format of thefinal report ensured students followed a systematic and efficient approach in completing a majorassignment. Students readily recognized the benefits of methodically completing their finaldesign report as a series of smaller, more-manageable tasks. Figure 2 shows a comparison ofstudent time survey data from 2007 and 2008 – indicating a significant reduction in the severityof the time spike associated with the individual project final report. Instructor feedback also wasrequired to be incorporated into each subsequent homework submission – underscoring theimportance of the revision process in achieving clear and concise technical writing results.Second, the creation of a dedicated fabrication laboratory provided the necessary facility
Page 14.650.8and principles of the engineering profession. As mentioned previously, the high drop-out rate Nomination By High School Teachers On Campus Kick-off Dinner On Campus On Campus On Campus On Campus Rocket Launch Laboratory Tour and Laboratory Tour and Rocket Design Project Competition Experimentation Experimentation Filed Trip 1 Field Trip 2 Field Trip 3
AfghanistanOn January 25, 2009 the National Military Academy of Afghanistan (NMAA) in Kabulgraduated its first class of cadets. Of the 84 graduates in this class, 18 of them studied CivilEngineering in a program designed and implemented by faculty members from the U.S. MilitaryAcademy at West Point and U.S. Air Force Academy in Colorado. The initial tasks these facultymembers faced included design of curriculum and courses, development of laboratory facilities,and hiring faculty. We deployed to Afghanistan between January and August 2008 as the CivilEngineering program entered its second year (the NMAA school year, which follows the Islamiccalendar, begins in March and ends in January). Our tasks included developing the final courses
Circuit Analysis I and II, Digital Electronics, Digital Logic Circuits,Electronic Devices & Circuits, and Microprocessors. It is a technical course that allows studentsto combine the basic knowledge they have learned in previous semesters and apply it to the fieldof instrumentation. In fact, while the primary objective of the laboratory is to introduce studentsto the concepts in instrumentation, it has also had a secondary objective of integrating the analogand digital concepts learned in previous courses. Since instrumentation is a critical part ofcontrol systems and all the senior design projects need some type of instrumentation, theElectronic System Interfacing course is one of the key courses in the Program.Traditionally, the Electronic
principlesthey are meant to illustrate become lost in a blizzard of factoids about perishable tools andtechniques that have little long-term value.Various drags also combine to make curricular change difficult. Sources of drag include thelogistics of laboratory technologies. These tend to be expensive in dollars, with price magnifiedby the number of copies needed in the teaching environment. Another expense is the time spentby faculty and technicians to install and make new technologies functional for teaching purposes,including time to learn new tools and techniques and to address in advance the problems thatstudents are likely to encounter. The latter costs are particularly hard to quantify and articulatefor purposes of resource allocation within the
AC 2009-2468: THE PROFESSIONAL SCIENCE MASTER’S (PSM) DEGREE INENGINEERING TECHNOLOGYHazem Tawfik, State University of New York Dr. Tawfik obtained his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering, from University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, in 1980. Since then he has held a number of industrial & academic positions and affiliations with organizations that included Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Stony Brook University (SBU), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Atomic Energy of Canada Inc., Ontario Hydro, NASA Kennedy, NASA Marshall Space Flight Centers, and the U.S. Naval Surface Warfare Center at Carderock, Md. Dr. Tawfik is the author of
avirtualclassroombringingstudents, laboratories, white boards to the other side of the globe. Thisis a new direction in global education practice that can be used effectively to buildinternational competency. The emergence of the global classroom is apparent in the GlobalProduct Realization course offered simultaneously via satellite initially to students in theNetherlands, at Delft Institute of Technology, in Korea, at Seoul National University,and atthe University of Michigan in 2000 (refer to Michigan Engineer, Spring/Summer 2001,article on “Going Global,” pgs. 4-5).Time zone differences were accommodated with theclass meeting at 8 am in Michigan, 2pm in the Netherlands, and 10 pm in South Korea onthe same day. A multicultural team worked on a team project together
curriculum development and on departmental committees, e.g., thepower curriculum subcommittee, the digital electronics subcommittee, the laboratory developmentsubcommittee, etc. Promotion and tenure requirements for UI faculty are identical at both locations.Unified procedures, including discussion and voting, and a single promotion and tenure committee at eachlevel (department, college, and university) and a single administrative chain apply. BSU has its ownpromotion and tenure system for its assigned faculty. With the faculty reporting administratively to the director in Boise, and academically to thedepartment chair in Moscow, there are bound to be times of conflict, the "serving two masters" problem.Specific examples of such situations
