peers.As we enter an age when diversity is highly valued, inclusion and equity are becoming commonterms associated with learning and work environments. ABET EAC Student Outcome 5 specifiescreating “a collaborative and inclusive environment” as part of teamwork, and, as such, it isessential we educate our incoming students on these topics and provide support for their socialand emotional development as part of their professional development.The authors present a new model for an engineering orientation for first-year students thatintroduces them to professional codes of conduct and educates students on the importance ofacting professionally and ethically in classrooms, laboratories, makerspaces, and even in thehallways. The orientation also
School of Mines and Director of Humanitarian Engineering Graduate Programs. Her research and teach- ing bring anthropological perspectives to bear on questions of social responsibility and engineering. In 2016 the National Academy of Engineering recognized her Corporate Social Responsibility course as a national exemplar in teaching engineering ethics. Her book Extracting Accountability: Engineers and Corporate Social Responsibility will be published by The MIT Press in 2021. She is also the co-editor of Energy and Ethics? (Wiley-Blackwell, 2019) and the author of Mining Coal and Undermining Gender: Rhythms of Work and Family in the American West (Rutgers University Press, 2014). She regularly pub- lishes in peer
to suggest how they ought to solve it. The third approach, socialjustice-oriented engineering, takes a stronger normative stance. Contextualization here is ameans to help students identify social injustices that engineers can then help to ameliorate [6].We interpret the results of our content review through our personal experiences as researchersand educators in science and technology studies (STS) and engineering education. We, like manyengineering educators, are wary of overly prescriptive ethics instruction which elides powerdynamics and places too much onus on individual actors [7]. Contextualization as an end is atempting solution; however, we also recognize the risks of illuminating complexity withoutproviding direction [8]. We see
role of empathy in various domains, including engineering ethics, design, and diversity, equity, and inclusion. He received his PhD from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education, as well as a Master of Science and Bachelor of Science from Purdue Uni- versity’s School of Civil Engineering. He is the 2021 division chair-elect for the ASEE Liberal Educa- tion/Engineering and Society division and is the Editorial Board Chair for the Online Ethics Center.Mr. Aristides Carrillo-Fernandez, Purdue University at West Lafayette Aristides Carrillo-Fernandez is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue Uni- versity. He previously worked as an export business development manager at a Spanish radio
implemented change the following weekend.He is thus experiencing mutual benefits between his engineering education and his militaryservice in the National Guard.DiscussionThis research on RANGE students mirrors some of our findings on student veterans in general.Like SVE’s, RANGE students were motivated to join the military primarily by financial reasonsand were motivated to major in engineering because of family influences, an opportunity topursue their inclinations for mechanical pursuits, and to earn a good living. While severalparticipants did mention a service ethic as influencing their decision to join the military, thistheme was not quite as strong as it was in our earlier studies of SVEs. The RANGE studentswere also more likely to indicate
Latin, had greater “transfer” value than others in facilitating learning. Forexample, Latin would help people think more rigorously, thus a student wishing to enterOxbridge should demonstrate proficiency in Latin in the entrance examination. John HenryNewman wrote to his sister Jemima in 1845, predating faculty psychology- “The great pointis to open men’s minds – to educate them-and make them logical it does not matter what thesubject is, which you use for this purpose. If you will make them think in politics you willmake them think in religion”. In the twenty first century Brad J. Kallenburg showed howreasoning in design is analogous with reasoning in ethics, and how the design paradigm canbe a means of bringing engineering ethics into
. Developing an entrepreneurial mindset is an important part of our education of 1 5 3.4 undergraduate engineering students.11. Developing ethics and empathy for others is an important part of our education 2 5 3.8 of undergraduate engineering students.12. Developing an appreciation for the global context of engineering is an 2 5 3.9 important part of our education of undergraduate engineering students.13. Engineering education research and innovation is important at my
