Conference Session

Active Engagement: From the New Engineering Librarian's Perspective

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Jane Dooley, Dalhousie University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries

(3), 188-198. doi: 10.1016/j.iilr.2008.06.0046. Jeffries, S. (2000). The librarian as networker: Setting the standard for higher education. In R. Raspa, & D. Ward (Eds.). The collaborative imperative: Librarians and faculty working together in the information universe (pp. 114-129). Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.7. Stoddart, R. A.; Bryant, T. W.; Baker, A. L.; Lee, A.; Spencer, B. (2006). PERSPECTIVES ON…Going boldly beyond the reference desk: Practical advice and learning plans for new reference librarians performing liaison work. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(4), 419-427. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2006.03.0098. Beck, D. M., & Callison, R. (2006). Becoming a science librarian: Accident

Conference Session

SE Curriculum and Course Management

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Francis Lutz, Monmouth University; James McDonald, Monmouth University

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Constituent Committee

. Thiswould free up the selection choices of interns and eliminate possible duplication of material.The academic leaders of the Software Engineering Masters’ degree program(s), which theorganization will use in the future for its software engineering interns, should be invited to abriefing with the organization’s management and a small cross section of employees so they canbetter understand the daily functions of the organization. A short panel session withorganizational management followed by an open Q&A session and, perhaps, one-on-onediscussions with a cross section of individual employees could substantially increase theunderstanding faculty would have of the interns’ academic needs.There is a very diverse range of continuing professional

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Poster Session

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathy Schmidt, University of Texas, Austin; Juan Garcia, University of Texas, Austin; Michael Webber, University of Texas, Austin

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Lake City, UT. 5. Reay, N. W., Li, Pengfei, & Bao, Lei. (2008). Testing a new voting machine methodology. American Journal of Physics, 72(2), 171-178. 6. Winer D. (2003). What makes a weblog a weblog? [Weblogs at Harvard Law Web site] http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/whatMakesAWeblogAWeblog#vignetteAndWikis Accessed January 14, 2009. 7. Vygotskoy, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. In: Cole M, John-Steiner V, Scribner S, Souberman E, trans-eds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 8. Ocker, R.J. & Yaverbaum, G.J. (2001). Collaborative learning environments: Exploring student attitudes and satisfaction in face-to-face and asynchronous computer

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Poster Session

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Anderson, United States Air Force Academy; Matthew Snyder, United States Air Force Academy; Michael Maixner, United States Air Force Academy

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

implementation of this course. Our thanks andappreciation for their effort and hard work: Mr. Lonn Rodine, Mr. Rob Lotz, Mr. RichardBoschee and Technical Sergeant Jonathon Solomon. Page 14.560.14Bibliography1. Volk, K. S., “Industrial Arts Revisited: An Examination of the Subject’s Continued Strength, Relevance and Value”, Journal of Technology Education, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1996.2. Menicucci, J., Duffy, J., Palmer, B., “Hands-on Introduction to Chemical and Biological Engineering”, Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.3. Farrow, D., “Development of a Manufacturing

Conference Session

Issues and Opportunities in IE Education

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marlin Thomas, Air Force Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering

. This also presents the greatest challenge for IE educators tomaintain a curricula core for the discipline and profession.End NotesThe views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect the official positionof the Air Force, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.References1. ALDRICH, J.G., 1912. “The Present State of the Art of Industrial Management,” Trans. of the ASME, Vol. 34, Paper 1378, pp. 1182-11872. BILLINGS, C., J.J. Junguzza, D.F. Poirier, and S. Saeed, 2001. “The Role and Career of the Industrial Engineer in the Modern Organization,” Ch. 1.2, Maynard’s Industrial Engineering Handbook, Ed. K.B. Zandin, Ch. 1.2, pp. 1.21-1.373. EMERSON, H.P. and D.C.E. Naehring, 1988 , Orgins of

Conference Session

Learning about Power Systems and Power Consumption

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kala Meah, York College of Pennsylvania; Wayne Blanding, York College of Pennsylvania

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

C 3 VdLR A B C Discrete, VdL _R Filter _Inv Ts = 5e-005 s. 7 VdL_R (pu

Conference Session

Introduction to Materials Courses

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Surendra Gupta, Rochester Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Materials

