Conference Session

Continuing Professional Development Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Moses Olayemi, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Collins N. Vaye, Florida International University; Viyon Dansu, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Jennifer Deboer, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

Conference Session

MASS: Mastery, Assessment and Success of Students

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Brad Gregory Davis, United States Military Academy; Kevin Francis McMullen, United States Military Academy; J. Adam Pegues, United States Military Academy at West Point

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

Proceedings, 2020.[12] M. G. Simkin, “Should you allow your students to grade their own homework?,” J. Inf. Syst. Educ., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 147–153, 2015.[13] W. Y. Hwang, N. S. Chen, R. Shadiev, and J. S. Li, “Effects of reviewing annotations and homework solutions on math learning achievement,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1016–1028, 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01126.x.[14] S. Hedtrich and N. Graulich, “Using software tools to provide students in large classes with individualized formative feedback,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 95, no. 12, pp. 2263–2267, 2018, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00173.[15] J. Lang, Small Teaching: Everyday lessons from the science of learning. San Francisco, CA

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Alexis Rae Walsh, University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Sarah E. Norris, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Nathaniel Blalock, Enlite Research Group Led by Dr. Faber: University of Tennessee - Knoxville; Daniel Patrick Mountain, University of Tennessee - Knoxville; Courtney June Faber, University of Tennessee at Knoxville

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

of 8 participantsCommunication response from other teammate(s)Delegation Impact of assigning roles to individual team members 8 out of 8 participants and overall distribution (or lack thereof) of tasks required by the projectLack of Team member(s) show a lack of motivation after 8 out of 8 participantsMotivation moving onlineMeeting Team member expresses challenge of getting team to 8 out of 8 participants meet after moving online due to schedulingRelationship Student expresses impact of getting to know teammates 8 out of 8 participantsFormation for online project compared to in

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nadiye O. Erdil, University of New Haven

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

(value) and variation were brought up again.The follow up report constituted addressing the following tasks: • Providing a description of the case including background, important factors, critical measures, etc. • Determining each design’s performance with regards to the quality measure(s) identified • Recommending which design that the company should continue with for further advancement based on both technical feasibility and economic value analysis • Providing statistical justification to all responsesAll the information necessary to conduct a technical feasibility analysis using statistical toolswas available in the materials covered during the lectures; but the students had to research togather more information to

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Liesl Klein, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Greg J. Strimel, Purdue University at West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

all the codinginstances.Table 1: Three examples of stories with their codes and IRR Post Story Coder L Coder G Coder S IRR # 1 My name is Gale. I'm a postdoc studying natural resource management, coping mechanism under 78.6% and I have ADHD and Generalized Anxiety Disorder. coping represented/women I've seen therapists off and on since age 19, and never thought I needed mechanism/behaviora coping meds. But once I started grad school, all my normal coping mechanisms

Conference Session

New Directions for Engineering Technology

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Osazuwa John Okundaye Jr., Texas A&M University; Malini Natarajarathinam, Texas A&M University; Mathew Kuttolamadom, Texas A&M University; Francis Quek, Texas A&M University; Sharon Lynn Chu, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

studentshone their skills.References [1] O. Okundaye, S. Chu, F. Quek, A. Berman, M. Natarajarathinam, and M. Kuttolamadom, “From making to micro-manufacture: Catalyzing stem participation in rural high schools,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Creativity and Making in Education, pp. 21–29, 2018. [2] O. J. Okundaye, M. Kuttolamadom, M. Natarajarathinam, S. L. Chu, and F. Quek, “Motivating stem participation through a’making as micro-manufacture (m3)’model,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018. [3] D. M. Yip-Hoi, “Teaching surface modeling to cad/cam technologists,” in American Society for Engineering Education, American Society for Engineering Education, 2011. [4] F. Heidari, “Status study of cad/cam/cnc

Conference Session

Working Together: Approaches to Inclusivity and Interdisciplinarity

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kenya Z Mejia, University of Washington; Yen-Lin Han, Seattle University; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

