Paper ID #40278The Complete Engineer: How the Whiting School’s Engineering Manage-mentand Leadership Course Complements Senior DesignDr. Mia Baytop Russell, The Johns Hopkins UniversityMs. Illysa Izenberg, The Johns Hopkins University Illysa Izenberg has over 26 years of business experience, 6 in aˆ CœCorporate Americaˆa C and the rest in strategy and management consulting and coaching. Sheˆa C™s taught graduate students since 2006 and undergraduates since 2010. Currently, she teaches EnginMichael AgroninAabhas Jain ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023The Complete Engineer: How the Johns
through the use of demonstrations, guest speakers, student projects and site visits. Dr. Kerzmann is a firm believer that all students learn in their own unique way. In an effort to reach all students, he has consistently deployed a host of teaching strategies into his classes, including videos, example problems, quizzes, hands-on laboratories, demonstrations, and group work. Dr. Kerzmann is enthusiastic in the continued pursuit of his educational goals, research endeavors, and engagement of mechanical engineering students. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 HydroIsland: Undergraduate Research Modeling an Ocean Thermal Energy
Paper ID #33702An Evaluation of a University-Level, High School Course Taught to FosterInterest in Civil Engineering (Evaluation)Ms. Morgan R. Broberg, Purdue University Morgan Broberg is a current Ph.D. student in Civil Engineering at Purdue University. Her research inter- ests include modeling, analysis, and design of steel-concrete composite systems and effective teaching in civil engineering.Susan Khalifah P.E., S.E., Purdue University Ms. Susan Khalifah is the Director of Student Experience in the Lyles School of Civil Engineering at Purdue University. Additionally, she is an instructor for CE 479 (Design of Building
mechatronics. His research also includes control optimization and system identification. He is also a graduate teaching assistant of design for manufacturability.Dr. Leon Liebenberg, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Leon is a Teaching Associate Professor in mechanical science and engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He is also a Fellow of the UIUC’s Center for Innovation in Teaching and Learning. Before coming to UIUC, he was a professor of mechanical engineering at two South African universities (University of Pretoria; North West University) and a higher education consultant in Switzerland where he worked with colleges of engineering and technology management. Leon is passionate about
2021 ASEE Midwest Section Conference Approach of Integrating Subject Matter Experts into Capstone Design Course Emmanuel U. Enemuoh, Ph.D. Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Minnesota Duluth, MN 55812, USA Correspondence: eenemuoh@d.umn.edu; Tel.: +1218-726-7686AbstractThis paper discusses an approach of integrating subject matter experts in teaching capstoneengineering design course. The approach requires the engineering student design teams to find atleast five subject matter experts in the field of the defined project. The subject matter experts arecommitted to serve in the
systems software companies in the Midwest. In addition to one U.S. patent, Schilling has numerous publications in refereed international conferences and other journals. He received the Ohio Space Grant Consortium Doctoral Fellowship and has received awards from the IEEE Southeastern Michigan and IEEE Toledo Sections. He is a member of IEEE, IEEE Computer Society and ASEE. At MSOE, he coordinates courses in computer organization, secure software development practices, network security, software verification, real time systems, and operating systems, as well as teaching embedded systems software development.Dr. Brad Dennis, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Brad Dennis is a new Software Engineering faculty member
Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Nancy, France. He obtained the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in metallurgy and materials science from Carnegie Mellon University. He has been involved in major revisions of the engineering curriculum at Stevens since 1980 and has published several articles on engineering design.Rashmi Jain, Stevens Institute of Technology Rashmi Jain is Associate Professor of Systems Engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology. Dr. Jain has over 15 years of experience of working on socio-economic and information technology (IT) systems. Dr. Jain is currently the Head of Education and Research for the International Council of Systems Engineering (INCOSE). She teaches and does
