is the Director of Engineering Entrepreneurship and an Associate Professor of Practice in the Texas A&M University College of Engineering. He has broad industry experiences, including over 35 years in all aspects of the telecommunications industry (sales, marketing, manufacturing, business de- velopment, and technical design), the creation of a telecommunications standard (SONET - Synchronous Optical Network) for the fiber optics industry that is still in use internationally over 30 years later, a wide variety of business experiences in international companies, and startup experiences. This has helped him lead a very successful industry career. Currently he is using his technical business experiences to
meet the workforce demand for AI robotic drivenconstruction industry. This on-going research initiative develops cutting-edge immersive cloud-based training modules suitable for all facets of careers in AEC to improve the workforce’spreparedness towards a more automated workplace.Introduction and BackgroundIncreasing automation and AI deployment may be the most economically disruptive event sincethe dawn of the industrial age. According to the US Department of Commerce, 40% of existingUS jobs could potentially be automated within the next ten years [1]. The McKinsey GlobalInstitute estimates that by 2030, 60% of all occupations will use automated machines andintelligent systems in some way, and up to 375 million workers worldwide will be
analysis. Other seminars will be dedicated to professional development issues such as professional ethics & responsible conduct of research, how to be successful in graduate school, career path decision, and effective technical communication. Finally, selected research topics will be given by both participating faculty and other invited speakers to broaden the background of the REU students beyond their own subjects. A list of presenters and seminar topics is included in the Table below. Table 4. REU Weekly Seminar Series Presenters Topics Chiang Shih/Janice Dodge Program orientation/Lab Safety Chiang Shih Responsible
, manufacturing processes, machine design with CAE meth- ods, rapid prototyping, CNC machining and quality control. His research interest includes sensor based condition monitoring of machining processes, machine tool accuracy characterization and enhancement, non-invasive surgical tool design and bio-materials applications. During his career, Dr. Ertekin published papers in referred journals and in conference proceedings in his area of research interest. He has also been PI for various NSF research projects including NSF-TUES and MRI programs. Dr. Ertekin is an active member in the Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME), and currently serves as a chair of Philadelphia SME Chapter-15.Dr. Radian G Belu, Drexel University
role in this transformation by supporting and shaping the academic journeys andeventual careers of their students. However, despite their central role in workforce development,faculty members often lack the resources and training needed to gain a deeper understanding ofthe diverse experiences and identities their students bring to the engineering classroom. This isespecially challenging for students with minoritized identities that are non-apparent or hiddenand cannot be easily observed by faculty. As part of the on-going Audio for Inclusion (A4I)Project, this paper and poster discuss the initial findings from focus groups with nine engineeringfaculty members from three universities nationwide. We delve into the intricacies and logistics
appropriate ITSframework and the development of privacy-protecting APIs to protect user privacy.toring. This initiative cultivates a dynamic academic and research milieu, deeply engaging studentsin critical tasks, fostering cross-mentorship, and collaborative research, which not only aligns withthe project’s objectives but also primes students for future academic and research careers, empha-sizing long-term sustainability and the prospect of future joint endeavors. The project deeply engages students in crucial roles, fostering a vibrant academic environ-ment. Students participate in content creation, model evaluation, and notably, disseminate theirresearch findings at national conferences. This exposure not only enriches their academic ex
. Adam Maltese, Indiana University, Bloomington Professor of Science EducationDr. Kelli Paul, Indiana University, Bloomington Dr. Kelli Paul is an Assistant Research Scientist at the Center for Research on Learning and Technology at Indiana University where her research focuses on the development of STEM interests, identity, and career aspirations in children and adolescents.Lauren Penney, Indiana University, Bloomington ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Failure in Focus: Unpacking the Impact of Video-Based Reflections on Museum Educator PracticesIntroductionWhile the term 'failure' often has negative associations [1], there is a current focus on failure
starting with the physical world application and focusing on developingstudents’ ability to abstract as a precursor to analysis; and (2) to assess if this new approachimproves student self-efficacy in basic mechanics. The hypothesis of the proposed research isthat, by starting with abstraction, students will build a stronger connection between the physicalworld and the mechanics modeling. In turn, this will improve student’s perceptions about theirability to solve engineering mechanics problems and their motivation to pursue careers asengineers in the future. The specific research questions we seek to answer are: (1) In what waysdoes teaching students how to abstract the physical world affect their self-efficacy to solveproblems in a basic
not wish to disclose it in the higher education setting.Project Overview and ContextThe NSF:RED project activities span the entire experience of the undergraduate studentengineering experience, including recruitment and transition into the engineering program,community building, transforming teaching and learning, holistic support and advising, andproviding career support as students prepare to join the work force. This paper focuses on onekey area of the project: the department’s efforts to transform teaching and learning through theredesign of core courses within the department, creating an inclusive learning environment inwhich all students may thrive. Efforts were aimed at enhancing the inclusivity of engineeringcourses for neurodiverse
