(1992).16. Hansen, J. & Campbell, D. Manual for the SVIB-SCII. (Stanford University Press, 1985).17. Voss, J. & Schauble, L. in The role of interest in learning and development (eds. Renninger, A., Hidi, S. & Krapp, A.) (Psychology Press, 1992).18. Eccles, J., Wigfield, A. & Schiefele, U. in Handbook of child psychology 1017–1095 (John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1998).19. Hidi, S. Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Rev. Educ. Res. 60, 549–571 (1990).20. Pintrich, P. A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. J. Educ. Psychol. 95, 667 (2003).21. Schiefele, U., Krapp, A. & Winteler, A. in The role of interest in
and high-school children) had a contractual right to use the Field Houseand adjacent play areas. In addition to the these formal relations, students had to treat thelarger network of local residents, businesses and institutions as part of their user group(s),if not their actual client(s).The Berg: Coursework and CurriculumThe authors set up two related courses: a six-unit section of the Comprehensive DesignStudio, open to fourth-year undergraduates in SU’s professional program, and a three-credit hour professional elective, open to students in architecture and engineering.Students enrolled in these two courses were joined by a student in Industrial Design fromthe school of Visual and Performing Arts and the aforementioned pair of
-known being the Myers Brigg Personality Type Indicator® (MBTI). The MBTI identifies16 different personality types founded on preferences in four major categories based on Jung’sTheory of Psychological Types. MBTI results indicate whether a person tends to be extroverted(E) or introverted (I), sensing (S) or intuitive (N), thinking (T) or feeling (F), and judging (J) or Page 26.411.2perceiving (P). Extroverted types focus energy on the outer world while introverted types focusenergy on the inner world. Sensing types process information through actual facts and detailsthat they encounter through their senses while intuitive types think more in
, 2016. 5. Reese, S. (2001). Excellence in engineering technology education. Techniques, 4, 26-27. 6. Kaufman, A., Warner, S., & Buechele, J., (2011). The characteristics of model technology education teacher. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 3, 25-34. 7. ASME Vision 2030 Task Force (2012). Vision 2030: Creating the Future of Mechanical Engineering Education, Phase 1 Final Report, https://community.asme.org/board_education/w/wiki/7883.asme-vision- 2030-project.aspx; retrieved February 1, 2016. 8. Grinter, I.E. chair, ASEE Committee on Evaluation of Engineering Education (1955). Summary of the Report on Evaluation of Engineering Education. Reprinted, Journal of Engineering Education, January
EngineeringSummer Undergraduate Research Program. We thank Dr. Richard Heiberger, Professor Emeritusof the Statistics Department at Temple University for his contribution in data analysis. We aregrateful to Dr. Brian Butz, Professor Emeritus of the ECE Department for his insightful remarkson the development of the framework.Bibliography1. C. Knight and S. DeWeerth, “A shared remote testing environment for engineering education,” in Frontiers in Education Conference, 1996. FIE ’96. 26th Annual Conference., Proceedings of, vol. 3, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, Nov 1996, pp. 1003–1006.2. Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.3. R. Adams, D
project– one that not only exercised the capabilities of the microcontroller, but also related to their ownfield(s) of endeavor. These team proposals were then evaluated and adjusted based on a) whetherthe project was too trivial; b) whether the project was overly complex for the scope of the course;and c) whether (hardware) resources were available to fulfill the project.Team projects make use of sensors and actuators that the students have had to identify during theplanning phase. Each team is in charge of its project design with the advice of the lab assistantsand the instructor. As part of the project, each team had to become familiar with sources forsensors or components for their projects. The predominant source of such components
examine solutions of their own. Students must understand the basicterminologies associated with different technologies. Being a college freshman student issufficient to understand the content of this course.Instruction consists of:a. Topics introduced through lectures, discussions, and reading assignments;b. Students working individually and collaboratively to complete assigned tasks and projects;c. Field activities, Internet, and library research on assigned subjects;d. Oral and multimedia presentations and written assignments;e. Quizzes, midterm test, and final exam.After an extensive search the selected book for the course was “Technology and Society:Issues for the 21st Century and Beyond / 3rd Edition” by Linda S. Hjorth, Barbara
