). Bielefeldt is active in the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), serving on the Civil Engineering Program Criteria Task Committee (2019-2022) and the Body of Knowledge 3 Task Committee (2016-2018). She is the Senior Editor for the International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering (IJSLE) and a Deputy Editor for the ASCE Journal of Civil Engineering Education. Her research focuses on engineering education, including ethics, social responsibility, sustainable engineering, and community engagement. Bielefeldt is also a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education.Laura MacDonald Managing Director, Mortenson Center in Global EngineeringCarlo Salvinelli Dr. Salvinelli is a Teaching Assistant
. Ellerbrock, “Contemporary STEM Issues: Engineering Training of Pre-Service Teachers for Middle School STEM Curriculum Development (Evaluation),” in 126th annual conference and exposition ASEE, 2019, pp. 1–10.[16] M. Aydeniz and K. Bilican, “The Impact of Engagement in STEM Activities on Primary Preservice Teachers’ Conceptualization of STEM and Knowledge of STEM Pedagogy,” Journal of Research in STEM Education, vol. 4, no. 2, 2018.[17] İ. Deveci and J. Seikkula-Leino, “A Review of Entrepreneurship Education in Teacher Education,” Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 105–148, 2018.[18] L. Bosman and S. Fernhaber, Teaching the Entrepreneurial Mindset to Engineers. Switzerland, Springer
, vol. 43, no. 5, Oct.2019, pp. 307–330, doi:10.1177/0193841X18807719.[5] K.L. Morgan, C. L. Bell-Huff, J. Shaffer, & J. M. LeDoux “Story-Driven Learning: APedagogical Approach for Promoting Students’ Self-Awareness and Empathy for Others,” Paperpresented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. July2021. https://peer.asee.org/37730[6] A. Sundin, K. Andersson, & R. Watt. “Rethinking communication: integratingstorytelling for increased stakeholder engagement in environmental evidence synthesis.”Environmental Evidence, Issue 7, no. 6, Feb 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0116-4[7] R.A. Mar, J. Li, A.T.P. Nguyen, & C.P. Ta. “Memory and comprehension of narrativeversus expository
Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019). Science and Engineering for Grades 6-12: Investigation and Design at the Center. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi.org/10.17226/25216. Dr. Nathan is currently on the Advisory Board to the Editor, Journal of Engineering Education, of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) (2015 to date). Dr. Nathan served as an Advisory Board Member for the Stanford University College of Engineering, Pathways from School to Work. Advising on data collection, analysis andinterpretation of data from a longitudinal study of undergraduate engineering students from college into the workforce,with policy recommendations for national engineering education and advising
Argument: ATheoretical Framework for Studying how Faculty Arrive at Their Deeply-held Beliefs AboutInequity in Engineering. In 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access.[7] Haynes, C., & Patton, L. D. (2019). From racial resistance to racial consciousness: EngagingWhite STEM faculty in pedagogical transformation. Journal of Cases in EducationalLeadership, 22(2), 85-98.AppendicesAppendix I. Gender ProtocolBACKGROUND INFORMATIONOur goal today is to explore your beliefs about the causes of gender-based inequities inengineering. As you know, this project is investigating beliefs about both gender- and race-basedinequities, but today we will focus on gender. Gender inequity can be a tough topic to talk aboutopenly, so we may fumble at
2019 he is the Faculty Co-Director of the Bernard M. Gordon-MIT Engineering Leadership Program, and since 2021 the Apollo Program Professor of Astronautics at MIT.John M. Feiler (Engineering Leadership Specialist)Kyra Tan-Tiongco (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)Reza S Rahaman (Industry Co-Director, Gordon Engineering LeadershipProgram) Reza Rahaman is the Bernard M Gordon Industry Co-Director and Senior Lecturer for the MIT Technical Leadership and Communication Programs - the Undergraduate Practice Opportunities Program (UPOP), the Bernard M. Gordon-MIT Engineering Leadership Program (GEL), the Graduate Engineering Leadership Program (GradEL), and the School of Engineering Communication Lab. Dr. Rahaman returned to
