that you will face in the real world. Learning how to figure out what information is important, how to frame a problem, what simplifications are needed, and what still needs to be learned are critical to your success in engineering. The good news: research shows that you can develop this deeper understanding through collaborating with peers to better understand and innovate solutions to real-‐world problems. I hope you take full advantage of this way of learning in EGR 270 to be creative, have fun and expand your mind. What Will You Learn in EGR 270? EGR 270 has three intended learning outcomes. The first focuses on learning
course objectives and instructor expectations. It was also necessary to identifyavailable tools.B. The assessment plan The intent of the Energy Systems Laboratory course is to provide students with an integratedenergy systems experience and to provide students with opportunities to develop effectivecommunication skills. Simply acquiring data and performing calculations is not enough. Thestudents must understand, apply, and communicate results. With this in mind, the courselearning objectives were divided into four objectives dealing with the application of fundamentalconcepts and engineering tools, and two objectives dealing with communication skills andeffective team working skills. Mastering all of these objectives prepares the students for
through the Use of CommonTeaching Tools ................................................................................................................................................................... 173Integration of State-of-the-Art Low Cost Components into Embedded and Digital Systems DesignCourses .................................................................................................................................................................................. 182Hands, Mind and Hearts-on Design Experiences .................................................................................................. 194 Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference
Pacific Southwest Regional ASEE ConferenceTransforming Engineering Education through Community Engagement, Entrepreneurship and Service Learning California State University, Fresno Fresno, CA 93740 March 31 – April 2, 2011 California State University ◊ Fresno Henry Madden Library ii The Conference Organizing Committee wishes to express its warmest gratitude to thefollowing
Education: International Perspectives on Curriculum Change, Sense Publishers, Springer, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, 2017.[12] J. E. Mills and D. F. Treagust, “Engineering Education – Is Problem-Based or Project-Based Learning the Answer,” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, The Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Inc., pp. 2 – 16, 2003.[13] L.S. Vigotsky, Thought and language, Cambridge, MA: M.I.T Press, 1962.[14] L.S. Vigotsky, Mind in society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.[15] A. Kozulin, “Vygotsky’s theory in the classroom: Introduction,” European Journal of Psychology Education, Vol. XIX, No.1, pp. 3 – 7, 2004.[16] W. Damon, “Peer Education: The Untapped Potential
integration,” Journal of Engineering Education, 82(1), pp. 3-8, 1993.5. J. Bordogna, E. Fromm, and E. W. Ernst, “An integrative and holistic engineering education,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(3), pp. 191-198, 1995.6. J. Bransford, A. Brown, and R. Cocking, How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school, Washington, DC: Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council, 2000.7. R. J. Shavelson, and L. Towne, Scientific research in education. Committee on scientific principles for education research, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2002.8. E. L. Boyer, Scholarship
Session 2745 ExCEEd Impact on a New Professor David P. Devine Indiana University Purdue University Fort Wayne Abstract The purpose of this paper is to present quantitative information and qualitative remarks regarding the impact of the ExCEEd Teaching Workshop (ETW) on an assistant professor of civil engineering technology at a regional campus of a large state university system in the Midwest. The participant attended the ETW during the summer between the first and second years of a tenure eligible appointment. Features of the ETW were adapted to the participant ’s teaching immediately
program outcomes have been met. The committees make decisions relating tochanges in courses and make recommendations relating to program changes to the departmentoutcomes assessment committee.I. IntroductionEngineering programs in the U.S. are accredited by the Engineering Accreditation Commissionof the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (EAC/ABET)1. In the past,programs were evaluated using a set of criteria that prescribed most of the courses and activitiesthat a program had to offer to be accredited. If a department followed ABET’srecommendations, their programs were generally accredited. Beginning in 2001, all programsare being evaluated based on the outcomes of the programs and the skills of their graduates.Universities