. This work encourages the engineering educationcommunity to find new ways to define how an inclusive practice is working for a specificcontext, as a supplement to a quantitative approach.References[1] C. E. Foor, S. E. Walden, and D. A. Trytten, “‘I Wish that I Belonged More in this Whole Engineering Group:’ Achieving Individual Diversity,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 103–115, 2007, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00921.x.[2] B. Berhane, S. Secules, and F. Onuma, “Learning While Black: Identity Formation and Experience for Five Black Men Who Transferred Into Engineering Undergraduate Programs,” J. Women Minor. Sci. Eng., vol. 26, 2020, doi: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2020024994.[3] M. Kali, S. Secules, and C

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Natalie Schaal, Loyola Marymount University; Spencer Edwin Chan, Loyola Marymount University; Julian K. Saint Clair, Loyola Marymount University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

thematching survey and one from the baseline (pre-) survey. Table 1 serves to highlight and labelthese five survey questions. Table 1: Main survey questions analyzed from the canceled GAIN pilot. The identifier “M” refers to the matching survey and “B” refers to the baseline survey Topic, Style, and Source Highlighted Survey Question Briefly describe the main challenge(s) you have faced Question M1: in college so far. Examples academic struggles, Challenges faced personal struggles, time management, work-balance life, difficult

Conference Session

Perspectives on Engineering Education During COVID-19

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Keven Alkhoury, New Jersey Institute of Technology ; Ahmed Z. Edrees, University of Jeddah & New Jersey Institute of Technology; Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Ashish D. Borgaonkar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

amongst all three teaching modes. Nevertheless, significant differences maysometimes exist between one or two pairs. Thus, post-hoc analysis (Tukey) is used to determinewhich pair(s) cause this significance, shown in Table 8. Tukey’s analysis are performed only onthe two significant constructs from the ANOVA analysis, and the results indicate that the students’response to the interactive construct differ significantly between a semester with fullyimplemented remote teaching and one with in-person labs with a p-value of (p = 0.001), a meandifference of (-0.930), and a standard error of (0.238); this difference indicates that students in in-person sessions anticipated to receive more interactive learning instructions than those in remotesessions

Conference Session

First-year Programs: Computation in the First Year

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jutshi Agarwal, University of Cincinnati; Gregory Warren Bucks, University of Cincinnati; Kathleen A. Ossman, University of Cincinnati; Teri J. Murphy, University of Cincinnati; Cijy Elizabeth Sunny, Baylor University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

computer programming students: a middle eastern and American comparison. IEEE Transactions on Education, 2006. 49(4): p. 443-50.15. Felder, R.M., Learning and teaching styles in foreign and second language education. Foreign Language Annals, 1995. 28(1): p. 21-31.16. Ma, L., et al., Investigating the viability of mental models held by novice programmers. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 2007. 39(1): p. 499-503.17. Bonar, J. and E. Soloway. Uncovering principles of novice programming. in Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN symposium on Principles of programming languages. 1983. Austin, Texas: ACM.18. Brown, H. D., & Gonzo, S. T. Readings on second language acquisition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall

Conference Session

Computers in Education 2 - Programming 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Safia Malallah, Kansas State University; Khaled Nasser Alsalmi, The Public Authority for Applied Education and Training; Joshua Levi Weese, Kansas State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

[1] D. Barr, J. Harrison, and L. Conery, "Computational thinking: A digital age skill for everyone," Learning & Leading with Technology, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 20-23, 2011.[2] C. ISTE. "Computational Thinking Leadership Toolkit - ISTE." https://cdn.iste.org/www-root/ct-documents/ct-leadershipt-toolkit.pdf?sfvrsn=4 (accessed 2021).[3] I. Corradini, M. Lodi, and E. Nardelli, "Computational Thinking in Italian Schools: Quantitative Data and Teachers' Sentiment Analysis after Two Years of" Programma il Futuro"," in Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 2017, pp. 224-229.[4] S. F. Sidek, C. S. Said, and M. H. M. Yatim, "Characterizing

