research in the areas of recruitment and retention. A SWE and ASEE Fellow, she is a frequent speaker on career opportunities and diversity in engineering. Page 23.1265.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 The Transfer Experience for Upper Division Engineering and Computer Science StudentsAbstractSince 2002 an academic scholarship success and professional development program has beenheld at Arizona State University for transfer and non-transfer students supported by NationalScience Foundation CSEM and S-STEM grants for scholars in engineering and
research agenda at the time the paper is presented in Atlanta.The goal is to ensure that the ASEE membership has access to the report close to the time of itsrelease and that ASEE is one of the first organizations to hear a summary presentation on its Page 23.1279.13content.References1. Sanders, M. (2009). Integrative STEM Education: Primer. Technology Teacher, 68 (4), 20- 26.2. Pruitt, S. (in development). Next Generation Science Standards. Achieve.3. Fogarty, R. (October 1991). Ten Ways To Integrate Curriculum. Educational Leadership, 61-65.4. Carr, R.L. & Strobel, J. (2011). Integrating Engineering into Secondary Math and Science
Accrediting Commission Criteria, website http://www.abet.org/DisplayTemplates/DocsHandbook.aspx?id=3150[3] Bergmann, L. S. and Zepernick, J., “Disciplinarity and Transfer: Students’ Perceptions of Learning to Write,” Writing Program Administration, 31, Fall/Winter 2007.[4] Walker, K. “Using Genre Theory to Teach Students Engineering Lab Report Writing: A Collaborative Approach, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 42, 1, March 1999[5] Mackiewicz, J., “The Effects of Tutor Expertise in Engineering Writing: A Linguistic Analysis of Writing Tutors’ Comments.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47, 4, December 2004[6] Nelms, G. and Dively, R. L., “Perceived Roadblocks to Transferring Knowledge from First-Year
affects both the amount of time we expect students to spend onIPC project work, and progress they should make toward completion of their portfolio.Establishing a Policy on the Progress of Portfolio CompletionReasonable expectation of progress must be set on the collection and presentation ofportfolio entries by students. For practicality, we tie the policy of progress on portfolioentry categories to the number of credits in each project course. Thus, each semester, aproject student must include an entry (i.e., artifact(s) and reflective commentary) for at Page 23.1344.9least one activity per project course credit. Each new entry must be in a category
, 2011. Retrieved Mar 16, 2012 from http://csunplugged.org/. [3] Blum, L., and Cortina, T. J. CS4HS: an outreach program for high school CS teachers. In Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer Science Education (New York, NY, USA, 2007), SIGCSE ’07, ACM, pp. 19–23. [4] Blum, L., Cortina, T. J., Lazowska, E., and Wise, J. The expansion of CS4HS: an outreach program for high school teachers. In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer Science Education (New York, NY, USA, 2008), SIGCSE ’08, ACM, pp. 377–378. [5] Bruckman, A., Biggers, M., Ericson, B., McKlin, T., Dimond, J., DiSalvo, B., Hewner, M., Ni, L., and Yardi, S. “Georgia Computes!”: improving the computing education
] Air Force Institute of Technology, USAF Wright-Patterson AFB, 1977.13. Harloff, G. J. and B. M. Berkowitz. “HASA - Hypersonic Aerospace Sizing Analysis for the Preliminary Design of Aerospace Vehicles,” (NASA-CR-182226). NASA, 1988.14. Howe, D. Aircraft Conceptual Design Synthesis. Professional Engineering Publishing Ltd., London, 2000.15. Isikveren, Askin T. “Quasi-Analytical Modelling and Optimisation Techniques for Transport Aircraft Design,” (Doctoral Thesis Report 2002-13). Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 2002.16. Jernell, Lloyd S. et al. “Design of a Large Span-Distributed Load Flying-Wing Cargo Airplane,” (NASA- TM-X-74031). NASA Langley Research Center, Vought Corporation, 1977.17. Kücheman, Dietrich. The
/viewcontent.cgi?article=1021&context=mech_eng_pub9. Hauck, A.J., and Rockwell, Q.T., “Desirable Characteristics of the Professional Constructor,” ASC Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference, Texas A&M University - College Station, TX, Spring 1996. Available at: http://www.ascjournal.ascweb.org/journal/1997/no1/JCE_Spring_1997.html10. Lee, N., Ponton, R., Jeffreys, A.W., and Cohn, R. “Analysis of Industry Trends for Improving Undergraduate Curriculum in Construction Management Education,” ASC Proceedings of the 47th Annual International Conference, Omaha, NE, April 2011. Available at: http://www.engineering.unl.edu/durhamschool/events/ascconference2011/11. Mead, S. P. and Gehrig, G. B., “Skills for the 21st Century: What
