this paper wedescribe the design of the new general engineering curriculum at the University of San Diego.The argument for an engineering curriculum with a broad foundation that includes the liberal artsis not novel. Just after the creation of the National Science Foundation (NSF) in 1955, theEngineers’ Council for Professional Development commissioned a study to investigate howengineering education could keep pace with rapid developments in science and technology. Theresult of this study was the influential Grinter report1, among whose recommendations includedan emphasis on the importance of integrating liberal arts into engineering education. While thereport argued for balance between the technical and liberal arts, few current
AC 2007-1732: DELIVERING CORE ENGINEERING CONCEPTS TOSECONDARY LEVEL STUDENTSChris Merrill, Illinois State UniversityRodney Custer, Illinois State UniversityJenny Daugherty, University of Illinois,-Urbana-ChampaignMartin Westrick, University of Illinois,-Urbana-ChampaignYong Zeng, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign Page 12.443.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Delivering Core Engineering Concepts to Secondary Level StudentsIntroductionWithin primary and secondary school technology education, engineering has been proposed asan avenue to bring about technological literacy. 1,2 Different initiatives such as curriculumdevelopment projects (i.e., Project
receptacles. Confined to an office, someonepours the available material resources onto a table. As time passes, disaster seems to beinevitable, when the engineers emerge victorious. Amazingly, they have crafted a solution from,among other things, duct tape, plastic bags, and pieces of the flight plan document. This isengineering at its unambiguous best. When needs, goals, time constraints, and availableresources are unambiguous, engineers can solve problems.Rarely, however, are the scope and boundary of an engineer's work so well defined. In theUnited States, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) describesengineering as devising components, systems and processes to meet needs. This is the process
program are either interested in engineering management careers, or areusing the degree as a foundation for careers other than engineering. Because of the diversestudent interests, the course is designed to allow the students to understand the pervasive role ofgovernment in the technical arena, and the need to use/manage technology within that context.The emphasis of the course material is on the federal level, however international, state, andlocal differences are included. This paper presents the curriculum for EP251 and discussesinstructor observations about how well the course works for sophomore engineering students.The instructor is interested in feedback about the need for such a curriculum.IntroductionLafayette College offers a sophomore
Paper ID #24495Autonomous Robot Vehicle: Incorporating Coding and Manufacturing Engi-neering Concepts in a Freshman Engineering Design CourseDr. Lunal Khuon, Drexel University Dr. Lunal Khuon is an Associate Clinical Professor at Drexel University in the Engineering Technology (ET) Department. He also serves as the Assistant Department Head for Graduate Studies and the Director of Research for the ET Department as well as oversees the Biomedical Engineering Technology concen- tration. Prior to Drexel, Dr. Khuon had previously held design and system positions at Texas Instruments, Motorola, Hughes, and IBM and faculty
2020.[3] K.M. Kecskemety, K.A. Parris, "Exploring the impact of a Matlab programming interactive e-textbook in a first-year engineering course," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2019.[4] R. Aust, M.J. Kelley, and W. Roby, "The use of hyper-reference and conventional dictionaries," Educational Technology, Research and Development, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 63-73, 1993.[5] R. McFall, H. Dershem, and D. Davis, "Experiences using a collaborative electronic textbook: Bringing the 'guide on the side' home with you," Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, March 2007.[6] A. de Noyelles and J. Raible, "Exploring the Use of E-Textbooks in Higher Education
careers, and are focused on those who are underrepresented in STEM and underserved. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Promoting the STEM Pipeline and Enhancing STEM Career AwarenessThrough Participation in Authentic Research Activities (RTP, Diversity) AbstractTo promote the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) pipeline andenhance the participation of students who have been historically underrepresented in STEMfields in the U.S, a team of faculty investigators with diverse expertise in STEM, education,public health and medicine have been working collaboratively on a National Institutes of Health(NIH)-funded STEM education project
