? International Journal of Science Education, 29 (2007), pp. 1745-1765.16. Berg C. A. R., Bergendahl V. C. B., Lundberg B. K. S., Tibell L. A. E. Benefiting from an Open-Ended Experiment? A Comparison of Attitudes to, and Outcomes of, an Expository versus an Open-Inquiry Version of the Same Experiment. International Journal of Science Education, 25 (2003), pp. 351- 372.17. Seery M.K., Flipped learning in higher education chemistry: emerging trends and potential directions, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 16 (2015), pp. 758-768.18. Ebert-May D., Brewer C., Allred S. Innovation in large lectures--teaching for active learning. Bioscience, 47 (1997), pp. 601-607.19. Roehl A, Reddy SL, Shannon GJ. The flipped classroom: An opportunity to
milestones on community college student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 48(7), 775-801.Dawson, S., & Hubball, H. (2014). Curriculum analytics: application of social network analysis for improving strategic curriculum decision-making in a research- intensive university. Teaching and Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 2(2), 59-74.Hodara, M., & Rodríguez, O. (2013). Tracking Student Progression through the Core Curriculum. New York: Community College Research Center, Columbia University.Krumm, A. E., Waddington, R. J., Teasley, S. D., & Lonn, S. (2014). Using Data from a Learning Management System to Support Academic Advising in Undergraduate Engineering Education. In J. A. Larusson & B
, Switzerland, Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. v-viii.[3] C. J. Thaiss and T. M. Zawacki, Engaged Writers Dynamic Disciplines, Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook Publishers, Inc. , 2006.[4] D. Melzer, Assignments Across the Curriculum, Boulder, CO: Utah State University Press, 2014.[5] M. Eodice, A. E. Geller and N. Lerner, The Meaningful Writing Project, Boulder: Utah State University Press, 2016.[6] S. Harrington, S. Dinitz, R. Bennett, L. Davenport and K. Warrender, "Turning Stories from the Writing Center into Useful Knowledge: Writing Centers, WID Programs, and Partnerships for Change," in Writing Program and Writing Center Collaboration: Transcending Boundaries, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, pp. 141-160.[7] M
). Confusions and conventions: Qualitative research in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 103, 1-7.Blair, E. E., R. B. Miller, M. Ong, and Y. V. Zastavker. (2017). Undergraduate STEM instructors' teacher identities and discourses on student gender expression and equity. Journal of Engineering Education, 106, 14-43.Blank, S. (2013). Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Business Review, 91, 63-72.Borrego, M. (2007). Conceptual difficulties experienced by trained engineers learning educational research methods. Journal of Engineering Education, 96, 91-102.Case, J. M., and G. Light. (2011). Emerging research methodologies in engineering education research. Journal of Engineering Education, 100, 186-210
: http://www.science-engage.org/index.html. [Accessed April 26, 2018]. [7] J. Hempel. “The Zuckerbeg hearings were silicon valley’s debut.” [Online]. Available: Wired, https://www.wired.com/story/the-zuckerberg-hearings-were-silicon-valleys-ultimate-debut/. [Accessed April 26, 2018].[8] D. MacMillan, and R. Winkler. “Silicon valley to washington: why don’t you get us?” [Online]. Available: The Wall Street Journal, https://www.wsj.com/articles/silicon-valley-to-washington-why-dont-you-get-us- 1523451203. [Accessed April 26, 2018].[9] March for Science. [Online]. Available: https://www.marchforscience.com/. [Accessed April 26, 2018].[10] S. Khimm, and A. Rafferty. “Pruitt makes EPA science board more industry friendly
in any mechanical engineering program across theworld. This paper presents three different approaches taken by faculty at three different regionaluniversities in the United States with similar small class size, low student-teacher ratio, andcomparable cost of attendance. We examine the pedagogical approach, course content, desiredoutcomes, and assessment of outcomes at three different universities to identify the desiredbalance between traditional, analysis-based outcomes and those targeted towards practice-basedskills.IntroductionA course in the design of machine elements has been a part of most mechanical engineeringcurricula since the 1950’s. The content of this course has its roots in academic research in solidmechanics, mechanisms and
of faculty in the establishment of MEERCat and how faculty-led researchprojects can contribute to informing both policy and practice at the department level. Thenarratives provided details on the history behind the development of these research projects, thelarge data collection efforts involved, and the collaborations inside the University that help theprojects function smoothly. Faculty who engage in course innovation or education research canuse this paper as a case study of how to get actively and collectively involved in influencingdepartment-level practices at their respective institutions.References[1] J. L. Melsa, S. A. Rajala, and J. P. Mohsen, “Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education