] P. Steif and M. Hansen, Feeding Back Results from a Statics Concept Inventory to improve Instruction, Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference, 2006.[4] R. Edwards, R. Englund and S. Sweeney, Direct Assessment of Mechanics of Materials Learning with Concept Inventory, Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference, 2007. Page 14.1143.12[5] B. Self, P. Cornwell, F. Costanzo, G. Gray, D. Evans and J. Lane, The Dynamics Concept Inventory Assessment Test: A Progress Report and Some Results, Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference, 2005

Conference Session

Curricular Developments in Energy Education

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Craig Somerton, Michigan State University

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

design method and the importance of energy inour society.References1. Mid Atlantic Solid Waste Consultants, “Larimer County Two-Season Waste Composition Study”, http://larimer.org/solidwaste/Publications/WasteSort.pdf, visited 3/6/2009.2. Cochran, Soni, “Vermicomposting: Composting with Worms”, http://lancaster.unl.edu/pest/resources/vermicompost107.shtml, visited 3/6/2009.3. Datar, M.T., Rao, M.N., and Reddy, S., “Vermicomposting - A Technological Option for Solid Waste Management”, Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management, v 24, n 2, May, 1997, p 89-93.4. http://www.urbanoptions.org/school.php, visited 3/6/2009.5. Davis, Karen C., Perkey, Megan L., Harth, Nicholas B., and Dees, Nathan, “STEPing into the Classroom: An

Conference Session

Engaging Students in Learning

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Marshall, University of Southern Maine

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

Problem-Based Learning (p. 13). New York: St. Martin’sPress.7. Albanese, M.A. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes andImplementation Issues. Academic Medicine, 68. 52-81.8. Marshall, J. and Marshall, J. (2007). In Search of Teaching Excellence. American Society for EngineeringEducators, June, 2007.9. National Joint Apprenticeship Training Commission (2008), Course 42, International Brotherhood of ElectricalWorkers.10. Michaelsen, L., (1998). Three Keys to Using Learning Groups Effectively. “Essays on Teaching Excellence”.Center for Teaching, University of Southern Maine. Vol. 9, No 5, 1998.11. Price, P.C., (2006). Are You as Good A Teacher as You Think? Thought & Action, Vol. 14, Fall

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathleen Meehan, Virginia Tech; Robert Hendricks, Virginia Tech; Peter Doolittle, Virginia Tech; Richard Clark, Virginia Western Community College; Carl Shek, Virginia Tech

materials to complement anyPowerpoint slide presentations that we develop. Secondly, the interactive learning materials muststimulate student thinking, rather than gaming. The learning materials may include circuit simulations,20tutorials to reinforce the theory upon which the laboratory exercise is based, general reference material onthe laboratory equipment, and material related to specific exercises21 as well contextual information onapplications of the materials by engineers in industry.At the beginning of each effort to develop a specific learning module, we identify the learning objectivesto be covered, the instructional method(s) that will be used, and techniques to evaluate the learningmodule, and to assess whether the learning objectives

Conference Session

DELOS Best Paper Nominations

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gene Liao, Wayne State University; Chih-Ping Yeh, Wayne State University; Qunfang Liao, Panasonic Automotive Systems

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

, “An analytic foundation for the Toyota Prius THS-II powertrain with a comparison to a strong parallel hybrid-electric powertrain,” SAE paper 2006-01-0666, 2006.9. N.C. Harris, T.M. Jahns and S. Huang, “Design of an integrated motor/controller drive for an automotive water pump application,” Conference Record of the IEEE Industry Applications, 37th IAS Annual Meeting, vol. 3, pp. 2028-2035, 2002.10. F.L. Luo and H.G. Yeo, “Advanced PM brushless DC motor control and system for electric vehicles,” Industry Applications Conference, IEEE, vol. 2, pp. 1336–1343, 2000.11. P.J. McCleer, “Electric drives for pump, fan, and compressor loads in automotive applications,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial

Collection

2009 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Thomas J. Impelluso

theory, learning difficulty and instructional design. Learning and Instruction 4: 295-312.[2] Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., and Sweller, J. (1998). Levels of expertise and instructional design. Human Factors 40, 1-17.[3] Pollock, E. Chandler, P. and Sweller, J. (2002). Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction. 12(1), 61-86.[4] Sweller, J., J. Van Merriënboer. and F. Paas. 1998. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review 10(3): 251-296.[5] Renkl, A., and R. Atkinson. 2003. Structure the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skill acquisition: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychologist 38(1):15-22.[6] Renkl