Conference Session

Innovative Pedagogies Afforded Through Technology and Remote Learning

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Hector Zuniga-Robles, Universidad Andres Bello; María Elena Truyol, Universidad Andres Bello

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

conversations are generated in class having laid out basic knowledge and any doubts generated are solved in class." (S14) "I think they serve to lay the groundwork for the subject that is going to be further discussed in class and thus, once in the class itself, one better understands the concepts and subject matter." (S36)Students' perception of the "Flipped Classroom + Podcasts" instructional practiceThe responses obtained from the “Student Response to Instructional Practices” (StRIP)questionnaire were compiled in spreadsheets and analyzed using the Excel statistical modules.The StRIP was sent by email to students at semester´s end, obtaining 26 responses out of the 53student total.Given the interest in analyzing student

Conference Session

Design Related

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Taylor Tucker, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Ava R. Wolf, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Nattasit Dancholvichit, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Leon Liebenberg, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

learning process to the student, but to intentionally add adegree of freedom and flexibility often missing from academic coursework. Allowing studentssome ability to shape their learning experience enables them to advance their personal skill setand interests in new and constructive ways. Pedagogically, the mini-projects aim to movestudents from a simple to a complex level of understanding; for example, moving beyond simplygrasping how a tool is employed to understanding its purpose, the need(s) it addresses, and theexpectations surrounding its use. In short, students learn how to think about tools and operationsthat are viable, feasible, and desirable. Adding opportunities for flexibility in pursuing some oftheir own interests can further

Conference Session

Program Support Initiatives

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ronald W. Welch, The Citadel; Robert J. Rabb P.E., The Citadel; Alyson Grace Eggleston, The Citadel

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

still be used to record classes forassessment and improve teaching. Additionally, recorded lectures can be easily edited to createshort instructional videos for supplemental instruction, additional problem solving, flippedclassroom, or even to give a lab orientation before the actual lab. Fully recorded sessions canalso be made available to select students who missed classes due to job interviews, athletics, orillness. As campuses increased their technical capacity and capability, the talent and equipmentcan and should still be used so all are proficient before we must react to another tumultuousevent.References[1] A. C. Estes, R. W. Welch, and S. J. Ressler, “The ExCEEd Teaching Model: Teaching Lessons Learned,” Journal of

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Unique Projects and Pedagogies

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

John Sangster P.E., Northeastern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

. Stylus Publishing, LLC., 2017.[7] W. C. Newstetter, “Of Green Monkeys and Failed Affordances: A Case Study of a Mechanical Engineering Design Course,” Res. Eng. Des., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 118–128, 1998.[8] D. Armel and S. A. Shrock, “The Effects of Required and Optional Computer-Based Note Taking on Achievement and Instructional Completion Time,” J. Educ. Comput. Res., 1996.[9] S. A. Lei, “Revisiting Extra Credit Assignments Perspectives of College Instructors,” J. Instr. Psychol., 2010.[10] T. Park, C. S. Woods, S. Hu, T. B. Jones, and D. Tandberg, “What Happens to Underprepared First-Time-in-College Students When Developmental Education is Optional? The Case of Developmental Math and Intermediate

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Praveen Meduri, California State University, Sacramento; Lawrence David Landis, Intel Programmable Solutions Group; Perry L. Heedley, California State University, Sacramento; Tyler Sheaves, Intel Corporation

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

." United Nations Organization. https://unsdg.un.org/resources/policy-brief-education-during-covid-19-and-beyond (accessed April 14, 2021).[3] S. Khan, R. Rabbani, I. Thalassinos, and M. Atif, "Corona Virus Pandemic Paving Ways to Next Generation of Learning and Teaching: Futuristic Cloud Based Educational Model," Available at SSRN 3669832, 2020.[4] J. Q. Michael Fullan, Max Drummy, Mag Gardner, "Education Reimagined: The Future of Learning," no. http://aka.ms/hybridlearningpaper. [Online]. Available: http://aka.ms/hybridlearningpaper[5] "Pandemic sparks game-changing approach to hardware training." https://www.cmc.ca/pandemic-sparks-game-changing-approach-to-hardware-training/ (accessed April 14, 2021).[6] Q. N. Naveed, M