redesigned advising process based on such feedback; we focused on ourEngineering Leadership program. The criteria for this selection was: 1) the cohorts within theprogram were well identified and documented, 2) the program was smaller (80 students) and newermaking it more flexible to adapt 3) the advisor(s)/faculty wanted to move to a three-pillar modelwhich focused on a) advising, b) mentoring, and c) professional development.A team involving four students from varying classifications, along with a student from a differentdepartment/college, was brought in to conduct focus groups around the challenges of the currentadvising process. Based on such, the team was re-aligned with the goal of conducting addition focusgroups of students about what type
Bachman who was a senior student in METprogram at Purdue Polytechnic Kokomo. The author of this paper would like to express his gratitude toMr. Dennis Carter, lab technician at Purdue Polytechnic Kokomo, for helping in setting up part of theexperiments conducted in this study. Funding was made available by Purdue Polytechnic to supportmaterials and equipment purchase needed for this project.References[1] M. Mujahid, P. Gandhidasan, S. Rehman, and L.M. Al-Hadhrami, “A review on desiccant based evaporative cooling systems,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 45, pp. 145–159, Feb. 2015.[2] D. Dougan, and L. Damiano, “CO2-based demand control ventilation – Do risks outweigh potential rewards?,” ASHRAE Journal, vol. 46(10), pp. 47
industry standards through theireducation [2].The ACCE standards, before the change to Student Learning Outcomes (SLO) were developed inthe 1990’s and were periodically revised and updated. A three-level structure (curriculumcategories, core subject matter & fundamental topical content) for setting the standards for thecurriculum content came into force in 2002 following almost 10 years of committee work [11].That curriculum standards were prescriptive that required a minimum number of credit hours tobe taught in specific core subject matter and all fundamental topical content to be covered.Within each curriculum category, there was a specific core subject matter that has to be includedin the curriculum. In most cases, a minimum number of
-relatedpositions [7]. Similarly, business ethics arose from philosophers’ interest in understanding whatconstitutes right and wrong behavior in the context of competitive financial transactions [8]. As aprogram of inquiry, some have dated the historical roots of business ethics to the mid 1970’s,when the first academic conference in business ethics was held [9]. Indeed, some of the samephilosophers interested in applied and practical ethics crossed contextual boundaries, applyingthe same structures of thought to several disciplinary realms. Bioethicist Tom Beauchamp is agood example of such cross-overs, having published one of the earliest anthologies in businessethics [10] just a few years after publishing his major work in bioethics.The same holds for
andreferential language to communicate conceptual understandings. Finally, the holistic applicationof rubrics to interview data allowed for understandings of the engineering design process to beexpressed in multiple ways: both implicit and explicit understandings could be expressed byparticipants and then scored by analysts’ application of the rubrics to each participant’s interviewas a whole.References[1] E. P. Douglas, S. S. Jordan, M. Lande, and A. E. Bumbaco, “Artifact elicitation as a method of qualitative inquiry in engineering education,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, USA, June 2015.[2] Engineering Accreditation Commission. “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs,” Accreditation Board for
programs tend to focus on leadership asa set of skills or experiences bolted onto a traditional engineering education with limited formalevidence of the impact these experiences have on student development.The purpose of this study is to test the effect of experiences engineering students have in leadershiproles on their perceived gains in leadership skills, using a national dataset. The framework guidingthis study is a model for engineering leadership identity constructed from Lave and Wenger’scommunities of practice model and Komives et al.’s model for leadership identity development(LID) which recognizes that the engineering formation process is, at its core, an identitydevelopment process. Engineering leadership is theorized to develop from
assurance in online learning,” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 11-24, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v17i4.402. [Accessed Jan. 4, 2018].[3] B. Brown, S. E. Eaton, D. M. Jacobsen, S. Roy and S. Friesen, “Instructional design collaboration: A professional learning and growth experience,” MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 439-452, Sept. 2013. [Online]. Available: http://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no3/brown_0913.htm. [Accessed Jan. 10, 2018].[4] I. T. Chao, T. Saj and D. Hamilton, “Using collaborative course development to achieve online course quality standards,” The International Review of Research in Open and
