, 2006, San Diego, CA, 6 pp.9. Roselli RJ & Brophy, SP (2006) Experiences with formative assessment in engineering classrooms. Journal ofEngineering. Education, 95, 325-333.10. Slain, D, Abate, M, Hodges, BM, Stamatakis, MK, & Wolak, S. (2004) An interactive response system topromote active learning in the doctor of pharmacy curriculum. Am. J. Pharmaceutical Education. 68(5), pp. 1 – 9.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported primarily by the Engineering Research Centers program of theNational Science Foundation under grant EEC-9876363. Page 12.1567.14
that 42% ofstudents in senior laboratory over a four year period were Type 3 learners, who areaction-oriented “hands-on”, common sense learners. This exercise has several benefits: • It provides an opportunity for students to have additional “hands-on” experience; • It demonstrates a physical application of the data or correlation; and, • It helps to develop an appreciation for the limitations of the data or correlations.As part of the combined requirements for CHEG 3143, Heat Transport, and CHEG 3232,Laboratory II, junior level chemical engineering students at the University of Arkansaswere required to perform simple heat transfer experiments or demonstrations usinginexpensive materials that are readily available in most
commercial implementations need new training in ethicsbefore developing the applications for global and distributed geographies. For the pastfew decades most computer users in the test measurement and analysis fields have beentrying and relying on the File Transfer Protocol (FTP) over Transmission ControlProtocol (TCP), but TCP though reliable requires an acknowledgement and produceslong round trip time as well as possibility of infiltration when in wireless mode or cyberspace. This should be as much a topic of ethics in computer communication andengineering field but also in computer science education in cyber security. Research shows that the supply of materials and research workers in U.SMechanical Engineering is slipping since 1999, a
course at UCSC wherein interdisciplinary teams of students work in an layered apprenticeship model with community mentors to design and implement sustainable solutions to water, energy, waste, transportation and social challenges using ”green technology”. Dr. Ball has worked as a research fellow with two NSF Centers for Learning and Teaching and most recently on several NSF projects that focus the integration of engineering and social science to support the advancement of experiential learning for sustainability in higher education.Dr. Michael S. Isaacson, University of California, Santa Cruz Michael Isaacson is the Narinder Singh Kapany Professor emeritus, professor of electrical engineering, Director of the Center
Paper ID #37174Centering Equity and Inclusion in Engineering Collaborationand WritingJennifer C Mallette (Associate Professor) Jennifer Mallette is an associate professor of English at Boise State University, where she collaborates with engineering faculty to support student writers. Her research builds on those collaborations, examining best practices for integrating writing into engineering curriculum; she also explores women’s experiences in engineering settings through the context of writing. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
architecture to undergraduate students: An experience report,” in Proc. of the 37th International Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 2, ICSE ’15, pp. 445–454, 2015.[13] M. McCracken, I. Hsi, H. Richter, R. Waters, and L. Burkhart, “A proposed curriculum for an undergraduate software engineering degree,” in Thirteenth Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, pp. 246–257, March 2000.[14] J. Saldaña, The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage, 2015.[15] M. R. Mehl, Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology, ch. Quantitative Text Analysis, pp. 141–156. American Psychological Association, 2006.[16] M. Gentzkow, B. Kelly, and M. Taddy, “Text as data,” Journal of Economic Literature, vol
is the Director of Programs for MentorNet (www.MentorNet.net). Sheis responsible for implementing, maintaining and enhancing MentorNet's programs. Originally trained as a researchscientist, she earned her bachelor's degree in integrative biology from the University of California at Berkeley andthe Ph.D. in biomedical sciences from the University of California at San Francisco.CAROL B. MULLER Ph.D. Dr. Muller is the founder and CEO of MentorNet (www.MentorNet.net) andconsulting associate professor of mechanical engineering at Stanford University. An educator and socialentrepreneur, she has spent more than 25 years in higher education, including work in academic administration,strategic planning and budget development, external relations
Educationdemand of these companies, and with the help of these industry partners and the Arizona St ateLegislators the MTF became a reality.Semiconductor manufacturing survives by rapid change to develop, produce and market newproducts better, faster and cheaper than the competition. The most flexible fab employees runproduction, make process-engineering decisions, manage workflow, maintain the equipment, andtrain as a team. These flexible skill requirements presuppose a broad knowledge in science,math and communications. However, few employees are that versatile. This paper describesimplementing an integrated learning model at all degree levels in MTF at ASUE to bridge thisgap.Integrated Learning ModelThe pedagogical model of the MTF is integrated
