Ethics your team developed in class. Part II. Application Select a Biomedical/Biotech related film from the list posted to Canvas. Watch the film (pause and take notes as needed) and evaluate the scenarios presented based on your code of ethics. 1. Identify 4 specific instances where bioethics can be applied. Write 1-2 paragraphs on the application of your code of ethics to each of the instances you selected. Did characters meet the expectations of each ethical principle in your code? How or how not? 2. Evaluate the actions of the primary character(s) throughout the film. Would you consider them to be ethical overall based
Psychological, Academic, and Economic Impact of COVID- 19 on College Students in the Epicenter of the Pandemic,” Emerging Adulthood, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 473–490, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1177/21676968211066657.[2] S. Abelson, S. K. Lipson, and D. Eisenberg, “Mental Health in College Populations: A Multidisciplinary Review of What Works, Evidence Gaps, and Paths Forward,” in Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research: Volume 37, L. W. Perna, Ed., in Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. , Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 1–107. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-66959-1_6-1.[3] J. R. Deters, J. A. Leydens, J. Case, and M. Cowell, “Engineering culture under stress: A comparative case study of undergraduate
Rubric : A Tool for Responsible Student Self- Assessment,” Teach. Educ. Fac. Publ., vol. 5, 2010.[12] D. Popken, “The Validity and Reliability of a Single-Point Rubric to Assess Student Writing Performance,” Western Connecticut State University, 2020.[13] J. K. Estell, H. M. Sapp, and D. Reeping, “Work in progress: Developing single point rubrics for formative assessment,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2016-June, 2016, doi: 10.18260/p.27221.[14] J. Lynch, S. Sorby, B. Aller, and T. Murphy, “Developing a Writing Rubric to Answer Research Questions (not for Grading!),” 2024, doi: 10.18260/1-2--45609.[15] Me. Michael J. Peeters PharmD, E. G. S. PharmD, and G. E. S. PhD, “A Standardized Rubric to Evaluate Student
, noisy text, and reorganize large sequences of strings into a columnar struc-ture. These results suggest that with more data and continuous improvement, these systems couldbe implemented to greatly support the admissions process in the future.References [1] R. Avyodri, S. Lukas, and H. Tjahyadi, “Optical character recognition (ocr) for text recogni- tion and its post-processing method: A literature review,” in 2022 1st International Confer- ence on Technology Innovation and Its Applications (ICTIIA), 2022, pp. 1–6. [2] S. Paliwal, V. D, R. Rahul, M. Sharma, and L. Vig, “Tablenet: Deep learning model for end-to-end table detection and tabular data extraction from scanned document images,” CoRR, vol. abs/2001.01469, 2020. [Online
Project Curriculum Module (Curriculum Exchange)," in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014, pp. 24.928. 1-24.928. 2.[14] R. A. Moore et al., "Creating Biologically Inspired Design Units for High School Engineering Courses," in 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 13-16 Oct. 2021, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637238.[15] H. Ehsan and A. P. Rehmat, "Unleashing the Power of Differentiation and Inclusivity: Designing a Multidisciplinary Exhibit for Children," The Science Teacher, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 32-40, 2024/11/01 2024, doi: 10.1080/00368555.2024.2407392.[16] H. Ehsan, J. P. Quintana-Cifuentes, S. Purzer, and A. P. Rehmat, "Engineering design and children: A
to best fulfill the assignment’s outcomes within the given timeframe, while teaching students about the writing process and self-help strategies. It is also wellcited in the literature that since the 1980’s, US undergraduate writing centers have been serving agrowing population of ESL graduate students, which is the case at UI as well.77 This isproblematic because most peer tutors are undergraduates trained to meet undergraduate writingneeds and so graduate students who visit writing centers may not receive the kind of targetedassistance they need. In this study, GA’s generally rated a graduate writing center’seffectiveness in addressing the identified challenges lower than faculty did. Although notspecifically mentioned, perhaps GA’s who
completed a task that required hands-on use of 1 2 3 4 5 3 equipment 4 Abandoned a task that required hands-on use of equipment 1 2 3 4 5 Verbally encouraged team member/s to get involved with tinkering 1 2 3 4 5 5 use of equipment, tools and materials Verbally discouraged team member/s from getting involved with 1 2 3 4 5 6 tinkering
that girls were not interested in long lectures.They were, however, very interested in hands-on activities and being able to communicate andbond with the female college students. It was also found that girls were most interested inspeakers who talked about their profession in the context of how it makes the world a betterplace, how it enhances the quality of their family life and how they manage family and work.Parents were very interested in opportunities available for their child to explore STEM fields,financial considerations for college, and the parent role in their child’s STEM education.Months prior to the event, the lead from SPAWAR Systems Center Pacific would meet with thestudent organization(s) from the hosting university (e.g. San
