lauren.n.singelmann@ndsu.edu enrique.vazquez@ndsu.eduAbstractWe present a distributed, scalable, student-driven method for both defining a set of projects andsubsequently assigning students to project teams. This process has been implemented within amixed online/in-person multi-university course comprised of both undergraduate and graduatelevel students who are predominantly, but not exclusively, pursuing engineering degrees. OurInnovation Based Learning (IBL) course seeks to provide students with maximum freedom andresponsibility for their own learning; we seek to radically rethink and reduce the organizationaltasks normally performed by the instructor. Re-assigning these tasks to the students creates newopportunities to learn soft skills such as
/) andMicrosoft SharePoint (office.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-sharepoint-workspace-2010-FX101825648.aspx) can be used for sharing documents and asynchronous messaging. Morerecently, engineering faculty have experimented with courses that involve multi-institutions andinclude groups of students from different sites and locations10. These multi-institutional projectsallow students to learn new types of communication skills and, more importantly, software toolsthat support the sharing of information. Students enrolled in these courses must learn how to usevarious online tools to build teams, exchange information, and work on projects together11.While there are many examples of online tools and management software to support studentprojects, there are
include Politics of Hip Hop, From Beast Books toDinosaurs Resurrected, Race in the Humanities and in the Social Sciences, Psychology in theCinema and the Arts, and Scientific Controversies and Public Debate. These courses representinnovative approaches to teaching and learning that integrate multiple disciplines, promotecritical thinking, and engage students in active learning.The course development process culminated in the creation of a comprehensive set of materialsthat included a detailed syllabus outlining course objectives, weekly assignments, assessments,and a reading list, as well as a range of course materials and resources. Additionally, thematerials featured sample evaluation criteria that enabled the assessment of integrative
more severe. Onecurrent type of violation is contract cheating, first coined by Lancaster and Clarke in 2006, whichinvolves paying a third-party to complete an assignment instead of the student enrolled in theclass [4]. Some researchers have even discovered “ghost students,” in which a fee is paid foranother person or company to enroll in an online course for an entire semester on behalf ofsomeone else [5]. Even though contract cheating and ghost-students are extremely severeviolations because of the awareness of the deviousness of the act, the underlying motivations forthese types of violations often reflect the same causes as other forms of academic integrityviolations [4].Students have cited a variety of motivations for engaging in academic
, there has been an effort to develop concept inventory questions forengineering core topics, including most of the core chemical engineering topics.6 Thesequestions seek to measure a student’s understanding of physical concepts instead of analyticalability. These questions are just now becoming available for beta testing.This paper reports on the start of an effort to compile a combination of analytical and conceptualmultiple-choice questions into a database organized by course learning objective for corechemical engineering courses at North Carolina A&T State University. These questions may bedelivered to students online via the WebAssign® homework system and automatically graded.The validity of individual questions can be determined
the successful completion of a project. Future plans include incorporating the gameinto the syllabus during the next course offering with some modifications based on students’suggestions.In the second case study, the author shares how his risk taking pedagogical approach was appliedin converting a traditionally lecture-based microprocessors course into a studio-based coursewith great success.Case Two – University of New HampshireBackgroundOne of the most common courses in a Electrical Engineering Technology (EET) program is acourse in Microprocessors or Microcontrollers. Typically these courses focus heavily on teachingstudents how to program in assembly language and/or machine code. This makes the lessonmaterial look very much like a
, faculty most likely needed to meet weeklyor every other week to achieve the best integration of these courses. We also feel that a numberof classes need to meet jointly, with both instructors present in the classroom—something wewere not able to do a lot this semester because of scheduling incompatibilities. One future goalmight be to have a joint syllabus, which could resemble the shared activities worksheet that wedeveloped during planning.Discussion: Some Activities that WorkedDuring the first few weeks of class, we realized that our initial worksheet of outcomes was ratherambitious and most likely not achievable with the current set-up. As we regrouped, we agreedthat each team would focus on building a significant shared project. Following
