learning achievement will beaddressed. More importantly, we will examine the course assessment based on the analysis ofcollected data from grading student course work, course evaluation and learning outcome survey.Finally, we will address the possible course improvement according to our assessment.II. Course OutlinesThe multidisciplinary course consists of the ME dynamic system modeling and EE feedbackcontrol system design (co-listed as ME 376/ECE 382) as shown in Figure 1 and is offered in thesecond semester in junior year with a 16-week class schedule. Three-hours of lectures each weekare allocated. Concurrently, the control system laboratory course (ECE 308) is offered with threecontact hours each week. The pre-requisite courses include Linear
quests forentrepreneuring success are qualitatively analyzed using the following two questions: 1) How do we introduce and measure the predictive engagement aspect of vulnerability in successful entrepreneurial storytelling? And, 2) How do we develop a procedure for applying the storytelling results to the start-up phases of entrepreneurial work and illuminate its effectiveness for delivering innovation.Increasingly, academic and industrial collaborations begin as entrepreneurial expectations fordelivering something novel. Defining the first steps of start-ups results in discussions of a seriesof related concepts: innovation, empathy, and storytelling. While the media is rich
impetus for the writing initiative described in this paper came from the OldDominion University's (ODU) Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP). As described on the universityweb site, the intention of the QEP is to improve upper-division undergraduate students'disciplinary writing, i.e., that writing that demonstrates a reasoning process supported byresearch and reflection on a problem, topic, or issue.14 Two faculty development andengagement initiatives were initiated: Writing as a critical skill that goes beyond demonstratingproficiency with the mechanics and structure of writing per se, and writing as a means tocommunicate what has been learned.Skill in writing is demonstrated by six student learning outcomes of the ODU QEP: 1. Clearly state a
designs. Thus, the writing assignment’s design elementfocused on system-level workflow, rather than details. The final project deliverable was an 8- to12-page report recommending an optimal conveyer type and tooling to meet target yield andbudget specifications.In test-teaching the assignment, the instructor’s objectives were as follows: 1. Observe how students respond to the assignment and determine to what extent they perceive educational benefit(s) toward developing their engineering communication skills. 2. Reveal emergent issues and how to fix them. 3. Observe the students’ reaction to the supplied topic for their assigned report documents and determine to what extent the students view a turn-key, macroscopic
engineeringundergraduate programs. Considering engineers are responsible for protecting the publics’ health,safety and welfare; educating engineers on how to be confident and competent leaders should be avital element of the undergraduate curriculum. (Source 1)In the Society for Human Resource Management’s 2012 survey, “Challenges Facing HRExecutives”, 52% of human resource executives stated the greatest challenges facing them would befurther developing the next generation of corporate leaders. This response was up from only 29% in2010 and demonstrates why universities should be focusing on developing leadership skills in orderto produce students who can fully compete in a challenging market. (Source 4
not have the opportunity to participate, 156 men and 13 women). Consequently, theparticipants in this study do not reflect the entire entering class nor do they include transferstudents or students migrating to engineering from other majors. Race/ethnicity for theparticipants was as follows: Native American - 2 (0.7%); African American - 29 (10.5%);Pacific Islander – 1 (0.4%); Asian 16 (5.8%); Hispanic/Latino – 8 (2.9%); Caucasian - 205(74.0%); Other - 14 (5.1%) and 2 did not indicate race/ethnicity.ProcedureParticipants were recruited from ENGR 1000, a course designed specifically for enteringengineering students. The course provided an opportunity for students to meet peers with thesame declared major and learn more about different fields
to better understand how middle school youth learned science asthey participated in an engineering design curriculum in an after-school studio setting (calledSTEM Club), guided by undergraduate facilitators within a collaborative Information andCommunications Technology (ICT)-embedded environment. The research questions guiding theinvestigation were: 1. How does social media influence youth’s understandings of science in this informal, engineering design-based afterschool studio setting? 2. What are ways to successfully determine changes in understanding? 3. How do the actions of site leaders and facilitators impact learning?Using a discursive psychology framework (Davies & Harré, 2000) we identify ways in which theteachers