the program grows will ultimately be a function of programassessment and funding. Parallel efforts will include curricula design incorporating the newMichigan Merit Core Curriculum.IV. Integrating an Enterprise Model into the High School CurriculumThe pilot will begin as an extracurricular program, however for this initiative to be successful inthe long term it needs to help students meet the state graduation requirements developed inresponse to the Cherry Commission. The new Michigan Merit Core Curriculum establishes arigorous set of graduation requirements that are among the best in the nation. The requirementswere created to prepare students with the skills and knowledge needed to meet the demands ofthe 21st Century global economy.The
Community and Economic Development funded position as statewide Program Manager for 2+2+2 Workforce Leadership Grants, and is co-PI of an NSF-ATE Advanced Manufacturing Project in PA.Robin Shoop, Carnegie Mellon University Robin Shoop is a lifelong teacher who was identified as teacher of the year in 1999. Currently he is the director of Carnegie Mellon’s Robotics Academy; the preeminent educational robotics curriculum development center in the world. Before he came to Carnegie Mellon he taught in the Pittsburgh Public School System for 28 years where he helped lead the district in the transition from Industrial Arts Education to Technology Education. Mr. Shoop is PI on the NSF funded Robotics
Paper ID #30020Examining shared understandings of design artifacts in upper elementaryschool engineering (Fundamental)Nicole Alexandra Batrouny, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach Nicole Batrouny is a PhD candidate in Mechanical Engineering at Tufts University. Her engineering education research interests include upper elementary engineering education, integrated science and en- gineering, collaboration in engineering, and decision making in engineering. For her Master’s thesis, she uncovered talk moves used by 4th grade students that fostered collaborative, disciplinary decision-making during an
the impact it had on students in the pandemic. Positive student feedback to flexibilitysupports advocacy for keeping and integrating greater adaptability and professor availability intocoursework. While students enter an engineering program expecting a particular experience, thelessons from the pandemic demonstrate the value of assisting students in learning to learn in avariety of platforms. Cultivating a variety of modes of learning facilitates students’ adaptabilityand the ability to shift platforms in future disruptions to work and learning environments. Thethemes in this study help to showcase the features that are important to all learning platforms,regardless of modality.Participants pointed to the student-professor interaction as
learning. Other researchersclaim that active learning can improve student attitudes about learning and result in increasedgains in learning [27], [28], [17]. Literature claims that student-centered teaching methods thatinclude active learning can lead to better learning outcomes such as academic success, improvedlearning attitudes and increased student persistence than traditional teacher-centered methods.This study focuses more on the process of learning than the outcomes of learning. How dostudents say they learn in a flipped environment? What do they say they do as they learn? Whathelps and hinders their learning process?A. Formative assessment An integration of both formative and summative assessment is needed to get a holistic picture ofthe
results.Stronger and more frequent student-TA interactions negatively predicted attention whilepositively predicting participation. Interaction effects between student-TA interactions andfaculty support were also significant, suggesting that what TAs do moderates the influence offaculty on student engagement.Given the importance that interactions play in facilitating academic integration, the distinctcontributions of TAs vs. faculty to student engagement are important and merit future research toassess their generalizability across other disciplines and institutions.Background: The Importance of EngagementStudent engagement is most frequently measured in terms of what students do, is measuredbroadly across multiple courses and academic activities, and has
recirculating combustors, solid-oxide fuel cells, micro heat engines, thermoacoustic engines, and thermal transpiration based propulsion and power generation. He has worked on a DARPA project to develop an integrated microscale power generator based on a solid-oxide fuel cell employing hydrocarbon fuels. Currently, his research is conducted in the Combustion and Energy Research Laboratory (COMER) at SU. Prof. Ahn has published over 20 papers in peer-reviewed journals (including Nature and other high impact journals) and a book, and made over 100 technical presentations (including over 20 invited sem- inars in Korea, Japan, China, Germany, and United States). He is an Associate Fellow of the American Institute of Aeronautics
