affected by this as many states will certainly adopt the model law into their own professional licensure requirements. Up to this point, AE programs have provided little input or participation in this effort.• The civil engineers have published a body of knowledge (BOK)21 that lists the skills and attitudes that civil engineers are expected to attain. These include additional skills beyond those required by ABET, such as leadership, project management, business policy and ethics. The new ABET civil engineering program criteria22 have been approved by the Engineering Accreditation Commission and will probably go into effect after the one year review period. The AE program criteria will likely be affected by these
areas, selecting appropriate media sources, using effective research processes, and demonstrating ethical use of resources and materials.To the Edge of Space is an exciting modality to address these educational standards. Theenthusiasm and engagement of students were so great that the Ferguson School teacher askedand was invited to participate again the next year. A level of continuity was created as previousfifth grade students were invited to serve as “veterans” while in the sixth grade.Students moving into sixth grade that were involved in the program as fifth graders were calledon to present their PowerPoint presentation at the fall parent meeting of the current fifth gradestudents. They again presented their project to the
restaurants, movie theaters, ashopping center, and a recreational park within walking distance or a short bus ride, several othersocial activities were arranged for them.Educational and other informational presentations need to be arranged too. Workshops on libraryresearch techniques, ethics, poster design, presentation skills, writing research papers, gettinginto graduate school, obtaining financial support, patents and licensing, and strategies for successin professional careers, are several alternatives. Several of these presentations can be organizedas lunch seminars. In addition, it is very important to schedule presentations for the students tohighlight their accomplishments. Formal presentations at the middle and the end of the ten-weekperiod
Advisory Board Involvement”, ASEE Annual Conference, June 20-23, Salt Lake City, UT.9. Kramer, K. (2004), “Partnering with Industry to Promote Ethical Business Practices in a Capstone Design Course”, 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 20 – 23, 2004, Savannah, GA.10. The Pennsylvania State University (2008). Industrial and Professional Advisory Council (IPAC) http://www.engr.psu.edu/AlumniFriends/ipac.aspx. Accessed: January 2008.11. Civil Engineering Institute, Inc. (2008). http://www.gmu.edu/org/cei/ Accessed: January 2008.12. ABET (2007), List of Accredited Programs by curricular area, http://abet.org/accredited_programs.shtml. Accessed: December 2007.13. ASEE (2007), 2006 Profiles of
?Brainstorming As a result of the pre-conference workshop, it was proposed that from the Turabo Declaration acommittee be created to develop the accreditation theme and strategies in LACCEI. A taskforceof 21 professionals, including deans, authorities and representatives of careers of Engineeringdisciplines, organizations and agencies of accreditation agencies from Latin American andCaribbean countries.The taskforce decided that one of the first objectives should be to have conceptual clarity anddefine the principles over which the system or systems will be developed, and determine whatthe final outcomes should be.With this objective in the taskforce defined the following:VisionTo produce engineers for the Americas that are creative, ethical, flexible
project management, industrial design, Page 13.703.2engineering economics, and ethics. Several mechanical dissections are conducted during thesemester.Team Collaboration with Microsoft OneNote and GrooveStudents in each section of ME 2024 are divided into teams of three and collaborate in and out ofclass on specific activities related to a semester-long design project. Teams select from a list of10 to 15 product ideas and develop an economically feasible product of sufficient technicalcomplexity. Students learn to apply engineering and industrial design methodologies to a productbefore taking more advanced topics such as mechanics of materials and
Professional Responsibility & Legal Issues8.1 Company Specific Policies and Procedures8.2 Regulatory Requirements8.3 Business Contracts, Patents, Copyrights and trademark laws8.4 U.S and International Codes, Standards and Regulations8.5 Professional Code of Ethics; Professional Liability Page 13.581.12 Appendix B: Comparison Tables of ASEM EMBoK versus Standardized EM Handbooks Table 1: ASEM EMBoK versus “Engineering Management”; Mazda, Fraidoon ASEM EMBoK Versus "Engineering Management"; Mazda, Fraidoon Corresponding Topic in
in the biomedical and health sciences • Promoting environments that support innovation, economic growth and development in an ethical and fair context • Supporting communities where Merck employees work and live4Within the Merck Foundation, the Engineering Advisory Committee provides support toengineering schools and engineering-related organizations. Areas in engineering educationfunded by the Engineering Advisory Committee are: • Graduate and undergraduate engineering education in the areas of chemical engineering including biochemical, mechanical, and industrial systems engineering with primary focus on chemical engineering • Curriculum and faculty development focusing on needs of pharmaceutical industry
science education are important foundations for becoming a competent engineer, butanother area central to engineering practice is design. Teaching and learning good design skillsare important aspects of engineering education in colleges and universities [19, 20]. ABET hasrecognized this need by including “an ability to design a system, component, or process to meetdesired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political,ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability” in the Criteria for AccreditingEngineering Programs, as one of the eleven learning outcomes that students should attain beforegraduation [21