and non-business courses. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Generating Start-up Relevance in Capstone Projects1. IntroductionAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) requires students to complete acapstone design experience that prepares them for engineering practice through team-basedprojects incorporating the knowledge and skills acquired in earlier course work [1]- [4].While capstone course pedagogy differs widely from one program to another, in all cases,students are expected, through the process of completing the capstone project, to understanddesign constraints, such as economic factors, safety, reliability, ethics, and social impact. Inaddition, students are
learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service- learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Greg Rulifson P.E., Colorado School of Mines Greg currently teaches in Humanitarian Engineering at CSM. Greg earned his bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering with a minor in Global Poverty and Practice from UC Berkeley where he acquired a passion for using engineering to facilitate developing communities’ capacity for success. He earned his master’s degree in Structural Engineering and Risk Analysis from Stanford University. His PhD work at CU Boulder focused on how student’s
activities includedliterature searches, electronic and mechanical design, selection of materials, designing andconducting experiments with human participants, computer programming, and documenting theirwork. Occasionally lab work required visits to indoor and outdoor off-campus locations. Eachstudent lived in a private bedroom and shared a living area, kitchen, and a bathroom with threeother students in the program. Students attended weekly seminars with topics including programexpectations, written and oral communication, ethics, graduate school, the experiences of peoplewith disabilities, and job search strategies. Students created and delivered presentations for localhigh school students at the end of the summer program. Students made optional
-layered mentoring structure for the students.Literature ReviewStudent veterans in engineeringAlthough veterans’ transition to higher education is an arduous process plagued with multiplechallenges and a need for identity re-configuration, the unique set of skills and dispositions theypossess are known to contribute to their academic resilience and perseverance. For studentveterans in engineering programs, many of their former military experiences prepare them todevelop clear and effective communication skills and teamwork capacity, which are highlyvalued in engineering fields [10]. Based on their prior military experiences, student veterans arealso likely to possess a strong work ethic and a keen interest in practical problem-solving. Theirstrong
2014 he was awarded by FAPESP with a post-doctoral research at the Centre for Ethics, Law and Public Affairs at the same university. His research focus relies on Engineering and Community Services; Socio-Legal Studies, Science and Technology Studies, Political philosophy, Sociology of Environment and Intellectual Property Rights.Dr. Cristiano Cordeiro Cruz, Aeronautics Technological Institute (Brazil) I currently develop a post-doctorate research at the Aeronautics Technological Institute (ITA) with a schol- arship from FAPESP (#2018/20563-3). I hold a PhD degree in Philosophy (University of S˜ao Paulo, 2017), a bachelor degree in Philosophy (Jesuit Faculty of Philosophy and Theology, 2008), a master degree in
influence over therelational dimension by cultivating social trust by exhibiting competence, care, predictability,and commitment to diversity. But in doing so, what should the guiding principles of students’behavior with communities be?4. Theory 2: How should engineers behave with communities?In a different writing, we have shown how engineering ethics benefit the relationships thatengineers have with corporate employers while not serving as appropriate guides in theirrelationship with communities. [22] To overcome the limitations of engineering ethics (the codesand the forms in which they are taught), we developed a set of criteria for socially responsibleengineering (SRE), which I highlight here with examples of how students began developingthese
Paper ID #21682Examining the Engineering Leadership Literature: Community of PracticeStyleDr. Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto Cindy Rottmann is a Senior Research Associate at the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) at the University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering leadership, engineering ethics education, inclusion/equity & qualitative research methodology.Dr. Doug Reeve, University of Toronto Dr. Reeve is the founding Director of the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) estab- lished in 2010. Development of personal capability has been central to
Methods Ethnography, a primary tool of anthropologists, is a common method used to understand culture from the perspective of insiders of that culture. Ethnographic methods include participant observation, field memos, autoethnography, interviews, and focus groups interviews.35, 36 The methodology of this paper is rooted in critical ethnography, which “begins with an ethical responsibility to address processes of unfairness or injustice within a particular lived domain”.21 Decolonizing Anthropology: For the scholar-activist doing qualitative work with the aim of ameliorating oppressive conditions, identity can act as a point of departure for theorizing. People with social identities that are underrepresented in institutions of power experience
