thesedecisions easier.” The video, “The ethical dilemma of self-driving cars - Patrick Lin” [15]highlights the concerns about the information that might be used in such decisions in the future.The first task wraps up with another self-reflection specifically answering the prompts: (1) Didyou change your mind about anything? and (2) What is your take-away from the discussions?Following that orienting task, students are asked to complete the main assignment in teams. Theyare provided an outline of the steps needed to complete the assignment. To begin this task teamsselect a case study from the list of ethical cases provided by the Markkula Center for AppliedEthics. [16] They are recommended to choose ethical cases related to the engineering orcomputer
Paper ID #11891A First-Year Attrition Survey: Why Do They Say They Are Still Leaving?Mr. Jeff Johnson, LeTourneau University Jeff Johnson is an Assistant Professor at LeTourneau University. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering Technology from LeTourneau in 1994 then proceeded to spend 16 years in industry focusing on machine and civil design as well as project management. In 2010 he began his teaching career at his alma mater to share his experiences with engineering and technology students. He earned a masters in Engineering Project Management from Eastern Michigan University in 2014. He is currently a co-PI on
Paper ID #29726Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of University Students’ Ability toRelate Calculus Knowledge to Function GraphsDr. Emre Tokgoz, Quinnipiac University Emre Tokgoz is currently the Director and an Assistant Professor of Industrial Engineering at Quinnipiac University. He completed a Ph.D. in Mathematics and another Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineer- ing at the University of Oklahoma. His pedagogical research interest includes technology and calculus education of STEM majors. He worked on several IRB approved pedagogical studies to observe under- graduate and graduate mathematics and engineering
ultimately, the development of a joint proposal led byProfessor Grace O’Connell, and in collaboration with diverse faculty in theMechanical Engineering Department. The process undertaken by the faculty todevelop and execute this proposal will be described as well as our lessons learned.Finally, acknowledgements will be given to all those who contributed to this work. 2The college of Engineering is the 2nd largest college on campus and home to ~250 active faculty, 240 staff, and 6,000 students. At its core, our dean, Dean Tsu- Jae King Liu, is committed to and has prioritized the advancement of diversity, equity, and inclusion.With this principle in mind
).“Validating the use of concept-mapping as a diagnostic assessment tool in organic chemistry:implications for teaching”. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12, 133-141.[4] Enszer, J. A. (2018). “WIP: Exploring Mind Maps for Assessment in an IntroductoryChemical Engineering Course.” Proceedings 2018 ASEE Annual Conference.[5] Noor-A-Alam, M., & Mendez, J. (2022). “Construction and Use of a Concept Map in anUndergraduate Dynamics Class”. Proceedings 2022 ASEE Annual Conference.[6] Johnstone, A. H., & Otis, K. H. (2006). “Concept mapping in problem based learning: acautionary tale”. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7, 84-95.[7] Saqib, N. (2022). “Let’s Take a Look at the Exam Figure: A Heat Transfer Exam ReviewActivity
Paper ID #25639STEM Servingness at Hispanic Serving InstitutionsDr. Vignesh Subbian, The University of Arizona Vignesh Subbian is an Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Systems and Industrial Engineer- ing, member of the BIO5 Institute, and a Distinguished Fellow of the Center for University Education Scholarship at the University of Arizona. His professional areas of interest include medical informatics, healthcare systems engineering, and broadening participation in engineering and computing. Subbian’s educational research is focused on ethical decision-making and formation of identities in engineering.Dr
motivation, as well as the impact of student motivation and engagement on facultymotivation. We also noted that the open-ended nature of sociotechnical integration can causestress and interfere with motivation in some students. In [13], we articulated some of the barriersand opportunities our team had discovered in the creation of a broadly applicable assignment topromote sociotechnical integration.With this background in mind and a new opportunity to spend a semester at the University ofCalgary in Alberta, Canada, I set out to study how macroethics and social justice areconceptualized and incorporated into teaching and research within two different departments: theWerklund School of Education and the Schulich School of Engineering. Given my