Collection

2009 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Amelito G. Enriquez

Students, J. Engr. Education, 87, 469-480.4 Rodger, S. H. (1995). An Interactive Lecture Approach to Teaching Computer Science. Proceedings of the twenty- sixth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, 1995, Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 278 – 282.5 Beekes, W. (2006). The ‘Millionaire’ Method for Encouraging Participation. The Journal of the Institute for Learning and Teaching 7, 25-36. Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Regional Conference 436 Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). A Learning to Collaborate

Conference Session

Contemporary Practices in Engineering Management Programs

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gene Dixon, East Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

, Requirements, andProcedures System" in [company]-1-01, Management Policies, will be issued to formally grandfather the Page 14.8.16 15existing system of policies and procedures to ensure that the site continues its exemplary record ofcompliance with statutory requirements and customer commitments.Following the issuance of the interim policy, all company-level policies and procedures, source andcompliance documents and various program-specific procedure manuals will be assessed by their ownersand subject matter experts. [company]'s collection of policies, procedures and manuals will be revised

Conference Session

Teams and Teamwork in Design I

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward Lumsdaine, Michigan Technological University; Josh Loukus, Michigan Technological University; Jason Dreyer, Michigan Technological University; Steve Chenoweth, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Monika Lumsdaine, E&M Lumsdaine Solar Consultants, Inc.

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Page 14.637.13were impressed by the professional quality of the oral presentation skills of the students as wellas their teamwork. % of Teams Passing the Design Review 100 80 60 40 Figure 7 20 Improvement in the number of teams who passed the panel review “without 0 S 07 F 07 S 08 F 08 Class conditions”No formal assessment tools were used to evaluate the success of the capstone design course uponcompletion of the projects at the end of the second semester. However, achievements have beengauged by:a. Client/sponsor

Conference Session

Think Outside the Box! K-12 Engineering Curriculum

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University; Debra Gilbuena, Oregon State University; Adam Kirsch, Crescent Valley High School

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics - Courses and Curricula

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Donald McEachron, Drexel University; Sheila Vaidya, Drexel University; Stacey Ake, Drexel University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

intellectual development in the college years: A scheme. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. In Clarkenburn, H.M., Downie, J.R., Gary, C. and Matthew, R.G.S. (2003). Measuring ethical development in life sciences students: A study using Perry’s developmental model. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 443-456.27. Mill. J. S. (1978). On Liberty. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing. Page 14.60.15

Conference Session

LABVIEW-Based Experiments and Robotics Laboratory

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Olawale Akinwale, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria; Lawrence Kehinde, Texas Southern University; Kayode P. Ayodele, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria; A. M. Jubril, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria; Olutola. P. Jonah, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria; Soji Ilori, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria; Xuemin Chen, Texas Southern University

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

kinematics of the robotic arm. Theexperiment only gives the user control over the angular positions of the servomotors of therobotic arm. Hence, the user computes the forward kinematics and then the inversekinematics for the individual gripper positions necessary to carry out the instructor specifiedtask (for example, a pick and place routine).The resulting angular positions arrived at for each of the positions which the robotic arm isdesired to move through are placed in tabular form. These values are now entered in this VIand the execute button is clicked on. Error checking is first done to ensure that the enteredvalues lie within the specified ranges of motion of each motor. If there is an error in theentered value(s), an error message to that

Conference Session

Potpourri

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ronald Welch, University of Texas, Tyler

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html Accessed 30 Jan 2009.6. ExCEEd Teaching Workshop. http://www.asce.org/exceed Accessed 11 Mar 2009. Page 14.537.17 Appendix 1 Course Outline Prior to Summer of 2006Lsn Class topic Deliverable(s)1 Introduction to engineering profession Undergraduate information sheet, e-mail addresses1L Laboratory: introduction to computer laboratory2 Course outline; laboratory notebooks; laboratory report example2L Continuation of computer laboratory3 Engineering ethics; discuss

Conference Session

Professional Issues in Civil Engineering Education

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ronald Welch, University of Texas, Tyler