Session 1448 INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS PROVIDE PROGRESS REPORT CARD FEEDBACK ON NEWLY DEVELOPED INDUSTRIAL CONTROL SYSTEMS LABORATORY Jerome Tapper, Walter W. Buchanan Northeastern University, Boston, MassachusettsAbstract ¾ In order for engineering technology programs to provide more formidable state-of-the-art programs for their students, program administrators must gain insight into theworthiness of their curricula. Engineering technology programs and courses supported andevaluated by industry representatives are quite valuable in preparing students for responding tolocal
Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Engineering Department (MEIE)and Rowan University’s Civil and Environmental Engineering Department. We also present thepartnership projects developed as a part of these workshops at both universities. We believe thatthese collaborations will lead to industry insights in our programs that will map toEntrepreneurially Minded Learning (EML), a pedagogical framework developed by KernEntrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) to promote graduates to become value creatorsfor their organizations. This focuses on developing skills in undergraduate engineering studentssuch that they are poised to create extraordinary value in their future organizations. EML seeksto expand the notion that design is focused on technical
Session 2530 A Survey of Authentic Teaching in Secondary Math and Science Classrooms Tamy L. Fry1 , Teri Reed Rhoads 1 , Mark Nanny 2 and Mary John O’Hair3 The University of Oklahoma School of Industrial Engineering 1 School of Civil Engineering and Enviro nmental Science 2 Center for Educational and Community Renewal3Abstract The Authentic Teaching Alliance (ATA) is a project funded through the National ScienceFoundation GK-12 program in which University of Oklahoma Fellows from engineering andeducation
22-25, 2003, p 11408-11411.4. Felder, R. M. and Silverman, L. K.,(1988), “Learning and Teaching Styles in EngineeringEducation,” Engineering Education 78(7), pp. 674-681.5. Jensen, E. (1998), “Teaching with the Brain in Mind,” Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervisionand Curriculum Development.6. Klegka, J.S. and O'Donovan, T.E.,(2002), “Using SIMULINK as a design tool”, ASEE AnnualConference Proceedings, Jun 16-19, 2002, p 8505-8517. .7. Metzger, R.P. and Rodriguez, A.,(2002), “An Interactive Modeling, Simulation, Animation, andReal-Time Control (MoSART) flexible Inverted Pendulum Environmnet”, ASEE Annual ConferenceProceedings, Jun 16-19, 2002, p 1-9.8. Rao, S.S., “Mechanical Vibrations”, 6th edition, Pearson9. https
me want to do grad school. I’ve always wanted to probably be an engineering professor. I thought that’d be cool because I like teaching. I was a tutor in high school and stuff like that. But I knew I would have to get a Ph.D., and that was kind of the ‘I don’t know if I want to do this’ part of it. And now that I’ve done this, the Ph.D. work doesn’t seem so bad.” “[the program] Opened my mind to different possibilities, and confirmed my interest in research. ”One student talked about her change in goals before and after the program by saying, “it [thesurvey] asked me if I was going to go to graduate school and I said ‘no,’ now I’ve changed mymind.”Specifically, students repeatedly talked about the panel
students mustdemonstrate “an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences.” And ABET SO #5states “an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership,create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives.”Therefore by the end of the program, engineering students must be able to engage and interact witha wide range of audiences verbally or in written communication.The written and oral communication assignments implemented in this foundational engineeringcourse create a context for technical communication in the discipline. These assignmentsencompass elements of technical writing with a clear purpose, an audience in mind, logicallyutilized format and
AC 2012-4469: LEVERAGING SIMULATION TOOLS TO DELIVER ILL-STRUCTURED PROBLEMS IN STATICS AND MECHANICS OF MATE-RIALSProf. Christopher Papadopoulos, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Christopher Papadopoulos is an Assistant Professor in the Department of General Engineering at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez. He earned B.S. degrees in civil engineering and mathematics from Carnegie Mellon University (1993) and a Ph.D. in theoretical and applied mechanics at Cornell University (1999). Prior to coming to UPRM, Papadopoulos served on the faculty in the Department of Civil Engineering and Mechanics at the University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. Papadopoulos has primary research and teaching interests in mechanics
