Paper ID #16371An Industry-University Partnership to Foster Interdisciplinary EducationProf. Farrokh Mistree, University of Oklahoma Farrokh’s passion is to have fun in providing an opportunity for highly motivated and talented people to learn how to define and achieve their dreams. Farrokh Mistree holds the L. A. Comp Chair in the School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering at the University of Oklahoma in Norman, Oklahoma. Prior to this position, he was the Associate Chair of the Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Tech – Savannah. He was also the Founding Director of the Systems Realization
assumptions of faith and divinity, their association with religious traditions raise ahost of issues most educators are not prepared or willing to deal with. A second challenge is thatthese contemplative practices require extensive first-hand experience before an educator is ableor ready to share them with students. This makes the solution not scalable, since it is not realisticto assume that mass numbers of technology and engineering educators will take up and sustainmindfulness meditation practice. Barbezat and Bush (2013) also point out a third and relatedchallenge: That, by nature of their introspective and spiritual nature, contemplative practicesmight raise complex questions about the nature of the mind and self that most educators are
/1-2--32505.21. Svihla, V. and Peele-Eady, T.B., Framing agency as a lens into constructionist learning. Proceedings of Constructionism, 2020: p. 313-324, http://www.constructionismconf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/C2020- Proceedings.pdf.22. Svihla, V., Peele-Eady, T.B., and Gallup, A., Exploring agency in capstone design problem framing. Studies in Engineering Education, 2021. 2(2): p. 96–119. DOI:10.21061/see.69.23. Svihla, V., Peele-Eady, T.B., and Chen, Y. Agency in framing design problems in AERA Annual Meeting. 2019. Toronto, ON, Canada.24. Konopasky, A.W. and Sheridan, K.M., Towards a diagnostic toolkit for the language of agency. Mind, Culture
validation, financial knowledge, motivation and self-efficacy, and social support[1], [3], [4]. The research questions are designed with TSC in mind and to support achievementof the purposes of the project. The research questions guiding this grant are: RQ1: What are assets, factors, and strategies that enable access for two- year college students to engineering transfer pathways? RQ2: Do assets, factors, and strategies vary in magnitude and/or presence across student demographics, locations, institutions, or intention to transfer? RQ3: How does use of digital learning tools and resources impact transfer outcomes for pre-transfer engineering students? RQ4: To what extent can transfer outcomes be
Session xxxx Can ASCE Cover the “E” in the MOE? Robert J. Houghtalen, P.E. Department of Civil Engineering, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology John A. Casazza Department of Continuing Education, ASCEAbstractThe American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) is beginning to move the profession in thedirection of requiring a certain body of knowledge (BOK) for professional licensure. This BOKwould be obtained through a baccalaureate (BS) degree, work experience, and a master’s degreeor equivalent (MOE). The “or
projects.There are a variety of approaches to outreach, but those that involve undergraduate engineeringstudents accomplish two goals: 1) encouraging more K12 students to consider engineering bybreaking stereotypes, and 2) involving the undergraduate engineering students in meaningfulcommunity engagement, which they will hopefully continue throughout their careers. There are several reasons that involving undergraduates in outreach is particularlyeffective, primarily because they can break the stereotypes of engineers that most K12 studentshave in their minds. Obama administration officials have met with business executives andschool deans in order to better understand the barriers to creating more engineers, which wereidentified as scientists
, regulate, shape, critique,publicize, and study science, including government scientists, funding agency officers, science-focused interestgroups, science communicators, academics, museum curators, and others.The Graduate Certificate in Innovation, Technology and Society. Social entrepreneurs understand that withinnovation comes responsibility. With past technological fixes contributing to global warming, market crashesand animal extinction, we need creative minds to develop strategies that address the root causes of complexproblems and incorporate them into viable business models. The Graduate Certificate in Innovation,Technology and Society provides you with an environment in which engineers and non-engineers work togetherto cultivate innovative
Session 3275 Teach Less Better Ronald P. Krahe, P.E. Associate Professor of Engineering Penn State Erie, The Behrend CollegeAbstractWhat are we trying to accomplish? Many of us feel the pressures of adding more and more material tothe curriculum. Just keeping up with technology can be a challenge in itself. At the same time, business,industry, and society are telling us that our teaching is vastly overrated, irrelevant and ineffective.Several interesting approaches have been suggested in literature to address