AC 2009-1785: GO FOR AEROSPACE! RECRUITING AND MENTORING THENEXT GENERATION OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERSMichele Dischino, Central Connecticut State University Dr. Dischino is an assistant professor in the Technology and Engineering Education Department, teaching courses for pre- and in-service K-12 technology educators. Dr. Dischino received her Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Pennsylvania in 2006 and her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Manhattan College in 1992. Before pursuing her doctorate, she gained several years of industry experience. Her doctoral research was conducted in the McKay Orthopaedic Research Lab at UPenn, where she explored strategies to improve the outcome of
, the administrative structure, including formal agreements between the two universities isexplained. Third, a history of the budget is reviewed, identifying sources of funds, and showing how thismoney is managed and controlled . Fourth, the curriculum is briefly discussed. The cooperative programis both innovative and unconventional, making it fertile ground for a young, energetic faculty to institutenew methods of teaching, particularly with technology. Finally, a summary of interest from students andfrom industry, in the form of enrollment and job placement performance, is considered. A cooperativeprogram is a viable alternative to building a new engineering college. This paper explains how Idahouniversities made it happen
classes. They investigated the impact ofCAPA on student exam performance while factoring in the effects of student characteristics suchas gender, grade point average (GPA), and ACT scores. They found that the ‘technology canhave a profound impact on learning if it is used in a way that capitalizes on its unique ability to“interact” with students, provide them with immediate feedback, and facilitate interactionsamong students and between students and teaching staff.’ There was evidence that femalestudents benefited even more than males.Hedgcock and Rouwenhorst 9 looked at feedback in the context of using student responsesystems (or “clickers”) in business and marketing classes. A key component of such systems isthe immediate feedback they provide
perceptionof faculty on integrating entrepreneurship into capstone courses [11], the extent to whichengineering faculty value and practice entrepreneurship education [9], and the beliefs of facultywho teach entrepreneurship to engineering students on various dimensions related to EM and thecontent of entrepreneurship courses [7], [8], [10]. However, there is very little documentation inthe engineering education literature on engineering deans’ perspectives on this topic. A few insights have emerged from the few studies that have focused on this critical groupof stakeholders. In an ASEE paper describing Baylor’s KEEN Innovators Fellow program, Fryand Jordan [6] mention that the Dean of Engineering and Computer Science had publiclysupported the
13Course prerequisite requirements will be emphasized through RCBC’s standard advisementprocesses in order to ensure students’ progress through the curriculum in a timely manner.The new program will be housed within the Department of Science, Technology, Engineering,and Mathematics (STEM). Existing full-time and adjunct faculty will be on-hand to teach, andfaculty with a specialization in MET will join the teaching staff. Laboratory facilities are also indevelopment.Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering TechnologyAt Rowan University, the Mechanical Engineering program has the highest enrollment of allengineering majors, and it turns away large numbers of highly-qualified students every year,owing to space and staffing limitations. Offering
Paper ID #24541Maker Education in a Sino-American Joint Institute: Taking Sichuan Uni-versity - Pittsburgh Institute as an ExampleMr. Dong Liang, Sichuan University Dong Liang is Laboratory Director in Sichuan University-Pittsburgh Institute (SCUPI). He is in charge of building teaching laboratories and oversight the routine use and maintenance of the lab facilities. He has a B.S. from Northwestern Polytechnical University in China in Flight Vehicle Manufacture Engineering and M.S. from the National Institute of Applied Sciences in France in Mechanical Engineering. Before joining in SCUPI, he has worked in GE Aviation as a
Paper ID #16797Evaluating best practices when interviewing stakeholders during designMr. Ibrahim Mohedas, University of Michigan Ibrahim Mohedas is currently a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from the University of Texas at Austin in 2011. His research focuses on the design of medical devices for resource limited settings, particularly related to the use of design ethnography in developing these technologies. He works in the Laboratory for Innovation in Global Health Technology (LIGHT) and is co-advised by Shanna Daly