project based learning.(http://faculty.stritch.edu/ljloeffler/521/Week2/PBL/PBL.pdf)2. McTighe, J. & Wiggins, G. (2005). Understanding by Design. Expanded 2nd ed. Association for Supervision andCurriculum Development.3. ABET. “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs” Accessed 30 Jan. 10 4. Albanese,M. A., and Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes andimplementation issues. Acad. Med. 68: 52–81.5. Hmelo-Silver, C.E. (2004). Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? EducationalPsychology Review, Vol. 16, No. 3 Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2010, American Society for Engineering
Develop possible solution(s) solution(s) Select the best Test and evaluate possible the solution(s) solution(s) Construct a prototype Figure 1. Illustration of the engineering design process model adapted from the Massachusetts DoE [13]Teaching and learning with the engineering design processIdentifying a design process model to use
. Dryburgh, "WORK HARD, PLAY HARD: Women and Professionalization in Engineering—Adapting to the Culture," Gender & Society, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 664- 682, 1999.[8] W. Faulker, "Dualisms, Hierarchies and Gender in Engineering:," Social Studies of Science, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 759-792, 2000.[9] W. Faulkner, "‘Nuts and Bolts and People’ Gender Troubled Engineering Identities," Social Studies of Science, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 331-356, 2007.[10] J. S. McIlwee and G. J. Robinson, Women in Engineering: Gender, Power, and Workplace Culture, SUNY Press, 1992.[11] J. A. Mejia, R. A. Revelo, I. Villanueva and J. Mejia, "Critical theoretical frameworks in engineering education: An anti-deficit andliberative approach
mentorscounts as mentoring when she shares, “…part of their recommendation as a mentor is that[classroom strategy] increases your [student evaluations] a lot… so, I guess that's a form ofmentorship." She recalls times of receiving help and affirmation, stating, “ [Another] professorjust in passing [said], ‘yeah, I have lab get-togethers,’ and I said, ‘yeah, I do that too.’” Here shecontinues to be uncertain whether these interactions were mentorship when she adds, “I don’tknow if that counts.” Blake seems more confident identifying non-relational forms ofmentorship, saying that she “Google [s] about it a lot, so it’s like the hive mind of mentorship(laughs), and [she goes] to workshops [that are] not really like one-on-one, but kindaprogrammatic
extent to which students be- Self-determination theory (Deci and Ryan, 2000), par- lieve they have meaningful control ticularly the importance of autonomy to intrinsic mo- over their learning. tivation (Reeve and Jang, 2006). (U)sefulness The extent to which students be- Future time perspective theory (Simons et al., 2004) lieve the material will be useful to and the utility value construct of expectancy-value them. theory (Wigfield and Eccles, 2000). (S)uccess The extent to which students be- Ability beliefs, including self-efficacy and com
combiningthe qualitative analysis described with a quantitative assessment based on assignment scores willbe implemented providing a more complete outlook on the effect of the STEAM-based activity.7. References[1] M Jamrisko and W. Lu, “The U.S. Drops Out of the Top 10 in Innovation Ranking,” Bloomberg. Technology., Jan. 22, 2018. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018- 01-22/south-korea-tops-global-innovation-ranking-again-as-u-s-falls#xj4y7vzkg (accessed Jul. 10, 2022).[2] D. Schaffhauser, “7 Ways to Get More Girls and Women into STEM (and Encourage Them to Stay),” The Journal, Oct. 02, 2017. Accessed: Feb. 22, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://thejournal.com/articles/2017/10/02/7-ways-to-get-more-girls-and-women-into
using the same language (MATLAB or Python) • Work together to build a notebook for students to solve an equation of your choice. The notebook must include code blocks for numerical computation (solving) and the following text blocks (in any order) o learning objectives o problem statement o mathematical equation(s) o an imageThe hands-on active learning exercise 2 challenged participants to apply the tools that theylearned in exercise 1 for a lesson on a topic of their choice. Participants were asked to includecode blocks, text blocks, learning objectives, a problem statement, mathematical equations, andan image because these were the most frequently used types of elements in the
found to be critical to successful doctoral degreematriculation and academic progress [14], [15], [16].McGee et al.’s [13] review mirrors others [11], [12], [17] who have explored the experiences ofBlack STEM doctoral students at HWIS. but what surprised the researchers was that BlackSTEM doctoral students from HBCUs had similar experiences. What was most telling was thesimilarity between experiences of Black STEM students at HBCUs and HWIS. HWIS are oftencastigated for their racially inhospitable environments and anti-Black racism attitudes which arevisible in their practices, policies, and dispositions, both institutionally and personally. In spite ofthe overall student body and faculty “looking like them” their departments did not
, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ+) STEM PractitionersIntroduction Where are the gays in engineering? LGBTQ+ people have always existed, but ourvisibility in society has ebbed and flowed across civilizations. Our presence has not changed inthe U.S.’s recent history, but our visibility has increased over time [1]. Some pridefully exclaimtheir presence in English and Spanish: “I’m here, I’m queer, get over it!”; “¡Estoy aquí, soy de lacomunidad, y no vas a definir quién seré!” Employee Resource Groups (ERG’s) withincorporations, groups such as the National Organization of Gay and Lesbian Scientists andTechnical Professionals (NOGLSTP), Out in Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (oSTEM), and Out for Undergrad (O4U
traditional engineering programs arehistorically rooted in the military developed engineering education from the early 1800’s [34],[35]. Though the profession has adapted and evolved greatly over the past 200 years, with thedevelopment of new technologies and roles for engineers, little in the core engineering curriculahas changed. Many engineering education programs are already struggling to stick to the originaldesign of a rigorous and technically focused curriculum, while simultaneously attempting tointegrate the use of new engineering technology into a brief 4-5 year time frame.Understandably, there then remains little room for the integration of leadership skills and coursesinto the curricula as it is already seeking to cover an abundance of
amelioration; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development for nontraditional data. Her NSF CAREER award studies master’s-level departure from the engineering doctorate as a mechanism of attrition. Catherine earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from Purdue University, and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Monique S. Ross (Assistant Professor) Assistant Professor, Knight Foundation School of Computing and Information Sciences and STEM Transformation Institute at Florida International University, research interests include broadening participation in computing through the exploration of: 1) race, gender
and much more consistent than in 2020. Thelowest number of unique views in 2021 was 23 for Activity 4. Despite having the lowestunique viewers for 2021, this video still had a similar number of views as video two in2020, and had more views than 2020’s video three, four, and five. While unique views alsodropped throughout the 2021 camp, a higher of number of camp attendees were maintainedthroughout all five activities; the 2021 camp finished with 25 unique views of the final video,five times more than in 2020.4.1.4 Watch TimeNext consider the watch time, describing the total hours per day the videos were watched(across all viewers). The watch time of each video per day shows that camp attendees in2020 watched each video according to the camp
follow-on research and development of the SnappyXODesign has been supported by an NSF I-Corps award (#1823736) to SBU and STTR Phase andPhase 2 awards (awards #2126882) to the startup. All opinions and conclusions presented in thispaper are those of authors only and not of funding agencies.References [1] S. Papert, Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1980. [2] D. A. Kolb, Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1984. [3] R. D. Beer, H. J. Chiel, and R. F. Drushel, “Using robotics to teach science and engineering,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 42, no. 6, p. 85–92, 1999. [4] A. Eguchi, “Robotics as a
. 2016, doi: 10.1080/21650349.2015.1026943.[12] A. N. N. Hui and S. Lau, “Formulation of Policy and Strategy in Developing Creativity Education in Four Asian Chinese Societies: A Policy Analysis,” J. Creat. Behav., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 215–235, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2010.tb01334.x.[13] A.-T. Koh, “Linking Learning, Knowledge Creation, and Business Creativity: A Preliminary Assessment of the East Asian Quest For Creativity,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 85–100, May 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(99)00075-X.[14] K. So and Y. Hu, “Understanding creativity in an Asian school context: Korean teachers’ perspectives,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 33, p. 100573, Sep. 2019, doi
provided for in-depth informationon the platform. Additionally, the authors would like to thank the teaching assistants in the targetcourses: Nadia Jorgenson, Lauren Magliozzi and Ayush Shahi who assisted Dr. Bolhari in thisproject.References [1] N. Anderson, K. Potočnik, and J. Zhou, “Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework,” Journal of Management, 40(5), pp. 1297–1333, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128 [2] K. M. Y., Law, and S. Geng, “How innovativeness and handedness affect learning performance of engineering students?” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(4), pp. 897–914, 2019