to pursue higher education. However, questionshave been raised as to whether online instruction can replace the traditional approach to teachingany time soon, particularly, in engineering schools [1, 2, 3, 4]. In fact, many members of the Page 23.877.2 1teaching faculty have often questioned if online education has the capability to effectivelycommunicateimportant concepts without compromising on quality. At the same time, faculty membersinvolved with traditional programs hesitate to readily denounce online education since they dorecognize that it is the best option for some people to complete
analysis using the same rote problem-solution procedures specified in the lecture. Thistype of “plug-and-chug” approach only requires students to (1) remember the problem-solutionprocedure, (2) understand how to apply the problem-solution procedure, and (3) apply theprocedure to the given data. While this approach can be used to evaluate students’ application ofstatistical concepts to engineering data, due to its deficiencies students often struggle tounderstand the relationship between statistics and the real-life processes to which they will beapplying statistics in their careers.A particular concept in engineering statistics for which the rote problem-solution approach isespecially poor is the subject of design of experiments (DOE). The DOE
withnew devices for occupied space environmental control. Students are very motivated to createdevices that positively influence their learning environment. This paper presents details ofstudent projects which interface with the microgrid system. Details of the microgridinfrastructure are also presented and discussed.IntroductionEngineering technology students at Penn State - Berks are involved with an innovative andemerging technology in the area of indoor building energy distribution. With the help of industrypartners of the Emerge Alliance® consortium, an engineering laboratory/classroom has beenconverted to use a 24VDC system to power its lighting needs.1 The 24VDC power is distributedthroughout the room via conductors embedded in the support
industry and illustrates several good robot program designs. Overall,The OLP method provides not only our students an excellent learning environment but also apowerful teaching tool for MET instructors. Our results indicate that the students have thefollowing competence to: 1) study multiple scenarios of a robotic workcell before any decision iscommitted, 2) determine the cycle time for a sequence of manufacturing operations, 3) Uselibraries of pre-defined high-level commands for certain types of robotic applications, 4)minimize production interruption and help meet flexible automation goals, and 5) ensure that arobotic system will do the functions that an end-user needs it to do. We also recognize that thestudents who understand both robotics
tested in ethics curricula. Furthermore, it is not clear how these pedagogicalactivities map onto recent conceptual advances in the interdisciplinary emotion scholarship.Some philosophers of education are seeking ways to bridge this divide, but there is a practicalneed to: 1) develop effective pedagogical practices that engage the emotions, and 2) study theeffects of engaging emotion in the learning process. We draw on scholarship from the learningsciences to suggest strategies for engaging the emotions in engineering ethics curricula. Weargue that incorporating and emphasizing the emotions in the engineering ethics classroom offersa new starting point to meet engineers and scientists where they are. Learning science shows thatlearning is always
Mechanical Engineering. While a student, again, he worked on the Formula SAE team and assisted them in designing and building a half scale Formula 1 race car using a 610 cc motorcycle engine.Dr. Dale A. Wilson, Tennessee Technological University Page 23.882.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Making Mathematics Relevant to Engineering Students Abstract: In 2004, the author, an Associate Professor of Mathematics and a truly nontradi-tional student, started an adventure by going back to school and majoring in Mechanical Engineer-ing. The author, along with his advisor and co
be the central or distinguishing activity of engineering” (p.103)1. Indeed the National Academy of Engineering reinforces this statement by describingengineering as “design under constraint” (p. 24)2. The report continues, “The engineer designsdevices, components, subsystems, and systems, and to create a successful design, in the sensethat it leads directly or indirectly to an improvement of our quality of life” (p. 24)2. And the veryessence of these statements manifests itself through the Grand Challenges of Engineering, whichinclude such challenges as “restor[ing] and improv[ing] urban infrastructure”, “prevent[ing]nuclear terror”, and “advanc[ing] personalized learning”3. Such challenges are renderedincredibly complex by deeply integrated
