C. Kaner and R. Fiedler. Inside out: A computer science course gets a makeover. In Association for Educa- tional Communication and Technology International Conference, 2005.[45] S. Kellogg. Technology enabled support modules for the inverted entrepreneurial classroom. In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference &
. Duffy, R. and W. Sedlacek, What is most important to students' long-term career choices: analyzing 10- year trends and group differences. Journal of Career Development, 2009. 34(2): p. 149-163.15. Ros, M., S. Schwartz, and S. Surkiss, Basic individual values, work values, and the meaning of work. Page 23.544.16 Applied psychology, 1999. 48(1): p. 49-71.16. Nosek, B., et al., National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009. 106(26): p. 10593.17. Dweck, C. and E.L. Leggett, A
Science Education, pages 131-152.3. C.A. Shaffer, M.L. Cooper, A.J.D. Alon, M. Akbar, M. Stewart, S. Ponce, and S.H. Edwards. (2010). Algorithmvisualization: The state of the Field. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 10:1-22.4. E. Fouh, M. Akbar, and C.A. Shaffer (2012). The Role of Visualization in Computer Science Education, Com-puters in the Schools 29, Issue 1-2, 95—117.5. L. Malmi, V. Karavirta, A. Korhonen, J. Nikander, O. Seppala, and P. Silvasti (2004). Visual algorithm simula-tion exercise system with automatic assessment: TRAKLA2. Informatics in Education, 3(2):267- 288.6. C.A. Shaffer, M. Akbar, A.J.D. Alon, M. Stewart, and S.H. Edwards (2011). Getting Algorithm Visualizationsinto the Classroom in Proceedings of the 42nd ACM
, "Model of Integrating Humanitarian Development into Engineering Education," Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, April 2010.7 M. J. Prince and R. M. Felder, "Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 123-138, 2006.8 M. Borrego and J. Bernhard, "The emergence of engineering research as an internationally connected field of inquiry," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 14-47, 2011.9 J. S. Brown, A. Collins and P. Duguid, "Situated cognition and the culture of learning," Educational Researcher, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 32-41, 1989
graciousprofessionalism mentality establish by FLL allows students to build confidence and learn fromeach other as they work to exceed expectations and self doubt.” Another coach described theimpact of the “cool factor” of robotics, stating From what I witnessed it made robotic[s] cool. I mean being on the robotic team became more popular [than] being on the football or basketball team. I had students who came to me everyday asking can they be on the robotics team. So just the buzz that FLL created around our school was worth [it] because it got a lot of students interest[ed] who normally could care less. Page 23.601.9When we asked