- burg, MS). He has authored/co-authored over a hundred technical papers and reports during his career in private industry, government and academia. His current research interests are nearshore wave trans- formations, coastal structures, tsunami inundation, hurricane surges, high performance computing, and engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A PhD in Engineering Degree: Coastal Engineering Emphasis AreaAbstract-Jackson State University approved a Coastal Engineering emphasis area for the PhDEngineering degree in April 2018. This is the first Doctoral engineering degree, among HistoricBlack Colleges and
. In 2016 she was a recipient of the U.S. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE). https://engineering.tufts.edu/me/people/faculty/kristen- bethke-wendell c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Elementary students’ disciplinary talk in a classroom with an explicit engineering decision making scaffold (Work in Progress)While engineering grows as a part of elementary education, important questions arise about theskills and practices we ask of students. Though the engineering design challenge is widely usedas a structure for doing engineering in educational settings [1], there are still questions about howto best organize design challenges to promote
, TalentSparks! R teacher professional development, Stellar Girls after-school STEM program for middle school girls, STEMgirls Summer Camps, and SCI: Science Career Investigation R . Ann has led the Education Subcommittee of the national Coalition of State Bio- science Institutes for five years and has twice been elected to serve on the Executive Committee, which she currently Co-chairs. Prior to joining the Institute in 2006, Ann successfully directed BiTmaP, a first of its kind, U.S. Department of Labor-sponsored initiative with the University of Illinois at Chicago that provides bioinformatics training to IT professionals. Prior to BiTmaP, she assisted in the management of technology start-ups and small businesses in
, technology, engineering, and mathematics programs.Prof. Hyoung Jin Cho, University of Central Florida Hyoung Jin Cho is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the Uni- versity of Central Florida. He earned his PhD in Electrical Engineering from the University of Cincinnati in 2002, MS and BS in Materials Engineering from Seoul National University in 1991 and 1989, respec- tively. He was a recipient of NSF CAREER award in 2004. His main research interest is in the develop- ment of microscale actuators, sensors and microfluidic components based on micro- and nanotechnology.Dr. Damla Turgut, University of Central Florida Damla Turgut is Charles Millican Professor of Computer Science at
several NSF- and NIH-funded projects, primarily working with national professional development programs for early-career academics from groups underrepresented in STEM. She is also currently serving as a Virtual Visiting Scholar of the AD- VANCE Research and Coordination Network. Her research is grounded in critical race and feminist theories, and her research interests include community cultural wealth, counterspaces, intersectionality, and institutional change.Dr. Emily Knaphus-Soran, Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity (CERSE), University of Wash-ington Emily Knaphus-Soran is a Senior Research Scientist at the Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity (CERSE) at the University of
note: Full details of this study have been submitted for publication to the Journal ofWomen & Minorities in Science and Engineering.We expect that most in this audience are well aware that the middle school years are a criticallyimportant time for identity development and career planning for girls, particularly with regardto supporting interests in engineering.Some would argue that offering engineering programming for middle school girls is importantand valuable regardless of long-term outcomes. But program funders and host universitiestypically want to see more than that, such as entry into STEM majors or recruitment to theuniversity. This study captures our effort to track long term outcomes of a program that’s beenrunning at WPI for the
Paper ID #25014Seeding a Strategic Campaign to Address Root Causes of Inequity in Engi-neering EducationDr. Ellen Foster, Purdue University Dr. Ellen K Foster currently holds a post-doctoral appointment in the engineering education department at Purdue University. She received her doctorate in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechninc Institute in 2017, and holds her BA in Astronomy and Physics from Vassar College.Dr. Jennifer Karlin, Minnesota State University, Mankato Jennifer Karlin spent the first half of her career at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, where she was a professor of
toengage intuition [14]. If the problem is too difficult or requires too much outside information,few will be motivated to solve the problem. For example, in previous studies of aerospaceengineering students in an introductory space mechanics class, a gap in intuition was observedbetween aeronautics and astronautics students. The aeronautics students who do not see how thematerial is important to their career (i.e. designing airplanes) demonstrate less intuition than theastronautics students on astronautical problems [9]. On the other hand, a problem that is tooobvious or has a clear “plug and chug” solution does not require higher-order processes. Asdeveloping an appropriate problem can be difficult, creating a broad tool was necessary. The
