extended into other domains, as it has been for general systemsthinking, another key element of system architecture.References:[1] E. Dano, “Augmented ARCADIA Capella based approach for the system architecture of engineered systems,” Presented to INCOSE Canada, Feb. 13, 2023, website: (https://incose- org.zoom.us/rec/play/qK0_yMxsAgwT5GZEEVwggAltKpDmQJk5NBM0AhCMzrE6- KOLNozMAIvUxqLVWkn5BKTY3iair6zxiZFx.mZjttg633nJRGoTs?continueMode=true&_x_zm_rtaid=liVYN xq9T3aSYjYJFK5FOg.1677558111981.d3e6fc0a4ca18c2e12583257a0238e66&_x_zm_rhtaid=581).[2] E. Dano. “System architecture, the missing piece of engineering education,” Proceedings of the Mid-Atlantic Section (MAS) ASEE Fall Conference, Philadelphia, PA., Sept. 2021.[3] R. Arnold
/dci-arrangement/ms-ets1-engineering-design (accessed April 8, 2021).[31] Allen D, Tanner K. Infusing active learning into the large-enrollment biology class: seven strategies, from the simple to complex. Cell Biol Educ 2005;4:262–8. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.05-08-0113.[32] Carlsen R. Effectiveness of Incorporating Inquiry-Based Learning into Pre-Laboratory Exercises. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, ASEE Conferences; 2017. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--28206.[33] Brame CJ. Active Learning. Science Teaching Essentials, Elsevier; 2019, p. 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814702-3.00004-4.[34] Haak DC, HilleRisLambers J, Pitre E, Freeman S. Increased structure and active learning
Annual Conference and Exposition. 1323. Neeley, K.A. (2019). Stuck on the verge or perpetually reinventing? What papers from the 2018 annual conference tell us about change and continuity in liberal education for engineers. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.24. Neeley, K.A. (2022). Engineering communication in ASEE 2000-2020: A historical approach to defining a collective enterprise. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.25. Neeley, K.A. & Luegenbiehl, H. (2008) Beyond inevitability: Emphasizing the role of intention and ethical responsibility in engineering. In Philosophy and design: From
. SAGE, October-December 2015, 1-13.(3) Trigwell, K.; Prosser, M. Improving the quality of student learning: the influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education 22, 1991, 251-266.(4) Knight, M.; Cooper, R. Taking on a New Grading System: The Interconnected Effects of Standards-Based Grading on Teaching, Learning, Assessment, and Student Behavior. NASSP Bulletin, 103(1), 2019, 65-92.(5) Banerjee, J. K. Mastery Learning for Undergraduates in Engineering. Proceedings of ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, July 2021. https://strategy.asee.org/37485.(6) Hjelmstad, K. D.; Baisley, A. A Novel Approach to Mastery-based Assessment in a Sophomore-level Mechanics Courses. Proceedings of
programs. Dr. Weese has been a highly active member in advocating for computer science ed- ucation in Kansas including PK-12 model standards in 2019 with an implementation guide the following year. Work on CS teacher endorsement standards are also being developed. Dr. Weese has developed, organized and led activities for several outreach programs for K-12 impacting well more than 4,000 stu- dents.Mr. Salah Alfailakawi, Kansas State University Salah Alfailakawi is a PhD student in Educational Technology (ET) Graduate Programs at Kansas State University’s College of Education. His areas of interest include social/cultural issues in ET, the impact of ET on learners and teachers, as well as pract
Ecology & Evolution, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 3–6, 2019. [3] E. Seymour and N. M. Hewitt, Talking about leaving. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1997, vol. 34. [4] B. E. Lovitts, Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2002. [5] H. B. Carlone and A. Johnson, “Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1187–1218, 2007. [6] Z. Hazari, G. Sonnert, P. M. Sadler, and M.-C. Shanahan, “Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations
% 9% 9% 9% 9% 22% 10% 17% 19% 19% 21% 20% 13% 16% 15% 17% 16% 0 Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Domestic Men 1018 968 1005 1028 1160 1213 1160 1106 1002 1195 1179 International Men 1475 1702 1830 1890 2098 2116 2658 2703 2990 3043 3218 Domestic Women 331 324