videos, which are publiclyavailable, that include examples of both prohibited behavior and encouraged behavior forindividual assignments. All scenarios now reference examples in calculus, chemistry, and physicscourse to make them more widely applicable across a broader range of science and engineeringdisciplines. The authors offer suggestions on how to utilize the videos along with additionalacademic integrity-related resources, such as syllabus language, a reflection assignment, anassignment cover sheet, and a form prohibiting sharing course-related documents.1. IntroductionAcademic integrity issues are among the most stressful that faculty face, and the statistics onstudent cheating rates and attitudes about cheating are troubling [1][2][3
∃# !(∗(26 2− #∃1∀0(!∃ 2∋∃ 1.∃∀(%(∀ 2(−,1 ,# −.∃0 2(−, −% +∃ 130(,& ∃/3(.+∃,2How are such maps created? While there is no one best method, a reasonable approach beginswith course syllabi. Every course should have a syllabus and as part of that syllabus, courseobjectives. Many of these objectives can be directly related to the performance criteria set up ascomponents of the student learning outcomes. A first pass at mapping performance criteria intoclasses can be done by a faculty committee, such as the curriculum or assessment committee,based upon available syllabi. After preliminary maps for coverage and tracking
. Description of the different generative AI chatbots available for use in the course Chatbot Name Description GeneralBot A bot available for general information; mostly direct access to the ChatGPT 4 model SyllabusBot A bot primed with course specific information, copied from the section syllabus WebDeveloperBot A bot designed to generate HTML, CSS, and JS to assist students with creating webpages BuildBot A bot specific for creating physical builds with the LEGO Education SPIKE Prime robotics kit PrimeBot A bot specific for creating MicroPython code for the LEGO
classes outside school, thus demonstrating special interest inIT, and reported their wish to pursue a degree in IT in future. A supplementary educationcompany Unium provided this data. The results show consistent replies among the groupsthat participated in the online survey and some discrepancy with the feedback fromstakeholders interviewed in the previous study, namely top management stakeholders,who placed a stronger emphasis on disciplinary knowledge, team work andcommunication skills, than did employers, students and high-school pupils respondents.The results of this study will be used to educate students about the expectations of theemployers regarding their competencies, to tailor the university courses, and toimplement soft-skills
2.8(B7) Links to external resources (e.g. EPD) 4.4 4.0(B8) Intranet (Departmental) 3.2 3.6(B9) Format of documents at Web 4.5 4.1(B10) Overall satisfaction of materials at the Web N/A 3.3(C1) Interactivity of course materials 4.6 3.0(C2) Facilitator feedback (e-mail/post message) 5.1 2.2(C3) Facilitators’ involvement in chat room 4.3 1.6(Cc4) Peer discussion at chat room 4.4 3.2(C5) Online quiz (w/ explanation
applications enhance student interest and provide themotivation to investigate, design, build and test similar or unrelated nanotechnology systems inthe project portion of the course.3.1 Nanotechnology System Design and Synthesis (NSDS)NSDS is a 3-credit, senior and graduate level course. It stresses the history, principles,application, and design of microtechnology and nanotechnology systems and consists of acombination of lectures and project work where students from different backgrounds can applytheir knowledge to the design of a nanotechnology system. The prerequisite is “senior standing”in a student’s respective major. The syllabus is as follows: Section 1: Microtechnology 1. History 2. Fabrication Processes
instructors have taught credit classeswhile some classes are co-taught by multiple librarians or as a librarian and faculty memberteam. For the workshops and other shorter instruction sessions, instructors are chosen for thetopic that is being taught. There are even cases of the material being made available online via aYouTube. So, not only are the types of instruction variable, there are also multiple methodsinstructors can utilize to teach a session.This paper presents a collaborative interdisciplinary approach to RDM instruction using currentliterature and the authors’ insight on their own recent course. Reviewing the successes andlessons learned from credit classes, seminars and workshop styled courses provided guidance forthe creation of a 3
“elementary scientific mathematics” sothat they can focus on learning electronics, not math. This is particularly important ifthere is a large number of freshman and sophomore in the class.3.3) Email listThe author creates an e-mail address list for each course, as a way to directly informstudents of any announcements and reminders. The author also encourages students tosend questions through email, and then sends the answers to selected questions placed bythe students to the list.3.4) Course websiteIn addition to these software tools, the author also creates a web page for each class,which is frequently updated. The class web site contains syllabus, class schedule, usefulInternet links, book info, and any other useful information relative to the