characteristics likely to predict their success in Dynamics? 2. Is this DFW rate improvement most closely related to the gradual improvement in the Freeform environment or instructor characteristics as (s)he implements the course environment?The authors hypothesize that the likelihood of DFW would drop in each year following theinception of Freeform as the new environment is institutionalized as the standard for ME 274and as instructors add and enhance the ABC components of Freeform (RQ2). Moreover, as anygiven instructor becomes comfortable with the environment and more confident and strategicabout their implementation of the course, the likelihood of student success would also increase.However, over the same time period for Dynamics at
Teaching International, 45(4), pp. 375-387.[12] Pierre-Antoine, R., Sheppard, S. D., and Schar, M., 2014, “Utilizing Concept Maps to Improve Engineering Course Curriculum in Teaching Mechanics,” Proceedings of the 2014ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, June 15-18, 2014.[13] Triplett, J., Kelly, J. E., Krause, S. J., 2011, “Development and Use of Concept Context Maps to Promote Student,” Proceedings of the 2011ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 26- 29, 2011.[14] Daugherty, J. L., Custer, R. L., and Dixon, R. A., 2011, “The Use of Concept Mapping to Structure a Conceptual Foundation for Secondary Level Engineering Education,” Proceedings of the
course, as it teaches us lessons that no textbook can convey.”Based on the student evaluation comments, these techniques will be modified and implementedinto the capstone design sequences in the coming year. Additionally, a participant focus groupwill be performed during the spring term, prior to the ASEE meeting.Bibliography1) Arrasmith, W. and Dinally, J.: Collaborative, Multi Disciplinary Learning Through Dynamic, Video Game Knowledge Modules: System Engineering Application, Paper presented at 2007 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii, June 2007.2) Atman, C., Adams, R., Cardella, M., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., and Saleem, J.: Engineering Design Processes: A Comparison of Students and Expert Practitioners, Journal of
s Contaminants Power Water Purifier in Retained/Store d Consumer Relocation Assembly Raw Noise of waters
, Retaining and Graduating More Women in Computer Science and Math Abstract We report on the CS/M Scholars Program which is supported by an NSF S-STEM grant that began in 2011. The program aims to increase the number of women graduating with degrees in Computer Science or Mathematics. It is well known that women are under- represented in these fields nationally and this is also the case at our university. Our efforts include targeted recruitment of female high school students with a record of academic achievement and leadership potential. In addition to providing scholarships, student success is bolstered by required first-year seminars, early advising, and monthly events focused on professional
fields that comprise pre-secondaryinstruction. This can limit their understanding of STEM content. Fellows offer rich contentknowledge in their fields. Fellows benefit from being in the classroom by developing moreeffective communication and teaching skills.2 This experience strengthens fellows’ abilities tocommunicate in research teams and prepares future Ph.D.’s to offer effective college instruction.It has also been found that classrooms with a fellow report more positive attitudes with respect toscience than those that did not have a fellow by the end of the year.4Grade Level Adaptions Fellows have many opportunities to implement the lesson plans that are presented at theworkshop or that they themselves create with partner teachers
1993-1998 Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Maryland, Baltimore County Mechanical Engineer 1989-1995 EEC Consulting Rockville, MD President, Dome Enterprises 1989 - 1993 Bethesda MD HONORS AND AWARDS Best Presentation Award, ICESEEI 2016 : 18th International Conference on Educational Sciences and Effective Educational Instructions. Paris France 2016 Outstanding Service and Commitment to the En- richment of the Science and Technology Program, Eleanor Roosevelt H.S., Greenbelt MD, 05/2003 SELECTED PUBLICATIONS 1. A. Bouabid, B. Bielenberg, S. Ainane, N. Pasha, ”Learning Outcomes Alignment across Engineering Core Courses”, 18th International Conference on Educational Sciences and Effective
-based practice in stem education,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, (Indianapolis, Indiana), ASEE Conferences, June 2014. https://peer.asee.org/23306. [6] D. M. Riley, “Aiding and abeting: The bankruptcy of outcomes-based education as a change strategy,” in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, (San Antonio, Texas), ASEE Conferences, June 2012. https://peer.asee.org/20901. [7] A. D. de Figueiredo and A. P. Afonso, Context and Learning: A Philosophical Framework. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2006. [8] I. Scheffler, Reason and Teaching. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1973. [9] G. Domenico and M. B. Burkins, Holistic engineering education: beyond technology. New York: Springer, 2010.[10] H. Morgan and S