communication skill. It has, therefore, become vitallyimportant for programs in engineering to provide the necessary tools for their students toexcel in the world outside the university during their experiential learning experiences. Thisfocus along with the increased emphasis on communication excellence in the classroom hasprovided another vital link between the academic and industrial worlds. When studentsbegin their experiential learning assignments, there are many things that are flowing throughtheir minds. They consider the money that they will be earning as part of the work force.They are also entering, in most cases, an environment that is unfamiliar to them. They havenot previously been in positions that have required them to become the
regards many educators have developed project-based learning exercises in engineering and other courses so that the students will learn by doing.Project-based learning motivates the learners and provides “hands-on” and “minds-on” training.A laboratory-based civil engineering course in Computer Aided Structural Analysis Design andExperimentation is redesigned using Fink’s Taxonomy of significant learning with learning goalsand several dimensions from foundational knowledge, application, integration, human dimension,caring and learning how to learn. In this respect, e-Learning plays a critical role in knowledge andskills development as well as course management. Learning Management System Moodle is usedas an e-Learning tool for communication with
of the interstate highway system on poor and minority communities in American cities. New Visions for Public Affairs, 7 (April), 9-21.Khan, B., Robbins, C., and Okrent, A. (2020). The State of US Science and Engineering 2020. National Science Foundation, (January 15th).Leydens, J. A., and Lucena, J. C. (2018). Engineering Justice : Transforming Engineering Education and Practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2018. Web.McGinn, R. E. (2003). Mind the gaps: An empirical approach to engineering ethics, 1997–2001. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9 (4), 517-542.Rabins, M. J. (1998). Teaching engineering ethics to undergraduates: Why? What? How? Science and Engineering Ethics, 4 (3), 291-302.Sensoy, O., and DiAngelo, R
, technology integration, online course design and delivery, program evaluation, and assessment. Dr. Lux’s current research agenda is STEM teaching and learning in K-12 contexts, technology integration in teacher preparation and K-12 contexts, educational gaming design and integration, and new technologies for teaching and learning.Dr. Brock J. LaMeres, Montana State University Dr. Brock J. LaMeres is a Professor in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at Mon- tana State University (MSU) and the Director of the Montana Engineering Education Research Center (MEERC). LaMeres is also the Boeing Professor at MSU where he is responsible for initiatives to im- prove the professional skills of engineering
approach.AcknowledgementsThank you to Patti Cyr, Robin Borkholder, and Elizabeth DeBartolo for their support and guidancein the development of the entrepreneurial mindset focused activity presented in this paper. Aspecial thanks to Tony DiVasta and the Toyota Production Systems Lab at RIT for supporting thestudents in the set-up and data collection of the production system prototype.References[1] L. Bosman, and S. Fernhaber, “Teaching the Entrepreneurial Mindset to Engineers.” Springer, 2018.[2] KEEN Engineering Unleashed. Website: https://engineeringunleashed.com/ Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network. [Accessed February 15, 2022].[3] C.S. Korach and J. Gargac, “Integrating Entrepreneurial Mind-set into First-Year Engineering Curriculum through
Across Academic Disciplines. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 2016. 30(1): p. 23-41.2. Jensen, K.J. and K.J. Cross, Engineering stress culture: Relationships among mental health, engineering identity, and sense of inclusion. Journal of Engineering Education, 2021. 110(2): p. 371-392.3. Whitwer, M., S. Wilson, and J. Hammer. Engineering Student Mental Health and Help Seeking: Analysis of National Data from the Healthy Minds Study. in 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). 2023. IEEE.4. Hargis, L.E., C.J. Wright, M.E. Miller, E.E. Usher, J.H. Hammer, and S.A. Wilson. Relationship Between Mental Health Distress and Help-Seeking Behaviors Among Engineering Students. in American Society
has over 100 peer-reviewed articles, and 175 national and international presentations.Dr. Robert M Capraro, Texas A&M University Robert M. Capraro, is Co-Director of Aggie STEM, Director of STEM Collaborative for Teacher Pro- fessional Learning, and Professor Mathematics Education in the Department of Teaching Learning and Culture at Texas A&M University. Dr. Capraro’s expertise is applied research in school settings, program evaluation, the teacher as change agent for STEM school improvement, and STEM student achievement. He recently received the best paper award from the International Conference on Engineering Education where he and two colleagues presented their work related to the Aggie STEM project. He