. Page - 2 For instance, the initial question we developed was “Can we use available institutional data toidentify differences in pass rates between student subgroups and can we predict time to declare successfor these different groups?”. We hypothesized there would be no detectable differences, and found wedisproved that null theory. For academic years 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20, 3,286frosh students came to the concerned Californian university to study engineering. Of that entire group,2,514 (77%) were able to successfully meet course requirements and declare engineering major by theend of their second year. However, of the 539 URM students and the same 5-year period, only 332 (62%)met course requirements and
Education Review, (2020), 8(1), 180-193.[4] M. G. Eastman, M. L. Miles, & R. Yerrick, Exploring the White and male culture: Investigating individual perspectives of equity and privilege in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 2019, 108(4), 459-480.[5] E. O. McGee, Interrogating structural racism in STEM higher education. Educational Researcher, (2020), 49(9), 633-644.[6] D. H. Nguyen & L. Ward, A colorblind discourse analysis of higher education race-conscious admissions in a post-racial society. NDL Rev., (2016), 92, 551.[7] A. E. Martin & T. R. Fisher‐Ari, “If We Don't Have Diversity, There's No Future to See”: High‐school students' perceptions of race and gender representation in STEM. Science
. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2023, American Society for Engineering Education ETD 4453. Amy Feldman, “Why the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire still burns hot today.” Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/amyfeldman/2019/11/22/why-the-triangle-shirtwaist-factory-fire-still-burns-hot- today/?sh=2d4e8081704a (accessed September 29, 2022).4. “Triangle Shirtwaist Fire.” AFL-CIO. https://aflcio.org/about/history/labor-history-events/triangle-shirtwaist- fire (accessed August 30, 2022).5. Lib Tietjen, “The power of the purse.” Tenement Museum. https
they do not continue reproducing unfair neo-colonial practices andassumptions of past development practices. Here we explore how STS concepts have servedengineering students to develop critical praxis, a more robust and responsible understanding ofthe relationships between engineering faculty, students, and communities, and the materialand social worlds in which they are embedded, using community development projects relatedto artisanal gold mining, inclusive management of electronic waste, and water access forunderserved communities as examples.BackgroundAs shown in our 2022 ASEE paper [1], pedagogies of formation are explorations that implicatethe self in questioning “what engineering is for” and how answers to these questions begin toshow
supported the efficacy of theapproach in achieving the stated goals of improving student learning and better preparing them fora career in the construction industry.AcknowledgmentsThe author gratefully acknowledges the General Education and Writing Across the Curriculumteams at New York City College of Technology for the valuable lessons provided throughworkshops and mentoring sessions.Reference 1. Kim, S., S. Chang, D. Castro-Lacouture. 2019. “Dynamic Modeling for Analyzing Impacts of Skilled Labor Shortage on Construction Project Management.” Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 36, No. 1. 2. Levanon, G., B. Cheng, and M. Paterra. 2014. “The risk of future labor shortages in different occupations and industries in the
%202030. (accessed Feb. 26, 2023).[2] D. White, et al. “An innovative hybrid electric drivetrain concept and student project” in Association for Engineering Education - Engineering Library Division Papers, American Society for Engineering Education-ASEE, Honolulu, HI, June 2007, p. 12.212.1–.[3] K. Blair, D. W. Miller, D. Darmofal, C. P. W. Young, & D. Brodeur. Problem Based Learning In Aerospace Engineering Education Paper presented at 2002 Annual Conference, June 2002, Montreal, Canada. 10.18260/1-2—10974[4] “Velis Electro”. Pipistrel Velis Electro. https://www.pipistrel- aircraft.com/products/general-aviation/velis-electro/ (accessed Feb. 6, 2023).[5] “Joby completes second of four system reviews
] Educating Engineers: Preparing 21st Century Leaders in the Context of New Modes of Learning: Summary of a Forum. doi: 10.17226/18254.[4] A. Wittig, “Implementing Problem Based Learning through Engineers without Borders Student Projects,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 3, no. 4, 2013, Accessed: Feb. 09, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1076104[5] S. M. Kusano and A. Johri, “Developing Global Engineering Competency Through Participation in ‘Engineers Without Borders,’” presented at the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2015, p. 26.500.1-26.500.14. Accessed: Feb. 09, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/developing-global-engineering-competency- through-participation-in