Conference Session

Research Methods and Studies on Engineering Education Research

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Johanna Naukkarinen, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology; Marja Talikka, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Scope of interventionEuropean Journal of Engineering Education 6 Engineering education 21Computer Applications in Engineering Education 3 Computer Science 7International Journal of Engineering Education 3 K-12 engineering 6IEEE Transactions on Education 2 34Journal of Engineering Education 2 Location of the authors'Journal of Systems and Software 2 institution(s)Advances in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Scott M. Randol, OMSI; Carla Herran, Oregon Museum of Science and Industry ; Smirla Ramos-Montanez, OMSI; Todd Shagott; Marcie R. Benne, Oregon Museum of Science and Industry (OMSI)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

, and data collection documents and procedures were available inboth Spanish and English languages for youth participants and their guardians. We followedOMSI guidelines for collecting, managing, and analyzing data in two languages (e.g., more thanone researcher is fluent in Spanish and English, instrument development includes members ofLatino communities, data is collected in participants’ preferred language(s) and is kept in thesource language throughout the analysis).Data collectionObservationA one-page form was used to gather observation data. The form prompted observers to recordthe size and make-up of the visitor group, the date and time of day, and the name of the exhibit.Once a visitor interacted with the exhibit, observers recorded the

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Recruiting and Retention

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Charmane V. Caldwell, Florida A&M University-Florida State University College of Engineering; Roxanne Hughes, National High Magnetic Field Laboratory

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

LLC is only for first-year students, the factors and skillsets participants learn stay with them their remaining time atFAMU.References[1] K., Inkelas, J.E. Jessup-Anger, M. Benjamin, and M.R. Wawrzynski, (2018) Living LearningCommunities that work: A research-based model for design, delivery, and assessment. StylusPublishing, LLC.[2] K. Inkelas, Z. E., K. E., Daver, Vogt, and J., Leonard, (2007). Living–Learning Programsand First-Generation College Students’ Academic and Social Transition to College. Research inHigher Education, 48(4), 403-434. doi: 10.1007/s11162-006-9031-6[3] K. Inkelas, M. Soldner, S. Longerbeam, and J. Leonard (2008). Differences in StudentOutcomes by Types of Living–Learning Programs: The Development of an Empirical

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Heydi L. Dominguez, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Vibhavari Vempala, University of Michigan; Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Aileen Huang-Saad, Northeastern University; Jacob Frederick Fuher, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

. 738–743.[4] L. J. Shuman, C. Delaney, H. Wolfe, A. Scalise, and M. Besterfield-Sacre, “Engineering attrition: Student characteristics and educational initiatives,” in Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education, 1999, pp. 1–12.[5] S. P. Nichols and N. E. Armstrong, “Engineering entrepreneurship: Does entrepreneurship have a role in engineering education?,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 134–138, 2003.[6] P. Shekhar, A. Huang-Saad, J. Libarkin, R. Cummings, and V. Tafurt, “Assessment of student learning in an entrepreneurship practicum course,” 2017.[7] T. P. James, E. Rose Morehouse, and T. P. James, “Employer Perceptions of Undergraduate Student Entrepreneurial

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Yen-Lin Han, Seattle University; Kathleen E. Cook, Seattle University; Gregory Mason P.E., Seattle University; Teodora Rutar Shuman, Seattle University; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

. Cook received her doctorate in Social and Personality Psychology from the University of Washington, with a minor in quantitative methods and emphases in cognitive and educational psychology. Her research has included classroom learning, identity, and person perception.Dr. Gregory Mason P.E., Seattle University Gregory S. Mason received the B.S.M.E. degree from Gonzaga University in 1983, the M.S.M.E. de- gree in manufacturing automation from Georgia Institute of Technology in 1984 and the Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering, specializing in multi-rate digital controls, from the University of Washington in 1992. He worked in a robotics lab for the Department of Defense for five years after receiving his