the local utility and worked with their engineering team to conduct this research that is bothbeneficial for the students and the utility. This partnership not only stimulated the students’ interestin research but also helped them develop skills in communication, project management, and softskills that will serve them well into their professional careers. The opportunities and challengesfrom this collaboration are also presented in this paper.1.0 IntroductionModern society is dependent on a consistent and reliable supply of electricity for its economicdevelopment. As such, creating a resilient and reliable power grid is essential as additional loadsare connected online. Power outages can have massive economic impacts, even if they are
, which includes many non-traditional students whoare older, hands-on, and career-motivated. During the 2018-2019 academic year, we implemented a laboratory section for EE 341.While developing these labs, we operated with the following five goals in mind. 1. The lab activities should be engaging, interesting, and motivate students to learn the more abstract concepts. 2. The lab activities should complement the material learned in lecture and homework. 3. The lab activities should not be too “cookbook”, meaning that there should be a chance for students to explore and interpret the results and think about how to apply the results. 4. The lab activities should not duplicate what the students learn in physics. While EE
Statistics mi- nor to further expand his data analytics and visualization skills. Education and healthcare are the two main career focus interests for Utkuhan and he wishes to use data-driven optimization solutions to improve the lives of others. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Effect of Integrated Life Science Units on Middle School Students’ EngagementAbstract This research to practice paper explores the effect of an integrated life sciences unit onmiddle school students' engagement. Prior research on middle school students’ engagementprovides the evidence of two primary findings: 1) students’ engagement in STEM courses showsa decline over
), Junior (njr = 154), and Senior (nsr = 146). Byexamining the development level within students’ class standing groups (freshman to senior), onecan gauge whether students over time perform at higher rates than previous years. Ideally, to testgains across a given span of time, data is collected longitudinally, tracking an individual acrosstheir college career. Because we assume that regardless of student ability and demographicbackground, as whole, students will have higher learning gains as they progress through theengineering program, we assert that by aggregating and averaging out values over different classstanding groups can provide insights similar to that of a longitudinal study.Figures 1 and 2, where average scores are examined across
electrical engineering from Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey, in 2003, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electri- cal and computer engineering from The Ohio State University, Columbus, in 2005 and 2008, respectively. He is currently an Associate Professor at the Electrical Engineering Department of University of South Florida, Tampa, FL. From 2009 to 2015, he was an Assistant Professor at the Electrical Engineering De- partment of University of South Florida. His research interests are small antennas, engineered materials, THz technologies, and reconfigurable RF devices, antennas and arrays using microfluidic reconfiguration techniques. Dr. Mumcu is the recipient of the 2014 CAREER award from the U.S. National Science
Paper ID #25714A Connected Course Approach for Introduction to Engineering Problem Solv-ingDr. Anthony Ferrar, Temple University Tony Ferrar is obsessed with student success. He focuses on preparing students for rewarding careers through pedagogical innovation and incorporating professional development into educational experiences. Anthony received his BS, MS, and PhD in mechanical engineering from Virginia Tech, where his research revolved around air-breathing propulsion. As a graduate student he contributed to Virginia Tech’s Gradu- ate Education Development Institute, Faculty Development Institute, and Networked Learning
; Computer Science The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Dr. Ala Qubbaj is the Dean for the College of Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (UTRGV) and the Principle Investigator (PI) for the UTRGV’s ADVANCE Institutional Transformation grant funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF); which focuses on increasing the representation and advancement of women in STEM fields. He is also the PI on an NSF INCLUDES (Inclusion across the Nation of Communities of Learners of Underrepresented Dis- coverers in Engineering and Science) project/Symposium for ADVANCING STEM Latinas in Academic Careers. Prior to his Dean position, Dr. Qubbaj served as Senior Associate Vice President