colonialbackdrop.This brief overview of the literature illustrates the potential limitations of traditional approachesto research ethics when applied to qualitative research, a challenge that is crucially important forthe growing discourse around the use of interpretive methods in engineering education. Theanalysis of prior work in the areas of feminist and de-colonizing methodologies points to theinherent link between considering ethics as an integral part of research and the holistic quality ofresearch findings. In the following we build on this discussion to explore a practice-based way ofintegrating ethical considerations into the research process as part of a larger, cohesiveconsideration of research quality.Theoretical frameworkThe Quality Framework that
study: a concept that will provide synergism for knowledgecreation and integration. The projects should generate products of value to the client andalso provide a natural feedback mechanism for new knowledge to be disseminatedthroughout the curriculum. Page 7.1020.4 “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”Activities are underway to implement this approach. A committee was formed in 2000 toaddress cross-college integration of MDE.A key element of the MDE approach has been to develop an integrated vision
compartmentalizing components of the design process used in lab toindividual teams. The goal is to expose students to a less controlled environment representativeof real-world design practice. Student teams are responsible for the design decisions of theirassigned component, as well as ensuring that components are compatible for use in the larger,class-wide system. Other highlights of the PLP system are: a „hands-on‟ experience with realhardware early in the computer engineering curriculum, low overall cost for students andinstitutions, and cross-course application of concepts. The latter is of great importance sincestudents often fail to see how concepts learned in one course apply to another.With an overarching system like PLP, where different aspects of
this transfer in a more effective manner [3]. The process of knowledge transfer ishighly dynamic and dependent on its content and relationship between student and teacher [4]and needs to be tailored to both for an effective outcome [5]. A number of different teachingmethods emerged over the years including active learning [6], flipping classroom [7, 8], problembased learning [9] to name just a few.After teaching mechanics courses in a traditional format for a number of years it becameapparent that any quantum jump in student learning success requires structural departure fromthe old teaching method and substantial overhaul modifications which would integrate differentpedagogical experiences and insights along with implementation of modern
inquiry assessment. She was awarded an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship in April, 2022, and aspires to continue in the research field and work for a university as a research professor and advisor.Dr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game- based learning in undergraduate classes as well as innovation and entrepreneurship. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023AbstractThis systematic literature review is a theory/methods paper that addresses the state of currentliterature in engineering
Session 1566without him.Bibliography[1] Faste, R., B. Roth, and D.J. Wilde, “Integration of Creativity into the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum,”ASME Resource Guide to Innovation in Design Education, Cary A. Fisher, Ed., American Society of MechanicalEngineers, New York, 1993.[2] "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, Effective for Evaluations during the 2001-2002 AccreditationCycle," ABET, 2000. (http://www.abet.org/images/Criteria/eac_criteria_b.pdf)[3] Dutson, Alan J. et al, 1997. "A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses," Journal of Engineering Education. 86(1):17-28.[4] Marin, John A., James E. Armstong Jr., and James L. Kays, "Elements of an Optimal Capstone Experience,"1999
architecture students in an Integrated Project Delivery Studio at Cal Poly. Prof. McDonald is a former Chair of the American Solar Energy Society (ASES) and of the USGBC Formal Education Committee, as well as a member of the California State University Chancellor’s Office Sustainability Advisory Committee for Education and Research. She is the principal author of SEDE – the Sustainable Environmental Design Education Program, a curriculum project for Page 23.800.1 landscape and architecture undergraduate professional education funded through the California Integrated Waste Management Board. Her work has
© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 The Earth Sustainability Course SeriesAbstractA four semester Earth Sustainability-themed general education curriculum was developed byVirginia Tech in response to urgent calls for a more seamless integration of liberal and technicaleducation. It provides a basic framework for understanding worldviews, water, energy, food,shelter, waste, and health from interdisciplinary viewpoints. Incorporating a learning communitypedagogy promotes deep and meaningful learning by inviting participants to become activeparticipants in their own learning.The focused curriculum of many engineering programs is not in and of itself adequatepreparation for meeting the needs of employers or our