- sity’s Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Department. He has also held a research appointment at the Department of Energy’s Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. Augmenting his scientific in- terests, Daniel serves as a STEM educator working to improve minority representation in STEM through high-impact research experiences. As an Innovation Advisor to Elsevier’s Academic Engineering Solu- tions Library Advisory Board (AES-LAB), he partners with librarians to create democratized approaches to 21st century information literacy education on a global scale,Mr. Brian J Wisner, Drexel University Brian is a PhD Candidate in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics at Drexel Univer- sity. Brian
traditionalmethods should remain as the major part of teaching. In Weisner & Lan[7] student learning iscompared in engineering laboratories on process control and monitoring. Computer-basedsimulation experiments are used as teaching tools for one group of students while another groupuses tactile experiments. The study reveals that student learning is not adversely affected bycomputer-based experiments. A similar comparison study is reported in Olin et al. [8], wheresimulation-based laboratory components are introduced a group of electrical engineeringstudents and their learning performances are assessed against a control group. The group thatused simulation-based environments outperformed the control group. The study in Fraser et al. [9]also reports
12% 11% 6% 8% 9% Laboratory skills 9% 12% 11% 5% 10% Preparing for 8% 5% 2% 3% 4% graduate school Problem solving 7% 2% 3% 3% 3% Clarification of 5% 3% 0 4% 3% career pathIn examining students’ desired outcomes, the most frequently occurring responses highlightedstudents’ interest in developing knowledge, skills, and experience related to the research process.A desire for discipline-related content knowledge acquisition was the
Paper ID #26870A Systematic Review of Technologies for Providing Feedback and Grades toStudentsDr. Rebecca Marie Reck, Kettering University Rebecca M. Reck is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University in Flint, Michigan. Her research interests include instructional laboratories, assessment, and student motivation. She earned a Ph.D. in systems engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. During her eight years as a systems engineer at Rockwell Collins, she earned a master’s degree in electrical engineering at Iowa State University. She earned a bachelor’s degree in electrical
Paper ID #22489Understanding the Significance of Integrating Codes and Standards into theLearning EnvironmentProf. Virginia Charter P.E., Oklahoma State University Virginia Charter has her BS in Fire Protection & Safety Engineering Technology from Oklahoma State University and MS in Fire Protection Engineering from Worcester Polytechnic Institute. She is currently pursuing a PhD in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies at OSU. Ms. Charter is the Program Coordinator and an Assistant Professor at OSU’s Fire Protection and Safety Engineering Technology program where she teaches Fire Protection Hydraulics and Water
chairing ten or more graduate student culminating projects, theses, or dissertations, in 2011 and 2005. He was also nominated for 2004 UNI Book and Supply Outstanding Teaching Award, March 2004, and nominated for 2006, and 2007 Russ Nielson Service Awards, UNI. Dr. Pecen is an Engineering Tech- nology Editor of American Journal of Undergraduate Research (AJUR). He has been serving as a re- viewer on the IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing since 2001. Dr. Pecen has served on ASEE Engineering Technology Division (ETD) in Annual ASEE Conferences as a reviewer, session moderator, and co-moderator since 2002. He served as a Chair-Elect on ASEE ECC Division in 2011. He also served as a program chair
all students at the US Air Force Academy (USAFA). Ittakes an innovative approach to first-year engineering education by introducing engineering inthe context of the design process. Students are organized into teams and are given assignmentsgeared towards hands-on exposure to five engineering disciplines: astronautical, aeronautical,mechanical, electrical, and civil. The final project requires them to design, construct, and launcha rocket-powered boost glider. The boost glider is produced in a five-stage process whichbalances textbook and laboratory work, with each stage focused on one of the engineeringdisciplines. Faculty from each of the five engineering departments at USAFA teach the course,reinforcing the multidisciplinary nature of
College College College Community College Program development Teaching over IVN Laboratory development
was implemented in the Fall2012 semester and is ongoing at our university. The central objective of this pilot was to examinehow adaptation and later adoption of the new MIT edX 6.002x (Electronics and Circuits) MOOCcontent in a flipped model of teaching might improve student learning in a credit-bearing collegecourse. Multiple objectives for this pilot included: to improve the department’s typical passagerate of 59% for this course; to improve students’ retention rate; to shorten students’ time-to-degree; to improve the quality of the content of the course; and to reduce the prerequisitecontribution for successful passage of subsequent courses. Student pass rates from the blendedlearning model Fall 2012 pilot jumped to 91%, as compared to a