through the stimulation and motivationof students [1]. Accordingly, it makes sense that those selected to teach undergraduatestudents should be trained properly for this function. Unfortunately, while mostcandidates applying for openings have little teaching experience, the institutions that arelooking to hire prospective faculty expect their candidates to be “teaching ready”[2].Adding to this problem is that the teaching experience that graduate students receive isquite different across the nation. For example, some graduate students are just used tograde homework and examinations, while others run homework recitations and a thirdgroup handles the laboratory. All of these experiences are quite unique and, at somelevel, a newly-hired faculty
(JHU), which integrateshands-on laboratory experience in collaboration with classmates and faculty with theconvenience of online coursework for working professionals. The cornerstone of the program isa summer residency course, Biomedical Engineering Practice and Innovation (“BEPI”).BEPI was designed to build upon foundational coursework by providing experiential learningopportunities in all program focus areas: Imaging, Instrumentation, and Translational TissueEngineering. BEPI combines seven weeks of online coursework with two three-day weekends inresidency at the main campus and hospital in Baltimore, for a total of twelve sessions taught bymultiple engineering and clinical faculty, each experts in their respective fields. Each of thethree
State labs and facility with STEM-oriented educational and entertainment programs.In Year 2, one SAC faculty member and seven students visited Texas State University inFebruary 2016 for a day-long tour of renewable energy demonstration/research laboratories andengineering manufacturing facilities. Texas State faculty and graduate students also provided anupdate on the Re-Energize program, including research and scholarship opportunities.Comparison of student surveys done before and after the TxState tour showed a significantincrease in students’ desire to learn more about sustainability and environmental issues, as wellas a significant increase in their knowledge of solar and wind energy technologies.Objective 3: Design and develop a
whatever he learns. He is currently doing his research in packaging technology under Professor Akram Hossain in Purdue University, Calumet. After seeing his insight, the Professor offered him a Teaching Assistant position in the laboratory for guiding the students in the subject of Mechatronics.Dr. Akram Hossain, Purdue University Northwest Akram Hossain, Purdue University Calumet Akram Hossain is a professor in the department of Engi- neering Technology and Director of the Center for Packaging Machinery Industry at Purdue University Calumet, Hammond, IN. He worked eight years in industry at various capacities. He is working with Purdue University Calumet for the past 27 years. He consults for industry on process
assistant professor in the Mechanical Engineering-Engineering Mechanics Department at Michigan Technological University since 2011. She is the founding director of the Nonlin- ear and Autonomous Systems Laboratory (NASLab). Her research interests include robotics, dynamics and control of autonomous systems, and energy autonomy. She is a recipient of 2015 National Science Foundation CAREER award and 2015 Office of Naval Research YIP award.Ms. Saeedeh Ziaeefard, Michigan Technological University Saeedeh Ziaeefard is a PhD student and research assistant with Nonlinear and Autonomous Systems Laboratory (NASLab) in the Department of Mechanical Engineering-Engineering Mechanics at Michigan Technological University. Her
the approaches to solving the problems but can't give each other the answers. Such mutual learning interaction between students is beneficial because students will either be required to articulate their knowledge of a subject in ways that another student can understand or will profit from getting an alternative perspective from a peer on how to approach a problem.For the author’s courses, students are provided a variety of ways to demonstrate learning of thecourse material. The HW problem sets have typically counted for around 25% of the coursegrade. All courses include a laboratory and/or project component that counts for about 25% ofthe course grade, while two exams and a cumulative final count for the remaining 50%. Sincethe LON
, Electrical and Mechanicalengineering degree programs have historically required their students to complete a coordinatedMultidisciplinary Engineering Laboratory sequence.2 Finally, multidisciplinary capstone courseshave been experimented with at CSM since the early nineteen nineties.3 Even with this strongfoundation, there are significant challenges to running a successful, multidisciplinary capstoneprogram.Capstone programs differ from other multidisciplinary courses in several ways. Freshmanexperiences don’t have the same expectations to deliver discipline specific technical content thatare required at the senior level. For that reason, a closer parallel to multidisciplinary capstonemight be found in multidisciplinary laboratory sequences