AC 2007-2901: PROMOTING HOLISTIC PROBLEM-SOLVING IN MECHANICSPEDAGOGYChris Papadopoulos, University of Wisconsin -Milwaukee Chris Papadopoulos is Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering and Mechanics at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. He is the PI of the UWM Computer Science, Engineering and Mathematics > Scholarship Program. His teaching and research interests are in engineeing mechanics, structural stability, engineering ethics, and engineering education. He is a recipient of the 2006 Ferdinand P. Beer and E. Russell Johnston, Jr. Outstanding New Mechanics Educator Award through the Mechanics Division of ASEE.Josh Bostwick, Cornell University Josh Bostwick is a doctoral
AC 2007-2930: A SCHOLARSHIP RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION STRATEGYTHAT SUCCESSFULLY ATTRACTS DIVERSE AND ACADEMICALLYTALENTED FRESHMENChris Papadopoulos, University of Wisconsin -Milwaukee Chris Papadopoulos is Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering and Mechanics at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. He is the PI of the UWM Computer Science, Engineering and Mathematics > Scholarship Program. His teaching and research interests are in engineeing mechanics, structural stability, engineering ethics, and engineering education. He is a recipient of the 2006 Ferdinand P. Beer and E. Russell Johnston, Jr. Outstanding New Mechanics Educator Award through the Mechanics Division of ASEE.Karen
of course content ‚ Goals, content, design and organization of the course. ‚ Appropriateness of course objectives. ‚ Appropriateness of instructional materials. ‚ Appropriateness of evaluative devices to foster and measure student learning (i.e., exams, written assignments). ‚ Appropriateness of methodology used to teach specific content areas (i.e., pedagogical strategies). ‚ Commitment to teaching and concern for student learning. ‚ Student achievement, based on performance on exams, projects, presentations and reports. ‚ Support of departmental instructional efforts. ‚ Professional and ethical behavior.Articles on peer evaluation of teaching
, because of theirleadership role or work ethic, carried more responsibility for the team.Results of Changes Introduced in 2007 Overall, the grading changes made produced positive results. Each change presentedadvantages as well as minor disadvantages that will be discussed in more detail. However,combination of the four changes made in 2007 produced a much different result in the finalcourse grades. Compared to the previous ten years, as depicted in Table 1, the final coursegrades in 2007 featured a course GPA much closer to the mean GPA of the students entering thecourse. While it was not the goal of the course directors to arbitrarily reduce the students’grades, the changes introduced appear to have tempered the impact that the natural bias
called EngE 1024, “Engineering Exploration” Over the past seven years, the first-year courses in the GE program have evolved from somewhat standard problem solving(including statics, electrical engineering, material balance concepts), graphics, and programmingcourses to a format that emphasizes early design and realization, collaborative learning, andhighly interactive classroom environments. In 2004, the syllabus of EngE1024 was updated toinclude general problem solving, engineering ethics, visualization of 3-D objects and alsovisualization of information, early design (including realization), graphing and simple analysis ofgraphs, and introduction to object-oriented programming (OOP) approaches for problem solving.Further, significant
3.32 1.59 engineering 4. Name some potential future applications of the methods 3.05 1.94 5. Explain the basics of bioprocess engineering 3.37 2.12 6. Describe the ethical issues and arguments associated with genetic engineering 2.42 2.29 7. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of biotechnology methods relative to 3.44 1.82 conventional methods 1=Very Knowledgeable; 2=Somewhat Knowledgeable; 3=Not Sure; 4=Somewhat Unknowledgeable; 5=Very Unknowledgeable Denotes statistical significance
suggested a more formal process of recording reviews andreminding them exactly what the review should accomplish. Taking these comments intoaccount a new policy was written (see Appendix A).The need to educate the students in the methodology was also noted. It was naïve for the authorto believe that the students would know what to do automatically without significant instructionand coaching. The students had not encountered this in previous engineering classes, and theauthor and the other course instructor took care to prepare the students. Combined with adiscussion of professional responsibility and ethics in the second lesson, the idea of peer reviewwas explained and the policy was introduced and its implementation discussed; this took abouttwo
first-yearengineering course calls for students to develop a logical problem solving process whichincludes sequential structures, conditional structures, and repetition structures for fundamentalengineering problems; translate a written problem statement into a mathematical model; solvefundamental engineering problems using computer tools; and work effectively and ethically as amember of a technical team. One approach to having first-year students solve open-endedproblems is through team-oriented tasks called Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs). These tasksare based upon the models and modeling perspective put forth by Lesh and Doerr7 and aredeveloped using six design principles8-9. The National Research Council’s Board of EngineeringEducation
concepts they need to learn to solve the problem posed. The case study shows therelationship between technical concepts and their social and ethical impact, limitationsdue to resource availability, and inter-personal conflicts.Learning the relevant concepts and their relationship to the problem is done in threesteps. Each step uses different techniques depending on the level of learning (fromBloom’s Taxonomy) that is being addressed.Step 4a: Shallow levels of learning—remember and (for upperclassmen) understand—can, and should, be mastered independently. Students are given a reading assignmentthat covers one or two specific concepts prior to each class period. Faculty usetechniques that help students learn material independently such as Just in
