Leadership Excellence. Editor of three books and author of over 160 journal articles and chapters, her research centers on the intersections of career, gender communication, leadership, and resilience. Fellow and past president of the International Communication Association, she has received numerous awards for her research, teaching/mentoring, and engagement. She is working on Purdue-ADVANCE initiatives for institutional change, the Transforming Lives Building Global Commu- nities (TLBGC) team in Ghana through EPICS, and individual engineering ethical development and team ethical climate scales as well as everyday negotiations of ethics in design through NSF funding as Co-PI. [Email: buzzanel@purdue.edu
also discovered ethical concerns regarding the technology. If a computer is used inthe communication of multiple individuals, how could misuse be detected and controlled?After the opportunity areas were defined, the teams envisioned future scenarios that illustrate animproved operator task flow with the integration of mixed reality technology. A head-mounteddisplay (HMD), the Microsoft HoloLens, was chosen to allow hands free operation. As part ofthe multidisciplinary teamwork, the technical limitations from the mechanical engineering pointof view had to be understood as well as the current limitations regarding the software andhardware of the HMD device.Follow up conversations with engineering lead to a more thorough, holistic understanding
sufficient cachet that accreditation is not necessary. This may be true; who would not hirea Stanford University graduate simply because the computer science program at Stanford Univer-sity is not accredited by ABET? At the same time, conforming to accreditation standards and peerreview would have helped Stanford or University of Texas avoid headlines that revealed that theircomputer science students have been graduating without taking course work in ethics, somethingABET accreditation standards have required for decades 7 . In contrast, several high-profile andprestigious programs such as MIT are accredited. In this case, presumably, the program or theinstitution has seen value in the accreditation process, or even perhaps to signal to lesser
• Beyond Surveys • Power of Utopia + Storytelling • Beyond “Do no Harm” • Researchers• Relationship Building • Participants • Make no assumptions • Value of Emergence • Ethical treatment of connections • Humility, Trust, Patience • Personal Responsibility for data • Research on Research? Chanel Beebe Beebe@purdue.edu ChanelBeebe.com
, ethics, etc. throughout their four-year undergraduate program of study [9-10] orgraduate program of study [11].The course discussed here is different from the models just mentioned in that it encompasses allof the following characteristics: (a) targeted towards beginning engineering students; (b) stand-alone, college-wide course; (c) emphasizing both career development and job searching skillsnecessary to secure an internship or full-time employment; and (d) taught primarily by practicingengineers. The goal of this course is not only to teach students the tactics and tools necessary tosecure a job, as emphasized in the work of Sharp and Rowe [12], but also to introduce studentsvery early on to the types of skills that they should be developing
investigatorwithout formal engineering education training, it was important to ensure there was an adequateopportunity to engage in both short and longer duration workshops. Step 2 of the processoutlined training of research protocols, necessary to steps to facilitate ethical and scientificallysound education research. Steps 1 and 2 provide the foundation and preparation for Step 3:Research Initiation of the pilot project. The pilot research project would start to understand theproblem outlined in the introduction. Finally, by Step 4, the initiated research would become acatalyst for additional topics of engineering education research that examines fundamentalresearch questions related to broadening participation in graduate engineering programs
challenged the understanding of enculturation the most(along with ethics). Further analyses and follow-up studies are being designed to investigate thisresult [3, 4].In terms of the dissemination efforts taking place, the official website for this project waslaunched (https://ectd.engr.tamu.edu/), and the Office of Technology Transfer has approveddissemination to other institutions with the proper intellectual property acknowledgments.Additionally, a proposal for a workshop devoted to increasing researcher's knowledge of theECTD was approved for the ASEE 2024 conference. This workshop affords the opportunity torun another cycle of validation for this instrument that will ensure its relevance and applicabilityto even wider audiences.We are also at a