Paper ID #35250Project Management Implementation in a Capstone Design CourseProf. Mike Simard PE, Villanova University Mike is an engineering leader with over 30 years’ experience in start-ups to Fortune 100 companies. Mike possesses both a Bachelor and Masters in Mechanical Engineering, as well as an MBA. He is a licensed Professional Engineer (PE), certified Project Manager Professional (PMP) and Certified Estimat- ing Professional (CEP). Mike has held senior positions in engineering design, project management and operations in the power generation, biomass conversion and building material industries. He has led a va
outputs can be classified into five categories, namely energy,material, information, generalized forces (includes moments) and generalized displacements(includes rotations). The later two categories are included to easily understand some of themechanical engineering tasks. The routes, through which the inputs are processed by the designto create the outputs, are called transmission paths that includes the processes of transfer,transmit, and transform. Thus, tracing the transmission paths is a crucial step in di entifyingfunctionality.2.3. Abstraction – ExampleLet us examine a task statement, that of “design a ship canal to connect two bodies of water.”The first thought that comes to mind is digging a simple “moat,” which is a possible
more effectively [8][9]. Notably, learning tocommunicate effectively (oral and written) requires correct sentence structure, which is lackingskill and requires assistance.Recognizing the root problem of engineering students' technical writing as inappropriate use ofsentence structure in English, this paper focuses on creating means to allow students to conveytheir thoughts using correct sentence structure. Prior literature suggests that complete sentenceseffectively allow an individual to communicate with another because complete sentencesenhance the strength and meaning of the ideas in the writer's mind [10].We hypothesize that this model will assist students in classifying written sentences asdeclarative, interrogative, imperative
Connecting Mentor Partners forAcademic Success of Undergraduates in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics.”https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1930461 (accessed April 27, 2023)2. H. McDevitt. “Haley McDevitt.” https://www.haleymcdevitt.com/ (accessed April 27, 2023)3. David Sibbet, "A graphic facilitation retrospective," Adapted from presentation at theInternational Association of Facilitators The Art and Mastery of Facilitation–Navigating theFuture IAF Conference, pp. 16-20, 2001.4. A. Gonzalez. “A Mindful Way to Reflect: Rose, Thorn, and Bud.” mindfulschools.orghttps://www.mindfulschools.org/inspiration/mindful-reflection/ (accessed April 27, 2023)5. Karima Kadi-Hanifi, Ozlem Dagman, John Peters, Ellen Snell, Caroline Tutton &
AC 2008-397: ENHANCING DESIGN LEARNING BY IMPLEMENTINGELECTRONIC PORTFOLIOSMieke Schuurman, Pennsylvania State University Mieke Schuurman is an engineering education research associate with the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education in the College of Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University. She received her Masters and PhD in Social & Organizational Psychology from the University of Groningen (The Netherlands). Her work focuses on the enhancement of engineering education. She is a member of ASEE and WEPAN, and actively involved in ASEE's Cooperative Education Division as their Research Chair. She has presented her work at annual conferences of ASEE, WEPAN
Paper ID #18133Research Experiences for School Teachers and Community College Instruc-tors in Smart-Vehicles: Initial Implementation and AssessmentDr. Kumar Yelamarthi, Central Michigan University Kumar Yelamarthi received his Ph.D. and M.S degree from Wright State University in 2008 and 2004, and B.E. from University of Madras, India in 2000. He is currently an Associate Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering at Central Michigan University. His research interest is in the areas of Wireless Sensor Networks, Internet of Things, computer aided design tool development, assistive devices, au- tonomous adaptive
Paper ID #21519How Free Choice Affects Student Interest in a Junior-level Embedded Sys-tems Lab CourseMr. Michael Trent Bolt, Auburn University Michael Bolt is a graduate student at Auburn University pursuing a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering. He is currently working as a research assistant to Dr. Mark L. Adams in the STORM Lab. His current projects include embedded system programming for environmental sensing projects, X-band RF design work, and the reorganization of lab course content to increase student interest in subject material.Mr. Andrew Cookston, Auburn University Andrew Cookston is a graduate student in the