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

, and how it relates to what engineers do toinclude using the Milton F. Lunch ethic topics and case studies to spark discussion.Leadership is thrust upon the freshmen through their laboratory teams. The team make-upis controlled by the faculty to ensure an equal spread of civil, mechanical, and electricalengineering students between teams. There are four graded laboratory experiences and adifferent student is appointed the leader for each laboratory. The civil engineeringstudent(s) are appointed the leaders during the civil engineering laboratory experienceand associated laboratory report preparation, and so on. The students construct a bridgeusing K’Nex that must support an arbitrary load. In the mechanical laboratory, thestudents build a Lego

Conference Session

ASCE Policy 465: Raising the Bar

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth Fridley, University of Alabama; Debra Larson, Northern Arizona University; Kevin Hall, University of Arkansas; Kevin Sutterer, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; James Alleman, Purdue University; Kenneth McManis, University of Louisiana; Jean-Pierre Bardet, University of Southern California; Brett Gunnink, Montana State University; George List, North Carolina State University; Roger Smith, Texas A&M University; Thomas Lenox, American Society of Civil Engineers

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

Level, Reston, VA, September. (http://www.asce.org/raisethebar)4. Bloom. B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst. E. J., Hill, W. H., and Krathwohl, D. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. David McKay, New York, NY.5. ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission, 2008. “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs – Effective for Evaluations during the 2009-2010 Accreditation Cycle.” ABET, Inc., December 2008.6. ASCE Accreditation Committee of CAP^3. 2007. Commentary on the ABET Engineering Criteria for Civil and Similarly Named Program In the Context of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (Version 3.4), Reston, VA, May. (http://www.asce.org

Conference Session

Aerospace Workspace: Current and Future 2

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Guerra, NASA; John A. Christian, University of Texas, Austin; Wallace Fowler, University of Texas, Austin

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace

functionality, students also learn to incorporate VisualBasic Macros toautomate tedious processes and enable finer detail in trade studies. Finally, the Excel add-in 8@Risk, developed by Palisade Corporation, is used to teach students to use Monte Carloanalyses in spacecraft design and performance assessment. Students learn how to perform MonteCarlo analyses and interpret the results through outputs such as probability density functions(PDFs), cumulative distribution functions (CDFs or “s-curves”), and tornado plots.Grades are determined by frequent lab assignments, quizzes, and a final project. There are fivelaboratory assignments and quizzes are given weekly at the beginning of each lab period. Thequizzes

Conference Session

Bridging the Gap and Freshman Programs

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Seung Youn Chyung, Boise State University; Janet Callahan, Boise State University; Doug Bullock, Boise State University; Kendra Bridges, Boise State University; Joanna Guild, Boise State University; Cheryl Schrader, Boise State University

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics

perform significantly better than random learners in computerapplication courses12 and other Science and Math-related courses, while random learners excel inFine Arts courses.13Table 1. Four Learning Style Types Identified by Gregorc Style Delineator. Sequential (S) Random (R) Concrete (C) Abstract (A) Concrete (C) Abstract (A)Concrete-Sequential Abstract-Sequential Concrete-Random Abstract-Random (CS) (AS) (CR) (AR)Motivational Orientations and Learning StrategiesIn addition to learning styles, students’ motivational orientations and learning strategies that theyuse also

Conference Session

Retention Tools and Programs

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jon Sticklen, Michigan State University; Thomas Wolff, Michigan State University; Wolfgang Bauer, Michigan State University; Daina Briedis, Michigan State University; Neeraj Buch, Michigan State University; Nathaniel Ehrlich, Michigan State University; John Courtney, Michigan State University; Ruth Heckman, Lansing Community College; Denise Fleming, Michigan State University; Louise Paquette, Lansing Community College; Renee Mickelson, Lansing Community College; Mark Urban-Lurain; Clifford Weil, Michigan State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

). Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation (NSF).14. Citations1. The Information Technology Association of America, Innovation and a Competitive U.S. Economy: TheCase for Doubling the Number of STEM Graduates(http://www.itaa.org/workforce/docs/Innovationwhitepaper.pdf). 2005.2. National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators 2006 (Two volumes), National ScienceFoundation. 2006.3. National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators 2006 (Two volumes), National ScienceFoundation, table 3-2. 2006.4. Seymour, E.; Hewitt, N. M., Talking about leaving : why