disciplines, but rather require aninterdisciplinary approach. Originally conceptualized by Rittel & Webber [2], wicked problemsare problems with multiple stakeholders and competing demands, which often contain ethical,social, political, or environmental dimensions. They are challenging to frame and scope, giventhe lack of an obvious “stopping point” when the problem to solution process is complete.Wicked problems reflect pressing societal issues like climate change, transportation and urbandevelopment, healthcare and technological unemployment – problems that frequently engage thetechnical expertise of engineers but require a breadth of disciplinary knowledge outside ofengineering as well, requiring strong collaborative skills and an intellectual
week for one period each on the same day.The grant developed curriculum for AI/Data Science and Computer Programming classes,created teacher instruction guides and resources for the classes, and remotely instructed theProgramming section using college mentors and grant staff.The goal of curriculum developed by the EQuIPD grant was to seamlessly tie concepts and real-world applications of AI with the practicality and creativity of computer programming. Studentswere taught a variety of problem-solving methods and design concepts, ethics, andresponsibilities as they relate to AI, conceptualization of AI processes and chatbot principles,Python programming basics, and construction of programs. These two classes worked alongsideeach other
. She is very passionate about integrating empathy development in engineering to foster a more inclusive culture in which students learn to respond innovatively and responsibly to global challenges.Dr. Constanza Miranda, The Johns Hopkins University Constanza is a multidisciplinary academic interested in the intersection between the creativity of design, the ethics of cultural anthropology, and the tech aspects of engineering. She is the Assistant Dean for Undergraduate Mentoring for the School of Engineering and faculty in the Biomedical Engineering Department at the Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore. She holds a PhD in Design with a focus in anthropology from NC State University and was a Fulbright grantee. Her
supporting STEM faculty on STEM education research projects.Dr. Sharon Miller, Purdue University Sharon Miller, PhD, is an Associate Professor of Practice in the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering at Purdue University. She received a BS degree in Materials Science and Engineering from Purdue University and MS and PhD degrees in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Michigan. Her educational efforts focus on biomedical engineering discipline-based educational research, including design self-efficacy, project-based learning, critical reflection in ethics, and high-impact practices. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Work in Progress: A Multi-level Undergraduate Curricular
. Under this protocol, copies of all completed course assignments in which studentsreflected on career plans and motivation were collected directly from course instructors for tworequired courses in the Biomedical Engineering (BME) curriculum:Sophomore Seminar: This is a required course which is usually taken by students in their first orsecond semester of joining the BME major. The course meets once per week and covers a varietyof topics including career paths, curriculum planning, biomedical ethics, and professionaldevelopment opportunities. Currently, data has been collected from three separate instructorssince the Spring 2019 semester. The specific assignments collected vary slightly by semester andinstructor, but in general consist of at
. Proferes, K. Shilton, and Z. Ashktorab, “Ethics Regulation in Social Computing Research: Examining the Role of Institutional Review Boards,” J. Empir. Res. Hum. Res. Ethics, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 372–382, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1177/1556264617725200.[19] M. Williams and T. Moser, “The Art of Coding and Thematic Exploration in Qualitative Research,” Int. Manag. Rev., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 45-55,71-72, 2019.[20] J. E. Seaman and J. Seaman, “Opening the Textbook: Educational Resources in U.S. Higher Education, 2017,” Babson Survey Research Group, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED582411.pdf[21] J. M. Scoulas, “College students’ perceptions on sense of belonging and inclusion at the
followed human subjects research ethics guidance from theuniversity at which the interviews were conducted and the authors’ university.ContextSeveral contextual factors undoubtedly shaped the interviews that were analyzed for this paper.First, a COVID-19 resurgence drove many campus activities back to the virtual realm. Second,Canada’s Indigenous people were frequently in the news. The nation’s Truth and ReconciliationCommission ,which was formed as a result of growing awareness the horrific situation withResidential Schools, was frequently in the news [25]. Canada recognized Sep. 30 as the NationalDay for Truth and Reconciliation with a number of educational and recognition activities.Perhaps related to all of the news and events, it is not
