studytime solving textbook problems [1, 2]. In undergraduate engineering courses, most of thesetextbook problems (and course assessments designed by instructors to include these textbookproblems either verbatim or a variation of these problems) are designed to evaluate the ability ofstudents to recall facts and basic concepts, and apply these concepts in various contexts to solvenumerical problems (Please refer to Tables A.1 and A.2 for sample questions). Students mightdevelop problem-solving skills, partially through pattern-based recognition, by completing theseassignments and also be able to achieve good grades in the course. However, these grades (andoverall GPAs) are often not an accurate reflection of their understanding of
to the rubric in Table 1 and was included as 10% of the overall course grade.Table 1: Rubric for grading homework chat participation. 0 points Student did not participate in the homework chat. Student showed up for the chat but was unprepared and 5 points unable to demonstrate understanding of the material. Student had some elements of the solution correct but had 7 points some significant misunderstanding of fundamental concepts. Student had the majority of the solution correct. They 9 points needed some prompting, but they were able to verbalize
researchers can disrupt the chilly, heteronormativeculture of STEM by modeling inclusive classroom and lab practices. Additionally, we offerinsights on how students negotiate their identity visibility in a chilly, heteronormative, and silentculture. Introduction Despite efforts to increase diversity and inclusion on college and university campuses,Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) programs continue to be largelycisgender, male, heterosexual, and white [1]–[3]This continued lack of diversity is largely due tothe heteronormative, racist, and sexist culture that serves to make STEM spaces inhospitable formarginalized students, and results in high levels of attrition for these groups [1], [4]. In order toaddress this, we
for DASA Aerospace in Wedel, Germany 1993. His initial research also made a major contribution to the M1A1 barrel reshape initiative that began in 1995. Shortly afterwards he was selected for a 1 year appointment to the United States Military Academy West Point where he taught Mathematics. Following these accomplishments he worked on the SADARM fire and forget projectile that was finally used in the second gulf war. Since that time, circa 2002, his studies have focused on unmanned systems both air and ground. His team deployed a bomb finding robot named the LynchBot to Iraq late in 2004 and then again in 2006 deployed about a dozen more improved LynchBots to Iraq. His team also assisted in the deployment of 84
racism on campuses as recently as September 2021where an anonymous racist letter was emailed to the student chapter of the National Society ofBlack Engineers (NSBE) (and subsequently almost all of the Black/African American students) atthe University of Massachusetts – Amherst [1], [2]. In June 2020, a mixed methods research study was conducted on how underrepresentedengineering students were impacted by COVID-19. The study included 500 participants, withroughly 50% of those participants identified as Black/African American. Participants were askedto respond to the prompt “Imagine you are chatting with a friend or family member about theevolving COVID-19 crisis. Tell them about something you have experienced recently as anengineering
programs, but the current published literature concerning these types ofprograms is lacking [1]. This study analyzes the Integrated Design Engineering (IDE) program atthe University of Colorado Boulder, one such multidisciplinary program. Quantitative surveydata and qualitative focus group data from the students in IDE are obtained and analyzed todetermine the value of these programs, as well as improvements that can be made. The results ofthe surveys and focus groups show that multidisciplinary engineering programs are in factvaluable in recruiting and retaining engineering students. These programs attract students whoare well-rounded, have many interests, are collaborative, and are looking for versatility in futurecareers. The program is able to
necessary, important, and hard to do well.Existing research in engineering education typically has overlooked investigating harm thatteammates enact on each other, and instructors’ understanding of how to teach about teamworkor about their responsibility for providing all students a safe and supportive environment. Thereis ample evidence that teaming experienced by women in undergraduate engineering educationexperience regular and routine marginalization by their teammates, threatening their right tolearn in a safe and supportive environment in ways that their majority teammates don’texperience [1]–[4]. There is much less research on the experience of racially minoritized studentsprecisely because they are so much less represented, yet it is clear
