. 10, p. 72, 2003.[2] M.Z. Jimenez, L. Salas-Morera, A. Cubera-Atienza, and M. Varo Martinez, “An Outreach Project For Engineering Education,” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 96-104, 2010.[3] M. Yilmoz, J. Ren, S. Custer, and J. Coleman, “Hands-on Summer Camp to Attract K-12 Students to Engineering Fields,” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 144-151, 2010.[4] Author unknown, “Girl Day Takes on New Urgency,” Professional Safety, Vol. 51, No. 1, p. 24, 2006.[5] M. Hunter, “Opportunities for Environmental Science and Engineering Outreach Through K-12 Mathematics Programs,” Environmental Engineering Science, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 461-471, 2006.[6] J. Musto, W. Howard, and S
Copyright © 2011, American Society for Engineering Education difficulty, repeat some modules with different difficulty levels, check Need-Help icon fordifficult modules when s/he needs extra help. Moreover, the student would be able tosubmit questions or comments to his/her instructor and receive the instructor’s responseback. The different modules in the learning tool, as shown in Figure 1, are described inthe following sub-sections.3.1. Information Module It provides the fundamentals of object-oriented properties, analysis, design andimplementation. It demonstrates the basic knowledge of classes, objects, methods, andthe relations among them. It also presents students with the main programming constructsused in Java (including purpose
(analysis, testing, and design) than a typical one-paper/single-use assignment or exam question.However, the cost may be amortized by grading savings in several offerings over time of large courses. Moresophisticated question variant generation awaits instructor-ready tools.References [1] Maplesoft, Maple T.A. 7 User Guide. Maplesoft, 2011. [2] ——, Maple 15 User Guide. Maplesoft, 2011. [3] Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning for the Commission on Behavioral and So- cial Sciences and Education, How People Learn, expanded edition ed., J. Bransford, A. Brown, and R. Cocking, Eds. National Research Council, 2000. [4] H. Anton, I. Bivens, and S. Davis, Calculus, 8th ed. Wiley, 2005. [5] B. Char, “Developing questions
requires the implementation of both digital andanalog modules on a single chip. The goal of this course is to introduce the modeling, designand analysis of analog CMOS VLSI. The students design analog VLSI layouts, extract thenetlists and simulate the circuit behavior. The transistor sizing in analog VLSI layouts is alsodiscussed.Upon the completion of this course, students are able to design and analyze basic analog andmixed-signal CMOS VLSI circuits. They get to know various analog/mixed-signal VLSIcircuits such as current sources and sinks, amplifiers, S/H circuits, switching-capacitancecircuits, analog-to-digital and digital-to-analog converters, etc. They are expected to be ableto design analog VLSI layouts, decide transistor sizing, and
hand of toy if placed in a ch hild’s mouthh. Images o f the studennt’s experiments are fouund inFig 2, shhowing how w the studen nts conducteed the expeeriments in controlled ssurroundingss andcollected d respective data. d (a) (b) (c)Fig. 2: Student condducted expeeriments of safety s and iimpact testiing of a Smuurf Toy (a) h hand sensorr submerged d in water to t simulate moisture m annd testing off conductiviity, (b) impaact testingg on a masss balance sca ale and (c) images
as “teaching as research”, the Wendt Commons staff will draw on keyprinciples that advocate for change in the traditional model for classroom instruction. Ratherthan providing an exhaustive review of the literature, the following presents a summary of thekey concepts on which our service model is based.Smith, et al., in their review of classroom-based pedagogies of engagement, point out thatlearning outcomes depend more on students’ approach to learning and faculty delivery ofmaterial rather than the content itself11. Drawing on research from the past 100+ years, theauthors note that active-learning approaches have been developed and injected into engineeringclassrooms since the 1940’s – yet there has been very little actual change in the
AC 2011-1956: INSTITUTIONAL ETHNOGRAPHY AS A METHOD TOUNDERSTAND THE CAREER AND PARENTAL LEAVE EXPERIENCESOF STEM FACULTY MEMBERSMarisol Mercado Santiago, Purdue University Marisol Mercado Santiago is a doctoral student in the School of Engineering Education, Purdue Univer- sity, and a research assistant in the Research in Feminist Engineering (RIFE) group. She has a M. E. in Computer Engineering and a B. S. in Computer Science (with honors). Among her research interests are (1) culturally responsive education, (2) engineering studies, and (3) art and engineering education. Address: School of Engineering Education, Armstrong Hall, 701 W. Stadium Ave., West Lafayette, IN 47907. mercado@purdue.edu.Alice L. Pawley