knowledge tables and course outcomes to guide course content decisions. This processremoved considerable breadth from the course, which provided time to introduce further depthinto the most critical topics. Another major change to the course was the addition of a 1 hour and45 minute lab section to the course. The lab section was scheduled weekly, but the intent was tooffer 5-6 labs per semester on key topics and to also use the time for exams.It is difficult to accurately quantify the change in course content from one semester to another,but using the topics listed in the syllabus as a guide, the total number topics covered in the coursewas reduced by approximately 25%. As the lecture material for each topic was reworked thefocus was again to
and how to measure the quality of software and the development process itself (a, e)• To comprehend the software testing and quality assurance processes for both traditional and distributed projects (a, g)• To apply testing and quality assurance concepts to small-scale software projects (a, c, e, g, k)• To comprehend formal verification methods (a, e) The course was designed to include in-class learning through group problem-solving andtraditional lectures, out-of-class learning through online lectures and/or research literaturereading for selected topics, and a semester-long team project focused on application of testingtechniques as well as performing QA activities. Additionally, graduate students were required tocomplete a
development program.Course DesignThe developed course in Information Systems & Automation in Industry (TECH64012) is agraduate course which may be taken by students following the Electronics, Manufacturing orComputer options of the Master of Technology degree program.The web-based course offers hyperlinks to access information on the course and its administration, theinstructor, course syllabus, laboratory experiments, lecture and lab notes, training modules, courseupdates, course calendar, grading policy, online quizzes and chat sessions.The training modules supporting the lecture, lab notes and the laboratory experiments includemodules that were developed using Macromedia Authorware Attain. The modules incorporatevarious multimedia
miss certain operational details and criticalinformation. In contrast, Figure 2 presents the pre-class visual instruction materials we developedspecifically for hearing-impaired students. These guides employ step-by-step textual instructionswith red annotation boxes to clearly illustrate software procedures. Hearing-impaired studentsreceive these customized materials in advance for preview, ensuring they can follow along duringclass.Unlike generic software tutorial videos and instructions available online, our teaching materialsare tailored based on the course syllabus and the specific needs of hearing-impaired students,making them more targeted for course learning. This customized approach not only saveshearing-impaired students significant
-Course Structural Engineering Sequence, Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, p. 12285- 12292, 2002.8. Tabatabai-Gargari, M., Project-Based Steel Design Course, Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, p. 11537-11546, 2004.9. Hipp, J., Course Syllabus for Sociology 114: The City and Urbanization at the Department of Sociology at the University of North Carolina at Chapil Hill, , Fall 2002.10. Mitchell, Course Syllabus for English 123: College Research Paper at the Department of English at the University of Northern Colorado, < http://www.unco.edu/che/syllabi/eng123/mitchell2005.pdf>, Spring 2005.11. McMullin, K., Course Syllabus for CE 163 – Design of
modules, links,and assignments carried internet-based components. The self-directed learning modulesimplemented in the capstone senior design course required students to reach the ASME’swebsite to read online material.4,5 Some universities and programs developed virtuallearning environments to deliver the online resources to their students, which will in thelong run help the students to develop self learning skills. 6 The components ofinformation technology have been widely used in engineering education.7 As thetechnological advancements are used as an active component of lifelong learning, theconcept of lifelong learning transformed from being taking some courses after graduationto a learning concept that encompasses the entire career. 8The
demand for entrepreneurship courses from students in Engineering and Sciencefaculties. Since 2000, the “Northern Ireland Centre for Entrepreneurship (NICENT)” hasbeen offering entrepreneurship education to students in the engineering, science, andtechnology disciplines. The University of Cambridge (UK) also offers entrepreneurshipeducation to science/technical students. Moreover, the key engineering schools inNorway offer entrepreneurship courses, having found that about 15% of engineeringstudents take an interest in entrepreneurship 3. Similarly, the Nottingham UniversityBusiness School offers entrepreneurship courses to engineering students taking MBA.The course syllabus includes modules such as entrepreneurship in the 21st century
least usedpractices also included classroom techniques that could encourage participation from all studentsmore often, which could also improve the in-classroom experience. Some of the most usedpractices from the menu included not judging student responses which directly contributes to theclassroom climate. However, some of the other highly used strategies focused on elements of thecourse outside of the classroom experience such as creating availability to meet with studentsand having explicit goals in the course syllabus. The open-ended responses from the facultysurvey expressed that faculty were grateful for the experience, but they also wanted moreinclusive teaching resources which could help them employ some of the practices that