), engineering ethics andgreen design. The second project is more intensive in terms of the project requirements anddeliverables to be completed in the same duration of seven weeks.In the second stage, the experimental group of eight teams was provided access to the DISTconfigured for the design problem. It was presented as a design support tool, and its usagewas optional in the completion of the project. Each design team was provided a laptop loadedwith the DIST, word processing, spreadsheet and Computer Aided Design (CAD) software. Page 11.205.8The teams were also rearranged (randomly) based on the peer
institutions, designing courses, teaching techniques, solving instructional problems, andanalyze case studies of ethical issues in academic life. Some doctoral students in the PFFprogram choose to complete the Graduate Certificate in College and University FacultyPreparation6, in which they take several courses geared at preparing them for teaching andfaculty careers and which includes a mentored teaching experience.Format of Support Activities: The format of the support activities ranged from individualconsultations with faculty developers to 1-2 year long teaching certificate programs for graduatestudents involving multiple seminar classes and a mentored teaching experience. Less clear fromthe websites was the level to which faculty and graduate
structurallyrational and economically prudent actually establishes the “correctness” and the “ethics”of building10. Khan argued that well detailed and efficient structures posses the natural elegance of slenderness and reason, and have possibly a higher value than the whims of a-priori aesthetics imposed by architects who do not know how to work closely with engineers, and who do not have an inner feeling for natural structural forms.11.What Links the Three Forms TogetherThe linkage between these three forms can be summarized as increasing constraints Page 12.693.5imposed on the designer, as one moves from sculptural form, through
availableto guide testing of more widely used equipment. The Codes are written so that they can beincorporated into an equipment purchase contract for use in conducting an acceptance test, andthey are meant to be applied to a field test as opposed to a laboratory or shop test. There areabout 40 “equipment codes” and about 15 “supplements” covering fundamental measurementtechniques and test (measurement) uncertainty.The PTCs can provide a useful bridge between college courses in the energy stem andinstrumentation/measurement and the “real world”. Also, the introduction to the ASME Codesand Standards activity and the part that individual engineers play in developing voluntarystandards is obvious link to the topics of professional ethics and
Accountability Exhibits self-confidence D2 Self Confidence PROFESSIONALD QUALITIES Possesses honesty/integrity/personal ethics D3 Integrity Shows initiative/is self-motivated D4 Self Motivation Demonstrates a positive attitude toward change D5 Positive Attitude Works effectively with others E1 Works with Others Understands and contributes to the organization’s E2 Goal orientationE TEAMWORK goals
and Wood, Leigh N. Fremantle, Australia : s.n., 2008.Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) International Education Research Conference.12. Providing in-depth and personalized feedback to online students using audio recording. Wallace, Ian andMoore, Catherine. Singapore : s.n., 2012. 3rd International Conference on e-education, e-Business, e-Management,and e-Learning.13. Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment. Lage, M., Platt, G. andTreglia., M. 2000, Journal of Economic Education, Vol. Winter, pp. 31-43.14. Psychological Considerations in Engineering Teaching: An Ethical Mandate to Produce Responsible Engineers.Lee, B. Kyun, Leiffer, Paul R. and Graff, R. William. Pittsburgh : s.n
teaching is particularly responsiveto the applications-oriented mission of NYIT and the School of Engineering?6. Did the faculty’s experience with ETIC lead to any technical consulting activities, externalfunding through grants or contracts?7. If students were engaged in completing a project to complete their senior level “capstonesequence”, how did this “course work” affect ABET Student Outcomes (SOs): “c”, “h” and “k”. c. “an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability”; h. “an understanding of the larger-scale impact of engineering
. However, we are clearly at the start of a large-scaleeducational experiment and longer-term quantitative evaluations are being set up to determine: The depth of understanding behind the increased applications fluency. The level of student accountability in terms of deliverables and data ethics that goes with ownership of a personal lab. Templates for a more rigorous process for student-driven experimental planning and results analysis. How much student-student cooperation is established given that it is an additional burden that they must organize since there are no longer scheduled lab classes where cooperation is imposed through shared use of lab equipment. Whether the
across settings 9. In engineering education, such authenticcontexts have been developed through “problem based” and “project based” activities 10. Amongthe advantages of such approaches are that students have greater opportunity to be mentored andpractice aspects of engineering for development that are often missed in the “core curriculum” oftraditional engineering education. Specifically, through “project based” engineering education,students work to: - formulate and solve ill-defined problems under complex conditions; - understand professional and ethical responsibilities associated with these complex conditions; - communicate with other engineers and with non-engineering professionals and the general public; and