theoretically informed development is demonstrated.Below, I describe the theoretical framework and object of study (§ 2), the methodology forevaluating the learning process (§ 3), learning results and an analysis of students’ activities (§ 4)in conceptual and non-conceptual labs. Finally in section 5, a short discussion, conclusion andimplications of the results are presented.2. Theoretical framework and object of study2.1 Variation theoryAs described briefly in the introduction, most students do not change their conceptions ofmechanics concepts, i.e. they do not change their ways of seeing the world using force andmotion concepts from a naive to Newtonian understanding, even after one or more universitylevel course(s) in mechanics. Hence, teaching and
. ( ) { } m& = ρV& = 62.4 lbm ft 3 (58 gal min ) 1 ft 3 7.48 gal = 484 lbm min ⎧ ft ⎫ ⎧g⎫ ⎪ ⎪ 32 . 2 ⎪ W& = m& w = m& ⎨ ⎬( z1 − z2 ) = (484 lbm min )⎨ s 2 ⎪(0 − 58) ft ⎩ gc ⎭ ft ⋅ lbm ⎬ ⎪ 32.2 ⎪ ⎪⎩ lbf ⋅ s 2 ⎪⎭ W& = (− 28,072 ft ⋅ lbf min ){1hp ⋅ min 33,000 ft ⋅ lbf } = −0.85hpSavery’s sales demonstrator pump
engineering capstone educational outcomes. The timeline to bring the project and students up to speed is longer than for a traditional capstone, including multi-disciplinary ones, as the SE foundation has to be established o first, in terms of SE knowledge acquisition o second, for socialization to and the buy in needed from the students to work on the project in a meaningful systems engineering mode.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Researchand Engineering (ASD(R&E)) STEM Development Office. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect
can be pushed out to the cell/smart phones of PEs’ registered forcourse(s) without their intervention (e.g., no browsing for information) regardless of the phonemodel, calling plan, or wireless service provider they own.In particular, this paper will discuss the following topics: 1. Existing models of university-company collaboration so as to introduce an atypical university-company collaboration in which the partnering company is a start-up which owns a potentially potent m-outreach technology. 2. Definitions of m-learning in order to better understand the unique educational potential for engineers of the m-outreach tool upon which this university-company collaboration rests. 3. Details of the technology behind the
AC 2011-1064: TOWARDS MORE EFFECTIVE TEACHING STRATEGIESOF ITERATION AND SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT IN SPACECRAFT DE-SIGNHadi Ali, Purdue University Hadi Ali is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He holds a B.S. in Aeronautics and Astronautics from Purdue University and a B.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Jordan. He earned his Masters degree in Aeronautics and Astronautics from Purdue University majoring in aerospace systems design. He is also pursuing a Masters degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue. Hadi is a student member of AIAA, IEEE, ASME, and SAE.Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette Robin S. Adams is an Assistant Professor in
. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.5 Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: AAUW press.6 Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122.7 Lord, S. M., Brawner, C. E., Camacho, M. M., Layton, R. A., Ohland, M. W., & Wasburn, M. H., (2009). Work in
. Haller, C. R.; Gallagher, V. J.; Weldon, T. L.; Felder, R. M., Dynamics of peer education in cooperativelearning workgroups. Journal of Engineering Education 2000, 89, 285-293.6. Demetry, C.; Groccia, J. E., A comparative assessment of students' experiences in two instructional formatsof an introductory materials science course. Journal of Engineering Education 1997, 86, 203-210.7. Terenzini, P. T.; Cabrera, A. F.; Colbeck, C. L.; Parente, J. M.; Bjorklund, S. A., Collaborative learning vs.Lecture/discussion: Students' reported learning gains. Journal of Engineering Education 2001, 90, 123-130.8. Woods, D. R.; Hrymak, A. N.; Marshall, R. R.; Wood, P. E.; Crowe, C. M.; Hoffman, T. W.; Wright, J. D.;Taylor, P. A.; Woodhouse, K
.) What kind of bridge is this? Le ally What is / are the purposes(s) or function (s) of this bridge? What is the bridge
strategy, oneteam didn’t do so effectively (Team E2), and the other (Team M2) did, obtaining the highestscore overall in the competition. Analyzing Team M2’s approach in more detail may providesome insight as to the nature of effective mathematics use in design solutions for these robotcompetitions. Page 22.1246.9 Table 2: Features of the Focus Teams Students Coaches/Mentors First Move
Faculty Emailed6. Have you increased or added the use of any of the six recommendations? If Yes,please indicate which one(s).Share an encouraging or Share an encouraging orinformative message with informative message withstudents 6 86% students 2 100%Take a minute to give Take a minute to giveconstructive feedback 4 57% constructive feedback 0 0%Show that you are Show that you areapproachable 4 57% approachable 1 50%Encourage students to meet Encourage students to meetwith you during office hours 6 86% with you during office hours