Science & Technology. His research focuses on spectral imaging for predicting food quality (beef tenderness) and early diagnosis of human diseases (peripheral arterial disease). He has active research in the area of food safety engineering through integration of heat transfer model and predictive microbial growth/death models for food safety risk assessment. Every fall, he teaches a large sophomore- level class on engineering properties of biological materials, which consists of both lectures and laboratory sessions with an enrollment of more than 70 students. Every spring, he teaches a junior-level course on principles of bioprocess engineering which has an enrollment of about 25 students.Dr. Ashu Guru, University of
graduate students responded to the question of theirconfidence in their ability to mentor students at the beginning and towards the end of theexperience. Figure 6 (a) shows the confidence the graduate student had in themselves to mentorothers in research, while Figure 6 (b) demonstrates the students’ evaluation of the program interms of helping them develop their confidence in mentoring.Table 2 which summarizes some of the statements made by the students themselves, showinghow they reacted to the experiences they were provided in the laboratory setting. It is clear fromtheir responses that the students gained a substantive experience that they would not have had theopportunity to have in the classroom. In addition, these students were able to
Paper ID #18366Industry Funded Research Impacts on Engineering Faculty’s Research Ex-periences: A Review and Synthesis of the LiteratureMr. Eric Holloway, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Eric Holloway currently serves as the Senior Director of Industry Research in the College of Engineering at Purdue University, where he focuses on industry research in the College of Engineering. From 2007-2013, Eric served as the Managing Director and the Director of Instructional Laboratories in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. As Director, he was in charge of the building and
challenges of this environment is that on a given day, all classroomsare used at about ninety percent capacity. Hence, we do not have the facilities orinfrastructure to move our massive amounts of introductory physics courses into a studioor laboratory based setting for some of the larger scale pedagogy initiatives. Further, withsuch saturation of our overall facilities, professors are typically never in the sameclassroom twice per day, making even tasks such as carrying demonstrations orspontaneous live experiments cumbersome. The setting at Wentworth is not unique andwe believe that our findings will benefit similarly sized institutions that are consideringthe inclusion of MLM content in their introductory physics sequence. Conducting thestudy at
social, environmental, and economic aspects ofsustainability and triple bottom line decision analysis. As we face growing populations andlimited resources, innovative approaches decision analysis will be important for engineers of the21st century and beyond.A key challenge in the course was the integration of life cycle assessment (LCA) software intothe curriculum due to (1) accessibility to the proprietary software and (2) a lack of previousexperience with the software. SimaPro 8 is proprietary software that was available to students inone computer laboratory. Unfortunately, online versions of this software were not readilyavailable and some students expressed frustrations in accessing the laboratory. Future versions ofthe course could include
and reduce the limitations in everyday life caused by back problems.The final device uses proven pulsed electromagnetic field therapy techniques which have beendemonstrated to be safe and effective for human use [1].The following procedural steps were undertaken by the students during the described SeniorDesign Project: 1. Formation of the team 2. Project and advisor selection 3. Literature survey 4. Creation and presentation of the design proposal 5. Cost and budget analysis 6. Design and development of the device 7. Laboratory testing of the developed device (and corrections if necessary) 8. Final presentationRationale of the project.Low back pain is a very common health problem in the general population and
use of Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) providedby manufacturers and the second approach is to teach the course with the systems approachwithout focusing on hardware, instruction set, and assembly language. Along the same lines, anexample of introducing IoT technology in an embedded networking course, specifically using theTexas Instruments (TI) ARM-based Connected Launchpad is documented in [6]. The design ofan Embedded Systems Laboratory to support rapid prototyping of robotics and IoT isdocumented in [7]. An interesting and creative approach was used to disseminate the informationneeded for both traditional laboratory experiments and student design projects; an extensive Wikisite called the “mbed cookbook Wiki” was used to provide