theyparticipated because they enjoy being involved in novel projects and those associated withengineering and technology. One student indicated that she had created a portfolio in highschool and was intrigued by creating an online portfolio.Eighty-eight percent of the engineering students who participated in the fall 2003 VTeP pilotexpressed satisfaction in the experience and a desire to continue to develop their ePortfolio.They cite an advantage in being able to keep a record of achievements and job experience andfeel that the ePortfolio will benefit them in future job searches. In addition, four studentsexpressed a desire to delve deeper into the system than they had time to do during the semester.Only two of the participating students indicated that
engineering, technology and scienceinstruction as well as having a secondary impact in the preparation of future teachers. Two workshopswere held in July 1998 and July 1999. Participants gained experience in process engineering throughhands-on laboratories, industry experts, and interactive demonstrations. Through industry involvementfrom 10 process engineering companies, faculty were given an initial networking base. Companiescontributing industrial speakers include Sony Music, Inductotherm, DuPont Engineering, Bristol-MyersSquibb, Chemical Industry Council of New Jersey, Cochrane, Tasty Baking Co., DuPontPharmaceuticals, DuPont Nylon, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, AE Technology-Hyprotech, and MobilTechnology Co. Participants use the given
Session 2793 History in Engineering Education: A Field Report W. Russell Callen, Steven W. Usselman School of Electrical and Computer Engineering/ School of History, Technology and Society Georgia Institute of Technology This is a paper about history in engineering education, not about the history of engineering education. Still, it isuseful at the start to take the historian’s perspective and to remember that curriculum reform has been a recurrenttheme of modern engineering education ever
Session 1455 Lifelong Learning for Innovation and Leadership in Engineering D. A. Keating, 1 T. G. Stanford, 1 D. D. Dunlap, 2 R. J. Bennett, 3 M. I. Mendelson, 4 D. H. Sebastian, 5 S. J. Tricamo 5 University of South Carolina 1 / Western Carolina University 2 St Thomas University 3 / Loyola Marymount University 4 New Jersey Institute of Technology 5 AbstractIn many ways graduate engineering education has served the U.S. well. But there is now broadrecognition that it must change
by the National Association of Manufacturers(NAM)2, U.S. manufacturing companies in 2018 accounted “for 11.39% of the total output in theeconomy, employing 8.51% of the workforce. Total output from manufacturing was $2,334.60billion in 2018. In addition, there were an average of 12.8 million manufacturing employees inthe United States in 2018, with an average annual compensation of $84,832.13 in 2017”. Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © American Society for Engineering Education 1According to National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)’s ManufacturingInnovation Blog3, “manufacturing engineering is a branch of engineering that
Session 3630 The Multimedia Instruction Initiative: Implications for Engineering Education Robert A. Chin, Amy R. Frank East Carolina UniversityRecently, East Carolina University reiterated its commitment to the delivery of high quality and effectiveinstruction through their Multimedia Instruction Initiative. The purpose of the Initiative was to assist faculty inintegrating electronically based instructional computing technologies into their respective curricula. A requestfor proposals yielded 39
AC 2011-279: EDGE DETECTORS IN IMAGE PROCESSINGJohn Schmeelk, Virginia Commonwealth University/Qatar Dr. John Schmeelk is a Professor of mathematics at Virginia Commonwealth University teaching mathe- matics at VCU/Qatar campus in Doha, Qatar. He received his PhD from George Washington University in Washington, D.C. He has been an invited speaker to conferences in Australia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Hungary, India, United Arab emmirate, Qatar and many other lands. Page 22.518.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Edge Detectors in Image
Paper ID #23374Learning Advanced Mathematics Through Engineering Design (Resource Ex-change)Mr. Euisuk Sung, Purdue University, West Lafayette Euisuk Sung is a Ph.D. candidate at Purdue University. He is majoring in Engineering and Technology Teacher Education. He has a computer science degree and experienced in working in a computer software company over three years. He served as an engineering and technology educator in middle and high schools for 9 years in South Korea. Currently he is working in an NSF granted , titled TRAILS. His research interests are design cognition, design process model, and all about STEM