Conference Session

Research Methods and Studies on Engineering Education Research

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Renato Alan Bezerra Rodrigues, University of Manitoba; Jeffrey Wayne Paul, University of Manitoba; Jillian Seniuk Cicek, University of Manitoba

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

virtual summer seminar. This seminar was moderated byAditya Johri, one of the editors of the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research(CHEER). In this series of 15 seminars, 32 CHEER authors engaged in a one-hour discussionwith Johri to elicit their current views on the topics highlighted in their chapters. As part of theintroduction to each seminar, Dr. Johri asked the author(s) how they entered the field of EER.The findings from the analysis of this secondary data are used to develop a framework to helpanswer the research question: How did current engineering education researchers enter thefield? This is the first step in our major research goal, which aims to investigate what institutionscan do to attract and retain EER

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division Technical Session 13

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Marcelo Caplan, Columbia College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

support systems, suggesting the sequencing of three phases whenconducting a Live on Facebook. A) Planning, where the Live Transmission is designed anddefined, generates an advance with the topics discussed, published/promoted in the same socialnetwork. B) Transmission begins with the expert (s) presentation and guests' presentation andtakes advantage of the options for reactions and comments to direct the Live Transmissioncontent and make it even more relevant. C) The post-broadcast when it must ensure that the LiveTransmission recording is available for future views.In the field of languages and culture, Ross [4] shows how the crisis has fundamentally alteredteaching methods, which is why a shift towards remote teaching is required in Harvard

Conference Session

Computers in Education 4 - Online and Distributed Learning 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sunay Palsole, Texas A&M University; Jeff Chernosky, Texas A&M University; Randy McDonald, Texas A&M University Engineering

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

] M. Simmons, G. Parchoma, M. Jacobsen, D. Nelson, and S. Bhola, “Designing for studentengagement in an online doctoral research methods course. Proceedings of the IDEAS:Designing for Innovation. pp. 81–91, 2016.[3] P. Nuangchalerm, T. Polyiem, and P. Wongchantra, “Learning achievement, science processskills, and moral reasoning of ninth grade students learned by 7E learning cycle andsocioscientific issue-based learning. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, vol. 5,no. 10, pp. 257-564, 2011.[4] S.J. Baldwin and J.H. Trespalacios, “Evaluation instruments and good practices in onlineeducation,” Online Learning, vol. 21, no. 2. pp. 1-18. doi:10.24059/olj.v21i2.913, 2017.[5] P. K. Gibson and T. Kinsey, “Need we train online

Conference Session

Community-Engaged Engineering Education Challenges and Opportunities in Light of COVID-19 Paper Presentations 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Camille Velarde, University of New Mexico; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Estike Kokovay Gutierrez

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division, Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

, "Community Engagement in Engineering Education: Needs and Learning Outcomes," in Developments in Engineering Education Standards: Advanced Curriculum Innovations: IGI Global, 2012, pp. 301-317.[8] E. A. Davis, A. S. Palincsar, A. M. Arias, A. S. Bismack, L. Marulis, and S. Iwashyna, "Designing educative curriculum materials: A theoretically and empirically driven process," Harvard Educational Review, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 24-52, 2014.[9] V. Svihla, T. Kubik, and T. Stephens-Shauger, "Performance assessment practice as professional learning," Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, vol. 13, no. 2, 2019.[10] P. Freire, Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Herder and Herder, 1970.[11] L. T. Smith