. Serving as a model for waterquality and quantity management, students engaged in hands-on experiences using a small-scalewetlands setup in the Cook Laboratory for Bioscience Research at Rose-Hulman Institute ofTechnology. In independent research projects, undergraduate research students measured waterquality parameters including TSS, BOD and nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) and optimizedremoval of various contaminants. In the classroom in Environmental Engineering Laboratory,students measured water quality parameters of various water bodies within a watershed andresearched the impacts of excess nutrients on water quality and economies. Students toured theconstructed treatment wetlands and were able to learn directly from a peer who had
Paper ID #29306An Advanced Technological Education Project for High ValueManufacturing: Lessons LearnedDr. Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is a professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product development engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minnesota. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his S.M. and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dr. Johnson’s research focuses on
Engineering, California Baptist University, Class of 2020, gibsonfleming@outlook.com c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 An Electronics Lab Project—Tutorial and Design of Printed Circuit Board “big_blinky”Abstract - Laboratory projects can be strategically used to improve the Electrical and ComputerEngineering (ECE) curriculum across all four years, according to National Science Foundation(NSF) research in which we participated. In this “spiral model” approach, lab component themesare introduced in the freshman year and revisited with increased sophistication andinterconnection in the following years. Labs are thus used as a “cohesive framework” thatconnects and
% Pre PostFigure 2. Comparison of pre- and post-survey confidence levels (Version 2 results only)Self-identified needsSixty-five students responded to the open-ended question, “What types of information, skills ortools do you foresee needing to conduct your research project? Include anything that comes tomind.” An inductive coding process was used to analyze these responses, which identified sixgeneral categories of need: information, information skills, coding skills and software,scientific/technical skills, laboratory resources, and general professional skills. Table V liststhese categories along with examples of some specific needs that emerged in each category.(Note that this is not an exhaustive list of all needs that were expressed
-understand educationmodules have the potential to enhance undergraduate students’ understanding of materials,mechanics, and even thermal concepts.It has been well-recognized that solid mechanics is one of the most critical and fundamentalengineering topics in multiple engineering education programs, such as aerospace, civil, industrial,mechanical, and petroleum engineering disciplines. Current solid mechanics education, however,mainly focuses on theoretical analysis with limited experimental demonstration. In mostengineering programs, the theoretical analysis is delivered to students via a series of courses, suchas Statics, Dynamics, Materials of Mechanics. The experimental demonstrations are only includedin one laboratory course related Materials
these problems. They must also be able todevelop their own brand and sell themselves as teachers and researchers. According to the deansinterviewed, the most common ways EM could help faculty is through enhancing the impact oftheir research and having them place more value in educational innovation. This is exemplifiedperfectly by the following quote from a dean J at an R1/R2 private institution: I am really speaking about using research funding to develop technologies that have, generally, commercial application, but that could be put to broader use beyond an individual laboratory. One of the descriptors I've used is, "science that doesn't stop at the laboratory door." Meaning, publishing the paper is wonderful, but
well as those who may already hold a college degree andseek training aligned with this viable career path. To prepare the targeted population to fulfillthese needs, the program will focus on applying theories and hands-on skills in the developmentof marketable products, efficient processes, and designs that reflect an awareness of howtechnology meets the needs of society today and in the future. Further, the AAS.MET programwill provide extensive classroom study along with laboratory explorations. The degree is beingdeveloped based on the Engineering Technology Accreditation Commission (ETAC) of theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. (ABET) accreditation standards. Oneof the long term goals of the program is to obtain ABET
on applications of nanotechnology and materials scienceconcepts. Two annual events crown the intervention: a) an annual club meeting at the universitycampus, and b) a Nanodays event, where each club conducts nanotechnology demonstrations attheir own schools. Furthermore, a group of high school students and teachers is selected toparticipate in a 4-week Summer Research Program, in the Center’s laboratories. Collegeadmissions data show that 75% (N=12) of the research summer program participants and 42% ofstudents admitted from schools with MSE clubs have enrolled at UPRM, with a 94% second-year retention rate. For the schools with MSE clubs, between 49% and 75% of students whochose to major in Science, Engineering or Technology programs were