Science, New York University) Elizabeth Hervias (Chemical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology) Maryom Rahman (Chemical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology) Amina Anowara (Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, Princeton University)B. Mentor PoolThe research projects performed by the undergraduate students during the summer REU will be within theareas of diagnosis, therapy, and mechanistic modeling of cancer systems. To further this intellectualcuriosity and the innovation spirit, the chosen faculty members are renowned, including multiple NSFawardees (2 NSF Career Award winners). The faculty members have a diverse intellectual focus in cancer,from diagnostic devices, machine learning, and mechanism to therapeutic
quality and usefulness, including howISPeL compared to other forms of instructional delivery, particularly PowerPoint. The survey alsoincluded open-ended items for students to make improvement recommendations.For the second survey, we collected student feedback from a two-week mini-course embeddedwithin a one-semester course on special topics in engineering, in which robotics topics weredelivered via ISPeL 21 . The survey for the mini-courses was designed to gather student feedbackon their course experiences in general 22 and its effect on their interest and motivation in roboticsand future career plans. Because the study is inspired by Self-Determination Theory 20 , weadapted course evaluation items that have been used in previous studies with a
fundamental engineering principles, theywill be equally valuable to students who pursue careers in other engineering areas. Once developed, ourmodules could be adopted by classic engineering programs such as Chemical, Electrical and MechanicalEngineering, as well as specialized Biomedical Engineering programs, and could be implemented by fac- Page 23.950.2ulty who do not have specialized biomedical expertise. This paper focuses on the description of thecourse modules, which has been the primary activity during this first year of the project.GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The goals and objectives of this project are outlined below. o To
degrees in Civil Engineering from University of Louisville and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from University of Cincinnati. He is an ABET program evaluator (PEV) and is a Coleman Fellow for Entrepreneurship. Page 23.1044.1Dr. Philip W. Johnson, University of Alabama During his career Dr. Johnson has done research and published on: high-speed centrifuges, advanced materials, turbo machinery, heat transfer, cuttings transport in drilling, using air as a drilling fluid, coal c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013
for women to choose a CS career. Orthogonally, Wang [43] correlatedfinancial aid with STEM major selection. While our student participants witnessed the impact ofexposure, staff support, and supportive policies, we did not explicitly investigate financial factors.We propose to investigate the influence of financial aid and other SES factors using quantitativeanalysis and to recount the population of varied SES.Gender and Race/Ethnicity: Students from minoritized groups in CS, as defined in [44], areunderrepresented due to both entry and high attrition (switching majors or dropping altogether).For example, women are less represented in the CS field due to pre-entry, institutional, andsocietal factors [45]. Oftentimes, minoritized CS students
Deweyan Pragmatist who focuses on student-centered teaching and reflection. She also is working toward making higher education a more socially just and safe space for all and uses writing, speaking, and research to address each of these important aspects of her academic career. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Research Initiation in Engineering Formation: Literature Review and Research Plan for an Engineering Specific Empathy ScaleAbstract Engineers are societal caregivers, solving problems for the betterment of society.However, both practitioners and students of engineering struggle to make concrete connectionsbetween empathy and their role as engineers. While
and ability to teach course content. Instead, the SPVEL connects students’ 1)appreciation for laboratory discipline content and relevance to their career aspirations, 2)engineering role identity development as a function of participation within the lab, and studentsociocultural identities (race, ethnicity, and gender).Research QuestionSPVEL was used to answer two research questions. How do student’s sociocultural identitycharacteristics relate to their perceptions of value in a virtual engineering lab? How are students’perceptions of virtual lab value related to the sociocultural identities and lab report grades?Research Methodology and EnvironmentThis study was conducted in a capstone senior Mechanical and Aerospace engineering
stereotype threats, the malleability of intelligence, and self-affirmations shouldhave a powerful impact in breaking this negative cycle when implemented systematically and asearly as possible in a student’s STEM education.Course Based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs)Participation in undergraduate research promotes confidence, motivation, and ultimately,persistence in STEM. Undergraduate research is a “high-impact practice” [25] with positiveeffects on both student persistence and learning. Large studies show that students with researchexperiences have a stronger intention to pursue a STEM career than students who do notparticipate [26], [27]. Meta-analyses with large student populations also support the conclusionthat student research
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Connecticut. He received his PhD in 2009 from the University of Nevada, Reno, and continued there as a Research Scientist. His latest research endeavor is on creativity and engineering education, with a focus on the unique potential of students with ADHD. Supported by multiple grants from the National Science Foundation, his research was highlighted the American Society of Engineer- ing Education’s Prism Magazine. He received a CAREER Award in 2016 to study the significance of neurodiversity in developing a creative engineering workforce.Ms. Connie Mosher Syharat, University of Connecticut Constance M. Syharat is a Research Assistant at the University
Dr. Steven Jiang is an Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at North Carolina A&T State University. His research interests include Human Systems Integration, Visual Analytics, and Engineering Education.Dr. Emily C. KernDr. Vinod K. Lohani, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Vinod K. Lohani is a Program Director at the National Science Foundation and his portfolio in- cludes the NSF Research Traineeship (NRT), Innovations in Graduate Education (IGE), and CAREER programs. Dr. Lohani is on leave from Virginia Tech where he is a Professor of Engineering Education. During 2016-19, he served as the Director of education and global initiatives at an
