. She is an Associate Editor for the ”Journal of American Indian Education” and has authored or edited three books and numerous articles in peer reviewed national and international journals. Her most recent edited volume was published in 2019 and is called ”The Price of Nice: How Good Intentions Maintain Educa- tional Inequity.”Dr. Ricky Camplain Ricky Camplain, PhD is an assistant professor of Health Sciences and the Center for Health Equity Re- search at Northern Arizona University. Dr. Camplain is a Comanche scholar who was trained in epidemio- logic methods at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health where I received a Master of Science in Public Health (MSPH
faculty (and their students) now and in the future.References[1] E. Wheeler and P. McKinney, "Are librarians teachers? Investigating academic librarians' perceptions of their own teaching roles," Journal of Information Literacy, Article vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 111-128, 12// 2015, doi: 10.11645/9.2.1985.[2] S. Stebelman, J. Siggins, D. Nutty, and C. Long, "Improving Library Relations with the Faculty and University Administrators: The Role of the Faculty Outreach Librarian," College & research libraries, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 121-130, 1999, doi: 10.5860/crl.60.2.121.[3] K. Tanaka et al., "Teaching Business: Looking at the Support Needs of Instructors," Ithaka S+R, 2019.[4] J. Arendt and M. Lotts, "What
for Non-Traditional Learners," American Society for Engineering Education, 2007.[2] N. T. Jones, S. R. Niemi and M. J. Traum, "Mysterious Negative Velocity Profile in a Miniaturized Velocity Profile Interrogator Solved Remotely," in 2021 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference.[3] M. E. Auer and C. Gravier, "Guest Editorial: The Many Facets of Remote Laboratories in Online Engineering Education," IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 260-262, 2009.[4] J
increase its members’ trust, comfort, and performance in that setting [27].MethodologyContextDuring the first year of the E4USA project, nine high school teachers were recruited to teach theE4USA course in local high schools. Each teacher attended one of two five-day PD workshops ata large U.S. university during the summer of 2019. Instructors were university professors, manyof whom had helped design the curriculum. To address implicit biases and stereotype threat, acontinuing issue within engineering education, teacher participants were tasked to read the firstthree chapters of the book “Whistling Vivaldi - How stereotypes affect us and what we can do”[17] before attending the PD. Through personal stories and research results, the author provides
, the authors plan to continue to study the impact of MESH on onlinecourses on disaggregated student grades by collecting more student responses in these courses in2021. Long-term the authors plan to create a MESH planning tool to help professors think abouthow to incorporate MESH structures into both synchronous and asynchronous class time, andmake intentional choices about how to create a culturally balanced online environment.Bibliography[1] Riegle-Crumb, C., King, B., & Irizarry, Y. (2019). Does STEM Stand Out? Examining Racial/Ethnic Gaps inPersistence Across Postsecondary Fields. Educational Researcher, 48(3), 133–144[2] Hurtado S, Cabrera NL, Lin MH, Arellano L, Espinosa LL. Diversifying Science: Underrepresented StudentExperiences
manufactur- ing, non-destructive inspection and evaluation, and vehicle autonomy. Dr. Gray came to the Engineering Education department as an instructor in 2018, and was promoted to Associate Professor of Practice in August 2019. Dr. Gray is primarily focused on pedagogy of first-year engineering students, but maintains an undergraduate research group with interests in automotive systems, communications, computing, and non-destructive inspection.Desen Sevi Ozkan, Tufts University Desen is a postdoctoral researcher in the Tufts Center for Engineering Education Outreach and the Insti- tute for Research on Learning and Instruction. She holds a Ph.D. in engineering education from Virginia Tech and a B.S. in Chemical
, Director of Centre for En- gineering Education ResearchDr. William ”Bill” C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette William (Bill) Oakes is a 150th Anniversary Professor, the Director of the EPICS Program and one of the founding faculty members of the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has held courtesy appointments in Mechanical, Environmental and Ecological Engineering as well as Curriculum and Instruction in the College of Education. He is a registered professional engineer and on the NSPE board for Professional Engineers in Higher Education. He has been active in ASEE serving in the FPD, CIP and ERM. He is the past chair of the IN/IL section. He is a fellow of the Teaching Academy and
role of empathy in various domains, including engineering ethics, design, and diversity, equity, and inclusion. He received his PhD from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education, as well as a Master of Science and Bachelor of Science from Purdue Uni- versity’s School of Civil Engineering. He is the 2021 division chair-elect for the ASEE Liberal Educa- tion/Engineering and Society division and is the Editorial Board Chair for the Online Ethics Center.Mr. Aristides Carrillo-Fernandez, Purdue University at West Lafayette Aristides Carrillo-Fernandez is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue Uni- versity. He previously worked as an export business development manager at a Spanish radio
Duke University in Durham, North Carolina. He is a member of ASEE and IEEE. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Adding a “Design Thread” to Electrical and Computer Engineering Degree Programs: Motivation, Implementation, and EvaluationAbstractThis article details the multi-year process of adding a “design thread” to a four year,undergraduate electrical and computer engineering curricula. We use the conception of a“thread” to mean a sequence of courses that extend unbroken across each year of theundergraduate curriculum. The design thread includes a project-based introduction to thediscipline course in the