criteria for accrediting engineering and engineering technologyprograms reflect the importance of standards competence for students. Specifically, the 2023-2024 Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) criterion 5d states, “The curriculum mustinclude a culminating major engineering design experience that 1) incorporates appropriateengineering standards and multiple constraints, and 2) is based on the knowledge and skillsacquired in earlier course work.” [1] Also, the Engineering Technology AccreditationCommission (ETAC) criterion 3 states student outcomes of “an ability to conduct standard tests,measurements, and experiments and to analyze and interpret the results” (3.A.4) and “an abilityto conduct standard tests, measurements, and experiments
faculty and improvement of curriculum and researchin academic institutes of other member countries.Keywords: Fulbright, Fulbright Scholar Award, Council for the International Exchange of Scholars.INTRODUCTION US Congress in 1946 approved the Fulbright program, which later proved to be a beacon forinternational understanding and collaboration [1]. The Fulbright Scholar Program wasadministered by the Council for International Exchange of Scholars (CIES) a non-profitorganization that was founded in 1947. Later in 1996, the Fulbright Scholar Programadministration transferred to the Institute of International Education (IIE). The Fulbright U.S.Scholar Program offers over 800 awards for US citizens to teach, conduct research and carry
in Science and Engineering for 10 years and is a past President of WEPAN. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Future GR.A.D.S. (GRaduate & Advanced Degree Students); A mentoring program to support undergraduate Hispanic seniors through the graduate school application process.Background/MotivationThe continuous development of the United States economy requires increased participation of itsSTEM workforce. While there is currently a STEM workforce supply shortage in some fieldsand surplus in others, there is consistently a shortage of STEM workforce supply for individualswith graduate degrees in engineering [1]. Hispanic people are a growing demographic in theUnited
distributed computing. Dr. Burge is also interested in Computer ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023On Measuring Cultural Competence: Instrument Design and TestingINTRODUCTIONThis research paper presents a novel instrument that quantitatively measures the culturalcompetence of students in university computing departments. Cultural competence first emergedin social work [1] and counseling psychology [2] as: “(A) set of congruent behaviors, attitudes, and policies that come together in a system, agency, or among professionals and enable that system, agency, or those professionals to work effectively in cross-cultural situations.”The representation of students from minoritized groups in computing
. Besides theelements mentioned above, students also had to complete an intellectual property (IP) assignment(of copyrights, trademarks, and patents where they studied each IP type, their applications, anddurations). They were also given information on the start-up incubators available in the region inaddition to the art standards from different educational levels. This study details the developmentprocess, also includes student feedback and the authors’ reflections for future improvements.1. Introduction1.1 Problem StatementIn this engineering department, students are exposed to product and tool design, and developmentin multiple courses including “Product and Tool Design” and “Rapid Prototyping and ReverseEngineering”. The “Rapid Prototyping and
indispensable role in providing the infrastructure that enables society andcommunities to be healthy, efficient, and thriving. To fulfill this responsibility, civil engineersmust be trained to be leaders with an array of socio-technical skills, knowledge, and attitudes.Further, there must be a sufficient number of trained engineers to meet societal needs. Thepresident of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Dennis D. Truax, recently calledattention to “a workforce shortage that’s going to be exacerbated in the near future” and notedthat the ASCE’s Future World Vision (FWV) project could contribute to workforce development[1]. This paper begins by framing enrollment and student interest challenges in civil engineering.This is followed by a
development, are described, underliningthe interdisciplinary nature that simulates real-world situations and integrates sustainability with creativityand innovation [1][2]. Capstone projects developed in the past five years by our students are the corollaryof their educational journey and also an excellent assessment of their level of skills and competenciesacquired during this journey. Manufacturing and energy, and sustainability capture more than 65% of thecapstone topics chosen by our students. These projects provide a great opportunity to experience andovercome the uncertainties inherent to all engineering projects. Projects are open-ended—having aspectrum of possible solutions; students are ultimately responsible in deciding which solution to
, working on passion projects, and being an engaged student, Damith focuses on continually honing his skills and knowledge to move the needle forward in the field of engineering and physics.Alexandro Salvatore Di Nunzio, York University, CanadaDr. Mojgan A. Jadidi, P.E., York University, Canada ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 GAME-BASED AND VIRTUAL REALITY SANDBOXES: INCLUSIVE, IMMERSIVE, ACCESSIBLE, AND AFFORDABLE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS D. Tennakoon1 , A. Di Nunzio1 , M. Jadidi 1 ∗ 1 Lassonde School of Engineering, York University, Toronto, Canada