, and R. L. Matz, “Supporting Equitable Team Experiences Using Tandem, an Online Assessment and Learning Tool,” in ASEE Annual Conference, 2021, https://peer.asee.org/377872. P. Braveman, “Defining Equity in Health”, Health Policy and Development Journal, col. 2, no. 3, pp. 180-185, December 2004, https://www.jstor.org/stable/255699793. W. J. Jordan, “Defining Equity, Multiple Perspectives to Analyzing the Performance of Diverse Learners”, Review of Research in Education, vol. 34, pp. 142-178, March 2010, http://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X093528984. S. Marginson, “Equity, status and freedom: a note on higher education”, Cambridge Journal of Education, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 23-36, March 2011, http://doi.org
. 107, no. 4, pp. 556–582, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1002/jee.20234.[21] A. Boklage, B. Coley, and N. Kellam, “Understanding engineering educators’pedagogical transformations through the Hero’s Journey,” European Journal of EngineeringEducation, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 923–938, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2018.1500999.[22] F. Tsuda-McCaie and Y. Kotera, “The Hero’s Journey: constructing continuity fromdiscontinuity in millennial career changers’ narratives,” Br J Guid Counc, 2021, doi:10.1080/03069885.2021.1936450.[23] N. K. Schlossberg, “A Model for Analyzing Human Adaptation to Transition,” CounsPsychol, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 2–18, Jun. 1981, doi: 10.1177/001100008100900202.[24] M. L. Anderson, J. Goodman, and N. K. Schlossber, “Chapter 2: The
Communications in Japan., vol. 42, no. 24. IFAC, 2010. doi: 10.3182/20091021-3-jp-2009.00055.[11] V. Kovanović, D. Gašević, S. Joksimović, M. Hatala, and O. Adesope, “Analytics of communities of inquiry: Effects of learning technology use on cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions,” Internet and Higher Education, vol. 27, pp. 74–89, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.06.002.[12] G. Sayeg-Sánchez, M. X. Rodríguez-Paz, and D. Valencia-Marquez, “Guided Learning Sequences as an e-Learning Enhancer During COVID-19 Emergency Conditions,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021.[13] F. B. Topu and Y. Goktas, “The effects of guided-unguided learning in 3d virtual environment on
, "Information technology, its impact on society and its future," in Advances in Computing 4.1, 2014, pp. 25–29.[2] M.J. Quinn, “On teaching computer ethics within a computer science department,” in SCI ENG ETHICS 12, 2006, pp. 335–343, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-006-0032-9.[3] E. Milonas, “How Do We "Raise" Ethically Minded Computer Students?” In Proc. 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020, https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-- 34730.[4] C. Lau, "A step forward: Ethics education matters!" In Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 2010, pp. 565–584.[5] A. Barnard, C. de Ridder, L. Pretorius, and E. Cohen, “Integrating computer ethics into the computing curriculum: A framework for implementation,” In Proc
building, and macroethics in science education. She received her PhD in physics at the Uni- versity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2019, where she focused on mastery-style online learning for engineers in a large preparatory physics course. In her postdoctoral work at Texas State University, she co-developed and implemented curricula to engage students in conversations about ethics, science and society, with a research interest in how to best support students and instructors in these conversations. She recently finished a AAAS Science & Technology Policy Fellowship at the National Science Foundation, supporting and working with the Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSI) Program. She is also an organizer for the
of thesurvey suggest that the students favor using VR technology and value its benefits as a newdesign tool. This work-in-progress paper continues to gather data regarding the effectiveness ofdigital technology in the design process and strives to provide findings to the wider body ofknowledge.References[1] B. Nisha, "The pedagogic value of learning design with virtual reality," Educational Psychology, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1233-1254, 2019.[2] "Oxford Dictionaries," Oxford Dictionaries, [Online]. Available: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english.[3] R. Oxman, "Digital architecture as a challenge for design pedagogy: theory, knowledge, models and medium," Design Studies, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 99-120, 2008.[4] J