Collection

2021 ASEE Pacific Southwest Conference - "Pushing Past Pandemic Pedagogy: Learning from Disruption"

Authors

Duc Hoai Tran, CSULB; Hen-Geul Yeh

differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario,” Comput. Educ., vol. 63, pp. 306–317, Apr. 2013. [2] C. J. Asarta and J. R. Schmidt, “Access patterns of online materials in a blended course,” Decision Sci. J. Innov. Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 107–123, 2013. [3] H. M. S. Ahmed, “Hybrid e-learning acceptance model: Learner perceptions,” Decision Sci. J. Innov. Educ., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 313–346, 2010. [4] S. Djenic, R. Krneta, and J. Mitic, “Blended learning of programming in the Internet age,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 247–254, May 2011. [5] D. Szafir and B. Mutlu, “ARTFuL: Adaptive review technology for flipped learning,” in Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Syst

Collection

Middle Atlantic ASEE Section Spring 2021 Conference

Authors

Amy Voss Farris, Pennsylvania State University; Anna Eunji Kim, Pennsylvania State University; Junde Li; Swaroop Ghosh, Pennsylvania State University

that we have only four heavy atoms (i.e.,carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and sulfur) and four positions in which they can be located. Thepurpose of the circuit is to identify one atom for each of these four positions with the highestprobability to form a molecule with a good fit for binding to the protein. Our four heavy atoms(C, N, O, and S) can inhabit four positions (44) which can be encoded as 256 uniquecombinations of molecules. Rather than checking all 256 possibilities one-by-one as a classicalcomputer would require, we leverage entanglement and superposition to check them all at onetime. As is true in our advanced quantum circuit, hydrogen is not encoded. This is becausehydrogen (H) is a light atom. Rather, we assume the presence of

Collection

2021 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Meeting

Authors

Otily Toutsop, Morgan State University; Rachida Satio Constance Kone, Morgan State University; ketchiozo wandji; Kevin Kornegay, Morgan State University; Caroline Kinyanjui, Morgan State University; Vinton Amsley Morris; Jay Jemal; Javaun Rose, Morgan State University

threatvector model. The Threat Modeling framework provides a list of risks that show which threatthe Arduino is exposed to and explores the available mitigation options. The tool creates a threatreport from the threat list as an organized document that displays all threats/mitigations in theenvironment. The STRIDE technique allows users to select from a variety of processes and dataflows. Table 1 below indicates the STRIDE technique type, definition, and proposed mitigationapproach.Table 1: Arduino Mega Board Threat Break Down with Potential Mitigation STRIDE Arduino Arduino Threat Break Down Potential Mitigation Threat S Spoofing Authentication - Attackers, assume Create a solid and long

Conference Session

Undergraduate Students' Development of Computational and Programming Skills

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Geoffrey L. Herman, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Sofia Meyers, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Sarah-Elizabeth Deshaies, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

R. R.Cocking, editors, How People Learn: Brain, Mind,Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press,2000. [Online]. Available: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9853/how-people-learn-brain-mind-experience-and-school-expanded-edition[4] K. Rayner, “Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visualsearch,” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 1457–1506,2009. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461[5] M. Hegarty, Multimedia learning and the development of mental models. Cam- bridge:Cambridge University Press, 2014, p. 673–702.[6] A. M. Madsen, A. M. Larson, L. C. Loschky, and N. S. Rebello, “Differences in visualattention

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Learning and Teaching Experiences

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University; Amy Trowbridge, Arizona State University; Keirien Taylor, Arizona State University, UOEEE; Daniel J. Laxman, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

a GCSP (5.0% (n=1) did not provide enoughinformation to determine their affiliation). Those who were affiliated with a GCSP includeprogram directors, committee members, faculty members, and staff while those who were notaffiliated with a GCSP were either faculty members preparing to start a GCSP at theirinstitution(s) or were unrelated to GCSP. Users were asked to select from a list of options andindicate how they found the online course modules platform. The results show that 40.0% ofusers (n=8) found the modules via the KEEN card on EngineeringUnleashed.com and 40.0% ofusers found the modules via email communication from the NAE GCSP. The modules were alsofound via the KEEN GCSP subnet, forwarded emails/recommendations from colleagues