a gateway exam in the junior-level Mechanisms course. The assessment results 15showed that due to the use of the concept map, the students‟ average score of the Mechanismsexam increased from 68% to 90%, and standard deviation decreased from 16.9 to 10.0.Concept maps for engineering dynamics have also been developed by engineering instructors atvarious institutions of higher learning 4, 16, 17. For instance, Cornwell 4 developed a concept mapfor particle kinematics, an essential topic in dynamics, to help students understand therelationships among kinematics concepts and organize the material in student‟s minds. He set uphis concept map on a corner of the classroom front wall. When he presented new materials, heshowed their location in the
Paper ID #45064GIFTS: Marching LEGO Ducks towards Critical IdeationProf. Brian Patrick O’Connell, Northeastern University Dr. O’Connell is an associate teaching professor in the First-Year Engineering program at Northeastern University. He studied at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst in 2006 then worked in industry as a Mechanical Engineer working on ruggedized submarine optronic systems. He returned to academia in 2011 at Tufts University planning to work towards more advanced R&D but fell for engineering education and educational technologies. His research now focuses on developing engineering technologies and
helping engineers at avery early stage of their careers has been a rewarding experience for industry practitioners. Byinterfacing with faculty members, cooperative efforts are more easily developed on projects atboth academic and industry levels. Recently, industry practitioners have indicated their interestin having faculty members make site visits to better foster these relationships. As industrypartners have returned they have adjusted their presentations to make them even moreinteractive. Most of the teams have become very adept at engaging the students and having fun.Table 2 contains some specific comments from first-year engineering faculty members. Table 2. Industry Comments on Industry Case Studies "In my mind
importance of DEI in engineering. It gave us a deeper understanding of ourselvesand each other, bringing us closer as a group. I often wished that our class periods were longerbecause our discussions got so involved that we got out of class late every class. We were engaged,thinking critically, listening, and bouncing ideas around. All while learning about DEI issues inengineering education and the industry it was a gratifying experience. I learned so much withoutneeding to take notes, watch mind-numbing PowerPoint presentations, or listen to a lecture to tryand decipher what was important and what was not.All these factors ignited my interest and passion for George Mason, the Engineering Department,and DEI topics. I wanted to be more involved at
considerations, redesign for a target this paper. Details have been previously published [2].customer group, prototyping, and presentation. Part ofthe motivation for this new curriculum was to promote PURPOSE OF REDESIGN“entrepreneurially minded learning” (EML), which aims While the first-year engineering courses have accomplishedto foster a mindset of curiosity, making connections, and their objectives, several of the instructors felt that the coursescreating value. Another motivation was to provide could be improved and offer more to students. Faculty at thestudents with the tools they need to acquire internships University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
people with different forms of expertise working on multiple facets orcomponents of the project. To ensure a diverse sample in terms of personal andacademic/professional background, we were also mindful of a number of diversity criteria in ourrecruitment and selection of participants, including in participants’ level and type of engineeringexperience, field of engineering, and sociodemographic traits such as race, ethnicity, and gender.Students were recruited from two universities – one a selective public research university andanother regional public university. Professional engineers were recruited locally from a varietyof industries. Interviews were conducted in person and lasted approximately 60 to 90 minutes byone member of our research
approach to STEM, he foundhimself more confident in teaching STEM and felt that it is something he can do. Kevin reported: “So definitely more about the engineering design process and really how it relates to something as simple as 3D printing. I think I always looked at engineering as this field of mathematics and science that I could never be a part of. Because I always struggled with science. And I don't know if it was just the teacher or the concepts. But I just knew and had this built in my mind that I'm not good at science. And so as engineering and with the advancement of technology and computer programming, and just seeing how companies and organizations are bringing it into the school setting, I