learning styles of engineering students, particularly those whoselearning style is often at odds with the traditional engineering curriculum. Continued research onthe connections between learning styles and student success in engineering curricula arewarranted.ReferencesBransford, J., Brown, A., and Cocking, R, (1999). How People Learn – Brain, Mind, Experience, and School,Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press,Bransford, J., Brophy, S. & Williams, S. When Computer Technologies Meet the Learning Sciences: Issues andOpportunities. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 59-84, (2000).Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Collier Books.Dunn, R. and Dunn, K. (1984). Ten ways to make the classroom a
Session 1668 An Assessment of Visualization Modules for Learning Enhancement in Mechanics Don Rhymer, Dan Jensen, Marty Bowe Department of Engineering Mechanics USAF Academy, CO 80840AbstractUntil recently, there has been a lack of content designed to enhance understanding of mechanicsof materials through the use of visualization. Therefore, visualization content in this area, aswell as quantitative assessment establishing its effectiveness, is needed. This paper builds on ourprevious work using visualization content by
their starting point in knowledge engineering, Åman and Andersson (2012) emphasize the importance ofindustrial design as “a field that incorporates an integrative aspect, stretching across the divide between therational and problem solving and the ‘irrational’ of the aesthetic and symbolic”. As such, ”design as an activityand profession is inherently integrative across ‘arts’ and ‘sciences’, but it is the integrative element that is at theforefront” (ibid).We believe that a narrow-minded view of objectives in product development and design can contribute to asituation, where economic targets get over-prioritised in relation to value for customers and other stakeholders,such as described by Åman and Andersson (2012). It has been claimed that the
Session 1620 Designing a Handheld-Friendly Web Site John K. Estell, Tim Baron, Matt Batcha, Adam Love Electrical & Computer Engineering and Computer Science Department Ohio Northern UniversityIntroduction The handheld computer, or PDA (personal digital assistant), represents a new phase ineducational technology that allows for a truly portable computational device in an affordablepackage. From its humble beginnings as an electronic data organizer, the PDA has evolved intoa sophisticated computational and informational tool through the development of various
Conference Proceedings, Jun 22-25, 2003, p 11408-11411. 4. Felder, R. M. and Silverman, L. K.,(1988), “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education,” Engineering Education 78(7), pp. 674-681. 5. Jensen, E. (1998), “Teaching with the Brain in Mind,” Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. 6. Klegka, J.S. and O'Donovan, T.E.,(2002), “Using SIMULINK as a design tool”, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Jun 16-19, 2002, p 8505-8517. . 7. Metzger, R.P. and Rodriguez, A.,(2002), “An Interactive Modeling, Simulation, Animation, and Real-Time Control (MoSART) flexible Inverted Pendulum Environmnet”, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Jun 16-19, 2002, p 1-9. 8. Rao, S.S
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Page 6.645.1 Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering EducationI first met with the Egyptian Principal Investigator on December 3, 1993 to sign thecontract. The project was not implemented until October 30, 1998. During the waitingperiod, I was informed that their selection of Su was based on my publication entitled"Vibration Diagnostic Analysis as part of Energy Audit and Energy ManagementApplication" and our newly established Vibration Laboratory.I also was informed that the budget was mis-managed by the Egyptian agency. USAIDtracked all the
Session 3268 Incorporating a Team Building Experiment into a Senior Level Laboratory Course Craig W. Somerton Department of Mechanical Engineering, Michigan State UniversityI. IntroductionIn spring of 1995 Ford Motor Company established a continuous quality improvement (CQI)partnership with the colleges of business and engineering at Michigan State University. Toinitiate the program, Ford held workshops for the faculty and staff that focused on CQIprinciples and their implementation. During these workshops there was considerable interactionamong personnel from the two