ethics and the ethicalunderstanding of engineering from a Philosophy of Technology approach. We then utilizethe intersection of queer theory and video game studies to present how the understandingof failure can help us reshape how it is approached in engineering. Finally, to illustrate theuse of these ideas, we present two theoretical examples of how failure can be enacted in theclassroom for a better understanding of engineering ethics.II. FAILING AT G AMES , A B RIEF I NTRODUCTIONThe initial quote, from the 2023 Game of the Year, Elden Ring [1], serves as a call to action,a start to an adventure, the beginning of a quest that we hope will change the world (at leastthe one within the game. . . ). Video games can act as a world within a
software development [1], politics [2], or theworkplace [3], the idea of incorporating game elements to enchance performance is rapidly beingimplemented. Such is the case in learning as well. Gamification is a new tool in making the studentenvironment more effective and dynamic than the traditional classroom model [4]. Gamificationis a natural application of experiential learning, wherein students learn by doing i.e. being activelyengaged in material with tasks, problems, or projects. Trivial examples of gamification to enhancelearning include those of educational games or in self-teaching tools such as Khan Academy orClasscraft. Early discussions of gamification in the classroom share the opinion that gamification has thepotential to improve
urbanplanning method. These approaches shift the power relationships traditionally established ininterview settings and allowed student participants to shape the direction of their interviews andstorytelling.In this paper, we first describe the central ethical and justice challenges to soliciting andengaging BIPOC students in research about their experiences. After describing the goals of thestudy, we explain two key strategies that allowed us to address these challenges in our datacollection: 1) Use of boundary objects to elicit participants narratives, and 2) the integration ofparticipatory urban planning methods.We show sample data sets to explain the ways our methods provided opportunities to learn morefrom students, to gain a comprehensive
built around a frameworkdrawn from a recent book [1] that explores the current status of sexual harassment inengineering. Our five panelists are a diverse group of women engineers representing multiplesexual orientations, races, and family backgrounds. Our panelists will present their experienceswith gender harassment, lessons learned, their responses to the harassment, and paths forward.The panel will emphasize approaches and responses to gender harassment that can beimplemented from the bottom up – by individuals or localized peer or work groups – withoutrelying on top leadership in an organization to take the initiative to transform culture or takedefinitive and proportionate action in response to individual harassment cases.Gender
concerned about the effects of climate change, and felt that sustainabledevelopment should be universally taught in higher education yet only 26% of respondents felttheir coursework was covering these issues in depth.7 Despite sustainability becoming a morepopular topic in engineering education programs in recent years, a few key hurdles remain thatare preventing or slowing the pace of curricular change, to more fully integrate sustainabilityacross engineering courses and programs.8 Barriers include: 1) belief that there is no space tointegrate sustainability into already jam-packed engineering courses, 2) lack of confidence orlack of familiarity with how to bring sustainability into the classroom, and 3) trust one-offmodules, seminars, or a
suggests that using LCDLMsis beneficial for females as they are for males. The paper concludes with implications andrecommendations for researchers to develop hands-on interventions.IntroductionAcross numerous studies, researchers have examined how gender impacts achievementmotivation and its influence on educational and occupational choices [1]–[5]. These studiesutilized achievement motivation theories to understand why men and women pursue differentcareer paths. In recent years, there has been significant progress toward achieving genderequality in academic achievement across different educational levels.Nevertheless, women continue to be significantly underrepresented, particularly in STEM fields,according to the National Science Foundation's
global, sociotechnical issues through engineering and to increaserepresentation and inclusion in engineering.IntroductionModern global issues (e.g., accessibility, climate change, health/pandemic, racism) are complex,systemic, sociotechnical problems, and the problem-solving skills of engineers are necessary toaddress these issues. Further, because engineering occurs within systems of social inequalities,politics, and social hierarchies, engineering students must have opportunities to consider thesesocial aspects of engineering [1]. Without exposure to unpacking inequalities, engineers mayperpetuate oppression, marginalization, and other forms of social inequalities [2]. Undergraduateengineering education then needs to train and empower