and Applied Science developed a new advising process for first-year students by employing advisors that are also First-Year Seminar teachers. Peer advisors are also part of the model. They are responsiblefor guiding the students to university resources, and help them normalize their experiencesthrough social events and group discussions [3]. The College of Engineering at RowanUniversity report their enhanced dual advising program in [4] . In this model, students areassigned a first-year advisor who is responsible for course sequencing, college and campuspolicies and procedures, and referral to campus resources such as tutoring, study abroad,while the faulty advisor provides discipline-specific academic, industry and career
perspective of various GPA systems and their impact onpassion, interest and motivation, surveys were distributed to undergraduate engineering students.The distribution of this survey consisted of both public and private channels such as email andclass announcements. The survey (Appendix I) consisted of questions on their opinions andattitudes of the various grade systems currently in place and the proposed continuous GPAscheme. In addition to multiple choice questions that asked if students believed that theircumulative GPA was an adequate representation of their academic competency, and if theirmotivation increased or decreased through their academic career, short response questions werealso introduced, allowing them to justify their answers to the
and revisenew scientific equipment; these skills are applicable to life beyond university in industry,academe or consultancy. Their design and application of new data capture technologies and thesignificant data analysis and interpretation associated with real world investigations will servethem well in their remaining years as students and their careers beyond. During this research, thestudent team worked independently, provided regular communications of status and progress andlearned how exciting it can be to work on scientific discovery. They know that these experienceshelped develop skills that will make them successful in future workplace or research settings.They developed goals for the future research teams to come after them, (such as
available on and off campus,but also make it possible for faculty to share best practices with each other. Furthermore, throughcollaborations, a faculty can serve as agent for change in his or her department. For example, afaculty can assist colleagues through instructional coaching method, and can also develop a plansensitive to his or her department’s needs. Overall, such collaborations can help to supportfaculty’s teaching excellence and to create a community across departments on campus.SUNY College at Buffalo Mechanical Engineering Program Industrial Advisory BoardBackground The mission of Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) Program at SUNY College atBuffalo is to prepare students for careers in engineering technology that includes
labs/projects in this course make the content more 4.20 0.84 understandable Understanding the content of this course will benefit 4.10 0.75 me in my career Doing the labs/projects shows me real-life applications 4.10 0.75 of the information Table 1. Survey question result .7. Acknowledgments Part of the material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. 504030. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. The diagram in Figure 2 is courtesy of Xilinx
their careers in their chosen profession. As educators, we have theinherent responsibility to provide our students the best opportunities for them to grow and learn inour classrooms. 2019 ASEE Zone 1 Conference, April 11-13, 2019 – Niagara Falls, New YorkReferences[1] R. B. Barr, and J. Tagg, “From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduateeducation,” Change, vol. 27, pp. 12-25, November/December 1995.[2] S. D. Downs, “Testing in the College Classroom: Do Testing and Feedback Influence GradesThroughout an Entire Semester?” Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, vol. 1,no. 2, pp. 172-181, Apr. 2015.[3] J. Cranney, M. Anh, R. McKinnon, S. Morris, and K. Watts, “The testing effect, collaborativelearning, and
in a large team environment—while doing something theylove—music? A rationale and resources for a conductorless orchestra now exist that can applyto diverse engineering schools, large and small, throughout the United States. 1Impetus Professional skills—leadership, teamwork, and communication—can make or break apurposeful life. Practiced effectively, they augment the virtues distinctive to an individual, thusgrowing character and agency for the better good. Given the centrality of technology today,engineering students will help shape our future, significantly. Yet often they lack theprofessional skillset to reach the greatest promise in their careers and as citizens. How canprofessional
of the46 following four areas: academic and career advising, high school preparation, engineering structure and47 curriculum, and faculty relations[9]. This paper focuses on faculty relations because, historically, 148 universities have relegated retention issues to staff and advisors. The importance of faculty influence on49 student retention is an under-researched and under-explored area. Specifically, faculty relations can be50 shaped through specific teaching practices instructors can use to increase student retention. Research51 supports the claim that student-professor relationships are vital in promoting the success of engineering52 students [10], [11]. One