instructor decisions and student support during COVID-19 and impact the pandemic is having on engineering students. She also recently won the prestigious CAREER award from the U.S. National Science Foundation to study increasing the fairness of engineering assessments. In total, she has been on the leadership of more than $24 million dollars in research awards. Her research on evaluation of online learning (supported by two NSF awards #1544259,1935683, ) has resulted in more than 20 peer-reviewed conference and journal publications related to engineering learners in online courses. She was a FutureLearn Research Fellow from 2017-2019; a 2018 recipient of the FIE New Faculty Fellow Award and was the 2021 Program Chair for the
in China 2025,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Salt Lake City, Utah, Jun. 2018, p. 29787. doi: 10.18260/1-2--29787.[2] Y. Cao et al., “Visions of Engineers for the Future: A Comparison of American and Chinese Policy Discourses on Engineering Education Innovation,” p. 18, 2021.[3] “Beijing Guidance,” Jun. 09, 2017. http://education.news.cn/2017-06/13/c_129631611.htm (accessed Mar. 16, 2022).[4] Y. (Leaf) Zhang, “International Students in Transition: Voices of Chinese Doctoral Students in a U.S. Research University,” J. Int. Stud., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 175–194, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.32674/jis.v6i1.487.[5] M. Prince and R. Felder, “The Many Faces of Inductive Teaching and Learning,” p. 8.[6] M. R
[22] J. DeBoer et al., “Transforming a dynamics course to an active, blended, and collaborativeformat: Focus on the faculty,” presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Jun. 2016. Accessed: May 15, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/transforming-a-dynamics-course-to-an-active-blended-and-collaborative-format-focus-on-the-faculty[23] D. Evenhouse et al., “Perspectives on pedagogical change: instructor and studentexperiences of a newly implemented undergraduate engineering dynamics curriculum,”European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 664–678, Sep. 2018.[24] Data digest, Purdue University, Student enrollment, May, 2022, [Online]. Available:https://www.purdue.edu/datadigest/[25] M. Q Patton
positive ones thatpromote Black students to pursue and persist in advancing their education in engineering.References[1] E. O. McGee and D. O. Stovall, "The Mental Health of Black College Students: A Call for Critical RAce Theorists to Integrate Mental Health into the Analysis," Educational Theory, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 167-193, 2015.[2] E. O. McGee, D. M. Griffith and S. L. Houston II, ""I Know I Have to Work Twice as Hard and Hope That Makes Me Good Enough": Exploring the Stress and Strain of Black Doctoral Students in Enigineering and Computing," Teachers College Record, vol. 121, p. 38, 2019.[3] J. K. Hyun, B. C. Quinn, T. Madon and S. Lustig, "Graduate student mental health: Needs assessment and utilization of counseling
]. In addition to the legal issues resulting from inadequate teacher preparation and safetytraining, the literature has documented a severe lack of safety in various aspects relative to P-12engineering education [7]. Specifically, Love et al. [9] highlighted the lack of improvement in P-12 engineering education related safety issues reported in studies from 2002 through 2022.Furthermore, a recent national P-12 engineering education safety study published by theInternational Technology and Engineering Educators Association (ITEEA) in collaboration withthe American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the National Science EducationLeadership Association (NSELA) provided a comprehensive overview of the status of safety inP-12 engineering
was a recipient of the Ap- prentice Faculty Grant from the Educational Research Methods ASEE Division in 2009. She also has been an Electrical Engineering Professor for two Mexican universities. Dr. Mendoza is interested in sTEm education, socioeconomically disadvantaged students, Latino studies in engineering and computer aided/instructional technology in sTEm.Dr. Deborah A. Trytten, University of Oklahoma Dr. Deborah A. Trytten is a Professor of Computer Science and Women’s and Gender Studies at the University of Oklahoma. Her research foci are diversity, equity, and inclusion in engineering education and introductory software engineering education. She has a particular interest in how organizational