, Gender, and Student Success from Year 1 to Year 2 in EngineeringAllison K. Murray*1, Kathryn Ermentrout 11 Mechanical Engineering, Opus College of Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI* Corresponding author: allison.murray@marquette.eduAbstractThere is a need to identify where student success disparities are occurring in engineering,investigate why the differences are present, and propose institutional and pedagogical changes toaddress them. This work seeks to understand how the gap in student success amongst students inengineering is correlated to student identity and academic level. Built upon an anti-deficitframework, this study works to reframe the narrative around the achievement gap
attempt to to this complex algorithm. remove “cancer” This free teacher resource kit contains three activities to introduce students to what cancer researchers are studying: (1) removing cancer cells using Play-Doh, (2) a wavelength tissue penetration activity to introduce key components of imaging tissue (taking pictures of body parts), and (3) the Classification Game to show how ML can contribute to the process
chemical engineering curriculum.IntroductionThe impacts of climate change are global and unprecedented. According to the UN HumanRights Office, “Human-induced Climate Change is the largest, most pervasive threat to thenatural environment and societies the world has ever experienced, and the poorest countries arepaying the heaviest price” [1]. Nearly all nations have committed to limiting global warming toless than 2°C above pre-industrial levels [2]. Integrated assessment models that connectemissions, economy, and climate demonstrate that the path to remaining below this limit will beexceedingly challenging, and that following the current trajectory, the threshold will be exceededbetween 2034 and 2052 [2]. Students will need to solve problems in
. Gomillion, University of Georgia Dr. Cheryl Gomillion is Assistant Professor in the School of Chemical, Materials, & Biomedical Engi- neering, part of the College of Engineering at the University of Georgia (UGA). She received her B.S. in Biosystems Engineering with an emphasis in Applied Biotechnology from Clemson University, and she completed both her Master’s and Ph.D. in Bioengineering also at Clemson University. Dr. Gomil- lion’s long-standing research interests are in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Specifically, the work of her research group focuses on three general areas: (1) design and evaluation of biomaterials for therapeutic purposes; (2) application of materials for engineering tissue
. The main textbook is‘Introduction to EMC’ [1]. To address the section on EMC system design, which includes PCBdesign and layout, and EMC measurements, the book 'EMC Engineering' [2] is used as a reference. i. Basic EMC topicsThese topics serve as a foundation for EMC principles and concepts, including electromagneticfields, transmission lines, EMI and antennas, non-ideal circuit components, and EMC regulations.The students will also gain an understanding of the latest industry standards and regulations relatedto EMC through discussions on these basic EMC subjects shown in Figure 1. Figure 1 Unconstructed view of EMC basic topics. ii. Advanced topicsThese advanced topics dive deeper into EMC, covering topics
the engineering faculty. The resultssuggest a) supporting first-year undergraduate students as they, particularly women, have theirlowest grades in the first year, b) diversifying admission requirements to benefit from the largeapplicant pools in the most populated departments, c) improving international applicants’admission success rate, who are refused admission due to high tuition fees, d) enhancingdomestic students application rate, and e) learning from success stories in the faculty.Keywords: gender equity, gender parity, engineering, graduate studiesIntroductionThe small number of women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM), and morespecifically, in engineering, has been well documented during the last few decades [1], [2
transmission or distribution line, the selection of an appropriate number and size of inverters Distributed generation of utility-scale photovoltaic solar is crucial. This selection should be based on the AC powerpower involves integrating it into the distribution grid. The required to be integrated into the grid.process of PV solar power generation involves convertingsunlight into electrical energy using PV modules [1]. The While the inverter converts DC power to low voltage ACamount of energy generated by the PV module depends
production agriculturalpractices on UMES farms for growing corn, soybean, and wheat utilizing advanced farmmachinery and drones to promote sustainable intensification through best practices in the growingarea of “precision agriculture” at a somewhat larger scale. Integration of advanced digitalagricultural tools such as the FarmBots (http://farmbot.io) for growing specialty crops on smallraised beds is also central to the overall scope of the project [1-3]. Since its inception, the projecthas adopted the experiential learning [4] paradigm and involved undergraduate students fromengineering and other STEM disciplines on campus to engage with one another in a verticallyintegrated [5] team setting along with the graduate student (s) in the Food Science