techniques including particular statistical techniques;8. Strong numerical and analytical skills;9. Strong oral and written communication skills, including preparation and delivery of professional, technical and non-technical reports and presentations;10. Time management skills.At the end of the period the students will be able to understand the real economic and socialimpact of engineering in this century. Another target goal to be achieved is to foster among themthe entrepreneurial mind to pursue other opportunities than find a job in a company. For theuniversity the final goal is to attract more students and enlarge the number of students inengineering programs. Besides by law the universities should to provide
the DIB and meetings with content-area experts led to the discoveryof five technical areas and nine non-technical professional skills that are highly desired in entry-level microelectronics engineers. The five technical areas include Radiation Hardening, System-On-Chip, Heterogeneous Integration and Advanced Packaging, Supply Chain, and Trusted AI.These technical areas represent high-need pathways and gaps in the existing microelectronicsworkforce. Additionally, nine professional skills were documented, including communication;diversity, equity, and inclusion; engineering habits of mind; leadership; lifelong learning; multi-disciplinary problem solving; professional and ethical responsibility; teamwork; andunderstanding solutions, impacts
throughantiquated methods such as: multiple choice, true/false, essay or thesis presentations. Thebest measure of a growing leader occurs when the challenge is fairly well defined, yet theanswer is unknown. The best solutions are developed when a group of like-minded peopleembrace a challenge together and through their diversity of thought and backgrounddiscover several plausible choices and embrace the "best” answer, not just the first correctanswer.A second example of how "The Bottom 3" attitude in The School of Engineering is makinga difference is at California Polytechnic San Luis Obispo; better known as Cal Poly, SLO.Key to Cal Poly, SLO’s success is that the School of Engineering bases its curriculum on
2004-1464 Cross-Functional Student Teams as a Teaching Tool for Enhanced Learning W. A. Clark, K.V. Johnson and C.A. Turner East Tennessee State University, Johnson CityAbstractTraditional engineering and science teaching methodology has been to train like-minded studentswithin the discipline of their respective majors. Curriculum time constraints, however, limit thenumber and nature of out of discipline elective courses. As a result, students are well trainedwithin their respective fields of study but lack the breadth of experience in interacting with
1 Design of a Hexacopter for Agricultural Spraying - A Collaboration Project between West Texas A&M University and FH JOANNEUM Roy J. Issa Mechanical Engineering Division West Texas A&M University Reinhard Puffing Aviation Institute FH JOANNEUM/University of Applied Sciences Graz, Austria Emad Manla Electrical Engineering Division
AC 2008-1681: SYSTEMS DESIGN USING REAL-WORLD EXPERIENCES WITHINDUSTRYROBERT GRAY, Penn State Erie Robert Gray earned a Ph.D. in EE from The Ohio University and a MSEE from the United States Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT). His technical practice involves wireless communication, guidance & controls systems, including integration of GPS, Inertial Navigation, MEMs and Radar systems. Previous experience before joining Penn State included: Senior Engineer of wireless remote control locomotive systems, GE Transportation Systems; Avionics Systems & Research Engineer for sensor fusion & GPS/Inertial Navigation systems integration, USAF; and field maintenance and reconnaissance aircraft
3 Internal Combustion Engines 4 Combustion Turbines 5 Fuel Cells 6 Heat Exchangers 7 Absorption Chillers 8 Desiccant Dehumidifiers 9 Case Study BibliographyPictures, illustrations, and tables are extensively used to aid in student appeal and understanding.The Bibliography section was developed with instructors in mind and contains citations
convinced a student wasready to be effective in the real world, and they failed systems. Students are not allowed tograduate until their work is satisfactory.V. Project ProposalAs a junior in the OC engineering program, David Compton was also a percussionist in the OCband and involved in some stage productions. He saw that setting up microphones for drumstook a long time and that they were easy to knock over. He saw a potential to do a systemsdesign project that would address this issue, and his original idea was to find a way to putmicrophones inside drums. He confided in several relatives and friends, and they all warned himagainst revealing too much to his professors. They had in mind professors who might be lookingfor an idea to steal. But from
Paper ID #41547Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) Accelerator Program: Overview,Results, and Lessons LearnedDr. Lisa Bosman, Purdue University Dr. Bosman holds a PhD in Industrial Engineering. Her engineering education research interests include entrepreneurially minded learning, energy education, interdisciplinary education, and faculty professional development.Dr. Katey Shirey, EduKatey As the founder of eduKatey, Dr. Katey Shirey supports science and math educators worldwide to bridge their content areas and bring engineering design and creativity to their students. Dr. Shirey earned her BA in physics, BA