that those feelings influence their thoughts, beliefs, and actions [17]. In engineering, weoften devalue the affective aspects of these discussions, and sometimes forget to bring up themoral/ethical aspects of our positions. This architecture develops the moral imagination ofengineering students by examining how their actions impact others.The ability to make meaning of complex, open-ended problems is critical to the success ofprofessional engineers in the workplace [18] and has been examined as a specific difficulty thatengineering students have [19]. The Four Voices architecture provides an alternative to simply"finding the best solution" to the issue being discussed. Instead, it asks participants to considerhow and why different parties
theirdiscipline knowledge.”8 Wasson also identified a need to integrate SE concepts, principles, andpractices into engineering programs. This will significantly upgrade the knowledge and skills ofnew engineering graduates to meet demands of the public and private workforce6.At the undergraduate level, the Western Kentucky University created a new SystemsEngineering (SE) Minor to upper division civil, electrical, and mechanical engineering9. Theintent is to prepare the student for their capstone design course. Their course consists of systemsengineering process, requirements, design fundamentals, subsystem fundamentals, trade studies,integration, technical reviews, and case studies and ethics. The minor in SE offers students toexpand their perspective on
Paper ID #22331Quantifying Changes in Creativity: Findings from an Engineering Course onthe Design of Complex and Origami StructuresDr. Justin L Hess, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis Dr. Justin L Hess is the Assistant Director of the STEM Education Innovation and Research Institute. His research interests include ethics, design, and sustainability. Dr. Hess received each of his degrees from Purdue University, including a PhD in Engineering Education, a Master of Science in Civil Engineering, and a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering. He is currently the Vice Chair of the American Society of Civil
of engineering, science, or technology. What matters is the learningoutcome (aim).She identifies three learning aims for technological literacy that should be offered throughoutundergraduate education. They are; Teaching for Citizenship; Teaching for Living Skills andCompetencies: Teaching for Employment Competencies.Teaching for citizenship “would involve ethics, politics and philosophy and ways in whichtechnological developments can impinge upon and challenge our understanding of moralreasoning”. For example, advances in medicine are an ever present reminder of this effect.Among other matters they raise important questions about the right to die. Kielsen argues thatthese decisions are not to be left to technocrats alone but for the average
Leadership within the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at Brigham Young University (BYU). The center provides oversight for leadership development and inter- national activities within the college and he works actively with students, faculty and staff to promote and develop increased capabilities in global agility and leadership. His research and teaching interests in- clude developing global agility, globalization, leadership, project management, ethics, and manufacturing processes. Gregg has lived in numerous locations within the USA and Europe and has worked in many places including North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. Prior to joining BYU, Gregg worked for Becton Dickinson, a
business acumen 4% 23% 46% 27% 0% 26 High ethical standards, integrity, and responsibility 0% 15% 27% 46% 12% 26 Critical thinking 0% 12% 27% 58% 4% 26 Willingness to take calculated risks 4% 19% 46% 23% 8% 26 Ability to prioritize efficiently 12% 15% 19% 50% 4% 26 Project Management: supervising, planning, scheduling, budgeting, etc. 4% 15% 27% 50% 4% 26 Teamwork skills and ability to function on
ofEngineering (NAE) Engineer of 2020 report.47 In this paper, we focus only on the ABEToutcomes, which were listed on the survey as shown in Table 2. Page 26.371.8Table 2. ABET Criterion a-k outcomesMath a Ethics c aScience CommunicationPlanning/conducting experiments b Global/societal context d bAnalytical skills Environmental context dDesign Economic issues dTeamwork
from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests broadly include the professional formation of engineers and diversity and inclusion in engineering, with specific interests in human-centered design, engineering ethics, leadership, service-learning, assistive-technology, and accessibility. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Phenomenography: A Qualitative Research Method to Inform and Improve the Traditional Aerospace Engineering Discipline I. Abstract This overview paper demonstrates the valuable attributes of phenomenography forinvestigating the