glimpse at the perceived problems in the past and in the future trend of development ofengineering education in Taiwan shows the vital role that a systematic assessment process isnecessary for further improve the quality of engineering education. On one hand, ABET EC2000 encourages the programs to establish a continuous self-assessment process todemonstrate its achievements; on the other hand, through objective reviews by professionalswithin the field, the findings may provide guidelines to improve the curriculum design and toguarantee an effective engineering education.II. Literature Review1. Rationale of EC 2000 Due to the huge difference among engineering programs, EC2000 is based on twofactors to do performance assessment, whether the
integrate sustainabilityinto education, particularly in manufacturing engineering and technology. It advocates for mentoringindependent studies as another approach beside developed curriculum with sustainability to foster a cultureof sustainability excellence in manufacturing engineering and technology, supporting the development ofsustainability education in both teaching and research. From sustainability principles integration, andenvironmentally friendly designs to optimizing production processes to leveraging Industry 4.0technologies, this array is seen as key to reshaping the future of manufacturing. The approach of this workfocuses on an independent research-based study to experimentally test the impact of main operationalconditions on Carbon
attacks of September 11 dramatically impacted the students andtheir social world. Hence, her research became unreplicable and ungeneralizable because ofsocietal change. Note, however, that at the same time, it became more valuable in a new waybecause it was gathering data during a unique moment in history. On the other hand, contextual factors may influence the research in ways that are notrecognized until the study is replicated. Many different research studies have been done onengineering schools as they adopt integrated curricula, design throughout the curriculum, and theABET 2000 criteria. Programs and innovations that work very well at one institution have failedat other institutions, occasionally from factors such as “lame duck
environment. The class teaches fundamentals ofengineering graphics. It provides students with an opportunity to learn solid modeling asa tool for design process and product realization in addition to skills/competencies thattraditional introductory graphics classes promote.The main thrust of the new curriculum is on the project-based learning. It is believed thatpresenting the topics of the course through a project would expose the students toreal engineering practice. In fact, this approach helps students, throughout theirengineering programs, to prepare themselves for the Capstone Projects in the seniordesign courses. Specifically, students are given the opportunity to disassemble a realproduct and construct drawings of its parts. At the end of the
their coursesreported minimal support for their efforts from their colleagues (what about department oruniversity). Both a 2007 survey by House et al. of technical communication skills or practicesof faculty 5 and a 2006 survey by Paretti et al. 6 found little widespread collaboration betweenengineering faculty and those with expertise in communication pedagogy (e.g. technicalcommunication and writing across the curriculum programs). While notable examples of suchcollaborations exist at institutions such as Northwestern University 7, Louisiana State 8, VirginiaTech 9, and elsewhere, these cases tend to be the exception rather than the rule. Less evidence isavailable regarding the integration of teamwork skills; surveys of capstone design
, communication, and collaboration skills. These are the skills that the studentsneed to succeed in their work, learning, and life during this century [28], [29], [30]. To ensuresuccess, students must acquire the essential principles and deep understanding of facts withincore subjects (such as math, language, arts, science, history, etc.) [23], [30]. They can apply thisknowledge to their day-to-day practice in the work environment.Regardless of the exact change in curriculum character, three very diverse strategies appear tohave been developed that involve substantial curriculum re-design: an add-on strategy, a re-building strategy, and an integration strategy. The integration strategy and add-on strategy aremost commonly utilized, while the re-building
states that the curriculum being taught now is almost identical to thattaught many decades ago. In general, it is believed that engineering economy instruction putsmore emphasis on routine and trivial calculations and less emphasis on the analysis and decisionmaking processes2,3.According to the literature, while the teaching materials of engineering economy has changedvery little over the years, the actual implementation of the topic in the work force has changeddramatically. Smith9 comments on how risk and risk management is vital to the engineeringenvironment, and yet the curriculum in undergraduate classes only skims the surface of thesetopics. Most textbooks acknowledge the presence and an overview of methods for measuringrisk, but many do