Most of Site VisitsUsing a service-learning pedagogy requires that engineering educators build connections withthe community.1, 2 However, these connections vary in quality. For example, engineeringeducators could create transactional agreements where community organizations accept studentprojects or engineering educators could cultivate long-standing partnerships where engineeringstudents expand their design knowledge working alongside of various community stakeholders.3Additionally, engineering students enter into a service-learning pedagogical experience withtheir own perceptions of working with community organizations and their own expectations ofwhat they will learn and do during the course.4 When students work with local
activities for K-12, particularly with Girl Scouts and students from rural areas. Page 23.885.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Mapping Rural Students’ STEM Involvement: Case Studies of Chemical Engineering Undergraduate Enrollment in the States of Illinois and Kansas1. IntroductionMany, including The National Academies 1, President Obama’s Administration 2, and technicalindustry leaders 3, have recently called for improving the participation and performance ofAmerica’s students in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) to maintain
theimportant biological information is contained in the small fluctuating voltages associated withsynaptic events rather than absolute potential distance from ground. To allow sufficientamplification to see these fluctuating potentials without magnifying the absolute potentials onwhich they ride, the logical choice is to use a low-frequency filter to eliminate the direct currentpotentials. With low frequency filters, one can select Low Frequency Filter (LFF) cutofffrequencies of 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, or 10 Hz, corresponding to time constants of 1.6, 5.3, 0.16, 0.05, or0.016 second. Even with modern digital equipment, the same LFF values work well withstandard scalp EEG frequencies. The most common setting is 1 Hz (τ = 0.16 s), which nicelypreserves most low
, in particular. In addition, discussion of sustainability inevitably involvesmultiple disciplines, so the discussion is enhanced with multiple perspectives.Sustainability Education for Materials EngineersTo evaluate the educational needs related to sustainability, The Metals, Minerals and MaterialsSociety (TMS) included questions on the topic in a recent member survey1. One portion of thissurvey asked respondents to rank the desired and actual proficiencies on several sustainability-related topics. The results, which are summarized in Table 1, show that the most important topicis energy use and efficiency, followed by recycling/reuse, life cycle analysis and corporate socialresponsibility. In all cases, the desired proficiency is lower than
(Thermodynamics) and Biomaterials I(Biomaterials). The research questions driving this study are: 1. What are students' perceptions regarding the utility of integrating computation in their studies and their future careers? 2. What are students' perceptions regarding their own abilities to implement computational methods commonly used to solve MSE problems? 3. What are students' intentions regarding the use of computation in their studies and future careers?Review of the LiteratureComputation is an essential engineering research and development tool for the analysis anddesign of solutions to modern technological needs3. Higher education, however, is not keepingpace by equipping undergraduate engineering students with the
students with thetools and abilities to create the future. Computer-based innovations play a particularlyprominent role because of how engrained they have become in many aspects of industryand our lives. It is important to have people who can create, maintain and fix computersand computer software. Unfortunately, high dropout rates in computing majors are far toocommon.In this study we examine the effectiveness of a new instrument to measure computingself-efficacy. Such a tool can provide a analysis of an important factor that has been tiedto student dropout in STEM majors. Our study explores three research questions thatwere present throughout the study: 1) What is the computing self-efficacy of university students pursuing a STEM
ofvariance, indicates that the factors that contribute more heavily toward changes in the students’intercultural sensitivity are (1) the experience of going through the REU summer program and(2) whether the student went to school at UPRM or not. Both of these factors also have astatistically significant two-way interaction with the different ICSS constructs. Non-parametricpaired analyses were used to test whether the experience had a positive effect in the participant’sintercultural scale. At a 0.05 significant level, every REU summer program was able to trigger astatistically significant improvement in the interaction confidence and interaction enjoymentconstructs of the ICSS. Overall, the REU program also had a statistically significant (𝛼 = 0.05