~7 days • Demonstrate integrated spacecraft systems performance prior to crewed flight • Demonstrate high speed entry (~11 km/s) and thermal protection system prior to crewed flight EM-2 no later than 2021 • Crewed lunar orbit mission • Mission duration 10–14 dayswww.nasa.gov/sls 4 The Road to First Flight in 2017 NASA Life Approval for Approval for Cycle
: Sample questions from workshop participant content assessment Module Question A wave has a wavelength of 50 m and is traveling at 2500 m/s. What is itsSound frequency? a. 250 Hz b. 50 Hz c. 2550 Hz d. 125,000 Hz Which property concerning electric flow is true?Electricity a. Electrons move toward the positive terminal of the circuit b. Electricity flows fast if the circuit is an open loop, not a closed
. Ali, A., & Ali, U. (2010). Predictability of engineering students’ performance at the University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar from admission test conducted by Educational Testing and Evaluation Agency (ETEA), NWFP, Pakistan. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 976–982.2. Andrew, S., Salamonson, Y., Weaver, R., Smith, A., O’Reilly, R., & Taylor, C. (2008). Hate the course or hate to go: Semester differences in first year nursing attrition, Nurse Education Today, 28(7), 865-872.3. Baker, J.G. (1998). Gender, race and Ph.D. completion in natural science and engineering, Economics of Education Review, 17(2), 179-188.4. Cohen, L. (1946). Predicting academic success in an engineering college
window (Team 8) Page 23.604.6The primary focus of this study is each team’s Project Executive Summary submittedelectronically. This assignment asked teams to write a maximum 2-page, single space summaryin which they were to address the following questions in a narrative form: How is your project specifically related to nanotechnology? Why is your project important for learners? How did you incorporate the [network]’s team in your solution? What problem are you solving? What is your solution? Briefly describe the grade level target you are targeting, the engineering activity, the science
www.spaceportindiana.com2 www.seds.org3 List, R.J., Smithsonian Meteorological Tables, vol. 114, 1951.4 Federal Standard 1037C, Telecom Glossary 2000, 7 Aug 1996.5 http://www.airnav.com/airport/KBAK Page 23.665.96 Yagi, H, and Uda, S., Japanese Patent No. 69115, 1926.
participating institution by trained PACE researchteam members and consultants. Interview questions focused on reasons for choosing anengineering major, experiences with engineering departments, support structures, andexperiences specific to being an underrepresented student in engineering. An appropriatequalitative study sample size is one that sufficiently answers the research question(s).18Therefore, this project analyzed interviews with thirty-four underrepresented minority studentsranging in age from 18-28. See Tables 1-3 for demographic information about the participants.Data analysis, using NVivo 9 qualitative data analysis software, utilized a combination of bothopen and focused coding methods.19 Research questions provided a lens for the
NON-PROPORTIONAL LOADINGThe distortion energy theory predicts that yielding occurs when the distortion strain energy perunit volume reaches or exceeds the distortion energy per unit volume for yield in simple tensionor compression of the material (Budynas and Nisbett, 2011). This leads to the failure criterionthat material yields when the effective stress or von Mises stress, reaches or exceeds thematerial yield strength, Sy. 1 (1 2 )2 ( 2 3 )2 ( 3 1 )2 S y 1/ 2 (3) 2Where σ1, σ2, and σ3 are the principal
teacher ran MD simulation of the nano-composite by GROMACSin Linux system and learned to use Visual Molecular Dynamics (VMD) to visualize moleculartopologies and analyze the results, and discussed current issues and future work trends. Figure 1: PNIPAM and GO (water box not shown). The engineering process is about finding solutions to problems. Today’s high schoolstudents need to think like both scientists and engineers. Scientists ask a question and follow thesteps of the scientific method to answer the question. Engineers ask: Who need(s) what becausewhy?5 Both methods are important for students to understand and experience, but in order to doso current delivery and instruction practices require modification