assignments will follow t Bloom's taxonomy(Bloom 1956) where each new assignment moves to a higher level with each module. Forexample, Module 1 is descriptive and focuses on knowledge acquisition, Module 2 focuses oncomprehension and understanding of materials to formulate questions, Module 3 moves toapplication, while Modules 4 and 5 will focus on analysis, evaluation, and creation. With eachModule there will be a set of tasks undertaken and an assessment. The final product will be asynthesis of engineering knowledge and social, political, economic, and ethical considerations. Module 1: Introduction. New knowledge/ tasks: The social science professors and the engineering professor will discuss the role of computer technology in community
supportsystems and the existence of service-connected disability. However, these students aspire to besuccessful against all odds, have an elevated work ethic, and employ a heightened level ofleadership, teaming, and communication. These assets can be invaluable for student veterans andtheir peers as they pursue careers in engineering. Results thus indicate that student veterans’military time and training do lend themselves as useful tools in navigating the transition toundergraduate engineering and ensuring success as engineering students. The identification ofthese unique skills and challenges affords us a better chance to understand these aspects oftransition and to facilitate change that better supports future student veterans with
onthose beliefs. The program is also grounded in John Dewey’s proposition that higher education isto assist individuals in developing the skills to be effective in their preferred occupation. Thisprogram focuses on developing professional competencies such as people and projectmanagement,leadership, and ethics, as well as perseverance, stress management, and the ability toreflect and modify one’s process of learning. Treveylan’s [9] studies on “the work that engineersdo” call for more emphasis on professional skills such as communication and the ability toperform effectively on teams. Treveylan advocates for students teaching others because“education, like engineering practice, relies on special kinds of social interactions” and thatstudents
on pedagogicalmethods, or seeing methods used by other instructors. SEEFs shared common motivations ofjoining a career involving instruction motivated by experiences during student teaching roles,and a desire to improve teaching practices. In addition, the SEEF community referred to Barkleyet al.’s handbook [29] on collaborative learning techniques provided a wealth of teachingmethods, along with Godsell’s sourcebook [30] which provided perspective on differentmethods, their implementation and evaluation, among many other sources. However common toall the SEEFs was interpreting the application of these methods to fit their discipline. Forexample, in Computer Science the jigsaw method was used to explore the ethics of human-computer
enterprises, learnadvanced technologies and corporate culture, conduct in-depth engineering practices, andparticipate in the technological innovation and engineering development of enterprises, so asto cultivate the professionalism and engineering ethics of students[3].” The training ofOutstanding Engineers is a realistic and urgent demand for improving the quality of higherengineering education. The cultivation of professional spirit and ethics requires students todeeply study the advanced technologies and corporate culture of enterprises, conductengineering practice in depth, and participate in the technological innovation and engineeringdevelopment of enterprises.On September 17, 2018, the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Industry and
of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering leadership in university and workplace settings as well as ethics and eDr. Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto Emily Moore is the Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (Troost ILead) at the University of Toronto. Emily spent 20 years as a professional engineer, first as an R&D engineer in a Fortune 500 company, and then leadingDr. Andrea Chan, University of Toronto Andrea Chan is a Senior Research Associate at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering | University of TorontoMs. Dimpho Radebe, University of Toronto Dimpho Radebe is a PhD student in Engineering Education at the University of Toronto
the Social Responsibility Attitudes of Engineering Students Over Time,” Sci Eng Ethics, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1535–1551, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9706-5.[13] J. Huff, B. K. Jesiek, C. B. Zoltowski, K. D. Ramane, and W. C. Oakes, “Social and Technical Dimensions of Engineering Identity,” presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2016. Accessed: Jan. 18, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/social-and-technical-dimensions-of- engineering-identity[14] M. H. Hwang, E. Trueblood, and S. A. Claussen, “Engineering Identity, Perceptions of Sociotechnical Education, and Views of Engineering Practice in Undergraduate Students,” in 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education