2007. 5. Minaie, Afsaneh, et.al., Nanotechnology in Engineering Education”, 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, June 2015. 6. “What is Nanotechnology?,” What is Nanotechnology? | Nano. [Online]. Available: https://www.nano.gov/nanotech-101/what/definition. [Accessed: 28-Jan-2018]. 7. P. Dockrill, “Scientists Just Developed The World's Smallest Transistor,” ScienceAlert, 07 Oct-2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-just- developed-the-world-s-smallest-ever-transistor. [Accessed: 28-Jan-2018]. 8. “VEGA3,” Tescan. [Online]. Available: https://www.tescan.com/en- us/technology/sem/vega3. [Accessed: 27-Jan-2018]. 9. M. J. Madou, Fundamentals of
expecting to see higher levels of student and agency motivation and engagement. With thismonetary award at stake, we also anticipate an improvement in the quality of this year’s projectproposals.References[1] R. G. Bringle and J. A. Hatcher, “A service-learning curriculum for faculty,” Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, pp. 112-122, 1995.[2] S. J. Peterson and M. J. Schaffer, “Service learning: A strategy to develop group collaboration and research skills,” Journal of Nursing Education, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 208-214, 1999.[3] C. I. Celio, J. Durlak, and A. Dymnicki, “A meta-analysis of the impact of service-learning on students,” Journal of Experiential Education, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 164-181, 2011.[4] M. J. Gray, E. H
Paper ID #23254Work in Progress: Introduction of Failure Analysis to a First-year RoboticsCourseDr. Kathleen A. Harper, Ohio State University Kathleen A. Harper is a senior lecturer in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She received her M. S. in physics and B. S. in electrical engineering and applied physics from Case Western Reserve University, and her Ph. D. in physics from The Ohio State University. She has been on the staff of Ohio State’s University Center for the Advancement of Teaching, in addition to teaching in both the physics and engineering education departments. She is
kinds of personalinteractions necessary to create the conditions for effective group work and learning well.References[1] Davis, D., Trevisan, M., Leiffer, P., McCormack, J., Beyerlein, S., Kahn, M. J., and Brackin, P. (2013). Reflection and metacognition in engineering practice. in M. Kaplan, N. Silver, D. Lavaque-Manty and D. Meizlish (Eds.) Using reflection and metacognition to improve student learning. (pp.78-103). Sterling, VA: Stylus.[2] Nilson, L. B. (2013). Creating self-regulated learners. Sterling, VA: Stylus.[3] Sousa, D. A. (2006). How the brain learns (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.[4] Mestre, J. (2002). Transfer of Learning: Issues and research agenda. Retrieved 1/18/2018 from https://www.nsf.gov/pubs
conceptualprimitive works. Then a final project was created in the course (2010~2013); students wererequired to finish a group project adopting the primitives lectured in the classes. Studentstaking the EOS course could thus be well trained and solve problems as expected. However,we got some feedbacks from graduated students, who asked to introduce more skills ofinnovation and imagination in such a course. Their values can be demonstrated not only fromtheir competencies of hands-on skills but also from designing a new product. Hence, in the fourth phase (2014~2016), CIM was adopted and SCAMPER wasintroduced in the EOS courses. Students were encouraged to put more innovation skills intotheir final project. The more verbs (S, C, A, M, P, E, R) applied to
preliminary analysis of the system is detailed below.Based on the competition information, it is assumed that the retrieval device will separate from amain parent satellite close to a piece of target debris and complete small maneuvering actions toachieve the best possible engagement position. Thruster nozzles using CO2 as a medium were goingbe used to demonstrate this motion. The concept is similar to the Manned Maneuvering Unit (MMU)developed by NASA for untethered extravehicular activity (EVA) activities. The design goal for thepayload was a simpler version incorporating only four thrusters. Two thrusters would be placed onthe outer edges of the main body and two on the rear in the same relative position.Calculations show that at 60 deg/s rotation
motivated a comprehensive study of sili-nail lamp at high student-throughput rates. Students could be con wafer behavior when exposed to microwaves. First theexposed to the concepts of crosslinking and glass transition temperature in the empty microwave was measured before itin a less formal setting than the traditional lecture, allowing was turned on, directly after it had been on for 15 s, and thenstudents to actually experience the concepts instead of solely every minute until the interior of the oven returned to roomhearing them described. temperature. It was found that even though each trial began at Student satisfaction with the demo version of the experi- room temperature
very different results.Trina’s efficiency started off as the best, but had a steep decline from 2015 to 2016. Sharp’sefficiency was never near the top but did not have that steep decline despite being the same typeof panel. Further investigation will be done into the loss of data for certain months as well as theeffect that cleaning has on the efficiency of our solar panels.5References 1 New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, NY-Sun Annual Performance Report through December 31, 2015, Final Report (March 2016), p. S-1 2 Kaya Laterman, “Is New York Ready for Solar Power?” The New York Times, The New York Times, 30 Sept. 2016, www.nytimes.com/2016/10/02/realestate/is-new-york-ready-for-solar
. Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.[5] M. R. Banaji & A. G. Greenwald, Blindspot: The Hidden Biases of Good People. New York:Delacorte Press, 2013.[6] C. Herring & L. Henderson, “From affirmative action to diversity: Toward a critical diversityperspective,” Critical Sociology, vol. 38. ED-5, pp. 300, 2012.[7] C. Herring, “Diversity and departmental rankings in chemistry,” in Careers,Entrepreneurship and Diversity: Challenges and Opportunities in the Global ChemistryEnterprise, H.N. Cheng, S. Shah & M.L. Wu, Eds. Washington, DC: American ChemicalSociety, 2014, pp. 225-236.[8] A. Kalev, F. Dobbin & E. Kelly, “Best practices of best guesses? Assessing the efficacy ofcorporate affirmative
EDC graduate track was approved. With MCEDC, her main duties have included student advising and academic program development. Recently, she co-developed the curriculum for the new Minor in Global Engineering offered by the CU Boulder College of Engineering and Applied Science starting in fall 2016. Ms. Sandekian earned B.S. and M.S. degrees in Aerospace Engineering Sciences at CU Boulder, a Spe- cialist in Education (Ed. S.) degree in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies from the University of Northern Colorado, and earned her Ph.D. in the Higher Education Student Affairs Leadership program from the University of Northern Colorado in 2017. c American Society for Engineering
, has anapproximately 60 seconds training time while achieving 95%-97% accuracy on the MNIST testset. The finalized model is Jetson ready. 98.5 98 97.5 97 96.5 96 95.5 95 94.5 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Figure 11: Runtime (s) vs. Accuracy (%) Baseline Network Batch Size 1024 Training Epochs 100 Learning Rate 0.01 Optimizer Adam Hidden Units 800
holds B.S. and M.A. degrees in Mathematics. Dr. Hensel has over seven years of experience working in engineer- ing teams and in project management and administration as a Mathematician and Computer Systems Analyst for the U. S. Department of Energy as well as more than 25 years teaching mathematics, statis- tics, computer science, and freshman engineering courses in higher education institutions. Currently, she leads a team of faculty who are dedicated to providing first year engineering students with a high-quality, challenging, and engaging educational experience with the necessary advising, mentoring, and academic support to facilitate their transition to university life and to prepare them for success in their
extending beyond ourfirst goals of STEM exposure and engagement.References[1] S. Rogers, S. Harris, I. Fidan, and D. McNeel, “Art2STEM: Building a STEM Workforce at the Middle School Level,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, BC, June 26-29, 2011.[2] M. Bright, “The Importance of Early, Consistent Exposure to STEM Fields,” Huffington Post, May 5, 2017. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/the-importance-of-early-and- consistent-exposure-to_us_5908e6b1e4b03b105b44bcdf[3] S. Oberoi, “The Economic Impact of Early Exposure to STEM Education,” Committee for Economic Development, June 21, 2016. https://www.ced.org/blog/entry/the-economic- impact-of-early-exposure-to-stem-education[4] H
., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 28-54.5 Capobianco, B. M. (2006). Undergraduate women engineering their professional identities. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 12(2-3), 95- 117.6 Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on Interest in Science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27-50.7 Zawojewski, J. S., Diefes-Dux, H. A., & Bowman, K. J. (Eds.). (2008). Models and Modeling in Engineering Education. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers8 Cooper, M. M., Cox, C. T., Nammouz, M., Case, E., & Stevens, R
experience working in engineer- ing teams and in project management and administration as a Mathematician and Computer Systems Analyst for the U. S. Department of Energy as well as more than 25 years teaching mathematics, statis- tics, computer science, and freshman engineering courses in higher education institutions. Currently, she leads a team of faculty who are dedicated to providing first year engineering students with a high-quality, challenging, and engaging educational experience with the necessary advising, mentoring, and academic support to facilitate their transition to university life and to prepare them for success in their engineering discipline majors and future careers.Dr. Melissa Lynn Morris, West
an formal assessment of the methodology and preset it as a full paper. Works Cited1. Newstetter, W. C. (2006). Fostering integrative problem solving in biomedical engineering: the PBL approach. Annals of biomedical engineering, 34(2), 217-225.2. Mason, G. S., Shuman, T. R., & Cook, K. E. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(4), 430-435.3. Johnson, David W., Roger T. Johnson, and Karl A. Smith. Cooperative Learning Returns to College What Evidence Is There That It Works? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 30.4 (1998): 26-35.