-visual materials as part of a distance learningpackage for to use in the university library or at home. Certainly this would allow students tostudy in their own time and at their own convenience. However one of the problems oftenassociated with distance learning material is lack of immediate feedback. However many effortshave been made in physics teaching in this respect. One such system has been described byWhitlock et al13. In this study learners solved physics problems by working at a distance via acomputer network and an audio link via pre and posttest analysis. The necessary physicsmaterial could be part of the standard lectures though this could detract from the main aim of thecourse and may also be inappropriate for students with a
Session 2660 International Strategic Alliances to Strengthen Engineering Education: Beyond the Learning Factory Lueny Morell, Jorge I. Vélez-Arocho, Miguel A. Torres University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez Cristián Vial/Pontifical Catholic University of Chile Uriel Cukierman/National Technological University of Argentina John Spencer/Microsoft Research & Development CenterAbstractIn 1994, NSF awarded three institutions (Penn State, University of Washington and University ofPuerto Rico at Mayagüez) and a national laboratory
Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”The Freshman and Sophomore Clinics at Rowan University The Freshman and Sophomore Clinics at Rowan University are intensive, team-based andmulti-disciplinary laboratory courses taken by all engineering students in the college. TheFreshman Clinic is taught by engineering faculty from each of the four disciplines at Rowan:Mechanical, Electrical and Computer, Civil and Environmental, and Chemical. It targetsproblem solving and engineering measurements in the fall semester and introduction to designand competitive assessment in the spring semester. In Freshman Clinic, we have concentrated onusing teams to build a feeling of belonging among the first year Engineering students who aremostly in
computationalmethods or course management.2. Educational ObjectivesEducational objectives for essentially any engineering course can be presented using thethree categories developed by Rugarcia, Felder, Woods, and Stice5. These categorieshighlight the importance of life-long learning skills to complement the ever-importanttechnical knowledge. An example of an objective for each category is given in thefollowing.• Attitudes: Students must accept responsibility for their education, including using all resources and requesting assistance when needed.• Skills: Students need to be capable learners; they should be able to set objectives, learn and teach material, and evaluate their own learning.• Knowledge: Students need mastery of a substantial body of
Systems Engineer, and those are the topics that he teaches in the DIT. He is actively engaged in engineering edu- cation research and has published at several conferences. He collaborates with an engineering education research group in his college, where they use and research problem-based learning.Dr. Martin Gerard Rogers, Dublin Institute of Technology Martin Gerard Rogers is Assistant Head of the School of Civil and Building Services Engineering. Page 25.1077.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Program Offerings and Curriculum Convergence Between the Dublin Institute
AC 2011-1861: ENRICHING K-12 SCIENCE EDUCATION USING LEGOSKeeshan Williams, The Polytechnic Institute of NYU KEESHAN WILLIAMS received a B.A. degree in Chemistry from Queens College, City University of New York (CUNY), Flushing, NY, in 2005. Upon graduation, he worked as a Chemist for a materials testing laboratory in College Point, NY, and most recently as a Materials Engineer for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. After obtaining his M.S. degree in Chemical and Biological Engineering at NYU-Poly in 2008, he started pursuing a Ph.D. degree also in Chemical and Biological Engineering at NYU-Poly in the same year. He is currently serving as a teaching Fellow at the Crispus Attucks Elementary School
opportunity that has come from the College and the Provost’s office. This resulted in significant renovations of manufacturing teaching laboratories shared between the industrial and mechanical engineering departments. This also included working strategically on scheduling of shared resources. Our collaboration on improvements to teaching laboratories has distinguished our resources and programs both locally and nationally as some of the very best available in manufacturing education. b) With university initiatives: We participated with the Student Innovation Space Building planning committee by facilitating collaboration with the local animal shelter who provided the context for the design challenges that