withrespect to US and international hypersonic vehicle research. The focus has been to: “…identify current international government and commercial sponsored programs that are investing in research and development of technologies for hypersonics air-breathing engines, atmospheric re-entry, and spaceplane concepts. Identify and describe the key technologies each projects is attempting to mature, their current schedule or roadmap, and the mission that the technologies would support.”The current DB user is focused on top-level managerial and policy-making decisions, thereforethe content displayed is broad but shallow, and does not explore the deeper technical workings ofproject. The goal of this project is to not only produce a support
head of the Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering major. He earned his MS degree in Ocean Engineering and PhD degree in Hydrodynamics from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Address: U.S. Coast Guard Academy, Department of Engineering, 27 Mohegan Ave., New London, CT 06320-8101; telephone: 860-444-8551; fax: 860-444-8546; e-mail: Todd.E.Taylor@uscga.edu.Corinna Fleischmann, U.S. Coast Guard Academy Corinna Fleischmann, MSCE, PE, is an instructor at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy (USCGA). She graduated from USCGA with his BSCE in 1998 and earned her MSCE from University of Texas, Austin in 2004. She holds the rank of Lieutenant in the U.S. Coast Guard. Address
declaration: Creating a sustainable world that provides a safe, secure, healthy life for all peoples is a priority for the U.S. engineering community. It is evident that the U.S. engineering community must increase its focus on sharing and disseminating information, knowledge and technology that provides access to minerals, materials, energy, water, food and public health while addressing basic human needs. Engineers must deliver solutions that are technically viable, commercially feasible, and environmentally and socially sustainable.5Clearly, sustainability education will play a major role in providing society with engineers whoare environmentally conscious and critically aware of the global engineering
AC 2009-606: APPLICATION OF THE EXCEED TEACHING MODEL TOIMPROVE GRADUATE TEACHING IN ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERINGCOURSESAudra Morse, Texas Tech Page 14.223.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009Application of the ExCEEd Teaching Model to Improve Graduate Teaching in Environmental Engineering Courses Page 14.223.2AbstractMany universities employ graduate teaching assistants to help reduce faculty teaching loads.However, the graduate teaching assistants may receive little to no training on teachingeffectiveness. Some universities may have programs to mentor graduate students in effectiveteaching strategies
Paper ID #21258Assessment of the Impact of Summer STEAM Programs on High School Par-ticipants’ Content Knowledge and Attitude Towards STEAM CareersMr. Marcelo Caplan, Columbia College Marcelo Caplan - Associate Professor, Department of Science and Mathematics, Columbia College Chicago. In addition to my teaching responsibilities, I am involved in the community engagement programs and activities of the department. I am the coordinator of three outreach programs 1) the NSF-ISE project ”Scientists for Tomorrow” which goal is to promote Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) learning in community centers in the
working knowledge of each individual aspectof software engineering, and also have gained experience in how these aspects are related to, anddepend on, one another in order to successfully develop a software system. Through this process,we can help students make software testing an integral part of their coding practice with theunderstanding that testing cannot just be added on to the software at the last minute after it isproduced.Currently, we are working on a TUES (Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science,Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) Type II project funded by NSF to develop a set ofinstructional materials in the form of course modules, not confined to a particular technique ortool but generalized over different aspects of
social sciences in the curriculum of the college was asserted. The paragraphcontinues: “The College was founded in the belief that a special need exists for physical scientists and engineers with broad enough training in the social sciences and humanities to assume technical responsibility with an understanding of the relation of technology to the rest of society.”This was the first published mission statement of the new college and it reflected the strongbelief at the time that the humanities and social sciences had a new historical role to play in theeducation of engineers and scientists. It was recognized that the professional training of engineersand scientists would require utilitarian courses in report writing