learning experiences. She has authored numerous engineering-focused teacher practitioner articles, chapters, and research articles, and presents her research regularly through the ASEE Pre- College Engineering Education Division, a division she has chaired. Her current research includes investigating how K-5 students plan, fail, and productively persist, and how simulated classroom environments can be used to help pre-service and in-service teachers practice facilitating discussions in science and engineering.Jamie Mikeska © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Simulated Engineering Teaching Experiences
% 97.6% 94.4% 80.3% David 9-12 75% 46% 78.4% 77.1% Karen 6-8 32.1% 7.9% 48.2% 28.8% Note. Pct. = Percentage of total. Eco Dis.= Economically Disadvantaged. Source: All data is reported by schools to government based on the 2015-2016 school year, and accessed through U.S. News & World Report, 2019. Culturally Responsive Teaching Outcome Expectations (CRTOE). The CROTEsurvey is designed to provide insight on the set of beliefs that teachers hold about the positiveoutcomes associated with culturally responsive teaching practices. The survey is a self-reportedmeasure whereupon teachers rate the
currently serves as his Department's Head, an American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Excellence in Civil Engineering Education (ExCEEd) Mentor, and the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Civil Engineering Division Freshman Director.Camilla M. Saviz (Professor and Chair) Camilla Saviz is Professor and Chair of the Civil Engineering Department at University of the Pacific in Stockton, CA where she has happily taught since 1999. She received B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Clarkson University, an M.B.A. from the New York Institute of Technology, and a Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from the University of California, Davis in the area of hydrodynamic and water quality modeling
teaching civil engineering. He also served as the Director, Graduate Professional Development at Northeastern University’s College of Engineering. He is the recipient of the 2021 NSPE Engineering Education Excellence Award and the 2019 ASCE Thomas A Lenox ExCEEd Leadership Award.Kelly Ann Arcieri (Co-op/Internship Advisor) Kelly Arcieri has served as the Co-op/Internship Advisor for the Civil Engineering and Computer Science programs at York College of Pennsylvania since 2017. She teaches a career training class to prepare civil engineering and computer science sophomores for their first co-op or internship. Kelly has helped 167 students to find nearly 200 co-ops or internships. With over 30 years of experience in
threads together descriptions of six different modes of complexity that engineers andbuilders working in predominantly Alaska Native remote communities have described as beingsituationally important for designing and constructing culturally and environmentally relevanthomes. As the engineers, carpenters, builders, drafters, economists, scientists, policymakers, andhomeowners we have spoken to affirm, it is important to unpack the implications that varyingsituational forces have on building processes. In doing so, engineers and builders canintentionally “think locally” and embrace complexity rather than ignore its impact on jointactivities (Escobar 2019). As Annemarie Mol and John Law have argued, the concept of“complexity” can be used to
possible when dropped. Theactivity occurred in three rounds: 1. An initial individual design in which the students tested their designs against a bare metal washer [test criterion 1]. 2. A group design in which teams of 3-4 students combined ideas from the first round to create and test three iterations of a collaborative design, each time trying to improve the design by further slowing the fall of the vehicle compared to the previous design [test criterion 2]. 3. A final individual design to incorporate ideas from the first two rounds and produce a final design solution that fell slower than any other prototype vehicles [test criterion 3].ParticipantsDuring the spring of 2019, the pre-field trip lessons
Paper ID #37196Perceptions of shared experiences in mentoring relationships:a collaborative autoethnographyJulie Martin Julie P. Martin is a Fellow of ASEE and an associate professor of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. Julie’s professional mission is to create environments that elevate and expand the research community. She is the editor- in-chief of Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, where her vision is to create a culture of constructive peer review in academic publishing. Julie is a former NSF program director for engineering education and frequently works with