Cimino, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Richard T. Cimino is a Senior Lecturer in the Otto H. York Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering at New Jersey Institute of Technology. His research interests include the intersection of engineering ethics and process safety, and broadening inclusion in engineering, with a focus on the LGBTQ+ community. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Initial validity evidence for a survey of skill and attitude development on engineering teamsAbstractThis research paper discusses an emerging project that 1) seeks to gather validity evidence for asurvey of engineering student teaming attitudes and skill
necessary as it ensuresstudents understand these principals early on. Recent pedagogical innovations also stress uponthis. Researchers like Cech [1] and Foor & Walden [2] have noted the disconnect betweentechnical training and social responsibility. The education system they propose may bridge thisdisparity. Cech [1] sees a culture of disengagement where technical skills are valued more thansocietal concerns, while Foor and Walden [2] cite resistance to diversity efforts, highlighting thenecessity for early and proactive DEIB involvement in education. These findings encourageestablishing a curriculum that is technically adept and ethically and socially aware. These ideas'practical applications, as reported by [3], [4], [5], [6], reflect our
related production process (2) Account for environmental, safety and applicable regulatory issues in designing a product (2) Recognize and analyze professional situations requiring ethical decisions with global context (4)Teams and Project SupportAt the beginning of an academic year, students were asked to rank preferences of ChE topicssuch as food, consumer goods, human health, energy, sustainability, etc. In the 2023-2024academic year, a new type of project option was added: developing a new in-class demo and/oractivity to help students learn ChE
our leaders Engineering Discovery Laboratory and Fabrication• Analysis - understand how to analyze information and Design Studio spaces. Then, in the middle of the week, data relevant to solving engineering problems we'll take a field trip to a nearby lake to explore sustainability and environmental stewardship initiatives.• Conceptualization - create and design ethical After completing the camp, you will leave excited about engineering solutions engineering and filled with a passion for how you can
and Historical Foundations” (CHF), (3) “Data and QuantitativeReasoning” (DQR), (4) “Engineering, Technology, and Society” (ETS), (5) “Literatures” (LIT),(6) “Natural and Physical Sciences” (NPS), (7) “Social Analysis, Politics, and Ethics” (SPE), and(8) “World Languages” (WOL). Although engineering faculty could contribute to anyperspective, their courses typically fall within the ETS perspective. As Union College increases 3the offerings within this new general education curriculum, all students will need to take coursesfrom all eight “Perspectives.” This inclusion of engineering within Union’s general educationcurriculum is a step toward both creating a
words diversity, equity, inclusion, andaccess from all accreditation criteria, the organization has stated that it remains committed tothese principles. Furthermore, regional accreditation bodies such as the Higher LearningCommission (HLC) require universities to demonstrate that their “processes and activitiesdemonstrate inclusive and equitable treatment of diverse populations” [19]. Previous studies alsoprovide examples of success in meeting new criteria and curriculum expectations [20] and [21].As one of the oldest and largest communities of infrastructure professionals, ASCE promotesDEI in both infrastructure and education policies. The ASCE Code of Ethics explicitly states thatengineers must “acknowledge the diverse historical, social, and
community outcomes were less optimal. The resultsdraw attention to important issues in the hopes of inspiring interest, attention to best practices,and cautions.IntroductionAs the interest and application of community engaged research (CER) is increasing inengineering, it is becoming clear that there is a lack of consensus on best practices and a generalunderappreciation of ethical challenges. This research aims to help address these shortcomings,by amplifying the voices of academic women of color who have engaged in CER in STEMfields. This paper begins by providing background information on CER, then moves to theresearch methods, and concludes with the findings.At its most basic, CER brings together two ideas: research and community
educational practices and professional outcomes. The integration of empathyinto engineering education and practice enhances the ability of engineers to design solutions thatare not only technically sound but also socially responsible and user-centered. Empathy helpsengineers understand and address the diverse needs of users, leading to more inclusive andeffective design solutions. This perspective is supported by various studies that highlight the roleof empathy in engineering education and practice [2], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Empathy is considered a necessary interpersonal skill for modern engineers, supportingcreativity, ethical decision-making, and collaboration. However, perceptions of its importance inpedagogy vary among instructors