Assessment of Student Attitudes and its Impact in a Hands-On Programming Model for the Introductory Programming Course Sheikh Ghafoor, Stephen Canfield, Michael Kelley, Tristan Hill Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, TennesseeSTEPHEN CANFIELDStephen Canfield is a professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at TennesseeTechnological University. He received his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering at Virginia Techin the field of parallel architecture robotics. His research interests include robotkinematics and dynamics, topological optimization of compliant manipulators and in-spacemechanisms active student learning and undergraduate student researchSHEIKH GHAFOORSheikh
Session 2548 Teaching Technical Communications to Engineering Technology Students: A Case Study Approach Paula Ford, Sohail Anwar The Pennsylvania State University—Altoona CollegeAbstractOne alternative to a long term-paper assignment in a technical writing course is the short memo.Engineering technology students enrolled in Ms. Ford’s sections of Technical Writing, English202C, at Penn State University—Altoona College are required to write a number of memos andshort reports in response to case studies. These case studies are designed to approximate thetypes of writing
technical elective for students who major inmechanical engineering and have had the traditional prerequisites for classical fluidmechanics.The course was first offered in the spring semester, 2005. The total student populationequaled 38 with 21 bioengineering majors and 17 mechanical engineering majors. Theincoming cumulative grade point averages of both sets of students wereapproximately the same (2.86/4.00 vs. 2.88/4.00).ApproachThe approach taken in this first offering of the course was integrative in structure andincluded as well current movie titles to generate in-class discussions and follow-upcritical review essays. A mind-map of the course topics and activities is presented inFigure 1
Paper ID #49803GIFTS: A CHEESE-Y Approach to SafetyDagan Trnka, Duke University Dagan Trnka is the Engineering Manager of Duke’s Design POD, the flagship makerspace for the engineering school’s First Year Design program. Dagan brings with him his startup experience as a mechanical design engineer where he learned about entrepreneurship, prototyping, and lean manufacturing. Dagan uses that experience and his passion for making and teaching to create spaces where experiential learning can thrive.Ali N Stocks, Duke University FYEE 2025 Conference: University of Maryland - College Park, Maryland Jul 27
document all my work in this way was different than any other class I had been in before so it was a hard adjustment.EPICS teaches a user-centered design approach that is consistent with the goals of EWB-USA.The course structure allowed students to learn a framework and reflect on how that approachapplied to their project work. Several students identified the user-centered approach in theirreflections on their learning. This semester was an extremely useful experience in the social aspect of my understanding of engineering. Working with our project partners in Uganda and developing a solution with cultural aspects in mind has helped me to develop a much more broad scope of mu cultural understanding. Working with
readiness, and itsultimate goal is increasing retention in this population [1], [2]. In addition to cohorting studentsin STEM courses, the GELC program requires students to co-enroll in a learning strategiescourse. The course is designed to develop self-regulatory, academic, and social-psychologicalcompetence for students through its three primary units: Habits of Professionals, Habits ofLearning, and Habits of Mind. An overarching goal of the course is to support students inbecoming successful STEM students and future engineering professionals. While the course is inits fourth iteration, the Fall 2020 semester marks the first use of the LASSI within the learningstrategies course. Our approach went beyond using the LASSI as a measure of
Tacit Knowledge in the Innovation Process Robert J. Podlasek, PH.D, PE Department of Mechanical Engineering Bradley UniversityAbstractTechnical innovation and entrepreneurship drive economic growth and prosperity. The successof the innovation process depends on utilizing new and existing technical knowledgeexpeditiously and in novel ways. Many new ideas are the result of the convergence of knowledgefrom seemingly unrelated domains and/or fields of interest. Moreover, innovative ideas tend toemerge from a combination of experience, published information, and dialogue. This process ofcollaboration and team science to