of ABET, and is currently Secretary/Treasurer of the ABET Foundation Board of Directors. She has also served as a program evaluator for J.D. pro- grams for the ABA, for universities’ regional accreditation for SACSCOC, and for Business Schools for AACSB. She also has served as the Chair of the ECE division of ASEE, the President of the Education Society of IEEE, and the chair of the Women in Engineering of IEEE. She served as the Treasurer and a Board of Directors member for WEPAN.Dr. Christine A. Stanley, Texas A&M University Christine A. Stanley is professor of higher education, holder of the Ruth Harrington Endowed Chair, and vice president and associate provost for diversity emerita in the College of
engagement and achievement in school,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 22–32, 1990, doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.22.[26] H. De Loof, A. Struyf, J. Boeve-de Pauw, and P. Van Petegem, “Teachers’ Motivating Style and Students’ Motivation and Engagement in STEM: the Relationship Between Three Key Educational Concepts,” Res. Sci. Educ. Australas. Sci. Educ. Res. Assoc., 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11165-019-9830- 3.[27] G. Crosling, M. Heagney, and L. Thomas, “Improving Student Retention in Higher Education: Improving Teaching and Learning,” Aust. Univ. Rev., Jan. 2009, Accessed: Feb. 10, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/ielapa.159225407205474.[28] E. A. Skinner and J. R. Pitzer, “Developmental
students at their institutions,” Teach. Learn. Inq., vol. 7, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.2.7.[8] J. H. Waldeck, V. O. Orrego, T. G. Plax, and P. Kearney, “Graduate student/faculty mentoring relationships: Who gets mentored, how it happens, and to what end,” Commun. Q., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 93–109, Jun. 1997, doi: 10.1080/01463379709370054.[9] W. Wright-Harp and P. A. Cole, “A Mentoring Model for Enhancing Success in Graduate Education,” Contemp. Issues Commun. Sci. Disord., vol. 35, no. Spring, pp. 4–16, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1044/cicsd_35_S_4.[10] N. A. of S. Medicine Engineering, and, P. and G. Affairs, B. on H. E. and Workforce, and C. on E. M. in STEMM, The Science of Effective Mentorship in
future.Ms. Reya Magan, Duke University Electrical and Computer Engineering and Computer Science student at Duke UniversityDr. Ann Saterbak, Duke University Ann Saterbak is Professor of the Practice in the Biomedical Department and Director of First-Year En- gineering at Duke University. Saterbak is the lead author of the textbook, Bioengineering Fundamen- tals. Saterbak’s outstanding teaching was recognized through university-wide and departmental teaching awards. In 2013, Saterbak received the ASEE Biomedical Engineering Division Theo C. Pilkington Out- standing Educator Award. For her contribution to education within biomedical engineering, she was elected Fellow in the Biomedical Engineering Society and the American
theory.Student Learning Approach and Course DevelopmentIn the Summer of 2019 the authors participated in their Center for Advancement of Teaching’ssummer course (re)design program to design their Control Systems and Instrumentation course.During this program, the authors worked through the book, Building a Pathway for StudentLearning [13]. Before this program, the authors approached the course design as “how can wepossibly consolidate all these topics to one course?” The course changed the authors’ narrative to“what do our students look like after they have completed our course? What can they do thatthey could not before taking our course?” From this crucial change in perspective, the authorsbegan to work backwards from a final project, build an
real-time feedback onhand-drawn free body diagrams for students. The system is driven by novel sketch recognitionalgorithms developed for recognizing and comparing trusses, general shapes, and arrows indiagrams. We have discovered students perform as well as paper homework or other onlinehomework systems which only check the final answer through deployment to five universities with450 students completing homework on the system over the 2018 and 2019 school years. Mechanixhas reduced the amount of manual grading required for instructors in those courses while ensuringstudents can correctly draw the free body diagram. Keywords: FBD, sketch, statics, dynamics, engineering education.IntroductionFree body diagrams are an integral part of
Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID #33574 AACSB. She also has served as the Chair of the ECE division of ASEE, the President of the Education Society of IEEE, and the chair of the Women in Engineering of IEEE. She served as the Treasurer and a Board of Directors member for WEPAN.Dr. Kerrie A. Douglas, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Douglas is an Assistant Professor in the Purdue School of Engineering Education. Her research is focused on improving methods of assessment in large learning environments to foster high-quality learning opportunities. Additionally, she studies techniques to validate findings from
Disparity in STEM Disciplines: A Study of Faculty Attrition and Turnover Intentions,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 607–624, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1007/s11162-008-9097-4.[29] K. Buch, Y. Huet, A. Rorrer, and L. Roberson, “Removing the Barriers to Full Professor: A Mentoring Program for Associate Professors,” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 38–45, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1080/00091383.2011.618081.[30] C. Grant, J. Decuir-Gunby, and B. Smith, “Advance Peer Mentoring Summits For Underrepresented Minority Women Engineering Faculty,” in 117th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY, Jun. 2010, p. 15.129.1-15.129.20, Accessed: Jun. 29, 2016. [Online]. Available: https
everyone, even though everything in the society pressures you into sameness – it is a handicap in the end. A handicap to live without knowing the struggle of difference – in all of its pain, its fear, its celebration, its compassion [2].”AbstractThis is an archival record of a proposed panel discussion for the 2021 ASEE Annual Conferenceand Exposition. It reflects a year-long conversation between the six co-authors. Panel attendeeswill be invited to join and expand upon that conversation. Further analyses and integration areplanned after the conference when we will have the benefit of other panel attendees’ commentsand their own narratives.Under ideal circumstances, engineering cultures in academia and industry bring out the best