onstudents’ success. The ACCESS project incorporates several co-curricular professionaldevelopment and student engagement elements, including social events, seminars, mentoring,undergraduate research, and participation in cybersecurity-related student organizations.Participating in social and professional development events fosters social connections anddevelopment of life skills such as discipline, self-esteem, and ethical behavior [5]. Facultymentoring and professional development seminars encourage persistence in students’ academicpaths and prepare them for their future careers by providing career guidance, relevantinformation, and networking opportunities [6]. Participations in subject-based studentorganizations and competitions increase student
laboratory conditions, the research aims to provide practical insights for educatorsconsidering these tools. The findings will contribute to broader discussions about technology-enhanced learning and the evolving relationship between artificial intelligence and humaninstruction in technical disciplines.Literature ResearchRecent advances in LLMs have shown their potential to transform educational settings, particularlyin programming courses where timely, detailed feedback is important. Fagbohun et al. [1] statesthat LLMs can automate grading with personalized feedback but that they still require carefulhandling of biases combined with human supervision to ensure that LLMs are fair and efficientand to reduce the occurrence of ethical risks like
engineering (i.e. developing prompts to maximizeoutput accuracy), evaluation of AI responses, and ethical considerations [9-11].Due to its versatile nature, AI has the capacity to be used in nearly every academic discipline,similar to the use of the internet. However, AI may be most effective in fields where students arerequired to complete more ill-defined tasks such as writing lab reports or creative writing [1],[8]. Similarly, AI has been used in marketing and other business fields for content creation, salesoptimization, and for customer service chatbots [12-13]. In science education, the use of AI hasbeen shown to can boost students’ motivation and participation in learning exercises, but it haslimitations regarding complex subjects, and can
the multidisciplinary and rapidly developingfield of nanotechnology. Topics include nanomaterials, micro/nanofabrication, microscopy,nanoelectronics, biological nanotechnology, nanoterrorism, social and ethical implications, etc.”A detailed list of topics covered during the course includes introduction to semiconductors,micro/nanofabrication (including alternative methods of nanofabrication such as microcontactprinting, nanoimprint lithography, self-assembly), scanning probe microscopies (scanningelectron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM)), nanomaterials (fullerenes,carbon nanotubes, graphene, quantum dots, nanoparticles), optical tweezers, magnetic storage,magnetoresistive materials, optoelectronic nanostructures
. Participants86 completed voluntary pre- and post-course surveys, which explored their motivations,87 prior experiences, perceived learning gains, and attitudes toward STEM. Institutional 2 88 review board approval ensured ethical compliance, and students retained the option to 89 withdraw at any time. By analyzing pre- and post-survey results, the study captured 90 shifts in engagement, confidence, and interest in STEM careers, providing insights 91 into the effectiveness of CURE within HBCUs. 92 Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 27.0. Descriptive statistics 93 summarized key aspects such as students’ demographics, motivations for course 94 enrollment, perceived learning
. Each track aligns with scholars’ career goals, emphasizing practical skills and industry certifications to improve employability [14].• Tech Up Space STEMinar Series hosts virtual and recorded lectures featuring industry leaders and workforce readiness experts. Topics include portfolio building, networking, technical interviews, graduate school preparation, AI ethics and responsibility, and leadership. The blended format of lectures and podcasts allows students to access the content at their convenience, integrating learning into their academic schedules [15, 16].Methodology & Key OutcomesTo assess REP’s impact, a comprehensive evaluation was conducted, including semester surveys,focus groups across the three EmTech
. We acknowledge the contributions of Erin Cech, Lea Marlor, Karen Nortz, andGracie Judge.References[1] ABET Accreditation Criteria https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation- criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2025-2026/ Accessed January 10, 2025[2] National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) https://www.nspe.org/ Accessed January 10, 2025[3] IEEE Code of Ethics, https://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/governance/p7-8.html Accessed January 10, 2025[4] S. M. Lord, B. Przestrzelski, and E. Reddy, “Teaching social responsibility in a Circuits course,” 2019 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, Tampa, FL, June 2019. https://peer.asee.org/33354[5] M. G