Conference Session

Think Outside the Box! K-12 Engineering Curriculum

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tara Gomez, California Institute of Technology; Oliver Loson, California Institute of Technology; Douglas Yung, California Institute of Technology; Sindhuja Kadambi, California Institute of Technology; Paul Lee, California Institute of Technology; Luz Rivas, California Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

Conference Session

ERM Poster Session

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nadia Kellam, University of Georgia; Joachim Walther, The University of Georgia; Ashley Babcock, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

." International Journal Of Engineering Education 21(1): 139 - 150.25. Prince, M. J. and R. M. Felder (2006). "Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases" Journal of Engineering Education 95(2): 123-138.26. Sheppard, S.D., J.W. Pellegrino and B.M. Olds (2008) "Guest Editors' Foreword: On Becoming a 21st Century Engineer" Journal of Engineering Education 97(3): 231-234.27. Bransford, J. (2007) "Preparing People for Rapidly Changing Environments." Journal of Engineering Education 96(1): 1.28. Kellam, N.N., T. Costantino, and B. Cramond (2009). "The Impacts of an Interdisciplinary Design Studio on Creativity." Proceedings of the Creativity and Innovation Symposium, Winston-Salem.29. Foor, C. E., S. E

Conference Session

ERM Poster Session

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dan Budny, University of Pittsburgh; Laura Lund, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

the course.Though these elements seem somewhat vague upon first review, the expectations and courseoutcomes must be carefully laid out and communicated from the first day of class in order to Page 14.1327.5maximize the level of satisfaction experienced by not only the students, but also by thecommunity partners and the instructor(s). Furthermore, it is also vital to reinforce theseexpectations and evaluate whether they are being met at various points during the course viasurvey and reflection. Although the community project is the fundamental tool with which aservice learning course is conducted, the specifics of each project are incidental

Conference Session

Assessment and Curriculum Development

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Hall, Louisiana Tech University; Stan Cronk, Louisiana Tech University; James Nelson, Louisiana Tech University; Patricia Brackin, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography 1. 2008-2009 ABET Criteria for Engineering Accreditation; http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents- UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/E001%2008-09%20EAC%20Criteria%2012-04-07.pdf 2. National Academy of Engineering, “The Engineer of 2020.” The National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2004. www.nap.edu 3. Litzinger, Thomas; Wise, John; Lee, Sangha; Simpson, Timothy; Joshi, Sanjay. 2001. Assessing Readiness for Lifelong Learning. Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference. pp. 2211-2219 4. Nelson, S. 2001. Impact of Technology on Individuals and Society: A critical thinking and lifelong learning class for

Conference Session

Engineering Design: Implementation and Evaluation

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gül Okudan, Pennsylvania State University; Alexander Yin, Pennsylvania State University; Saraj Gupta, Pennsylvania State University; Lisa Lattuca, Pennsylvania State University; Patrick Terenzini, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Communication,” Design Studies, 23, 473-496.10. Ehrlenspiel, K. (1999). “Practicians – How They Are Designing? … and Why?,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED’99), 721-726.11. Bucciarelli, L.L. (1984). “Reflective Practice in Engineering Design,” Design Studies, 5, 3.12. Dorst, K. and Cross, N. (2001). “Creativity in Design Process: Co-evolution of Problem-Solution,” Design Studies, 22, 5, 425-437.13. Okudan, G.E. and Mohammed, S., (2006). "Facilitating Design Learning in a Collaborative Environment: Findings on Team Functioning,” International Journal of Engineering Education - Special Issue on Design, Vol. 22, No.3.14. National Academy of Engineering (2004). The Engineer of 2020:Visions of Engineering

Conference Session

Design Communications

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Keelin Leahy, University of Limerick; William Gaughran, University of Limerick

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. 2007: World Scientific Publishing Co.Pte. Ltd.5. Cross, N., Design as a Discipline: Designerly Ways of Knowing. Design Studies, 1982. 3(4): p. 221-227.6. Baynes, K., About Design. 1976: London: Design Council Publications.7. de Vries, M.J., Tamir, Arley. Shaping Concepts of Technology: What Concepts and How to Shape Them. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1997. 7(1 & 2): p. 3-10.8. Atkinson, S., Key factors which affect pupils performance in technology project work. IDATER 94, Loughborough: Design and Technology, Loughborough University, 1994: p. 30-37.9. Petroski, H., Design Paradigms - Case Histories of Error and Judgment in Engineering. 1994: Cambridge University Press.10