United States. The Bridge, 39(3), 5-10.2. Goodland, S. (1997). Responding to perceived training needs for graduate teaching assistants. Studies in Higher Education, 22(1), 83-92.3. Salinas, M.F., Kozuh, G., & Seraphine, A. (1999). I think I can: Improving teaching self-confidence of international teaching assistants. Journal of Graduate Teaching Assistant Development, 6(3), 149-156.4. Fink, L.D. & Ambrose, S. (2005). Becoming a professional engineering educator: A new role for a new era. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 185-194.5. Shulman, L. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching; A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Witrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Teaching, 3rd ed
address 0X30D 15. ------------- 16. Read transmission data from RX FIFO at long address 0X311 17. The data read continues depends on its desired length 18. ------------- The very last action on the receiving side is to do a read on the INTSTAT register (shortaddress at 0X31) to clear the INT flag(s) and it will automatically stop the INT action from themodule to the MCU. The actual set up of the hardware of the master control unit is shown in photo 1: Amicrocontroller trainer configured as a master (a PIC16F877A MCU) control unit in associationwith a MRF24J40MA transceiver module, power supply and miscellaneous passive componentsare assembled and configured on the PIC trainer. You will note that MRF24J40MA module isplugged
were made in Indonesia, and a screen designed in Korea). It made me realize how interconnected everything is now. One of my favorite books is called “The World is Flat,” and it was at that moment that the world truly felt flat and so small. No accomplishment, advancement, product, or anything can be claimed by a single country now. Everything humanity does now is a global effort in every sense.The CURE students appreciated the universally positive work relationships that they shared withtheir PKU graduate student mentors but did not develop social relationships with them thatextended outside of the lab or their shared work. The mentors made the effort to make theirCURE colleague(s) comfortable in the labs by sharing
Project ResultsThe overall quality of the students‟ design projects was more than satisfactory. Students showedsignificant innovation and built a wide variety of designs, ranging from parabolic dishes, aconverted projection television utilizing the television‟s large Fresnel lens, a parabolic troughcomplete with rotisserie, and several simpler ovens built from various materials, includingcardboard boxes, mini-refrigerators, streetlights, toolboxes, and various other scavenged items.A wide variety of insulation materials were utilized, including shredded newspaper, carpeting,plastic bottles, Styrofoam, commercial spray foams, commercial fiberglass insulation, andscavenged clothes and blankets. In addition to the basic egg, many students made more
pen-input of equations is substantiallymore efficient than keyboard entry, and is greatly preferred by users. Page 22.82.4Classroom Presenter15 is perhaps one of the most widely used pen-based instructionaltools. This lecturing system allows students and instructors to communicate duringlectures using tablet computers. However, this system does not interpret what is written,and is not intended to provide tutoring capabilities.Newton’s Pen16 is a Statics tutoring system implemented on LeapFrog Inc.’s FLYT Mpentop computer. The FLYT M , which employs Anoto technology,13 is a ballpoint pen withan embedded computer processor and an integrated digitizer
about pursuing studies and careers in these fields. Forthese students, “engineering” is much more than a field of study. Most (69%) view it as a sciencededicated to solving problems, creating, and building things to satisfy needs. Only 19%considered engineering specifically as a career or field of study. While we cannot infer that theirviews are driving their interest, it is interesting to notice that 81% of these students indicated thatthey like engineering and will consider studying it. Overwhelmingly, these students associatedthings or jobs done by engineers with creativity, design, planning, and problem solving toimprove human life—An engineer designs, created, plans, and improves; s/he solved problemswith computers, robots, machines; an
new way is related to the observation.Potential Artifacts: persuasive essay, blog, journal, presentationAdditional Information: 1. Observations may be made of customers, clients, co-workers, suppliers, companies, etc. 2. For example, “Students check their text messages more frequently than their email, so faculty could send course emails as text messages to the class.”--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Discovery Competency D4: Develop new insights by provoking unexpected responses in anexperiment or series of experiments.Primary Traits: A passing submission for this criterion must: 1. Describe the experiment(s): what/who is the subject of the experiment(s