Paper ID #18265Utilizing Cluster Analysis of Close-Ended Survey Responses to Select Partic-ipants for Qualitative Data CollectionMs. Katherine M. Ehlert, Clemson University Katherine M. Ehlert is a doctoral student in the Engineering and Science Education department in the College of Engineering, Computing, and Applied Sciences at Clemson University. She earned her BS in Mechanical Engineering from Case Western Reserve University and her MS in Mechanical Engineer- ing focusing on Biomechanics from Cornell University. Prior to her enrollment at Clemson, Katherine worked as a Biomedical Engineering consultant in Philadelphia
Session Number T4D4 Predictability of college success for ethnic minority SEM students: is high school GPA a reliable tool? Carlon G. Ami Multicultural Engineering Program University of New Mexico AbstractThis study was an attempt to determine whether high school grade point average(HSGPA) or ACT scores were better correlated with the success of a select group ofethnic minority students at the University of New Mexico (UNM). Third-semesterretention and third semester grade point average, graduation rate, grade
Fuzzy Versus Conventional Control Marian S. Stachowicz, Laboratory for Intelligent Systems, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, USA, The Warsaw School of Computer Science, Warsaw, Poland mstachow@d.umn.eduAbstractThis article presents notes from the interdisciplinary course ECE 5831 Fuzzy Sets Theory and ItsApplications and an introduction part to ECE 4951 Design Workshop dedicated to IntelligentControl, both taught at the ECE Department, University of Minnesota Duluth. What are theadvantages and disadvantages of fuzzy control as compared to conventional
Paper ID #23636A Second Year Review of a New FYE ProgramDr. George D. Ricco, University of Kentucky George D. Ricco is an assistant professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of Kentucky. He focuses his work between teaching in the first-year engineering program at UK and research in student progression. Previously, he was the KEEN Program Coordinator at Gonzaga University in the School of Engineering and Applied Science. He completed his doctorate in engineering education from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education. Previously, he received an M.S. in earth and planetary sciences
notes of the students -without passing through the mind of either one - continues as “the norm”.The purpose of this paper is to renew the call for deployment of better and more effectiveinstructional strategies in the classrooms of the Arab Gulf States, stressing on cooperativelearning practices as a viable alternative to the traditional low-interaction lecture-basedenvironment that has gripped the engineering education of Region’s institution for decades. Thepaper sheds light on: theoretical roots, research support, current practices, and suggestions forredesigning classes-if need be- to stimulate interaction and help break the traditional lecturedominant pattern, when cooperative learning protocols are deployed. The paper shows howcooperative
Session Number : 3420 Using Intr oductor y Computer Science as a Tool for Teaching Gener al Pr oblem Solving By Major Timothy G. Nix Affiliation: United States Militar y Academy, West Point, NY Abstr actThe primary purpose of the U.S. Military Academy at West Point is to produce leadersfor the U.S. Army. Thus, the curriculum is tailored with this goal in mind. One of theselling points of the computer science program is its emphasis on problem solving. Thepremise is that the problem solving skills that are instilled through computer science canbe extrapolated to problem solving in general and
unique transducers, and instrumentation inall science and engineering fields require such common course instruction and training ofstudents in all disciplines of engineering and technology. A common course in instrumentation will meet the interests of all students andprepare them to appreciate the importance of instrumentation applications in a variety ofindustries. It creates a balanced perspective in the minds of students to solveinstrumentation problems in the real world. The learning experiences through such courseswill give students confidence to design instrumentation systems starting from scratch andnot depend on the assembly of off-the-shelf devices. The course will incorporate emergingtrends in instrumentation and develop problem
discussions. Peter Drucker in his bookPost-Capitalist Society describes the journey from a capitalistic society to a knowledge societyby saying, “knowledge is the only meaningful resource.” (p. 42) The function of management isto apply existing knowledge and to define what new knowledge is needed and how it can beused. “That knowledge has become the resource, rather than a resource, is what makes oursociety ‘post-capitalist.’ ” (p. 45) 1 The study of knowledge management becomes increasingly important in engineering andtechnology as several forces converge: · marketing to global customers · competing with new providers of goods/services · growing computer networks and increasing use of information technology