focuses on a qualitative analysis of articles in the engineering educationliterature drawn from The Journal of Engineering Education spanning the past 10 years. Fourbroad criteria guided the selection and analyses of the articles: (1) Content: What major types of content for cyberlearning environments are being created focused particularly on engineering education? For example, the NSF identifies various categories of content for cyberlearning environments such as interactive online courses, intelligent tutors, virtual and remote laboratories, and serious games. (2) Pedagogy: How are these cyberlearning environments being incorporated in the classroom to promote learning? For example, several educators have reported
sustainability, and July focused on convertingproject course implementation to online formats (due to COVID-19).In order to facilitate effective sharing of information and peer learning, SUMMIT-P uses twoprotocols during project meetings that provide a format for effective and fruitful discussion. Thetwo protocols, Descriptive Consultancy protocol and Success Analysis with Reflective Questionsprotocol, have historically been applied in the K-12 education community [4]. The DescriptiveConsultancy protocol [5], originally developed by Nancy Mohr and revised by Connie Parrishand Susan Taylor in August 2013, was modified by McDonnough and Henschel [6] and has beenadapted for this project to help presenters think more expansively about a particular
includes the course syllabus. The changes introduced in the second year arehighlighted in the blue and the changes that introduced in the third year are highlighted in thered. The instructor information and the names are blacked out.5. ResultsThe end of semester survey and students final grades are used to evaluate the effectiveness of thenew introduced teaching methodology. Table 1 Provides statistics on student enrollment at eachyear. One student dropped the course during the second year due to family issues and anotherstudent dropped the course during the third year due to financial issues.Figure 2 shows samples of students’ work during the second and third year. It was interesting forus to see students’ ability to come up with different
Senior Design project model, it was an elective for the architecturestudents, and the civil engineering students enrolled in a separate Civil Engineering SeniorDesign course with a separate syllabus. The faculty leader had to navigate the varyingrequirements, values, and deliverables of each course. It was intended that each discipline withinthe team would have a faculty mentor within their department to answer more detailed questionsand to receive critiques, but for many teams that did not happen. To further complicate theprocess, due to students’ varying schedules, meeting times were set by the students just once aweek for one hour. Larger teams were not able to establish an overlapping hour within the week,so they were divided into sub-teams
WebCT material developed for the IADE offering. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education • Course Syllabus: A detailed course description involving requirements, outcomes and success criteria for the course. • Course Schedule: Comprehensive information of the material covered by week and links to individual homework assignments. • Course Content: Lecture notes for all material covered in the course, examples, and online quizzes. • PSpice Resources: Active links to tutorials and information concerning the PSpice circuit simulation software. • Email and Discussion
objectives were achieved. 4.1 Student learning assessment mechanismENGR 290 is a full credit course, just like any other Bucknell course, and students wereevaluated with multiple assessment instruments. The course syllabus specified studentperformance evaluation as follows: • Professionalism and Active Participation 25% • Presentations 35% • Journals 20% • Term Paper 20%Since the course takes place on the road, in a foreign country, professionalism is an extremelyimportant element. The syllabus spelled out eight specific areas of “professionalism” a studenthad to follow in order to succeed in the course. These included being on-time, respecting others,being responsible, and contributing to the team and the course, among others
design. The University Curriculum Committee approved the request to change thecontact hours for Structural Analysis from 3 hours of lecture per week to 2 hours of lecture plus2 hours of laboratory per week to accommodate the experiential aspects of these proposedchanges. After assessing the changes to the Structural Analysis course, we will decide whether tomake similar changes in the class meeting times for the Structural Design courses.The Structural Analysis course syllabus lists the following broad goals for the course: a) Students will develop technical skills in classical methods for analysis of determinate and indeterminate structures. b) Students will gain proficiency in analysis structures comprised of trusses, beams, frames