Paper ID #32502Assessing Emphasized Engineering Practices and Their Alignment withEngineers’ Personal ValuesDr. Erika A. Mosyjowski, University of Michigan Erika Mosyjowski is a research fellow and lecturer focusing on engineering education at the University of Michigan. She earned a B.A. in sociology and psychology from Case Western Reserve University and an M.A. and Ph.D. in Higher Education from the University of Michigan. Her research interests include cultural beliefs about what engineers do and who they are, students’ career thinking and trajectories, and ways to effectively facilitate more diverse, inclusive, and
+ Design. He is the co-director of the Virginia Tech E-textiles Lab and the Associate Director of the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology. He received his Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University and his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Cincinnati. His research and teaching interests include wearable computing, electronic textiles, and interdisciplinary design teams for pervasive computing. In 2006 he was selected for the National Science Foundation’s Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) for his research in e-textile-based wearable computing.Ms. Annie Yong Patrick, Annie Y. Patrick received her Master of Science in
classrooms in order to help students make connections among the STEM disciplines and achieve deep understanding. Her work focuses on defining STEM integration and investigating its power for student learning. Tamara Moore received an NSF Early CAREER award in 2010 and a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) in 2012.Ms. Bunmi Babajide, Purdue University, West Lafayette Bunmi Babajide is a PhD student at Purdue University in the college of Engineering. She obtained her Undergraduate and Masters in Electrical Engineering and currently interested in research topics in cur- riculum design for K-12 and professional engineering environments.Mrs. Anastasia Marie Rynearson, Purdue University, West
approaches that engage students in developing models of real world problems and their solu- tions. Her research also involves working with educators to shift their expectations and instructional prac- tice to facilitate effective STEM integration.Tamara is the recipient of a 2012 Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) for her work on STEM integration with underrepresented minority and underprivileged urban K-12 students.Kristina Maruyama Tank, University of Minnesota, Twin CitiesMr. Aran W Glancy, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Aran W. Glancy is a Ph.D. Candidate in STEM Education with an emphasis in Mathematics Education at the University of Minnesota. He is a former high school
. He earned his PhD in Educational Psychology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign with a focus in Engineering Education. His interests are centered around mentorship, mental health, and retention in STEM students and faculty. Additionally, he helps support the development of new engineering education scholars and researches quality in mixed methods research methodologies.Dr. Karin Jensen, University of Michigan Karin Jensen, Ph.D. (she/her) is an assistant professor in biomedical engineering and engineering education research at the University of Michigan. Her research interests include mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering
University. He is also an Associate Director of Purdue’s Global En- gineering Program, leads the Global Engineering Education Collaboratory (GEEC) research group, and is the recent recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance understanding of geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering education and professional practice.Prof. Josh Boyd, Purdue University Josh Boyd is associate professor and
teamwork in engineering, design education, and engineering identity. She was awarded a CAREER grant from NSF to study expert teaching practices in capstone design courses nationwide, and is co-PI on NSF. Her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, the effects of curriculum on design cognition, the effects of differing design pedagogies on retention and motivation, the dynamics of cross-disciplinary collaboration in both academic and industry design environments, and gender and identity in engineering.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Dr. Lisa DuPree McNair is an associate professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech where she also serves as assistant department head of Graduate
underserved elementary schools to promote STEM literacy, and provided in school STEM training for both teachers and students. She began her career at Rice in 2010 as a post-doctoral research fellow and then project manager in the Colvin labs. She joined the office of STEM engagement at the beginning of 2015 as Director of Programs and Operations. In her role Carolina is responsible for overseeing the program operations and the research efforts for the RSTEM group. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Nanotechnology Research Experience for Teachers Enhancing STEM EducationAbstractTeachers serve a vital role in improving the nation’s STEM education and
aftertreatment.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers
scholarship granting activity. The first two grant periods, herein known asSEECS 1 and SEECS 2, were each funded for $600K over the life of the grant; SEECS 3 (thecurrent grant) is funded for just a few dollars short of $1M.SEECS incorporates a mandatory zero-credit seminar course known as the Professional andPersonal Development Seminar that all students must take and pass each semester for whichscholarship funding is received. Seminar activities include invited lectures on technical topicsand technical tours; presentations and activities designed to provide preparatory experiences asstudents transition from college to work or cooperative education/internship; activities to helpstudents better understand their own personal needs for career success
teammates, and then arguing their designs. They really had to take ownership of those words. They couldn’t skate around them. Yeah, they definitely, the science concepts related to that task, they had them.”The process of arguing for their designs seems to encourage the students to think deeply andcritically about the scientific concepts involved in design. These types of comments, althoughnot definitive, suggest that students are able to learn about the core ideas of science as theydesign solutions to problems by including opportunities for them to participate in the practice ofarguing from evidence. Females are underrepresented in engineering careers [18]. Adolescent girls are alsodiscouraged from pursuing STEM subjects by