engineering.References1. am Ende, D. (ed) Chemical Engineering in the Pharmaceutical Industry: R&D to Manufacturing. Wiley, 2010.2. http://pharmeng.rutgers.edu/ [accessed 1/7/2013]3. http://chemicaleng.njit.edu/academics/graduate/masters/pharm.php [accessed 1/7/2013]4. Farrell, S., Slater, CS., Gephardt, ZO., Savelski, MJ. Workshop Modules on Pharmaceutical Engineering forUndergraduate Education. Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, TX, 2012.5. Cavanagh, DP, Wagner JJ. A Three-Week Hands-On Introduction to Biotransport & Drug Delivery for First-YearEngineering Students. Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2004.6. Allen, LV. Popovich, N., Ansel, HC. Ansel’s Pharmaceutical Dosage
with mention of scientific study. The information presented was simplyaccessed and assimilated into their solutions without any concerns for accuracy or credibility.The subjects did not also address the limitations in the source that reported data only to a speedof 8 m/s for helmets, but relied on concept based assumptive relationships between the height ofthe hill, co-efficient of friction and velocity, of which the accuracy and implications remainedunquestioned.Analysis of Engineering Post-test Safety Recommendations UnitIn this post-test, the subjects based their conclusions off of their initial analysis supplemented byconcepts and supplemental information. There were minimal conclusions based off ofassumptions formed by first person or
. The proposedself-regulated learning model is actually repeated cycles of the four phases towards learninggoals as shown in Fig. 1 and is similar to the processes of engineering design. Thus,presentation of the two processes together are expected to provide a unified conceptual processmodel for self-regulated learning and creative problem solving for guiding students’community service learning projects. s Review learning performance and Set positive learning belief and ie U
education connections6) Outreach, support and focus on underserved, especially females, minorities,and economically disadvantagedOn-going community and industry engagement7) A communicated STEM plan is adopted across education, communities andbusinesses8) STEM work-based learning experiences, to increase interest and abilities infields requiring STEM skills, for each student and teacher9) Business and community partnerships for mentorship, internship and otherSTEM opportunities that extend the classroom wallsConnections with postsecondary education10) Alignment of student’s career pathway with postsecondary STEMprogram(s)11) Credit completion at community colleges, colleges and/or universities*Figure 4: STEM Attribute Implementation Rubric
Earthquake Engineering Simulation (CMMI-0927178). The findings,statements and opinions presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarilyrepresent those of the NSF.References 1. NEES Overview. (2013). Retrieved March 15, 2013, from the NEES web site: http://nees.org/aboutnees/overview 2. Quake-Catcher Network http://qcn.stanford.edu/ 3. Brophy, S., Lambert, J. & Anagnos, T. (2011). NEESacademy: Cyber-enabled Learning Experiences for K- 16 Earthquake Engineering and Science Education, Proc. 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conf., Rapid City, South Dakota. 4. Pluta, G., NEES EOT (2011), Make Your Own Earthquake: NEES@Illinois, http://nees.org/resources/2988. 5. Van Den Einde, L
Classes,” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Volume 5, Issue 2 (September 2001).2. Descoteaux, T., Muckerman, D., and Sabol, S., “The Importance of an On-Campus Residency Experience in Distance-Education Programs,” Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.3. McElrath, E., and McDowell, K., “Pedagogical Strategies for Building Community in Graduate Level Distance Courses,” MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, Volume 4, Number 1 (March 2008).4. Ozelkan, E., and Galambosi, A., “Benchmarking Distance Education in Engineering Management Programs,” Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.5