Paper ID #36229Using qualitative research methodology to examine women STEM faculty’sparticipation in entrepreneurship education programsAida L´opez RuizDr. Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology Prateek Shekhar is an Assistant Professor - Engineering Education at New Jersey Institute of Technology. His research is focused on examining translation of engineering education research in practice, assessment and evaluation of dissemination initiatives and educational programs in engineering disciplines. He holds a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin, M.S. in Electrical Engineering
AC 2008-1616: INTEGRATING ENGINEERING ETHICS EDUCATION INTO AMULTI-DISCIPLINARY SEMINAR COURSE: MAKING THE “SOFT”OUTCOMES RELEVANTDavid Cottrell, University of North Carolina at Charlotte DR. DAVID S. COTTRELL is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He graduated from the United States Military Academy in 1978 and retired in 2000 after more than 22 years of service with the US Army Corps of Engineers. Studies at Texas A&M University resulted in an MS Degree in Civil Engineering in 1987 and a PhD in 1995. He is a registered Professional Engineer and has taught courses in statics, dynamics, mechanics of materials, graphic
Software Engineering2004 (SE2004) report developed by the joint IEEE-CS/ACM task force which presented detailedcurriculum guidelines for software engineering undergraduate degree programs, SWE educatorshave had the luxury of much needed guidance about what our curricula should look like. Theicing on the cake took the form of Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET)accreditation of software engineering programs by the Engineering Accreditation Commission(EAC); we finally made the cut and were being recognized as real engineers by the engineeringaccreditation commission, but at what price? SE2004 did an excellent job of elucidating theunderpinnings of all engineering disciplines including software engineering. It also identified
inengineering education by integrating instructional design techniques, transforming theclassroom into a cooperative learning environment, and incorporating the use ofinformation technology in the teaching/learning process. One of the major outcomes ofthat work is a conceptual framework for assisting faculty in transitioning from moretraditional instructional modes to more collaborative modes of instruction. Drawingheavily on a typical engineering process, this framework maps concepts readilyunderstood in the engineering design world to the development of instructionalexperiences. This paper outlines that framework and discusses our efforts to export thisframework to faculty beyond Bucknell through a pair of national workshops conductedlast summer
Virginia Tech Engineeringand Education faculty, K-12 educators, corporations, and policy/decision makers throughoutVirginia in order to improve engineering education. The specific objectives are to: (i) develop anew Masters/Technology Education Teaching Licensure Option for engineering graduates; (ii)create a contemporary framework for undergraduate engineering pedagogy, beginning withfreshman engineering experiences; and (iii) initiate the “Virginia Engineering /EducationCollaborative” to ensure stakeholders’ ownership of project outcomes.A number of initiatives are currently underway to create the proposed contemporary curriculumframework. These initiatives can be classified into following categories: • Collection and analysis of data
leading to adegree in engineering are substantially equivalent and that the accredited programs of bothparties satisfy the academic requirements for entry to the practice of engineering at a professionallevel.The first of these agreements was signed in 1980 by the CEAB and the EngineeringAccreditation Commission (EAC) of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology Page 7.474.3(ABET) in the United States of America. This agreement was updated and ratified by bo th “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2002, American Society for Engineering
AC 2012-4810: AN AUTOMATED APPROACH TO ASSESSING THE QUAL-ITY OF CODE REVIEWSLakshmi RamachandranDr. Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University Ed Gehringer is an Associate Professor in the departments of Computer Science and Electrical & Com- puter Engineering at North Carolina State University. He received his Ph.D. from Purdue University and has also taught at Carnegie Mellon University and Monash University in Australia. His research interests lie mainly in computer-supported cooperative learning. Page 25.154.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 An
course? Please check all types of questions you ask on you exams: Please check all types of technology that you incorporate in your Engineering Economy course: Please check all of the following teaching methods that you use in your Engineering Economy course: Figure 1: Quantitative Survey Questions. Page 22.58.3Survey Results for Instruction The survey results from the Instruction section give an indication of who is teaching theEngineering Economy course across U.S. classrooms. According to the participants’ responsesto the highest degree they have