: ● Introduction to Library Resources & Literature Review – Typically condicted at the beginning of the program, this session brings engineering librarian specialists to introduce students to library and online resources available to researchers. Students conduct a literature review with guidance and feedback from mentors. ● Mind Mapping/Systems Thinking – This workshop introduces Mind Mapping [9] as a tool for Systems Thinking. Participants use both software and pen-and-paper methods practice systems level understanding of not just technical, but societal, ethical, and global implications of their topic. They visualize and situate their research in the context of the vision of the Center as well as the broader
particular approaches are in instilling the entrepreneurial mindset in engineering students.A survey was developed to determine how students’ participation in the various entrepreneurial learningopportunities impacted various facets of students’ entrepreneurially-minded thinking. Also, direct studentassessment was performed in the second junior-level course and senior-level course in the engineeringentrepreneurship minor program to assess their entrepreneurial skills.The survey was administered during the fall 2014 term to all 506 junior and senior engineering students.The response rate to the survey was 17% (although 132 students started the survey, only 86 completed itin its entirety). The direct assessments were performed during the final
AC 2007-2247: OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT AS A SITE OF INTEGRATION: ABETMEETS THE COUNCIL OF WRITING PROGRAM ADMINISTRATORSMarie Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie Paretti is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC).Lisa McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa McNair is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC).Diana George, Virginia Tech Diana George is a Professor of English at Virginia Tech, where she directs the First-Year Writing Program.kelly belanger, Virginia Tech Kelly Belanger is an Associate
Paper ID #38507Work in Progress: Knowing Our First-year Students, Meeting Them WhereThey Are, and Supporting Them for SuccessDr. Kathleen A Harper, Case Western Reserve University Kathleen A. Harper is the assistant director of the Roger E. Susi First-year Engineering Experience at Case Western Reserve University. She received her M. S. in physics and B. S. in electrical engineering and applied physics from CWRU and her Ph. D. in physics from The Ohio State University.Dr. Kurt R. Rhoads, Case Western Reserve University Kurt R. Rhoads, Ph.D., P.E. is the faculty director of the Roger E. Susi First-Year Engineering Experience
., Kovithavongs, T., Mielke, 8., et al. Assessment of Exam Performance After Change to Problem-based Learning. Differential Effects by Question Type. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 1998 Vol. 10, No. 2, pp.86-91.2. Albanese, M.4., and Mitchell, S. Problem-based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes and Implementation Issues. Academic Medicine, 1993, Vol., 68, pp.52- 81.3. Bailey, R., and Z. Szabo, "Assessing Engineering Design Process Knowledge," International Journal of Engineering Education,Vol.22, No. 3, 2006, pp. 508-518.4. Bransford, J.D., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, Expanded ed., Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2000.5. Bradshaw, G
hands-on activities includemore than 250 different 3-D mechanical puzzles, games, mind teasers, LEGO® Mindstormscompetitions, and design projects, each of which illustrates principles and strategies ininventive/innovative problem solving. (Please see some of the puzzles at:http://www.ee.fau.edu/faculty/raviv/teach.htm). These activities allow for self-paced, semi-guided exploration that improves self-esteem and encourages questioning and daring. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education* This work was supported in part by the National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance (NCIIA), and in
Education2 Bransford, JD, Brown, AL, and Cocking, RR (Eds.) 1999. How People Learn: Mind, Brain, Experience, andSchool. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.3 Brophy, SP. 2003. Constructing Shareable Learning Materials in Bioengineering Education. IEEE Engineering inMedicine and Biology Magazine 22: 39-46.4 Klein, SS and Roselli, RJ. 2003. The Iron Cross. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Pre-CollegeEducation: Best Practices in High School Engineering.http://www.asme.org/education/precollege/bestpractice/bp.htm5 Sherwood, RD and Klein, SS. 2003. Biomedical Engineering Topics in High School Science Instruction: InitialDevelopment and Field Studies. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society of Engineering Education AnnualConference &
throughout their lives. Education cannot give learners all the information that they need to know, but rather it must provide the tools for continuing to learn. Keeping that in mind, the main objectives of the Introduction to Mechanical Design course were the following:1. Ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, statistics, science and engineering2. Ability to design a system, component or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints3. Ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems4. Ability to use the techniques, skills and modern engineering tools necessary to engineering practice. The process for integrating inquiry techniques into the course, contained designing activities, assignments, and