surveys, available to the participants online using the GTNeuro.net website(powered by Drupal 6.0’s webform feature, secured with AES encryption), were utilized tomonitor and understand the perspectives of LINCR Fellows (biweekly), PIs (monthly), andmentors (biweekly) before, during and after the LINCR program. The survey instruments weredeveloped by the LINCR planning committee and were sent out to the relevant user groups asreminders via the Boomerang application attached to Google mail. These short feedback formswere used to assess how the collaborations were proceeding and/or ask the graduate studentshow valuable the collaborations are to their particular research. We took survey data in abiweekly capacity to see how impressions change
majority of theworkforce for the aerospace industry in the San Fernando Valley, which highlights the necessityof incorporating the latest topics such as green engineering into the curriculum of the College ofEngineering.5.Bibliography(2008, May 22). Retrieved from USAToday: http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/industries/environment/2008-05-20-green- companies_N.htm(2013). Retrieved from Institute for Sustainability: www.csunsustainability.orgSustainable Engineering. (2013). Retrieved from http://csunsustainability.org/curriculum/sustainable-engineering/Lele. (2009). Getting serious about Green manufacturing. Frost and Sullivan.Northridge, C. S. (2012).Sandy Glatt, R. H. (2009). Energy Efficiency as a Resource: Midwest area
. Corral, M., Vector Calculus. 2008: GNU Free Documentation License.6. Zeager, C.S.a.J., College Algebra. 2009, Lakeland, FL.7. Khan, S. Khan Academy. 2008 [cited 2012 November and December]; Available from: http://www.khanacademy.org/.8. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. MIT Open Courseware. 2001 [cited 2012 November and December]; Available from: http://ocw.mit.edu/index.htm. Page 23.430.6
. Arc Flash is due to the rapidrelease of energy caused by an arcing fault between two phases or from a phase to ground of anAC power circuit. The discharge of energy may be massive and vaporize copper causing an arcblast devastating everything in its path. This may be more easily described in the followingfigure or from the YouTube video inadvertently shown in the EET class a year ago. The resultsare devastating.Why the focus on Arc Flash?The study of arc flash dates to the early 1980's paper "The Other Electrical Hazard: Electric ArcBlast Burns" by Ralph Lee which was published in the IEEE Transactions on IndustrialApplications. The standards based on this paper have been available for quite a long time buthave only recently been taken
Aerospace Engineering Training 1992-2002, conducted by Abacus Associates, 2003.[3] J. Bauman. NASA chief justifies cuts during session at USU. Deseret Morning News, August 15, 2006. Cited from online version: http://www.deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,645193239,00.html?pg=2[4] M.D. Griffin, “How Do We Fix Systems Engineering”, 61st International Astronaut Congress, Prague, Czech Republic, 2010.[5] H. Petroski, “To Engineer is Human: The Role of Failure in Successful Design”, St. martin’s Press, New York, 1985.[6] H. Petroski, “Design Paradigms: Case Histories of Error Judgment in Engineering”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994.[7] D. Lanning, W. Lestari, S. Waterhouse, “A Laboratory-Based Course in Aerospace
required by investors, E(R)In estimating the expected rate of return, the assumption was made that the company could belocated in either the US or a Latin American country such as Peru. For the US option, the riskfree rate of return, RF was 6%, the market rate of return, RM, was 10% (S&P 500),5 the unleveredbeta, β, for the company was 1.29.6 This is beta value for the diversified chemical industry,which is a close substitute for the plastics company’s beta value. Substituting these values inequation (2) yields an expected rate of return of 11.2% for the plastics company. ERUS 6% 1.2910% 6% 11.2%Estimating the E(R) for Peru with equation (2) seemed a bit more difficult because of sparsefinancial data to
define the terms of theprompt and develop a design brief that reframed the problem to their chosen area of interest,identified stakeholders, and presented preliminary design requirements for a type of product tobe designed. Design briefs were then swapped between student teams–through a process thatensured the anonymity of the delivering team–to create the starting point for the conceptualdesign phase. In this phase, students were required to provide any necessary reframing to makethe problem workable, complete both ideation and selection activities, and produce a conceptualdesign, alternative designs and low-fidelity prototype(s). These designs were then swappedbetween teams as in the previous iteration so that each team had a new type of