is concerning for many reasons. Stevens and collaborators point out that: “Students often have vague images of professional engineering work, and the images they do have are strongly colored by the experiences in their educational careers…As a result, students often ignore, discount, or simply do not see images of engineering that emphasize its nontechnical, noncalculative sides and its non-individual aspects” ([6], p. 120).Similarly, Jonassen also notes problems in the discrepancy between engineering problems solvedby students and practitioners: “Learning to solve classroom problems does not effectivelyprepare engineering graduates to solve workplace problems” ([7], pp. 103-104). When apracticing engineer fails to consider social
electronicallybefore the beginning of the next class. The beginning of the next class began with discussion ofsolutions from these assignments.Five types of assignments were available to students: concept questions, practice problems,homework problems, unit tests, and an advanced project. Concept questions were designed tohelp students learn to connect detailed course content with their outside experiences, othercourses in the curriculum, and their own career goals. Some of these questions asked students toreflect on and self-assess their own learning processes. Practice problems were similar tohomework and test problems. The advanced project was a group project that involved visiting alab to acquire EEG data during an “oddball” experiment and performing data
creativityand innovation: Civil engineers don't magically become creative and innovative later in their careers. We must foster this during the pre-licensure period. Any job that does not require creativity and innovation can be automated and done by robots. Are we training engineer robots? or are we training problem solvers? Creativity should be promoted in our profession as much as is reasonable. The smartest tend to be the most creative and if we shun that part of a young person's interest, we will lose that valuable talent to another profession. Civil engineering is being left out of the innovation centers that are becoming so popular on campuses and proving to be highly effective in expanding the learning opportunities for
Paper ID #26697Tensions in Applying a Design-Thinking Approach to Address Barriers to In-creasing Diversity and Inclusion in a Large, Legacy Engineering ProgramSean Eddington, Purdue University, West Lafayette Sean Eddington (Ph.D., Purdue University) will be an assistant professor of Communication Studies at Kansas State University beginning Fall 2019. Sean’s primary research interests exist at the intersec- tions of organizational communication, new media, gender, and organizing. Within engineering contexts, Sean has examined career issues within the engineering discipline regarding (1) new faculty experiences
Paper ID #26443The Impact of Multidisciplinary Teams on Sustainability Projects in EPICSDr. Stephanie M. Gillespie, Arizona State University Stephanie Gillespie joined the EPICS@ASU program after finishing her Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. She has extensive experience in K-12 outreach and curriculum development, and is passionate about giving students opportunities to make a difference throughout their academic career. As the EPICS Director of Instruction, Stephanie leads the EPICS pro- gram’s curriculum development, EPICS-Community College program, and program
systemsthinking, ethics, social justice, and social responsibility (SR) into engineering education. Forexample, the problem rewrite assignment is a form of problem-based learning, a pedagogicalstrategy that others are using to teach SR and SJ [22]. Another promising strategy is usingcorporate social responsibility (CSR) as a tool in engineering ethics education, as a way ofpreparing students for “the CSR dimensions of their careers” and broadening studentsunderstanding of stakeholders, especially to include oppositional groups [23]. Nieusma andCieminski [24] suggest “a shift to ethics knowledge as ‘skills that must be practiced in order tobe learned’ [that] could fit nicely with the contemporary emphasis on active and problem-basedlearning approaches in
engineers. Because Make to Innovate is open tostudents from the freshman level to the senior level, we hope to reinforce these skills throughouttheir academic career continuously.ConclusionWe believe that the Make to Innovate program is helping our students in learning additional skillssuch as professional skills, manufacturing skills, and moving a design to reality. These skills willhelp our students in becoming better engineers and give them experience that can help them intheir future careers. The data we have collected so far have shown that we are making an impacton students and that employers have taken notice of the benefit of the program. As with anyprogram though, continuous assessment and improvement are needed to keep the