and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education.Engineering Education, V. 78 (7), pp. 674-681.Foor, C., Walden, S., and D. Trytten. 2007. “I Wish that I Belonged More in this WholeEngineering Group:”Achieving Individual Diversity. Journal of Engineering Education. 96:2,103-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00921.xGoldman, C. 2012. A Cohort-based Learning Community Enhances Academic Success andSatisfaction with University Experience for First-Year Students. The Canadian Journal for theScholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3:2. http://dx.doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2012.2.3Johnson, S. Luyben, W. and D. Talhelm. 1995. Undergraduate Interdisciplinary ControlsLaboratory. Journal of Engineering Education. 84:2, 133-136. https://doi.org
Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active researcher, including studying academic policies, gender and ethnicity issues, transfers, and matriculation models with MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engi- neering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork models, broadening participation initiatives, and S-STEM and LSAMP programs.Dr. Rebecca Brent, Education Designs, Inc Rebecca Brent is President of Education Designs, Inc., a consulting firm located in Chapel Hill, N.C. She is a certified program evaluator and a faculty development consultant. Brent received
the effects of changing variables. In this paper we discuss thefunctionality and capabilities of the tool and provide a few example use cases that can serve as alaunching point for instructors who may consider adopting it in their courses.Fig. 1 - Example of the single-point property calculator.Fig. 2 - Example T-s diagram for the state shown.4. SurveyWe implemented these PYroMat based calculators in a single undergraduate engineeringthermodynamics course as a pilot test and gathered usability data to help guide future tooldesign. Students in the course were trained using both traditional table methods and the onlinetool, and were asked to use the tool for completion of their homework assignments throughoutthe semester. A total of eight
.[2] Cyber Seek, “Cybersecurity Supply/Demand Heat Map,” Cyber Seek Website, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.cyberseek.org/heatmap.html. [Accessed: 03-Feb-2019].[3] M. Egele, T. Scholte, E. Kirda, and C. Kruegel, “A survey on automated dynamic malware-analysis techniques and tools,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 1–42, Feb. 2012.[4] S. Kalra and S. K. Sood, “Elliptic curve cryptography,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computing and Artificial Intelligence - ACAI ’11, 2011, pp. 102–106.[5] A. Cheddad, J. Condell, K. Curran, and P. Mc Kevitt, “Digital image steganography: Survey and analysis of current methods,” Signal Processing, vol. 90, no. 3, pp
evolve both the CT-integrated activities and the research instruments for the most effective curriculum design. The curriculum will follow design principles and inclusive engineering experiences from Cunningham and Lachapell [21] and follow a 5-E constructivist model of engage, explore, explain, elaborate and evaluate [22]. CT thinking practices were pulled by the university research team from Weintrop et al.’s Taxonomy of CT [23] for integration with STEM. Those practices include Data Collection, Data Creation, Understanding a System as a Whole, Understanding the Relationship Between Parts of a System, Preparing Problems for Computational Solutions, a bit of Programming, and Using Computational Models to Solve a Problem. Data Practices
middle school science classroom can video games and alternative text heighten engagement and learning for students with learning disabilities?. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(2), 87-99.3. Israel, M., Marino, M., Delisio, L., & Serianni, B. (2014) Innovation configuration on supporting content learning through technology for K-12 students with disabilities CEEDAR Center, University of Florida: Gainesville, FL4. Basham, J. D., Smith, S. J., Greer, D. L., & Marino, M. T. (2013). The scaled arrival of K-12 online education: Emerging realities and implications for the future of education. Journal of Education. 193(2), 51-60.5. Vasquez, E. (2018, July). Keynote: Leveraging innovation for enhanced supports for
implementation with emphasis on two of the classrooms inparticular, as the third class will be included in a later study.Classroom Implementation ExperimentFor on-site mentoring Prof. Van Wie met with two implementing professors: Prof. S. Wilson (UK-Lex) in a Fall 2016 visit before initiating his Spring 2017 sabbatical and Prof. D. Englert (UK-Pad) during the sabbatical period. To begin, Prof. Van Wie set-up an LC-DLM with ancillary fluidreservoir, pump, tubing and connectors, while the new implementing professors set-up acompanion system. They then went through student team-based worksheets to practice datacollection and review the activity-guiding questions on the worksheet. Discussions also took placearound pre- and posttest questions, how to coach