attempt to describe a pedagogical innovation anddemonstrate its impact on student learning. These studies include qualitative measurements ofimprovement such as student feedback in learning logs 1 and quantitative measurements such asperformance on examinations 2. The vast majority of researchers assess the impacts of newteaching methods primarily using correlational or comparative studies. They often gatherempirical data to understand if there is an improvement combined with qualitative feedback instudent reflections to understand why the intervention was successful or unsuccessful. Nearly allof these pedagogical studies aim to measure the improvement in learning resulting from anintervention. These studies essentially aim to perform a
activity that used material selection as the primary driver fordevice performance. This is the ‘bridge’ that we focused on, allowing a general ‘design’ activitybe applicable to multiple disciplines.Another challenge concerned the assessment of design skills. Based on previous work3 a metricwas selected. The metric is termed “RADD”, and has been used each quarter for over five years.The metric targets four areas: 1)Requirements, 2)Analysis, 3)Design, and 4)Drawings (RADD).The metric has been adapted for use in assessing different media. For example, the initial usewas to assess documents such as engineering proposals. Then the metric was modified to assesspresentations, such as Design Reviews. For this effort, we chose to create a RADD metric
Education, 2013 Mechanical Engineering Design Experience for Hispanic and Low Income Students AbstractIn 2011, California State University, Northridge (CSUN) received a grant from the Departmentof Education's Hispanic-Serving Institutions STEM program to boost the number of studentswho transfer from a community college and graduate with degrees in engineering and computerscience.The program, known as the AIMS2 (Attract, Inspire, Mentor, and Support Students) studentsupport program, has three main objectives: (1) To increase the number of Hispanic and lowincome students who transfer from junior colleges (2) To increase the number of Hispanic andlow income students who join
directly sketch a truss free-body diagram(FBD) onto a computer tablet; they can also sketch the FBD with a mouse and a standardcomputer monitor. As the student sketches the FBD into the program, Mechanix is able toautomatically detect and label the nodes of the truss as the instructor entered it. The student thendraws an axis and proceeds to solve the problem as he/she would by hand, i.e. labeling the FBDwith input and reaction forces, etc. The student’s ability to draw their own sketch mimics theprocedure that is taken when drawing a sketch on paper, which is the traditional way of solvingtruss problems, this makes it is easier for the student to transition back and forth betweenMechanix and traditional truss solving methods. Figure 1 shows a
automotive company requires for its operational activities such asrunning the production system, process and product control, and working with suppliers. Thesecond offering is a PhD degree that delivers the research workforce that can develop andinnovate new technologies and products.3-‐1 Curricula Development and Design Recognizing the fact that engineering curricula have been traditionally slow when responding toindustrial demands, and typically lack the “real-world” preparations demanded by industry ashighlighted by Miller7. So there is a need to develop a curricula design-structure that utilizes anobjective methodology and uses the industry input to yield a set of educational offerings thatcater to the professional and awareness skills
place.Industries are demanding that engineering graduates must have certain skills. In order to ensurequality assurance worldwide, an International Engineering Alliance [1] has been formed with thefollowing mission: Mission - working together to advance and benchmarking and mobility in the engineering profession.There are three agreements known as Washington, Dublin and Sidney Accords covering mutualrecognition in respect of tertiary-level qualifications in engineering.8.1 Washington, Dublin and Sidney AccordsThe Washington Accord signed in 1989 was the first – it recognizes substantial equivalence inthe accreditation of qualifications in professional engineering, normally of four years.The Sydney Accord which commenced in 2001
describes an on-going research project in establishing the validity of a direct methodfor teaching and measuring undergraduate engineering students’ professional skills. Proficiencyin engineering professional skills (Table 1) is critical for success in the multidisciplinary,intercultural team interactions that characterize global 21st century engineering careers. Yet,faculty members around the world have struggled to define, teach and measure professionalskills since their introduction as ABET criteria for engineering programs in 20001,2,3,4 . In fall2006, the Washington State University (WSU) College of Engineering in the northwesternUnited States (US) developed an innovative, direct method to teach and measure the ABETprofessional skills