practical work: An extension of the technology acceptance model," Computers & Education, vol. 135, pp. 1-14, Jul 2019. [7] J. Campbell, A. Macey, W. Q. Chen, U. V. Shah, and C. Brechtelsbauer, "Creating a Confident and Curious Cohort: The Effect of Video-Led Instructions on Teaching First-Year Chemical Engineering Laboratories," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 97, no. 11, pp. 4001-4007, Nov 2020. [8] K. Woelk and P. D. Whitefield, "As Close as It Might Get to the Real Lab Experience Live-Streamed Laboratory Activities," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 97, no. 9, pp. 2996-3001, Sep 2020. [9] K. Cook-Chennault and A. Farooq, "Virtualizing Hands-On Mechanical
, McCain Boonma, Rachel Fox, Kat Francis, Matt Goffin, and Bala Maheswaran, ASEE-NE Virtual Conference Proceeding 2020 [5] Agnihotri, Nikhil. "Designing an Arduino-based EMG Monitor." Engineers Garage, 7 June 2021, www.engineersgarage.com/arduino-based-emg-monitor-ad8226/. [6] "Just a Moment..." Just a Moment.., www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636220300795. [7] "Physicians: Determining Patient Mobility Needs." Official Hoveround Website | Mobility Solutions from Hoveround, www.hoveround.com/health- professionals/determining-mobility-needs. [8] "Sparkfun/SparkFun_MMA8452Q_Arduino_Library." GitHub, github.com/sparkfun
Things Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 8182-8201, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2935189. 2. T. Alladi, V. Chamola, B. Sikdar and K. -K. R. Choo, "Consumer IoT: Security Vulnerability Case Studies and Solutions," in IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 17-25, 1 March 2020, doi: 10.1109/MCE.2019.2953740. 3. S. Loukil, L. C. Fourati, A. Nayyar and C. So-In, "Investigation on Security Risk of LoRaWAN: Compatibility Scenarios," in IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 101825-101843, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3208171. 4. East Carolina University, College of Engineering and Technology, Department of Technology Systems, Information and Computer Technology, https://cet.ecu.edu/techsystems
. Cady and G. Pearson, “Building educator capacity in K-12 engineering education,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, American Society for Engineering Education, Jun. 2020.[2] S. S. Guzey, T. J. Moore, and M. Harwell, “Building up STEM: An analysis of teacher- developed engineering design-based STEM integration curricular materials,” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), vol 6, no. 1, p. 2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1129.[3] M. A. Bakah, K. A. Nihuka, and A. G. Anto, “Fostering the sustainability and scalability of curriculum innovations through collaborative design,” In Collaborative curriculum design for sustainable innovation and teacher learning, pp
Profession,” in Proc. Summit on the Future of Civil Engineering, August 2009, doi: 10.1061/9780784478868.002.[2] ASCE, Code of Ethics, 2020. Accessed: July 7th 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.asce.org/career-growth/ethics/code-of-ethics[3] D. E. Armanios et al., “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Civil and Environmental Engineering Education: Social Justice in a Changing Climate,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference. Jul. 2021. https://peer.asee.org/36988[4] A.-K. Winkens and C. Leicht-Scholten, “Does engineering education research address resilience and if so, how? – a systematic literature review,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–19, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1080
working on technical training and engineering projects funded by the Asian Development Bank, World Bank, and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Countries where he has worked include Armenia, Bangladesh, Bulgaria, China, Egypt, Indonesia, Macedonia, Poland, Romania, and Thailand. In addition, he has taught undergraduate and graduate courses in engineering education for the department. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 The Influence of Role Models on Students’ Interest in STEM (Work-in-Progress)IntroductionSTEM fields drive our nation’s economic growth and competitiveness with new innovativetechnologies [1]. In a projection, it was estimated that from 2019 to 2029 STEM