] Stevens, R., Johri, A., & O’Connor, K. (2014). Professional Engineering Work. In A. Johri & B. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (pp. 119-138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139013451.010[2] Trede, F., & Smith, M. (2012). Teaching reflective practice in practice settings: students' perceptions of their clinical educators. Teaching in higher education, 17(5), 615-627.[3] Hitlin, S., & Elder, G. H. (2007). Time, self, and the curiously abstract concept of agency. Sociological theory, 25(2), 170-191.[4] Paretti, M. C., & Kotys-Schwartz, D. A., & Howe, S., & Ford, J. D., & Lutz, B. D., & Kochersberger, K., & Gewirtz, C
students.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNos. 1664264 and 1664266. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.References[1] N. A. of Engineering., “Educating the engineer of 2020 : adapting engineering education to the new century.” National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2005.[2] N. Nielsen, N. R. C. (U.S.)., and P. C. on E. on S. I. in U. S. Education., “Promising practices in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education : summary of two workshops.” National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2011
/2015che_academicindustryalignmentstudy.compressed.pdf [Accessed Oct. 14, 2017].[2] U. S. Chemical Safety Board, “Investigations”. [Online]. Available:https://www.csb.gov/investigations/ [Accessed Feb. 4, 2018].[3] L. D. Feisel, A. J. Rosa, “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate EngineeringEducation”, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, pp. 121-130, 2005.[4] U. S. Chemical Safety Board, 2009. “T2 Laboratories, Inc. Runaway Reaction”. [Online].Available: https://www.csb.gov/t2-laboratories-inc-reactive-chemical-explosion/ [Accessed Apr.30, 2018].[5] ABET. “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2016-2017”. [Online]. Available:http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2016-2017/#program [Accessed Feb. 4, 2018].[6
, Race, Rigor, and Selectivity in U.S. Engineering: The History of an OccupationalColor Line. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.[4] E. J. Woodhouse, “Curbing overconsumption: Challenge for ethically responsible engineering,”IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, v ol. 20, no. 3, pp. 23-30, 2001.[5] M. Chua, “Unstable equilibrium: The privilege of being oblivious,” ASEE Prism, S eptember2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.asee-prism.org/unstable-equilibrium-sep/http://www.asee-prism.org/unstable-equilibrium-sep/. [Accessed December 3 2018].[6] joint submission at ASEE conference, omitted for blind review since these professionalcommunities overlap.[7] J. B. Bennett, Collegial Professionalism: The Academy, Individualism
centralimportance of electromagnetics, we believe a meaningful, hands-on experience in this area iscrucial for the success of undergraduate electrical engineering students.Introduction: Unless you are reading this on a handwritten scroll in a cave by candlelight, there is agood chance the following equations are directly impacting your life this very moment: ∇ ∙ 𝐃 = 𝜌𝑉 ∇∙𝐁 =0 ∇ × 𝐄 = − ∂𝐁⁄∂𝑡 ∇ × 𝐇 = 𝐉 + ∂𝐃⁄∂𝑡.These are known as Maxwell’s equations, which were described by James Clerk Maxwell in the1860’s and form the foundation of the classical electromagnetics. They describe how
Academy of Engineering (NAE) for ”For innovations in nanomanufacturing with impact in multiple industry sectors”; Society of Manufactur- ing (SME)’s David Dornfeld Blue Sky Manufacturing Idea Award for ”Factories-In-Space”; SME-S.M. Wu Research Implementation Award; three Edison Awards for Innovation; Tibbett Award by the US Small Business Association sponsored by EPA for successful technology transfer; R&D 100 Award, (the ”Os- car” of innovation); Fellowships to the International 1. Academy of Production Engineering (CIRP), 2. the American Society of Materials (ASM), 3. the American Society of Mechanical Engineering (ASME), and 4. the Institute of Physics (IoP), London, England; multiple best paper awards
with thesoftware/hardware of the visualization wall. II. 3D Visualization Creation in Autodesk® Maya® Using PythonThe computer script developed in Python allows for a streamlined representation ofmathematically complex functions in a 3D-environment – enabling the instructor with a tool thatbrings the textbook functions/formula into the digital domain. The computer script constructs avector field in Maya®'s 3D-Space by employing the openly available ‘numpy’ library. Afterimporting the library into Maya®, creation of a meshgrid space [see Fig. 2(a)] and linear algebra (a) (b) Fig. 2. Graphical representation of a meshgrid space (a) and a vector field generated in
almosta century, it started to become more popular in the 1970’s. See, for example, Spady’s work [2,3], which examines CBL for public K-12 education.There are many publications that discuss CBL in different settings. Henri, et al. [4] presented acomprehensive review in 2017. They indicate that CBL may be beneficial for the success of adiverse student body and may also serve the needs of industry, which needs a cadre of engineerswho have mastered fundamental engineering skills. Discussions of implementation of a varietyof CBL-related methods in engineering programs have been published, such as [5] and [6]. Somepapers focus heavily on CBL for the “soft skills” embedded within engineering programs, suchas [7]. Studies analyzing a wide range of